👤 Guoqiang Liu

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧪 BiometalDB 🧬 Extraction
3182
Articles
1983
Name variants
Also published as: A Liu, Ai Liu, Ai-Guo Liu, Aidong Liu, Aiguo Liu, Aihua Liu, Aijun Liu, Ailing Liu, Aimin Liu, Allen P Liu, Aman Liu, An Liu, An-Qi Liu, Ang-Jun Liu, Anjing Liu, Anjun Liu, Ankang Liu, Anling Liu, Anmin Liu, Annuo Liu, Anshu Liu, Ao Liu, Aoxing Liu, B Liu, Baihui Liu, Baixue Liu, Baiyan Liu, Ban Liu, Bang Liu, Bang-Quan Liu, Bao Liu, Bao-Cheng Liu, Baogang Liu, Baohui Liu, Baolan Liu, Baoli Liu, Baoning Liu, Baoxin Liu, Baoyi Liu, Bei Liu, Beibei Liu, Ben Liu, Bi-Cheng Liu, Bi-Feng Liu, Bihao Liu, Bilin Liu, Bin Liu, Bing Liu, Bing-Wen Liu, Bingcheng Liu, Bingjie Liu, Bingwen Liu, Bingxiao Liu, Bingya Liu, Bingyu Liu, Binjie Liu, Bo Liu, Bo-Gong Liu, Bo-Han Liu, Boao Liu, Bolin Liu, Boling Liu, Boqun Liu, Bowen Liu, Boxiang Liu, Boxin Liu, Boya Liu, Boyang Liu, Brian Y Liu, C Liu, C M Liu, C Q Liu, C-T Liu, C-Y Liu, Caihong Liu, Cailing Liu, Caiyan Liu, Can Liu, Can-Zhao Liu, Catherine H Liu, Chan Liu, Chang Liu, Chang-Bin Liu, Chang-Hai Liu, Chang-Ming Liu, Chang-Pan Liu, Chang-Peng Liu, Changbin Liu, Changjiang Liu, Changliang Liu, Changming Liu, Changqing Liu, Changtie Liu, Changya Liu, Changyun Liu, Chao Liu, Chao-Ming Liu, Chaohong Liu, Chaoqi Liu, Chaoyi Liu, Chelsea Liu, Chen Liu, Chenchen Liu, Chendong Liu, Cheng Liu, Cheng-Li Liu, Cheng-Wu Liu, Cheng-Yong Liu, Cheng-Yun Liu, Chengbo Liu, Chenge Liu, Chengguo Liu, Chenghui Liu, Chengkun Liu, Chenglong Liu, Chengxiang Liu, Chengyao Liu, Chengyun Liu, Chenmiao Liu, Chenming Liu, Chenshu Liu, Chenxing Liu, Chenxu Liu, Chenxuan Liu, Chi Liu, Chia-Chen Liu, Chia-Hung Liu, Chia-Jen Liu, Chia-Yang Liu, Chia-Yu Liu, Chiang Liu, Chin-Chih Liu, Chin-Ching Liu, Chin-San Liu, Ching-Hsuan Liu, Ching-Ti Liu, Chong Liu, Christine S Liu, ChuHao Liu, Chuan Liu, Chuanfeng Liu, Chuanxin Liu, Chuanyang Liu, Chun Liu, Chun-Chi Liu, Chun-Feng Liu, Chun-Lei Liu, Chun-Ming Liu, Chun-Xiao Liu, Chun-Yu Liu, Chunchi Liu, Chundong Liu, Chunfeng Liu, Chung-Cheng Liu, Chung-Ji Liu, Chunhua Liu, Chunlei Liu, Chunliang Liu, Chunling Liu, Chunming Liu, Chunpeng Liu, Chunping Liu, Chunsheng Liu, Chunwei Liu, Chunxiao Liu, Chunyan Liu, Chunying Liu, Chunyu Liu, Cici Liu, Clarissa M Liu, Cong Cong Liu, Cong Liu, Congcong Liu, Cui Liu, Cui-Cui Liu, Cuicui Liu, Cuijie Liu, Cuilan Liu, Cun Liu, Cun-Fei Liu, D Liu, Da Liu, Da-Ren Liu, Daiyun Liu, Dajiang J Liu, Dan Liu, Dan-Ning Liu, Dandan Liu, Danhui Liu, Danping Liu, Dantong Liu, Danyang Liu, Danyong Liu, Daoshen Liu, David Liu, David R Liu, Dawei Liu, Daxu Liu, Dayong Liu, Dazhi Liu, De-Pei Liu, De-Shun Liu, Dechao Liu, Dehui Liu, Deliang Liu, Deng-Xiang Liu, Depei Liu, Deping Liu, Derek Liu, Deruo Liu, Desheng Liu, Dewu Liu, Dexi Liu, Deyao Liu, Deying Liu, Dezhen Liu, Di Liu, Didi Liu, Ding-Ming Liu, Dingding Liu, Dinglu Liu, Dingxiang Liu, Dong Liu, Dong-Yun Liu, Dongang Liu, Dongbo Liu, Dongfang Liu, Donghui Liu, Dongjuan Liu, Dongliang Liu, Dongmei Liu, Dongming Liu, Dongping Liu, Dongxian Liu, Dongxue Liu, Dongyan Liu, Dongyang Liu, Dongyao Liu, Dongzhou Liu, Dudu Liu, Dunjiang Liu, Edison Tak-Bun Liu, En-Qi Liu, Enbin Liu, Enlong Liu, Enqi Liu, Erdong Liu, Erfeng Liu, Erxiong Liu, F Liu, F Z Liu, Fan Liu, Fan-Jie Liu, Fang Liu, Fang-Zhou Liu, Fangli Liu, Fangmei Liu, Fangping Liu, Fangqi Liu, Fangzhou Liu, Fani Liu, Fayu Liu, Fei Liu, Feifan Liu, Feilong Liu, Feiyan Liu, Feiyang Liu, Feiye Liu, Fen Liu, Fendou Liu, Feng Liu, Feng-Ying Liu, Fengbin Liu, Fengchao Liu, Fengen Liu, Fengguo Liu, Fengjiao Liu, Fengjie Liu, Fengjuan Liu, Fengqiong Liu, Fengsong Liu, Fonda Liu, Foqiu Liu, Fu-Jun Liu, Fu-Tong Liu, Fubao Liu, Fuhao Liu, Fuhong Liu, Fujun Liu, Gan Liu, Gang Liu, Gangli Liu, Ganqiang Liu, Gaohua Liu, Ge Liu, Ge-Li Liu, Gen Sheng Liu, Geng Liu, Geng-Hao Liu, Geoffrey Liu, George E Liu, George Liu, Geroge Liu, Gexiu Liu, Gongguan Liu, Guang Liu, Guangbin Liu, Guangfan Liu, Guanghao Liu, Guangliang Liu, Guangqin Liu, Guangwei Liu, Guangxu Liu, Guannan Liu, Guantong Liu, Gui Yao Liu, Gui-Fen Liu, Gui-Jing Liu, Gui-Rong Liu, Guibo Liu, Guidong Liu, Guihong Liu, Guiju Liu, Guili Liu, Guiqiong Liu, Guiquan Liu, Guisheng Liu, Guiyou Liu, Guiyuan Liu, Guning Liu, Guo-Liang Liu, Guochang Liu, Guodong Liu, Guohao Liu, Guojun Liu, Guoke Liu, Guoliang Liu, Guopin Liu, Guoqing Liu, Guoquan Liu, Guowen Liu, Guoyong Liu, H Liu, Hai Feng Liu, Hai-Jing Liu, Hai-Xia Liu, Hai-Yan Liu, Haibin Liu, Haichao Liu, Haifei Liu, Haifeng Liu, Hailan Liu, Hailin Liu, Hailing Liu, Haitao Liu, Haiyan Liu, Haiyang Liu, Haiying Liu, Haizhao Liu, Han Liu, Han-Fu Liu, Han-Qi Liu, Hancong Liu, Hang Liu, Hanhan Liu, Hanjiao Liu, Hanjie Liu, Hanmin Liu, Hanqing Liu, Hanxiang Liu, Hanyuan Liu, Hao Liu, Haobin Liu, Haodong Liu, Haogang Liu, Haojie Liu, Haokun Liu, Haoling Liu, Haowei Liu, Haowen Liu, Haoyue Liu, He-Kun Liu, Hehe Liu, Hekun Liu, Heliang Liu, Heng Liu, Hengan Liu, Hengru Liu, Hengtong Liu, Heyi Liu, Hong Juan Liu, Hong Liu, Hong Wei Liu, Hong-Bin Liu, Hong-Li Liu, Hong-Liang Liu, Hong-Tao Liu, Hong-Xiang Liu, Hong-Ying Liu, Hongbin Liu, Hongbing Liu, Hongfa Liu, Honghan Liu, Honghe Liu, Hongjian Liu, Hongjie Liu, Hongjun Liu, Hongli Liu, Hongliang Liu, Hongmei Liu, Hongqun Liu, Hongtao Liu, Hongwei Liu, Hongxiang Liu, Hongxing Liu, Hongyan Liu, Hongyang Liu, Hongyao Liu, Hongyu Liu, Hongyuan Liu, Houbao Liu, Hsiao-Ching Liu, Hsiao-Sheng Liu, Hsiaowei Liu, Hsu-Hsiang Liu, Hu Liu, Hua Liu, Hua-Cheng Liu, Hua-Ge Liu, Huadong Liu, Huaizheng Liu, Huan Liu, Huan-Yu Liu, Huanhuan Liu, Huanliang Liu, Huanyi Liu, Huatao Liu, Huawei Liu, Huayang Liu, Huazhen Liu, Hui Liu, Hui-Chao Liu, Hui-Fang Liu, Hui-Guo Liu, Hui-Hui Liu, Hui-Xin Liu, Hui-Ying Liu, Huibin Liu, Huidi Liu, Huihua Liu, Huihui Liu, Huijuan Liu, Huijun Liu, Huikun Liu, Huiling Liu, Huimao Liu, Huimin Liu, Huiming Liu, Huina Liu, Huiping Liu, Huiqing Liu, Huisheng Liu, Huiying Liu, Huiyu Liu, Hulin Liu, J Liu, J R Liu, J W Liu, J X Liu, J Z Liu, James K C Liu, Jamie Liu, Jay Liu, Ji Liu, Ji-Kai Liu, Ji-Long Liu, Ji-Xing Liu, Ji-Xuan Liu, Ji-Yun Liu, Jia Liu, Jia-Cheng Liu, Jia-Jun Liu, Jia-Qian Liu, Jia-Yao Liu, JiaXi Liu, Jiabin Liu, Jiachen Liu, Jiahao Liu, Jiahua Liu, Jiahui Liu, Jiajie Liu, Jiajuan Liu, Jiakun Liu, Jiali Liu, Jialin Liu, Jiamin Liu, Jiaming Liu, Jian Liu, Jian-Jun Liu, Jian-Kun Liu, Jian-hong Liu, Jian-shu Liu, Jianan Liu, Jianbin Liu, Jianbo Liu, Jiandong Liu, Jianfang Liu, Jianfeng Liu, Jiang Liu, Jiangang Liu, Jiangbin Liu, Jianghong Liu, Jianghua Liu, Jiangjiang Liu, Jiangjin Liu, Jiangling Liu, Jiangxin Liu, Jiangyan Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jianhui Liu, Jiani Liu, Jianing Liu, Jianjiang Liu, Jianjun Liu, Jiankang Liu, Jiankun Liu, Jianlei Liu, Jianmei Liu, Jianmin Liu, Jiannan Liu, Jianping Liu, Jiantao Liu, Jianwei Liu, Jianxi Liu, Jianxin Liu, Jianyong Liu, Jianyu Liu, Jianyun Liu, Jiao Liu, Jiaojiao Liu, Jiaoyang Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Jiaqing Liu, Jiawen Liu, Jiaxian Liu, Jiaxiang Liu, Jiaxin Liu, Jiayan Liu, Jiayi Liu, Jiayin Liu, Jiaying Liu, Jiayu Liu, Jiayun Liu, Jiazhe Liu, Jiazheng Liu, Jiazhuo Liu, Jidan Liu, Jie Liu, Jie-Qing Liu, Jierong Liu, Jiewei Liu, Jiewen Liu, Jieying Liu, Jieyu Liu, Jihe Liu, Jiheng Liu, Jin Liu, Jin-Juan Liu, Jin-Qing Liu, Jinbao Liu, Jinbo Liu, Jincheng Liu, Jindi Liu, Jinfeng Liu, Jing Liu, Jing Min Liu, Jing-Crystal Liu, Jing-Hua Liu, Jing-Ying Liu, Jing-Yu Liu, Jingbo Liu, Jingchong Liu, Jingfang Liu, Jingfeng Liu, Jingfu Liu, Jinghui Liu, Jingjie Liu, Jingjing Liu, Jingmeng Liu, Jingmin Liu, Jingqi Liu, Jingquan Liu, Jingqun Liu, Jingsheng Liu, Jingwei Liu, Jingwen Liu, Jingxing Liu, Jingyi Liu, Jingying Liu, Jingyun Liu, Jingzhong Liu, Jinjie Liu, Jinlian Liu, Jinlong Liu, Jinman Liu, Jinpei Liu, Jinpeng Liu, Jinping Liu, Jinqin Liu, Jinrong Liu, Jinsheng Liu, Jinsong Liu, Jinsuo Liu, Jinxiang Liu, Jinxin Liu, Jinxing Liu, Jinyue Liu, Jinze Liu, Jinzhao Liu, Jinzhi Liu, Jiong Liu, Jishan Liu, Jitao Liu, Jiwei Liu, Jixin Liu, Jonathan Liu, Joyce F Liu, Joyce Liu, Ju Liu, Ju-Fang Liu, Juan Liu, Juanjuan Liu, Juanxi Liu, Jue Liu, Jui-Tung Liu, Jun Liu, Jun O Liu, Jun Ting Liu, Jun Yi Liu, Jun-Jen Liu, Jun-Yan Liu, Jun-Yi Liu, Junbao Liu, Junchao Liu, Junfen Liu, Junhui Liu, Junjiang Liu, Junjie Liu, Junjin Liu, Junjun Liu, Junlin Liu, Junling Liu, Junnian Liu, Junpeng Liu, Junqi Liu, Junrong Liu, Juntao Liu, Juntian Liu, Junwen Liu, Junwu Liu, Junxi Liu, Junyan Liu, Junye Liu, Junying Liu, Junyu Liu, Juyao Liu, Kai Liu, Kai-Zheng Liu, Kaidong Liu, Kaijing Liu, Kaikun Liu, Kaiqi Liu, Kaisheng Liu, Kaitai Liu, Kaiwen Liu, Kang Liu, Kang-le Liu, Kangdong Liu, Kangwei Liu, Kathleen D Liu, Ke Liu, Ke-Tong Liu, Kechun Liu, Kehui Liu, Kejia Liu, Keng-Hau Liu, Keqiang Liu, Kexin Liu, Kiang Liu, Kuangyi Liu, Kun Liu, Kun-Cheng Liu, Kwei-Yan Liu, L L Liu, L Liu, L W Liu, Lan Liu, Lan-Xiang Liu, Lang Liu, Lanhao Liu, Le Liu, Lebin Liu, Lei Liu, Lele Liu, Leping Liu, Li Liu, Li-Fang Liu, Li-Min Liu, Li-Rong Liu, Li-Wen Liu, Li-Xuan Liu, Li-Ying Liu, Li-ping Liu, Lian Liu, Lianfei Liu, Liang Liu, Liang-Chen Liu, Liang-Feng Liu, Liangguo Liu, Liangji Liu, Liangjia Liu, Liangliang Liu, Liangyu Liu, Lianxin Liu, Lianyong Liu, Libin Liu, Lichao Liu, Lichun Liu, Lidong Liu, Liegang Liu, Lifang Liu, Ligang Liu, Lihua Liu, Lijuan Liu, Lijun Liu, Lili Liu, Liling Liu, Limin Liu, Liming Liu, Lin Liu, Lina Liu, Ling Liu, Ling-Yun Liu, Ling-Zhi Liu, Lingfei Liu, Lingjiao Liu, Lingjuan Liu, Linglong Liu, Lingyan Liu, Lining Liu, Linlin Liu, Linqing Liu, Linwen Liu, Liping Liu, Liqing Liu, Liqiong Liu, Liqun Liu, Lirong Liu, Liru Liu, Liu Liu, Liumei Liu, Liusheng Liu, Liwen Liu, Lixia Liu, Lixian Liu, Lixiao Liu, Liying Liu, Liyue Liu, Lizhen Liu, Long Liu, Longfei Liu, Longjian Liu, Longqian Liu, Longyang Liu, Longzhou Liu, Lu Liu, Luhong Liu, Lulu Liu, Luming Liu, Lunxu Liu, Luping Liu, Lushan Liu, Lv Liu, M L Liu, M Liu, Man Liu, Man-Ru Liu, Manjiao Liu, Manqi Liu, Manran Liu, Maolin Liu, Mei Liu, Mei-mei Liu, Meicen Liu, Meifang Liu, Meijiao Liu, Meijing Liu, Meijuan Liu, Meijun Liu, Meiling Liu, Meimei Liu, Meixin Liu, Meiyan Liu, Meng Han Liu, Meng Liu, Meng-Hui Liu, Meng-Meng Liu, Meng-Yue Liu, Mengduan Liu, Mengfan Liu, Mengfei Liu, Menggang Liu, Menghan Liu, Menghua Liu, Menghui Liu, Mengjia Liu, Mengjiao Liu, Mengke Liu, Menglin Liu, Mengling Liu, Mengmei Liu, Mengqi Liu, Mengqian Liu, Mengxi Liu, Mengxue Liu, Mengyang Liu, Mengying Liu, Mengyu Liu, Mengyuan Liu, Mengzhen Liu, Mi Liu, Mi-Hua Liu, Mi-Min Liu, Miao Liu, Miaoliang Liu, Min Liu, Minda Liu, Minetta C Liu, Ming Liu, Ming-Jiang Liu, Ming-Qi Liu, Mingcheng Liu, Mingchun Liu, Mingfan Liu, Minghui Liu, Mingjiang Liu, Mingjing Liu, Mingjun Liu, Mingli Liu, Mingming Liu, Mingna Liu, Mingqin Liu, Mingrui Liu, Mingsen Liu, Mingsong Liu, Mingxiao Liu, Mingxing Liu, Mingxu Liu, Mingyang Liu, Mingyao Liu, Mingying Liu, Mingyu Liu, Minhao Liu, Minxia Liu, Mo-Nan Liu, Modan Liu, Mouze Liu, Muqiu Liu, Musang Liu, N A Liu, N Liu, Na Liu, Na-Nv Liu, Na-Wei Liu, Nai-feng Liu, Naihua Liu, Naili Liu, Nan Liu, Nan-Song Liu, Nana Liu, Nannan Liu, Nanxi Liu, Ni Liu, Nian Liu, Ning Liu, Ning'ang Liu, Ningning Liu, Niya Liu, Ou Liu, Ouxuan Liu, P C Liu, Pan Liu, Panhong Liu, Panting Liu, Paul Liu, Pei Liu, Pei-Ning Liu, Peijian Liu, Peijie Liu, Peijun Liu, Peilong Liu, Peiqi Liu, Peiqing Liu, Peiwei Liu, Peixi Liu, Peiyao Liu, Peizhong Liu, Peng Liu, Pengcheng Liu, Pengfei Liu, Penghong Liu, Pengli Liu, Pengtao Liu, Pengyu Liu, Pengyuan Liu, Pentao Liu, Peter S Liu, Piaopiao Liu, Pinduo Liu, Ping Liu, Ping-Yen Liu, Pinghuai Liu, Pingping Liu, Pingsheng Liu, Q Liu, Qi Liu, Qi-Xian Liu, Qian Liu, Qian-Wen Liu, Qiang Liu, Qiang-Yuan Liu, Qiangyun Liu, Qianjin Liu, Qianqi Liu, Qianshuo Liu, Qianwei Liu, Qiao-Hong Liu, Qiaofeng Liu, Qiaoyan Liu, Qiaozhen Liu, Qiji Liu, Qiming Liu, Qin Liu, Qinfang Liu, Qing Liu, Qing-Huai Liu, Qing-Rong Liu, Qingbin Liu, Qingbo Liu, Qingguang Liu, Qingguo Liu, Qinghao Liu, Qinghong Liu, Qinghua Liu, Qinghuai Liu, Qinghuan Liu, Qinglei Liu, Qingping Liu, Qingqing Liu, Qingquan Liu, Qingsong Liu, Qingxia Liu, Qingxiang Liu, Qingyang Liu, Qingyou Liu, Qingyun Liu, Qingzhuo Liu, Qinqin Liu, Qiong Liu, Qiu-Ping Liu, Qiulei Liu, Qiuli Liu, Qiulu Liu, Qiushi Liu, Qiuxu Liu, Qiuyu Liu, Qiuyue Liu, Qiwei Liu, Qiyao Liu, Qiye Liu, Qizhan Liu, Quan Liu, Quan-Jun Liu, Quanxin Liu, Quanying Liu, Quanzhong Liu, Quentin Liu, Qun Liu, Qunlong Liu, Qunpeng Liu, R F Liu, R Liu, R Y Liu, Ran Liu, Rangru Liu, Ranran Liu, Ren Liu, Renling Liu, Ri Liu, Rong Liu, Rong-Zong Liu, Rongfei Liu, Ronghua Liu, Rongxia Liu, Rongxun Liu, Rui Liu, Rui-Jie Liu, Rui-Tian Liu, Rui-Xuan Liu, Ruichen Liu, Ruihua Liu, Ruijie Liu, Ruijuan Liu, Ruilong Liu, Ruiping Liu, Ruiqi Liu, Ruitong Liu, Ruixia Liu, Ruiyi Liu, Ruizao Liu, Runjia Liu, Runjie Liu, Runni Liu, Runping Liu, Ruochen Liu, Ruotian Liu, Ruowen Liu, Ruoyang Liu, Ruyi Liu, Ruyue Liu, S Liu, Saiji Liu, Sasa Liu, Sen Liu, Senchen Liu, Senqi Liu, Sha Liu, Shan Liu, Shan-Shan Liu, Shandong Liu, Shang-Feng Liu, Shang-Xin Liu, Shangjing Liu, Shangxin Liu, Shangyu Liu, Shangyuan Liu, Shangyun Liu, Shanhui Liu, Shanling Liu, Shanshan Liu, Shao-Bin Liu, Shao-Jun Liu, Shao-Yuan Liu, Shaobo Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Shaohua Liu, Shaojun Liu, Shaoqing Liu, Shaowei Liu, Shaoying Liu, Shaoyou Liu, Shaoyu Liu, Shaozhen Liu, Shasha Liu, Sheng Liu, Shengbin Liu, Shengjun Liu, Shengnan Liu, Shengyang Liu, Shengzhi Liu, Shengzhuo Liu, Shenhai Liu, Shenping Liu, Shi Liu, Shi-Lian Liu, Shi-Wei Liu, Shi-Yong Liu, Shi-guo Liu, ShiWei Liu, Shih-Ping Liu, Shijia Liu, Shijian Liu, Shijie Liu, Shijun Liu, Shikai Liu, Shikun Liu, Shilin Liu, Shing-Hwa Liu, Shiping Liu, Shiqian Liu, Shiquan Liu, Shiru Liu, Shixi Liu, Shiyan Liu, Shiyang Liu, Shiying Liu, Shiyu Liu, Shiyuan Liu, Shou-Sheng Liu, Shouguo Liu, Shoupei Liu, Shouxin Liu, Shouyang Liu, Shu Liu, Shu-Chen Liu, Shu-Jing Liu, Shu-Lin Liu, Shu-Qiang Liu, Shu-Qin Liu, Shuai Liu, Shuaishuai Liu, Shuang Liu, Shuangli Liu, Shuangzhu Liu, Shuhong Liu, Shuhua Liu, Shui-Bing Liu, Shujie Liu, Shujing Liu, Shujun Liu, Shulin Liu, Shuling Liu, Shumin Liu, Shun-Mei Liu, Shunfang Liu, Shuning Liu, Shunming Liu, Shuqian Liu, Shuqing Liu, Shuwen Liu, Shuxi Liu, Shuxian Liu, Shuya Liu, Shuyan Liu, Shuyu Liu, Si-Jin Liu, Si-Xu Liu, Si-Yan Liu, Si-jun Liu, Sicheng Liu, Sidan Liu, Side Liu, Sihao Liu, Sijing Liu, Sijun Liu, Silvia Liu, Simin Liu, Sipu Liu, Siqi Liu, Siqin Liu, Siru Liu, Sirui Liu, Sisi Liu, Sitian Liu, Siwen Liu, Sixi Liu, Sixin Liu, Sixiu Liu, Sixu Liu, Siyao Liu, Siyi Liu, Siyu Liu, Siyuan Liu, Song Liu, Song-Fang Liu, Song-Mei Liu, Song-Ping Liu, Songfang Liu, Songhui Liu, Songqin Liu, Songsong Liu, Songyi Liu, Su Liu, Su-Yun Liu, Sudong Liu, Suhuan Liu, Sui-Feng Liu, Suling Liu, Suosi Liu, Sushuang Liu, Susu Liu, Szu-Heng Liu, T H Liu, T Liu, Ta-Chih Liu, Taihang Liu, Taixiang Liu, Tang Liu, Tao Liu, Taoli Liu, Taotao Liu, Te Liu, Teng Liu, Tengfei Liu, Tengli Liu, Teresa T Liu, Tian Liu, Tian Shu Liu, Tianhao Liu, Tianhu Liu, Tianjia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Tianlai Liu, Tianlang Liu, Tianlong Liu, Tianqiang Liu, Tianrui Liu, Tianshu Liu, Tiantian Liu, Tianyao Liu, Tianyi Liu, Tianyu Liu, Tianze Liu, Tiemin Liu, Tina Liu, Ting Liu, Ting-Li Liu, Ting-Ting Liu, Ting-Yuan Liu, Tingjiao Liu, Tingting Liu, Tong Liu, Tonglin Liu, Tongtong Liu, Tongyan Liu, Tongyu Liu, Tongyun Liu, Tongzheng Liu, Tsang-Wu Liu, Tsung-Yun Liu, Vincent W S Liu, W Liu, W-Y Liu, Wan Liu, Wan-Chun Liu, Wan-Di Liu, Wan-Guo Liu, Wan-Ying Liu, Wang Liu, Wangrui Liu, Wanguo Liu, Wangyang Liu, Wanjun Liu, Wanli Liu, Wanlu Liu, Wanqi Liu, Wanqing Liu, Wanting Liu, Wei Liu, Wei-Chieh Liu, Wei-Hsuan Liu, Wei-Hua Liu, Weida Liu, Weifang Liu, Weifeng Liu, Weiguo Liu, Weihai Liu, Weihong Liu, Weijian Liu, Weijie Liu, Weijun Liu, Weilin Liu, Weimin Liu, Weiming Liu, Weina Liu, Weiqin Liu, Weiqing Liu, Weiren Liu, Weisheng Liu, Weishuo Liu, Weiwei Liu, Weiyang Liu, Wen Liu, Wen Yuan Liu, Wen-Chun Liu, Wen-Di Liu, Wen-Fang Liu, Wen-Jie Liu, Wen-Jing Liu, Wen-Qiang Liu, Wen-Tao Liu, Wen-ling Liu, Wenbang Liu, Wenbin Liu, Wenbo Liu, Wenchao Liu, Wenen Liu, Wenfeng Liu, Wenhan Liu, Wenhao Liu, Wenhua Liu, Wenjie Liu, Wenjing Liu, Wenlang Liu, Wenli Liu, Wenling Liu, Wenlong Liu, Wenna Liu, Wenping Liu, Wenqi Liu, Wenrui Liu, Wensheng Liu, Wentao Liu, Wenwu Liu, Wenxiang Liu, Wenxuan Liu, Wenya Liu, Wenyan Liu, Wenyi Liu, Wenzhong Liu, Wu Liu, Wuping Liu, Wuyang Liu, X C Liu, X Liu, X P Liu, X-D Liu, Xi Liu, Xi-Yu Liu, Xia Liu, Xia-Meng Liu, Xialin Liu, Xian Liu, Xianbao Liu, Xianchen Liu, Xianda Liu, Xiang Liu, Xiang-Qian Liu, Xiang-Yu Liu, Xiangchen Liu, Xiangfei Liu, Xianglan Liu, Xiangli Liu, Xiangliang Liu, Xianglu Liu, Xiangning Liu, Xiangping Liu, Xiangsheng Liu, Xiangtao Liu, Xiangting Liu, Xiangxiang Liu, Xiangxuan Liu, Xiangyong Liu, Xiangyu Liu, Xiangyun Liu, Xianli Liu, Xianling Liu, Xiansheng Liu, Xianyang Liu, Xiao Dong Liu, Xiao Liu, Xiao Yan Liu, Xiao-Cheng Liu, Xiao-Dan Liu, Xiao-Gang Liu, Xiao-Guang Liu, Xiao-Huan Liu, Xiao-Jiao Liu, Xiao-Li Liu, Xiao-Ling Liu, Xiao-Ning Liu, Xiao-Qiu Liu, Xiao-Qun Liu, Xiao-Rong Liu, Xiao-Song Liu, Xiao-Xiao Liu, Xiao-lan Liu, Xiaoan Liu, Xiaobai Liu, Xiaobei Liu, Xiaobing Liu, Xiaocen Liu, Xiaochuan Liu, Xiaocong Liu, Xiaodan Liu, Xiaoding Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Xiaofan Liu, Xiaofang Liu, Xiaofei Liu, Xiaogang Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Xiaoguang Margaret Liu, Xiaohan Liu, Xiaoheng Liu, Xiaohong Liu, Xiaohua Liu, Xiaohuan Liu, Xiaohui Liu, Xiaojie Liu, Xiaojing Liu, Xiaoju Liu, Xiaojun Liu, Xiaole Shirley Liu, Xiaolei Liu, Xiaoli Liu, Xiaolin Liu, Xiaoling Liu, Xiaoman Liu, Xiaomei Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Xiaoming Liu, Xiaona Liu, Xiaonan Liu, Xiaopeng Liu, Xiaoping Liu, Xiaoqian Liu, Xiaoqiang Liu, Xiaoqin Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Xiaoran Liu, Xiaosong Liu, Xiaotian Liu, Xiaoting Liu, Xiaowei Liu, Xiaoxi Liu, Xiaoxia Liu, Xiaoxiao Liu, Xiaoxu Liu, Xiaoxue Liu, Xiaoya Liu, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoyang Liu, Xiaoye Liu, Xiaoying Liu, Xiaoyong Liu, Xiaoyu Liu, Xiawen Liu, Xibao Liu, Xibing Liu, Xie-hong Liu, Xiehe Liu, Xiguang Liu, Xijun Liu, Xili Liu, Xin Liu, Xin-Hua Liu, Xin-Yan Liu, Xinbo Liu, Xinchang Liu, Xing Liu, Xing-De Liu, Xing-Li Liu, Xing-Yang Liu, Xingbang Liu, Xingde Liu, Xinghua Liu, Xinghui Liu, Xingjing Liu, Xinglei Liu, Xingli Liu, Xinglong Liu, Xinguo Liu, Xingxiang Liu, Xingyi Liu, Xingyu Liu, Xinhua Liu, Xinjun Liu, Xinlei Liu, Xinli Liu, Xinmei Liu, Xinmin Liu, Xinran Liu, Xinru Liu, Xinrui Liu, Xintong Liu, Xinxin Liu, Xinyao Liu, Xinyi Liu, Xinying Liu, Xinyong Liu, Xinyu Liu, Xinyue Liu, Xiong Liu, Xiqiang Liu, Xiru Liu, Xishan Liu, Xiu Liu, Xiufen Liu, Xiufeng Liu, Xiuheng Liu, Xiuling Liu, Xiumei Liu, Xiuqin Liu, Xiyong Liu, Xu Liu, Xu-Dong Liu, Xu-Hui Liu, Xuan Liu, Xuanlin Liu, Xuanyu Liu, Xuanzhu Liu, Xue Liu, Xue-Lian Liu, Xue-Min Liu, Xue-Qing Liu, Xue-Zheng Liu, Xuefang Liu, Xuejing Liu, Xuekui Liu, Xuelan Liu, Xueling Liu, Xuemei Liu, Xuemeng Liu, Xuemin Liu, Xueping Liu, Xueqin Liu, Xueqing Liu, Xueru Liu, Xuesen Liu, Xueshibojie Liu, Xuesong Liu, Xueting Liu, Xuewei Liu, Xuewen Liu, Xuexiu Liu, Xueying Liu, Xueyuan Liu, Xuezhen Liu, Xuezheng Liu, Xuezhi Liu, Xufeng Liu, Xuguang Liu, Xujie Liu, Xulin Liu, Xuming Liu, Xunhua Liu, Xunyue Liu, Xuxia Liu, Xuxu Liu, Xuyi Liu, Xuying Liu, Y H Liu, Y L Liu, Y Liu, Y Y Liu, Ya Liu, Ya-Jin Liu, Ya-Kun Liu, Ya-Wei Liu, Yadong Liu, Yafei Liu, Yajing Liu, Yajuan Liu, Yaling Liu, Yalu Liu, Yan Liu, Yan-Li Liu, Yanan Liu, Yanchao Liu, Yanchen Liu, Yandong Liu, Yanfei Liu, Yanfen Liu, Yanfeng Liu, Yang Liu, Yange Liu, Yangfan Liu, Yangfan P Liu, Yangjun Liu, Yangkai Liu, Yangruiyu Liu, Yangyang Liu, Yanhong Liu, Yanhua Liu, Yanhui Liu, Yanjie Liu, Yanju Liu, Yanjun Liu, Yankuo Liu, Yanli Liu, Yanliang Liu, Yanling Liu, Yanman Liu, Yanmin Liu, Yanping Liu, Yanqing Liu, Yanqiu Liu, Yanquan Liu, Yanru Liu, Yansheng Liu, Yansong Liu, Yanting Liu, Yanwu Liu, Yanxiao Liu, Yanyan Liu, Yanyao Liu, Yanying Liu, Yanyun Liu, Yao Liu, Yao-Hui Liu, Yaobo Liu, Yaoquan Liu, Yaou Liu, Yaowen Liu, Yaoyao Liu, Yaozhong Liu, Yaping Liu, Yaqiong Liu, Yarong Liu, Yaru Liu, Yating Liu, Yaxin Liu, Ye Liu, Ye-Dan Liu, Yehai Liu, Yen-Chen Liu, Yen-Chun Liu, Yen-Nien Liu, Yeqing Liu, Yi Liu, Yi-Chang Liu, Yi-Chien Liu, Yi-Han Liu, Yi-Hung Liu, Yi-Jia Liu, Yi-Ling Liu, Yi-Meng Liu, Yi-Ming Liu, Yi-Yun Liu, Yi-Zhang Liu, YiRan Liu, Yibin Liu, Yibing Liu, Yicun Liu, Yidan Liu, Yidong Liu, Yifan Liu, Yifu Liu, Yihao Liu, Yiheng Liu, Yihui Liu, Yijing Liu, Yilei Liu, Yili Liu, Yilin Liu, Yimei Liu, Yiming Liu, Yin Liu, Yin-Ping Liu, Yinchu Liu, Yinfang Liu, Ying Liu, Ying Poi Liu, Yingchun Liu, Yinghua Liu, Yinghuan Liu, Yinghui Liu, Yingjun Liu, Yingli Liu, Yingwei Liu, Yingxia Liu, Yingyan Liu, Yingyi Liu, Yingying Liu, Yingzi Liu, Yinhe Liu, Yinhui Liu, Yining Liu, Yinjiang Liu, Yinping Liu, Yinuo Liu, Yiping Liu, Yiqing Liu, Yitian Liu, Yiting Liu, Yitong Liu, Yiwei Liu, Yiwen Liu, Yixiang Liu, Yixiao Liu, Yixuan Liu, Yiyang Liu, Yiyi Liu, Yiyuan Liu, Yiyun Liu, Yizhi Liu, Yizhuo Liu, Yong Liu, Yong Mei Liu, Yong-Chao Liu, Yong-Hong Liu, Yong-Jian Liu, Yong-Jun Liu, Yong-Tai Liu, Yong-da Liu, Yongchao Liu, Yonggang Liu, Yonggao Liu, Yonghong Liu, Yonghua Liu, Yongjian Liu, Yongjie Liu, Yongjun Liu, Yongli Liu, Yongmei Liu, Yongming Liu, Yongqiang Liu, Yongshuo Liu, Yongtai Liu, Yongtao Liu, Yongtong Liu, Yongxiao Liu, Yongyue Liu, You Liu, You-ping Liu, Youan Liu, Youbin Liu, Youdong Liu, Youhan Liu, Youlian Liu, Youwen Liu, Yu Liu, Yu Xuan Liu, Yu-Chen Liu, Yu-Ching Liu, Yu-Hui Liu, Yu-Li Liu, Yu-Lin Liu, Yu-Peng Liu, Yu-Wei Liu, Yu-Zhang Liu, YuHeng Liu, Yuan Liu, Yuan-Bo Liu, Yuan-Jie Liu, Yuan-Tao Liu, YuanHua Liu, Yuanchu Liu, Yuanfa Liu, Yuanhang Liu, Yuanhui Liu, Yuanjia Liu, Yuanjiao Liu, Yuanjun Liu, Yuanliang Liu, Yuantao Liu, Yuantong Liu, Yuanxiang Liu, Yuanxin Liu, Yuanxing Liu, Yuanying Liu, Yuanyuan Liu, Yubin Liu, Yuchen Liu, Yue Liu, Yuecheng Liu, Yuefang Liu, Yuehong Liu, Yueli Liu, Yueping Liu, Yuetong Liu, Yuexi Liu, Yuexin Liu, Yuexing Liu, Yueyang Liu, Yueyun Liu, Yufan Liu, Yufei Liu, Yufeng Liu, Yuhao Liu, Yuhe Liu, Yujia Liu, Yujiang Liu, Yujie Liu, Yujun Liu, Yulan Liu, Yuling Liu, Yulong Liu, Yumei Liu, Yumiao Liu, Yun Liu, Yun-Cai Liu, Yun-Qiang Liu, Yun-Ru Liu, Yun-Zi Liu, Yunfen Liu, Yunfeng Liu, Yuning Liu, Yunjie Liu, Yunlong Liu, Yunqi Liu, Yunqiang Liu, Yuntao Liu, Yunuan Liu, Yunuo Liu, Yunxia Liu, Yunyun Liu, Yuping Liu, Yupu Liu, Yuqi Liu, Yuqiang Liu, Yuqing Liu, Yurong Liu, Yuru Liu, Yusen Liu, Yutao Liu, Yutian Liu, Yuting Liu, Yutong Liu, Yuwei Liu, Yuxi Liu, Yuxia Liu, Yuxiang Liu, Yuxin Liu, Yuxuan Liu, Yuyan Liu, Yuyi Liu, Yuyu Liu, Yuyuan Liu, Yuzhen Liu, Yv-Xuan Liu, Z H Liu, Z Q Liu, Z Z Liu, Zaiqiang Liu, Zan Liu, Zaoqu Liu, Ze Liu, Zefeng Liu, Zekun Liu, Zeming Liu, Zengfu Liu, Zeyu Liu, Zezhou Liu, Zhangyu Liu, Zhangyuan Liu, Zhansheng Liu, Zhao Liu, Zhaoguo Liu, Zhaoli Liu, Zhaorui Liu, Zhaotian Liu, Zhaoxiang Liu, Zhaoxun Liu, Zhaoyang Liu, Zhe Liu, Zhekai Liu, Zheliang Liu, Zhen Liu, Zhen-Lin Liu, Zhendong Liu, Zhenfang Liu, Zhenfeng Liu, Zheng Liu, Zheng-Hong Liu, Zheng-Yu Liu, ZhengYi Liu, Zhengbing Liu, Zhengchuang Liu, Zhengdong Liu, Zhenghao Liu, Zhengkun Liu, Zhengtang Liu, Zhengting Liu, Zhenguo Liu, Zhengxia Liu, Zhengye Liu, Zhenhai Liu, Zhenhao Liu, Zhenhua Liu, Zhenjiang Liu, Zhenjiao Liu, Zhenjie Liu, Zhenkui Liu, Zhenlei Liu, Zhenmi Liu, Zhenming Liu, Zhenna Liu, Zhenqian Liu, Zhenqiu Liu, Zhenwei Liu, Zhenxing Liu, Zhenxiu Liu, Zhenzhen Liu, Zhenzhu Liu, Zhi Liu, Zhi Y Liu, Zhi-Fen Liu, Zhi-Guo Liu, Zhi-Jie Liu, Zhi-Kai Liu, Zhi-Ping Liu, Zhi-Ren Liu, Zhi-Wen Liu, Zhi-Ying Liu, Zhicheng Liu, Zhifang Liu, Zhigang Liu, Zhiguo Liu, Zhihan Liu, Zhihao Liu, Zhihong Liu, Zhihua Liu, Zhihui Liu, Zhijia Liu, Zhijie Liu, Zhikui Liu, Zhili Liu, Zhiming Liu, Zhipeng Liu, Zhiping Liu, Zhiqian Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhiru Liu, Zhirui Liu, Zhishuo Liu, Zhitao Liu, Zhiteng Liu, Zhiwei Liu, Zhixiang Liu, Zhixue Liu, Zhiyan Liu, Zhiying Liu, Zhiyong Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Zhong Liu, Zhong Wu Liu, Zhong-Hua Liu, Zhong-Min Liu, Zhong-Qiu Liu, Zhong-Wu Liu, Zhong-Ying Liu, Zhongchun Liu, Zhongguo Liu, Zhonghua Liu, Zhongjian Liu, Zhongjuan Liu, Zhongmin Liu, Zhongqi Liu, Zhongqiu Liu, Zhongwei Liu, Zhongyu Liu, Zhongyue Liu, Zhongzhong Liu, Zhou Liu, Zhou-di Liu, Zhu Liu, Zhuangjun Liu, Zhuanhua Liu, Zhuo Liu, Zhuoyuan Liu, Zi Hao Liu, Zi-Hao Liu, Zi-Lun Liu, Zi-Ye Liu, Zi-wen Liu, Zichuan Liu, Zihang Liu, Zihao Liu, Zihe Liu, Ziheng Liu, Zijia Liu, Zijian Liu, Zijing J Liu, Zimeng Liu, Ziqian Liu, Ziqin Liu, Ziteng Liu, Zitian Liu, Ziwei Liu, Zixi Liu, Zixuan Liu, Ziyang Liu, Ziying Liu, Ziyou Liu, Ziyuan Liu, Ziyue Liu, Zong-Chao Liu, Zong-Yuan Liu, Zonghua Liu, Zongjun Liu, Zongtao Liu, Zongxiang Liu, Zu-Guo Liu, Zuguo Liu, Zuohua Liu, Zuojin Liu, Zuolu Liu, Zuyi Liu, Zuyun Liu
articles

New heights in CT differentiation of adrenal lesions and a rational definition of non-enhancement.

Lichun Liu, Fangmei Zhu, Zongfeng Niu +4 more · 2025 · BMC medical imaging · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
To explore the stratification and identification of adrenal lipid-poor adenomas (LPAs), adrenal cysts (ACs), and adrenal ganglioneuromas (AGNs) from each other using contrast-enhanced computed tomogra Show more
To explore the stratification and identification of adrenal lipid-poor adenomas (LPAs), adrenal cysts (ACs), and adrenal ganglioneuromas (AGNs) from each other using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Pathologically confirmed, 348 patients were categorized into Model 1 (260 LPAs, 34 ACs), Model 2 (260 LPAs, 54 AGNs), and Model 3 (34 ACs, 54 AGNs). Statistical analyses were performed on the differences in the degree of enhancement in the arterial/venous phase (DEap/DEvp) (in HU) and the corresponding graded variables for the arterial/venous phase (GVap/GVvp). Models were evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and the Hosmer‒Lemeshow (HL) test. The values of the area under the curve (AUC) for DEap, DEvp, GVap, and GVvp in Models 1-3 were 0.996, 1.000, 0.993, and 0.999; 0.980, 0.978, 0.961, and 0.975; and 0.734, 0.892, 0.725, and 0.883, respectively. The p values of the HL test were 0.984, 1.000, and 0.113, respectively. The DEvp interval values (in HU) for the LPAs, ACs, and AGNs were [4.9, 190.2] HU, [-3.7, 4.2] HU, and [-4.8, 41.8] HU, respectively. The GVap and GVvp ranges for the LPAs, ACs, and AGNs were [1, 6], [0, 2], and [0, 2] and [1, 6], [0, 1], and [0, 5], respectively. DEvp enhanced discrimination in Models 1 and 3, whereas DEap performed better in Model 2. Lesions with DEvp < 4.5 HU are likely represent non-enhancing pathology (e.g., cysts). When both GVap and GVvp are 0, when both GVap and GVvp are [2, 6], and when GVap is [3, 6] and GVvp is 6, LPA, AC, and AGN are excluded. Not applicable. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s12880-025-01916-6
LPA

FGF22 Secreted by Hair Papilla Cells Regulates Hair Follicle Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation.

Yu Luo, Tong Xiao, Binpeng Xi +5 more · 2025 · Biomolecules · MDPI · added 2026-04-24
Hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) are resident stem cells within hair follicles (HFs) that possess self-renewal and differentiation capacities, serving as a critical model for regenerative medicine res Show more
Hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) are resident stem cells within hair follicles (HFs) that possess self-renewal and differentiation capacities, serving as a critical model for regenerative medicine research. Their dynamic interaction with dermal papilla cells (DPCs) plays a decisive role in HF development and cycling. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3390/biom15111560
FGFR1

Serum BDNF helps identify favorable subgroups in HCC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic TKIs.

Caifeng Gong, Jinglong Huang, Dandan Cao +10 more · 2025 · Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · SAGE Publications · added 2026-04-24
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic agents have become a standard strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There remains an urgent need for effective biomarke Show more
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic agents have become a standard strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There remains an urgent need for effective biomarkers to guide treatment, with C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein in immunotherapy (CRAFITY) scores and cytokine levels representing promising candidates. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and potential biomarkers of anlotinib plus TQB2450 in patients with advanced HCC. This study was a single-arm, phase Ib trial. Twenty-five patients with advanced HCC were enrolled. Patients received an intravenous infusion of TQB2450 (1200 mg, on Day 1) and oral administration of anlotinib (initiated at 10 mg, once a day, from Day 1 to Day 14), which was repeated every 3 weeks. Blood was collected at baseline for serum cytokine analysis. After a median follow-up of 41.80 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.49 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 8.94 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 22 patients, with grade ⩾3 TRAEs observed in 12 patients. Patients who achieved clinical benefit (CB) had higher baseline serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels than non-CB patients (median, 227.97 vs 129.26 pg/ml, Anlotinib plus TQB2450 demonstrated promising efficacy with manageable safety in advanced HCC. Elevated serum BDNF levels might serve as a potential positive prognostic marker and, together with ECOG score, may help complement the CRAFITY score in identifying subgroups that could benefit from ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1177/17588359251407052
BDNF

E3 ligase HERC5-catalyzed UGDH isgylation promotes SNAI1-mediated tumor metastasis and cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Xu Zhang, Fayu Liu, Qigen Fang +2 more · 2025 · Biology direct · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide due to its high aggressive potential and drug resistance. Previous studies have revealed an impor Show more
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide due to its high aggressive potential and drug resistance. Previous studies have revealed an important function of HECT And RLD Domain Containing E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 5 (HERC5) in cancer. Six GEO gene microarrays identified HERC5 as a significant upregulated gene in OSCC tissues or cells (log2 Fold change > 1 and adj.p < 0.05). This study aimed to explore the role and underlying mechanisms of HERC5 in OSCC development. High HERC5 expression in OSCC tissues was confirmed by our hospital validation cohort and positively correlated with primary tumor stages. Subsequent functional studies demonstrated that knockdown of HERC5 inhibited the migratory and invasive capabilities with decrease of Vimentin and increase of E-cadherin in OSCC cells. In cisplatin treatment, cell survival rates were significantly reduced in HERC5-silencing OSCC cells, accompanied by the increase in cytotoxicity, DNA damage and apoptosis. OSCC cell-derived tumor xenograft displayed that HERC5 depletion inhibited pulmonary metastasis as well as restored the cisplatin-induced tumor burden. In line with this, overexpression of HERC5 yielded the opposite alterations both in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) was identified as a HERC5-binding protein. Cysteine residue at position 994 in the HECT domain of HERC5 catalyzed the conjugation of ubiquitin-like protein Interferon-induced 15 kDa protein (ISG15) to UGDH (ISGylation of UGDH) and facilitated its phosphorylation, therefore enhancing SNAI1 mRNA stability. SNAI1 depletion inhibited HERC5 overexpression-triggered invasion and cisplatin resistance of OSCC cells. Our study indicates that HERC5 may be a promising therapeutic target for OSCC. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1186/s13062-025-00622-1
SNAI1

Advancing the clinical assessment of glomerular podocyte pathology in kidney biopsies via super-resolution microscopy and angiopoietin-like 4 staining.

Xiaojing Liu, Suxia Wang, Gang Liu +7 more · 2025 · Theranostics · added 2026-04-24
📄 PDF DOI: 10.7150/thno.101498
ANGPTL4

RNA-seq shows Angiopoietin-like 4 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by inducing M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages.

Guanghua Cui, Wei Liu, Xiaoke Sun +8 more · 2025 · International journal of biological macromolecules · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a particularly aggressive form of cancer, characterized by its rapid progression and a complex interplay with the surrounding immune cellular environment. The Show more
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a particularly aggressive form of cancer, characterized by its rapid progression and a complex interplay with the surrounding immune cellular environment. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively investigate the role of ANGPTL4 in the context of HCC, utilizing RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) techniques to explore its impact on the M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and to uncover potential mechanisms driving HCC progression. To achieve this, we performed a transcriptome analysis of HCC cell lines, alongside cells obtained after co-culturing these lines with macrophages. By comparing gene expression profiles between the experimental groups exposed to ANGPTL4 and control groups, we aimed to identify specific molecular pathways associated with ANGPTL4's function. In addition to gene expression analysis, we employed flow cytometry to assess the polarization status of TAM. Furthermore, we utilized immunohistochemistry to evaluate the distribution of macrophages within HCC tissues and to quantify the expression levels of M2 macrophage markers. The results derived from RNA-seq analysis were particularly revealing; treatment with ANGPTL4 led to a significant upregulation of genes linked to M2 polarization, notably including CD206 and Arg1. In subsequent experimental observations, it became evident that ANGPTL4 not only facilitated the M2 polarization of macrophages but also enhanced the proliferation and migratory capacity of HCC cells through the upregulation of these same cytokines. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138523
ANGPTL4

GPIHBP1 increase accounts for rheumatic arthritis-related hypotriglyceridemia by facilitating lipids uptake of white adipose tissues.

Meng-Ke Song, Meng-Fan Gu, Ling Liu +7 more · 2025 · Arthritis research & therapy · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
Metabolism alteration is a common complication of rheumatic arthritis (RA). This work investigated the reason behind RA-caused triglyceride (TG) changes. Fresh RA patients' whole blood was transfused Show more
Metabolism alteration is a common complication of rheumatic arthritis (RA). This work investigated the reason behind RA-caused triglyceride (TG) changes. Fresh RA patients' whole blood was transfused into NOD-SCID mice. Metabolism-regulatory tissues were examined after sacrifice. To verify the findings, tissues of the rats with long-lasting adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) were analyzed. Some rats were injected with human plasma and GPIHBP1, and their blood TG was monitored. Various cells were stimulated by cytokines or rheumatic subjects' serum. Some pre-adipocytes were cultured by human serum or in the presence of HUVEC cells and GPIHBP1. TG decrease occurred in blood and white adipose tissues (WAT) of the RA blood-transfused NOD-SCID mice and chronic AIA rats. Fatty acids (FA) oxidation in muscles was accelerated a bit, while TG catabolism status in their livers was varied. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and RA/AIA serum promoted expression of TG utilization-related enzymes and FA uptake transporters in pre-adipocytes, but barely affected LPL. Mild IL-6 stimulus promoted GPIHBP1 release of HUVEC cells. GPIHBP1 was increased in RA serum. This change can decrease blood TG in rats, which was overshadowed by an injection of excessive GPIHBP1. RA serum slightly inhibited LPL secretion in pre-adipocytes. Both HUVEC cells co-culture and GPIHBP1 supplement reduced LPL distribution on pre-adipocytes, and eliminated LPL activity difference between normal and RA serum-treated cells. No TG uptake difference was observed in these circumstances. RA-associated inflammation induces GPIHBP1 secretion of endothelial cells, which facilitates blood TG hydrolysis and uptake to compensate the loss in WAT. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s13075-025-03483-1
LPL

Whole genome sequencing analysis of body mass index identifies novel African ancestry-specific risk allele.

Xinruo Zhang, Jennifer A Brody, Mariaelisa Graff +122 more · 2025 · Nature communications · Nature · added 2026-04-24
Xinruo Zhang, Jennifer A Brody, Mariaelisa Graff, Heather M Highland, Nathalie Chami, Hanfei Xu, Zhe Wang, Kendra R Ferrier, Geetha Chittoor, Navya Shilpa Josyula, Mariah Meyer, Shreyash Gupta, Xihao Li, Zilin Li, Matthew A Allison, Diane M Becker, Lawrence F Bielak, Joshua C Bis, Meher Preethi Boorgula, Donald W Bowden, Jai G Broome, Erin J Buth, Christopher S Carlson, Kyong-Mi Chang, Sameer Chavan, Yen-Feng Chiu, Lee-Ming Chuang, Matthew P Conomos, Dawn L DeMeo, Mengmeng Du, Ravindranath Duggirala, Celeste Eng, Alison E Fohner, Barry I Freedman, Melanie E Garrett, Xiuqing Guo, Chris Haiman, Benjamin D Heavner, Bertha Hidalgo, James E Hixson, Yuk-Lam Ho, Brian D Hobbs, Donglei Hu, Qin Hui, Chii-Min Hwu, Rebecca D Jackson, Deepti Jain, Rita R Kalyani, Sharon L R Kardia, Tanika N Kelly, Ethan M Lange, Michael LeNoir, Changwei Li, Loic Le Marchand, Merry-Lynn N McDonald, Caitlin P McHugh, Alanna C Morrison, Take Naseri, NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium, Jeffrey O'Connell, Christopher J O'Donnell, Nicholette D Palmer, James S Pankow, James A Perry, Ulrike Peters, Michael H Preuss, D C Rao, Elizabeth A Regan, Sefuiva M Reupena, Dan M Roden, Jose Rodriguez-Santana, Colleen M Sitlani, Jennifer A Smith, Hemant K Tiwari, Ramachandran S Vasan, Zeyuan Wang, Daniel E Weeks, Jennifer Wessel, Kerri L Wiggins, Lynne R Wilkens, Peter W F Wilson, Lisa R Yanek, Zachary T Yoneda, Wei Zhao, Sebastian Zöllner, Donna K Arnett, Allison E Ashley-Koch, Kathleen C Barnes, John Blangero, Eric Boerwinkle, Esteban G Burchard, April P Carson, Daniel I Chasman, Yii-der Ida Chen, Joanne E Curran, Myriam Fornage, Victor R Gordeuk, Jiang He, Susan R Heckbert, Lifang Hou, Marguerite R Irvin, Charles Kooperberg, Ryan L Minster, Braxton D Mitchell, Mehdi Nouraie, Bruce M Psaty, Laura M Raffield, Alexander P Reiner, Stephen S Rich, Jerome I Rotter, M Benjamin Shoemaker, Nicholas L Smith, Kent D Taylor, Marilyn J Telen, Scott T Weiss, Yingze Zhang, Nancy Heard-Costa, Yan V Sun, Xihong Lin, L Adrienne Cupples, Leslie A Lange, Ching-Ti Liu, Ruth J F Loos, Kari E North, Anne E Justice Show less
Obesity is a major public health crisis associated with high mortality rates. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigating body mass index (BMI) have largely relied on imputed data fr Show more
Obesity is a major public health crisis associated with high mortality rates. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigating body mass index (BMI) have largely relied on imputed data from European individuals. This study leveraged whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 88,873 participants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program, of which 51% were of non-European population groups. We discovered 18 BMI-associated signals (P < 5 × 10 Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58420-2
POC5

TMEM106A mediates atherosclerosis progression through macrophage-centered immune responses and chemokine signaling.

Menglong Gao, Xingbang Liu, Zhen Fang +5 more · 2025 · Frontiers in immunology · Frontiers · added 2026-04-24
Atherosclerosis (AS) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, characterized by intricate interactions between immune dysregulation and lipid metabolism abnormalities-identify Show more
Atherosclerosis (AS) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, characterized by intricate interactions between immune dysregulation and lipid metabolism abnormalities-identifying key mediators in its pathogenesis is critical for improving diagnostics and therapies. This study focuses on Transmembrane Protein 106A (TMEM106A) to clarify its role and clinical relevance in AS progression. Public transcriptomic datasets (GSE43292, GSE100927, GSE28829) were analyzed to assess TMEM106A expression and diagnostic value; single-cell RNA-seq data (GSE159677) defined its cellular localization. Immune infiltration (ssGSEA, Cibersort, xCell) and CellChat (intercellular communication) analyses explored its immune associations. TMEM106A was significantly upregulated in AS samples across datasets, with strong diagnostic efficacy (AUC 0.80-0.95). Single-cell analysis confirmed its specific enrichment in macrophages, with functional links to immune-related pathways. TMEM106A promoted macrophage infiltration, foam cell formation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses, while regulating PLCB2 in chemokine signaling; silencing TMEM106A alleviated these pro-atherosclerotic effects. TMEM106A contributes to AS progression by modulating macrophage-mediated immune responses and chemokine signaling, as validated in experimental models. These findings support its potential as a clinically relevant biomarker and promising therapeutic target for AS intervention. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1681645
APOE

Genome-wide analysis identifies susceptibility loci for heart failure and nonischemic cardiomyopathy subtype in the East Asian populations.

Yi Han, Yun Hong, Yan Gao +11 more · 2025 · PLoS genetics · PLOS · added 2026-04-24
Heart failure (HF) is a serious cardiovascular condition resulting from abnormalities in multiple biological processes, affecting over 64 million people worldwide. We sought to expand our understandin Show more
Heart failure (HF) is a serious cardiovascular condition resulting from abnormalities in multiple biological processes, affecting over 64 million people worldwide. We sought to expand our understanding of the genetic basis of HF and more specific NICM subtype in the East Asian populations and evaluate the biological pathways underlying subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. We conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for all-cause HF in the East Asian populations (N cases ~ 13,385) and a more precise definition of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) subtype in multi-ancestry populations (N cases~3,603). We identified a low-frequency East-Asian enriched coding variant near MYBPC3 and a NICM specific locus. Follow up analyses demonstrated male-specific HF association at the MYBPC3 locus, and highlighted SVIL as a candidate causal gene for NICM. Moreover, we demonstrated that SVIL deficiency aggravated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, apoptosis and impaired cell viability in phenylephrine (PE)-treated H9C2 cells. In addition, the gene expression level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) which was deemed as a hallmark for HF was further elevated by SVIL silencing in PE-stimulated H9C2 cells. RNA-sequencing analysis of H9C2 cells revealed that the function of SVIL might be mediated through pathways relevant to regulation and differentiation of heart muscle. These results enhance our understanding of the genetic architecture of HF in the East Asian populations, and provide important insight into the biological pathways underlying NICM and sex-specific relevance of the MYBPC3 locus that warrants further replication in another datasets. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011897
MYBPC3

Rodent Models for Atherosclerosis.

Linghong Zeng, Jingshu Chi, Meiqi Zhu +4 more · 2025 · International journal of molecular sciences · MDPI · added 2026-04-24
Atherosclerosis, a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, is driven by a complex interplay of dyslipidemia, inflammation, and arterial plaque formation and progression. Animal models are indispensab Show more
Atherosclerosis, a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, is driven by a complex interplay of dyslipidemia, inflammation, and arterial plaque formation and progression. Animal models are indispensable to elucidate the pathogenesis and develop novel therapies. Rodent models are widely utilized due to their cost-effectiveness, reproducibility, and rapid disease progression. However, notable species differences exist in lipoprotein composition and lipid metabolism pathways. Mice and rats exhibit an HDL-dominant profile, whereas Syrian golden hamsters express cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and display a higher LDL fraction, but lower than that of humans, offering a model closer to human metabolically. Divergent CETP activity across species further complicates the translational relevance of the findings from these models for atherosclerosis and related metabolic disorders. This review systematically examines the key factors in rodent model selection and optimization, with consideration on the roles of sex and age. We focus on three commonly used and well-characterized rodent strains prone to atherosclerosis: C57BL/6J mice, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, Wistar rats, and golden hamsters. On Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3390/ijms27010378
APOE

Mechanical and thermal responsive chiral photonic cellulose hydrogels for dynamic anti-counterfeiting and optical skin.

Baoqi Li, Mingcong Xu, Bang An +8 more · 2025 · Materials horizons · Royal Society of Chemistry · added 2026-04-24
Dynamic responsive structural colored materials have drawn increased consideration in a wide range of applications, such as colorimetric sensors and high-safety tags. However, the sophisticated intera Show more
Dynamic responsive structural colored materials have drawn increased consideration in a wide range of applications, such as colorimetric sensors and high-safety tags. However, the sophisticated interactions among the individual responsive parts restrict the advanced design of multimodal responsive photonic materials. Inspired by stimuli-responsive color change in chameleon skin, a simple and effective photo-crosslinking strategy is proposed to construct hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) based hydrogels with multiple responsive structured colors. By controlling UV exposure time, the structural color of HPC hydrogels can be effectively controlled in a full-color spectrum. At the same time, HPC hydrogels showcase temperature and mechanical dual-responsive structural colors. In particular, the microstructure of HPC hydrogels undergoes a transition from the chiral nematic phase to the nematic phase under the action of external stretching, leading to a significant reflection of circularly polarized light (CPL) to linearly polarized light (LPL). Given the diverse responsiveness exhibited by HPC hydrogels and their unique structural transition properties under external forces, we have explored their potential applications as dynamic anti-counterfeiting labels and optical skins. This work reveals the great possibility of using structural colored cellulose hydrogels in multi-sensing and optical displays, opening up a new path for the exploration of next-generation flexible photonic devices. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1039/d4mh01646g
LPL

Shunt configuration's role in shaping hemodynamics of reverse Potts shunt in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Jinlong Liu, Xiafeng Yu, Jiwen Xiong +4 more · 2025 · Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · Frontiers · added 2026-04-24
Reverse Potts shunt is a promising yet high-risk therapy for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension. Postoperative hemodynamics is critically influenced by shunt configuration but is difficult to p Show more
Reverse Potts shunt is a promising yet high-risk therapy for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension. Postoperative hemodynamics is critically influenced by shunt configuration but is difficult to predict. This study aimed to quantify the effects of shunt size and location on hemodynamics to guide surgical planning. Based on a patient-specific model, four postoperative models with two different shunt locations [left pulmonary artery (LPA)-descending aorta (DAO) and pulmonary artery bifurcation-aortic arch] and three conduit sizes (4, 5, and 6 mm) were created. The direct Potts shunt model was created by a direct side-to-side anastomosis between the LPA and DAO with a 6-mm circular opening. Quantitative parameters including the shunt ratio (SR), which was defined as the percentage of the shunt flow rates to the total pulmonary inflow rate, lower limb oxygen saturation, and pressure were analyzed. Increasing the shunt size from 4 mm to 6 mm elevated the SR from 6.01% to 9.80%, concurrently reducing lower limb oxygen saturation from 89.57% to 86.52%. When taking 11,000 Pa as the threshold, this increased SR resulted in a reduction of the high-pressure area from 17.32% of the total pulmonary artery area to almost zero. Meanwhile, the high-pressure area on the aorta expanded from 8.72% of the total aortic area to 14.94%. These results indicated a reduction in the right ventricular afterload and an increase in the left ventricular afterload. Notably, a 6-mm shunt at the pulmonary artery bifurcation yielded a significantly larger SR than at the LPA (9.80% vs. 2.68%), which is attributed to a higher pressure gradient at the pulmonary artery bifurcation (1,201 Pa vs. 162 Pa). The shunt location had a greater impact on the SR than shunt size within the 4 mm-6 mm range in this specific case. A 6-mm shunt at the pulmonary artery bifurcation yielded a significantly larger SR than at the LPA, which is attributed to the higher preoperative pressure gradient at the bifurcation site. Left heart function is as critical as right heart function in maintaining pressure balance and determining outcomes, as the shunt flow increases the left ventricular afterload. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1697468
LPA

Family caregivers' needs at 6 months after pancreatic cancer surgery: A latent profile analysis.

Linglong Liu, Xiaoping Fang, Xinbo Wang +8 more · 2025 · International journal of nursing studies advances · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Family caregivers ('carers') bear the highest care burden during the postoperative survivorship period of pancreatic cancer, given its poor prognosis. Most carers report unmet needs when taking on car Show more
Family caregivers ('carers') bear the highest care burden during the postoperative survivorship period of pancreatic cancer, given its poor prognosis. Most carers report unmet needs when taking on caregiving responsibilities during this period. Thoroughly investigating carers' needs is essential for helping families address practical care challenges. However, this important topic remains underexplored. To assess the need levels and identify need subgroups among carers of patients with pancreatic cancer 6 months after surgery and demographic predictors contributing to heterogeneity. Cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited from the pancreas centres of four tertiary A-level comprehensive hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. 240 patients with pancreatic cancer and their carers ('dyads') participated in the survey. Carers completed the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in Cancer for Carers, the Activities of Daily Living Scale for patients, and the General Demographic Information Questionnaire for dyads. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to categorise carers' needs. Non-parametric and chi-square tests were used to examine differences in need scores and sociodemographic characteristics among subgroups. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) was used to analyse sociodemographic impacts. Six months post-surgery, the total carers' need score was 41.83 ± 22.65 points, indicating a moderate level, with the highest needs reported for healthcare personnel, information and knowledge, and facilities and services. The LPA results revealed that carers were divided into five distinct subgroups based on differing levels of need across the domains assessed by the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in Cancer for Carers, with proportions of 8.8 %, 22.5 %, 8.3 %, 55 %, and 5.4 %. Subgroup membership was predicted by four factors: carers' sex (odds ratio [OR]: 11.08, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.64, 74.99, We have highlighted the complex individualised needs of carers of patients with pancreatic cancer. Through LPA and MLR, we identified distinct need subgroups and their predictors. Healthcare professionals may be able to improve dyads' health by tailoring support to each subgroup's specific needs and issues. Registration number: ChiCTR2400079415, registered 03/01/2024, first recruitment 04/02/2024. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100416
LPA

The truncated AXIN1 isoform promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through SRSF9-mediated exon 9 skipping.

Qian-Qian Zhang, Ying-Shuang Miao, Jun-Yi Hu +3 more · 2025 · Molecular and cellular biochemistry · Springer · added 2026-04-24
Axis inhibitor protein 1 (AXIN1) is a protein recognized for inhibiting tumor growth and is commonly involved in cancer development. In this study, we explored the potential molecular mechanisms that Show more
Axis inhibitor protein 1 (AXIN1) is a protein recognized for inhibiting tumor growth and is commonly involved in cancer development. In this study, we explored the potential molecular mechanisms that connect alternative splicing of AXIN1 to the metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transcriptome sequencing, RT‒PCR, qPCR and Western blotting were utilized to determine the expression levels of AXIN1 in human HCC tissues and HCC cells. The effects of the AXIN1 exon 9 alternative splice isoform and SRSF9 on the migration and invasion of HCC cells were assessed through wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. The interaction between SRSF9 and AXIN1 was investigated using UV crosslink RNA immunoprecipitation, RNA pulldown, and RNA immunoprecipitation assays. Furthermore, the involvement of the AXIN1 isoform and SRSF9 in HCC metastasis was validated in a nude mouse model. AXIN1-L (exon 9 including) expression was downregulated, while AXIN1-S (exon 9 skipping) was upregulated in HCC. SRSF9 promotes the production of AXIN1-S by interacting with the sequence of exons 8 and 10 of AXIN1. AXIN1-S significantly promoted HCC cells migration and invasion by activating the Wnt pathway, while the opposite effects were observed for AXIN1-L. In vivo experiments demonstrated that AXIN1-L inhibited HCC metastasis, whereas SRSF9 promoted HCC metastasis in part by regulating the level of AXIN1-S. AXIN1, a tumor suppressor protein that targets the AXIN1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling axis, may be a promising prognostic factor and a valuable therapeutic target for HCC. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1007/s11010-024-05012-1
AXIN1

A Novel Approach for the Early Identification of Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease Using EEG and Psychometric Data.

Shyamal Y Dharia, Qian Liu, Stephen D Smith +1 more · 2025 · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · IEEE · added 2026-04-24
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with impairments in memory and executive functions. Despite significant advancements in identifying genetic risk factors Show more
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with impairments in memory and executive functions. Despite significant advancements in identifying genetic risk factors, the high cost and limited accessibility of genetic testing remain major barriers. In this work, we propose a cost-effective screening approach that leverages EEG recordings and psychometric test scores to predict an individual's genetic risk for AD. Our Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model shows promising performance: it achieved an F1 score of 72.21% in distinguishing APOE-ϵ4/PICALM GG non-carriers (N) from APOE-ϵ4 carriers with the risky PICALM GG alleles (A+P+). It reached an F1 score of 60.78% for differentiating non-carriers (N) from APOE-ϵ4 carriers without the risky alleles (A+P-), and 65.12% when separating A+P- from A+P+. To enhance interpretability, we employ Grad-CAM, which reveals that EEG features contribute more significantly to gene prediction than psychometric measures. Notably, our model also identifies three key psychometric tests, MINI COPE (which assesses emotional coping skills), the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and NEO Neuroticism, as associated with higher AD risk, consistent with prior research. Moreover, our results align with earlier findings reporting increased theta-band power among high-risk individuals. Finally, Higuchi Fractal Dimension (HFD) features drove most of the EEG-based prediction capability, as shown through our ablation study. This study highlights the potential of integrating neurophysiological and cognitive assessments to develop accessible and reliable screening tools for AD genetic risk, enabling earlier diagnoses. The code has been released at https://github.com/ Shyamal-Dharia/EEG-Psycho-Genes-AD. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3639217
APOE

Dietary Se-enrich Cardamine violifolia supplementation decreases lipid deposition and improves antioxidant status in the liver of aging laying hens.

Mengke Yan, Xin Cong, Hui Wang +7 more · 2025 · Poultry science · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Aging-related lipid metabolic disorder is related to oxidative stress. Selenium (Se)-enriched Cardamine violifolia (SEC) is known for its excellent antioxidant function. The objective of this study wa Show more
Aging-related lipid metabolic disorder is related to oxidative stress. Selenium (Se)-enriched Cardamine violifolia (SEC) is known for its excellent antioxidant function. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of SEC on antioxidant capacity and lipid metabolism in the liver of aged laying hens. A total of 450 sixty-five-wk-old Roman laying hens were randomly divided into 5 treatments: a basal diet (without Se supplementation, CON) and basal diets supplemented with 0.3 mg/kg Se from sodium selenite (SS), 0.3 mg/kg Se from Se-enriched yeast (SEY), 0.3 mg/kg Se from SEC (SEC), or 0.3 mg/kg Se from SEC and 0.3 mg/kg Se from SEY (SEC + SEY). The experiment lasted for 8 wk. The results showed that dietary SEC + SEY supplementation decreased (P < 0.05) triglyceride (in the plasma and liver) and total cholesterol levels (in the plasma), and increased (P < 0.05) HDL-C concentration in plasma compared to CON diet. Compared with CON diet, SEC and/or SEY supplementation decreased (P < 0.05) the mRNA expression of hepatic ACC, FAS and HMGCR, and increased (P < 0.05) PPARα, VTG-II, Apo-VLDL II and ApoB expression. Dietary SEC + SEY and SEY supplementation increased (P < 0.05) Se content in egg yolk and breast muscle compared to CON diet. Dietary SEC, SEY or SEC + SEY supplementation increased (P < 0.05) the activity of antioxidant enzymes (GSH-PX, T-AOC and T-SOD) in the plasma and liver and decreased (P < 0.05) MDA content in the plasma compared to CON diet. Dietary Se supplementation promoted (P < 0.05) mRNA expression of Nrf2 in the liver. In contrast, dietary SEY and SEC supplementation resulted in a decrease (P < 0.05) of hepatic Keap1 mRNA expression compared to CON diet. Dietary SEC + SEY and/or SEC supplementation increased (P < 0.05) mRNA expression of Selenof, GPX1 and GPX4 in the liver compared with CON diet. In conclusion, dietary SEC (0.3 mg/kg Se) or SEC (0.3 mg/kg Se) + SEY (0.3 mg/kg Se) improved the antioxidant capacity and the lipid metabolism in the liver of aged laying hens, which might be associated with regulating Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104620
APOB

Multi-Angle Bioactivity Cartography for Computational Screening and Mechanistic Analysis of AChE Inhibitors From Yellow Gastrodia elata.

Ruijun Sun, Yuchi Zhang, Jingying Xu +7 more · 2025 · Archiv der Pharmazie · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are crucial for the symptomatic management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with natural products-particularly botanical sources like Yellow Gastrodia elata (YGE)-se Show more
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are crucial for the symptomatic management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with natural products-particularly botanical sources like Yellow Gastrodia elata (YGE)-serving as promising reservoirs of such inhibitors. Nevertheless, comprehensive screening and mechanistic characterization of their inhibitory potential remain limited. This study sought to identify potent AChE inhibitors from YGE, investigate their mechanisms of action, and assess their therapeutic prospects for AD. Methodologically, an integrated approach was employed, combining ultrafiltration-liquid chromatography (UF-LC) for rapid inhibitor screening, molecular docking and dynamics simulations for mechanistic insight, two-stage high-speed countercurrent chromatography for compound isolation, enzyme kinetics to delineate inhibition modalities, and network pharmacology to uncover relevant AD-related targets. The findings identified seven active constituents with notable AChE inhibition, among which parishins A and G were obtained at high purity (98.26% and 97.26%, respectively) and exhibited mixed-type inhibition with low IC Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1002/ardp.70174
BACE1

Apolipoprotein A5 reduces clearance of VLDL by altering apolipoprotein E content.

Pheruza Tarapore, Debi Swertfeger, Jamie Morris +6 more · 2025 · Journal of lipid research · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Apolipoprotein A-V (APOA5) is a critical regulator of circulating triglyceride (TG) levels. Its deletion leads to elevated plasma TG concentrations by altering the metabolism of VLDL particles in vivo Show more
Apolipoprotein A-V (APOA5) is a critical regulator of circulating triglyceride (TG) levels. Its deletion leads to elevated plasma TG concentrations by altering the metabolism of VLDL particles in vivo. One way APOA5 exerts its effects is through the modulation of LPL activity, specifically by disrupting inhibitory interactions between LPL and angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs). However, the impact of APOA5 on VLDL composition and its potential to alter VLDL metabolism in other ways remains poorly understood. To address this, we investigated the influence of APOA5 on the VLDL proteome, LPL activation, and hepatic remnant uptake. Using VLDL from Apoa5 KO and WT mice, we found no evidence that APOA5 directly enhances LPL activity in purified or plasma systems. However, VLDL from Apoa5 KO mice was cleared significantly more slowly by cultured hepatocytes. VLDL proteomics experiments from two independent laboratories identified altered contents of 23 proteins involved in lipoprotein metabolism, inflammation, and immune response in Apoa5 KO VLDL, including reductions in APOE and serum amyloid A1. Remarkably, reintroduction of recombinant mouse APOA5 to the KO plasma partially restored the WT VLDL proteome, including APOE, and normalized VLDL uptake by hepatocytes without altering LPL lipolysis. These findings reveal that APOA5 influences hepatic clearance of VLDL remnants by modulating particle composition, particularly APOE content. This study expands the functional scope of APOA5 in TG metabolism and underscores its role in VLDL remodeling and remnant clearance, offering new insights with implications for understanding hypertriglyceridemia and its roles in inflammation and immune response. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2025.100917
APOA5

New Insights into Genetic Diversity and Differentiation of 11 Buffalo Populations Using Validated SNPs for Dairy Improvement.

Alfredo Pauciullo, Giustino Gaspa, Carmine Versace +13 more · 2025 · Genes · MDPI · added 2026-04-24
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3390/genes16040400
LPL

Multi-omics integration deciphers immune-metabolic heterogeneity in CRC: A prognostic model and therapeutic strategies targeting ANGPTL4/FABP4/RBP7.

Ning Ding, Meimei Jiang, Guiyun Jia +6 more · 2025 · Computers in biology and medicine · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
The heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and therapeutic resistance in Colorectal cancer (CRC) present substantial clinical challenges. In this study, 1136 CRC samples from TCGA a Show more
The heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and therapeutic resistance in Colorectal cancer (CRC) present substantial clinical challenges. In this study, 1136 CRC samples from TCGA and GEO were utilized for the overall research design, and tumor subtype classification (Immunity_High and Immunity_Low) was specifically performed on the TCGA cohort (n = 568) using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and t-SNE dimensionality reduction; t-SNE was selected because the study focused on distinguishing local clustering features of immune subtypes-it excels in enhancing sample aggregation within subtypes and highlighting local differences, which aligns with classification needs, so UMAP (prioritizing global structure preservation) was not used. The GEO cohort (n = 568) was used for subsequent validation of the prognostic model and results. A 12-gene prognostic model, comprising ANGPTL4, FABP4, RBP7, and 9 additional non-core genes (CCL22, NOS2, TGFB3, APOD, CHGB, CX3CL1, APOBEC3F, LCN12, BST2), was developed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-Cox regression (LASSO-Cox regression) regression.The functions of the core genes and potential therapeutic candidates were investigated via single-cell sequencing, molecular docking, dynamics simulations, drug sensitivity analysis, Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and quantitative Real - time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). The Immunity_High subtype, characterized by the presence of CD8 This multi-omics study integrates multi-omics data to elucidate the immune-metabolic heterogeneity in CRC, establishing a precise prognostic model and providing bioinformatic evidence for key roles of ANGPTL4, FABP4, and RBP7 in the tumor microenvironment, thereby suggesting novel strategies to overcome immunotherapy resistance. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111271
ANGPTL4

FGFR1-amplified colorectal cancer: a distinct prognostic subtype identified through integrated genomic and immunohistochemical profiling.

X Lyu, R Cai, B Han +10 more · 2025 · ESMO open · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations are established therapeutic targets in cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma but remain understudied in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study i Show more
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations are established therapeutic targets in cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma but remain understudied in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study investigates the prevalence, clinicopathological correlates, and prognostic impact of FGFR alterations in CRC. We analyzed 608 stage I-IV CRC samples (2014-2024) through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). FGFR genomic status was correlated with survival outcomes using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. External validation of FGFR genomic alterations was carried out using the 19 datasets (n = 6998) with prognostic impact validated through The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon and Rectum Adenocarcinoma (COREAD) dataset (Firehose Legacy, n = 640), both accessed via cBioPortal database. Large-scale genomic profiling of CRC [n = 7606 (608 in-house + 6998 public cohorts)] identified FGFR1 amplification (3.8% prevalence) as the predominant FGFR alteration subtype. Multivariable analysis confirmed FGFR alterations as independent predictors of poor disease-free survival [DFS; hazard ratio (HR) 2.58, P = 0.0002] and progression-free survival (PFS; HR 2.17, P = 0.0011), with FGFR1 amplification showing strongest prognostic impact (DFS HR 2.91, PFS HR 2.52, P < 0.01). Notably, the prognostic magnitude of FGFR alterations was comparable to KRAS/BRAF mutations in both localized and metastatic CRC. In addition, we established a semiquantitative immunoreactive score (IRS) system achieving 95.2% concordance with NGS (κ = 0.901), enabling reliable FGFR1 screening in routine pathology workflows. This study provides the first comprehensive characterization of FGFR genomic alterations in CRC through large-scale profiling (n = 7606), establishing FGFR1 amplification as the predominant alteration. Unlike FGFR2/3-driven malignancies, FGFR1-amplified CRC exhibited aggressive clinical behavior and inferior survival outcomes across disease stages. To address the diagnostic challenges in routine practice, we further developed a validated immunohistochemical scoring system (IRS), establishing a cost-effective and clinically feasible alternative to molecular assays for identifying FGFR1-driven CRC subsets. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105561
FGFR1

A new perspective on cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder: Changes in gut microbiota and their inflammatory regulatory mechanisms.

Xiaodong Song, Qilin Zhong, Rongxu Zhang +10 more · 2025 · Journal of affective disorders · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Cognitive impairments in major depressive disorder (MDD) affect patients' social functioning, with underlying mechanisms involving gut microbiota and inflammatory factors remaining unclear. The study Show more
Cognitive impairments in major depressive disorder (MDD) affect patients' social functioning, with underlying mechanisms involving gut microbiota and inflammatory factors remaining unclear. The study analyzed cognitive function, gut microbiota changes, and inflammatory factor levels in 39 unmedicated MDD patients and 41 healthy controls, employing correlation and moderation effect analysis. MDD patients scored lower than controls in cognitive functions like information processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal learning, visual learning and social cognition. They showed reduced gut microbiota diversity and increased levels of inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, IL-27, IL-33). Sellimonas abundance correlated negatively with attention/vigilance, moderated by TNF-α, IL-27, and IL-33. This relationship was stronger at lower inflammation levels. MDD patients exhibit multi-domain cognitive dysfunction alongside pro-inflammatory states and disrupted gut microbiota. The abundance of Sellimonas significantly predicts attention/vigilance deficits. Inflammatory factors modulate the impact of gut microbiota on cognitive function, suggesting chronic low-grade inflammation as a key risk factor for cognitive impairment in MDD. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119648
IL27

Fish Swim Bladder-Derived ECM Hydrogels Effectively Treat Myocardial Ischemic Injury through Immunomodulation and Angiogenesis.

Yulong Fu, Canran Gao, Hailing Zhang +7 more · 2025 · Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
Injectable hydrogel implants represent a promising therapeutic approach for ischemic heart failure; but their efficacy is often limited by low bioactivity, poor durability, and inadequate injection te Show more
Injectable hydrogel implants represent a promising therapeutic approach for ischemic heart failure; but their efficacy is often limited by low bioactivity, poor durability, and inadequate injection techniques. Herein, a unique hydrogel incorporating extracellular matrix from fish swim bladder (FSB-ECM), which has distinct advantages over mammalian derived ECM, such as low antigenicity, bioactivity, and source safety, is developed. It consists of collagen, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans, including 13 proteins common in the myocardial matrix and three specific proteins: HSPG, Col12a1, and vWF. This hydrogel enhances cardiac cell adhesion and stretching while promoting angiogenesis and M2 macrophage polarization. In addition, its storage modulus (G') increases over time, reaching about 1000 Pa after 5 min, which facilitates transcatheter delivery and in situ gelling. Furthermore, this hydrogel provides sustained support for cardiac contractions, exhibiting superior longevity. In a rat model of ischemic heart failure, the ejection fraction significantly improves with FSB-ECM treatment, accompanied by increased angiogenesis, reduced inflammation, and decreased infarct size. Finally, RNA sequencing combined with in vitro assays identifies ANGPTL4 as a key protein involved in mediating the effects of FSB-ECM treatment. Overall, this new injectable hydrogel based on FSB-ECM is suitable for transcatheter delivery and possesses remarkable reparative capabilities for treating heart failure. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1002/advs.202500036
ANGPTL4

Association between 24-hour movement behaviors and depressive symptoms among urban older adults in china: a compositional isotemporal substitution analysis.

Hu Ji, Glenn Roswal, Jing Min Liu +2 more · 2025 · Frontiers in psychiatry · Frontiers · added 2026-04-24
To examine the association between 24-hour movement behaviors and depressive symptoms in older adults using compositional data analysis, and to investigate the dose-response characteristics of time re Show more
To examine the association between 24-hour movement behaviors and depressive symptoms in older adults using compositional data analysis, and to investigate the dose-response characteristics of time reallocations between movement behaviors in relation to depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1093 urban-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above in selected communities of Jinan City, Shandong Province, China, between April 2024 and September 2024. The Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LF) was used to estimate time spent in moderate to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), sedentary behavior (SB), and sleep (SLP) across a typical 24-hour day. The Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-9 item (PHQ-9) was applied to assess depressive symptoms. Compositional isotemporal substitution models were employed to explore the associations between time reallocations among 24-hour movement behaviors and depressive symptoms, accounting for the co-dependent nature of time-use data. (1) The geometric means of time spent in MVPA, LPA, SB, and SLP were 25.33 minutes, 141.26 minutes, 738.10 minutes, and 455.15 minutes, respectively. Variation matrix analysis revealed the highest log-ratio variance between MVPA and SB (0.168), and the lowest between SLP and SB (0.031). (2) The prevalence of screening-positive depressive symptoms was 16.29% among Chinese urban older adults. (3) Results from compositional linear regression models showed that time allocated to MVPA, LPA, and SLP (relative to the remaining movement behaviors) was negatively associated with depressive symptoms, while time spent in SB was positively associated. (4) Dose-response analysis further indicated that: (a) MVPA substitutions with other movement behaviors exhibited nonlinear and markedly asymmetric effects on depressive symptoms; (b) replacing MVPA with LPA, SB, or SLP resulted in increasingly larger changes in predicted scores as substitution duration increased, whereas the reverse substitution (MVPA for other movement behaviors) produced progressively smaller changes; and (c) substitutions between SB and LPA displayed linear and symmetrical effects. The findings provide evidence of an association between 24-hour movement behaviors and depressive symptoms in Chinese urban-dwelling older adults and reinforce the importance of achieving a balance between different types of movement behaviors over a 24-hour period for mental health. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1706591
LPA

Genetic association of circulating lipids and lipid-lowering drug targets with vascular calcification.

Pengfei Zhang, Wenting Wang, Qian Xu +5 more · 2025 · Atherosclerosis · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Vascular calcification (VC) significantly increases the incidence and mortality of many diseases. The causal relationships of dyslipidaemia and lipid-lowering drug use with VC severity remain unclear. Show more
Vascular calcification (VC) significantly increases the incidence and mortality of many diseases. The causal relationships of dyslipidaemia and lipid-lowering drug use with VC severity remain unclear. This study explores the genetic causal associations of different circulating lipids and lipid-lowering drug targets with coronary artery calcification (CAC) and abdominal aortic artery calcification (AAC). We obtained single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) associated with seven circulating lipids and 13 lipid-lowering drug targets from publicly available genome-wide association studies and eQTL databases. Causal associations were investigated by univariable, multivariable, drug-target, and summary data-based Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Potential mediation effects of metabolic risk factors were evaluated. MR analysis revealed that genetic proxies for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TC) and Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) were causally associated with CAC severity, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) level was causally associated with AAC severity. A significant association was detected between hepatic Lipoprotein(A) (LPA) gene expression and CAC severity. Colocalisation analysis supported the hypothesis that the association between LPA expression and CAC quantity is driven by different causal variant sites within the ±1 Mb flanking region of LPA. Serum calcium and phosphorus had causal associations with CAC severity. Inhibitors targeting LPA might represent CAC drug candidates. Moreover, T2DM, hypercalcemia, and hyperphosphatemia are positively causally associated with CAC severity, while chronic kidney disease and estimated glomerular filtration rate are not. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119136
APOB

Selenium Nanoparticles vs Selenite Fertilizers: Implications for Toxicological Profiles, Antioxidant Defense, and Ferroptosis Pathways.

Qiting Fang, Zhonghua Liu, Kaixi Wang · 2025 · Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · ACS Publications · added 2026-04-24
Selenium (Se) foliar fertilizers enhance crop nutrition and address human selenium deficiency, while improper application may lead to excessive intake and residue accumulation. Our study comprehensive Show more
Selenium (Se) foliar fertilizers enhance crop nutrition and address human selenium deficiency, while improper application may lead to excessive intake and residue accumulation. Our study comprehensively assessed the toxicity and function of novel selenium nanoparticles and traditional sodium selenite fertilizers across cell, zebrafish, and murine models. Both fertilizers enhanced antioxidant pathways at low doses, but selenium nanoparticles exhibited stronger antioxidant and ferroptosis-modulating effects with lower toxicity at a high dose. Sodium selenite increased total and lipid ROS production, leading to decreased viability of cells and increased distortion and mortality of zebrafish. In mice, sodium selenite induced hepatic toxicity and decreased GPX4. Transcriptome analysis revealed that sodium selenite downregulated c-JUN and APOA4, weakening the antioxidant defense, whereas selenium nanoparticles promoted ferroptosis resistance through FGF21. These findings suggest selenium nanoparticles as a safer alternative for Se biofortification, mitigating health risks while supporting food security and environmental sustainability. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02034
APOA4

Illuminating the FGFR fusion landscape in Chinese patients: unveiling novel molecular insights and clinical implications.

Zhuo Liu, Dandan Zhao, Baoming Wang +14 more · 2025 · The oncologist · Oxford University Press · added 2026-04-24
Despite the increasing approval and ongoing clinical trials of FGFR-targeted therapies, accurately detecting FGFR fusions remains a challenge due to limited research, low incidence rates, complex fusi Show more
Despite the increasing approval and ongoing clinical trials of FGFR-targeted therapies, accurately detecting FGFR fusions remains a challenge due to limited research, low incidence rates, complex fusion partner distribution, and unique kinase domain distribution. We conducted a multicenter study to comprehensively profile FGFR fusions in the largest Chinese pan-cancer cohort to date, comprising 118 FGFR fusions from 114 individuals. Both DNA- and RNA-based sequencing approaches were utilized to reveal novel and fundamental features of FGFR fusion. Our research reveals an incidence rate of 0.96% for FGFR rearrangements within this Chinese cohort, including a high incidence rate of FGFR fusions (40%) in parotid gland carcinoma. However, this is based on a small sample size of 5 tumors and should be interpreted cautiously pending validation in larger cohorts. We also uncovered distinct breakpoint distribution patterns across various FGFR rearrangements. For example, a primary breakpoint in intron17 of FGFR2 was predominant (21/22), while FGFR1/3 breakpoints displayed substantial diversity. For the first time, we identified "hot" breakpoints in FGFR1 intron17, exon18, and FGFR3's 3' untranslated region. These findings underline the importance of incorporating these regions in targeted sequencing to ensure comprehensive detection of FGFR1/3 fusions. Notably, we observed a predilection for intrachromosomal distribution in common FGFR1/2/3 fusions. In contrast, most novel fusions (12/15) exhibited an interchromosomal distribution pattern, indicating variations in the fusion formation mechanism. Importantly, our study demonstrates the substantial incremental value of RNA-NGS or other orthogonal methods in confirming the functionality of FGFR rearrangements initially identified by DNA sequencing. In our cohort, 46% (6/13) of rare FGFR1/2/3 fusions lacked detectable RNA transcripts; however, this does not definitively indicate non-functionality as factors such as low RNA quality, expression below detection limits, or nonsense-mediated decay may contribute. Therefore, RNA-based validation is critical for accurately identifying potentially targetable FGFR fusions and guiding therapy. Our findings offer critical novel insights into functional FGFR fusions and bear considerable clinical implications for identifying individuals whose tumors are most likely to respond favorably to FGFR-targeted therapies. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf347
FGFR1

Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) as a prognostic marker for reduced survival in pancreatic cancer.

Jinyue Liu, Yueping Jiang, Yueyi Xing +5 more · 2025 · BMC gastroenterology · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients diagnosed with pancreat Show more
This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC). A retrospective cohort of 364 pathologically confirmed PC patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2022 was analyzed. The optimal cutoff for Lp(a) was identified using X-tile software, allowing categorization into high and low Lp(a) groups. To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify independent prognostic variables affecting OS and PFS. Patients with high Lp(a) had significantly shorter OS and PFS both before and after PSM (post-PSM OS: 12.28 vs. 27.67 months, P = 0.003; PFS: 7.00 vs. 11.30 months, P = 0.002). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed high Lp(a) as an independent predictor of poor OS [HR = 2.11 (1.17-3.81), P = 0.013] and PFS [HR = 2.14 (1.20-3.83), P = 0.010]. In the surgical subgroup (n = 215), high Lp(a) was also associated with worse OS (16.43 vs. 35.47 months, P = 0.02) and PFS (8.40 vs. 11.77 months, P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis in this subgroup showed that high Lp(a) remained an independent risk factor for OS [HR = 2.82 (1.36-5.87), P = 0.006] and PFS [HR = 2.01 (1.06-3.86), P = 0.034]. Elevated serum Lp(a) is an independent predictor of reduced OS and PFS in patients with pancreatic cancer. In contrast to conventional lipid profiles, the genetic stability of Lp(a) makes it a reliable baseline prognostic marker. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-04573-9
LPA

Retraction of "Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Notopterol Derivatives as Triple Inhibitors of AChE/BACE1/GSK3β for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease".

Nan Wang, Wenjie Liu, Lijun Zhou +11 more · 2025 · ACS omega · ACS Publications · added 2026-04-24
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03368.].
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.5c06137
BACE1