👤 Julie Henriques

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a potent, independent causal risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to assess the association between Lp(a) and the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and angiographic characteristics of obstructive CAD and occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI). We included 446 individuals with very high Lp(a) (>230 nmol/L) who underwent routine lipid profiling, matched 2:1 by age and sex using nearest-neighbor propensity matching to 223 controls with low Lp(a) (≤7 nmol/L). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess CAD- and MI-free survival. Multivariable ORs were calculated for multivessel disease and the SYNergy Between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery-1 score. Median follow-up time, defined by age at last follow-up, was 60 years (Q1-Q3: 50-71). Individuals with very high Lp(a) had significantly lower event-free survival time for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD and occurrence of MI (P = 0.006 and P = 0.012, respectively). In multivariable analysis, Lp(a) was associated with multivessel CAD (adjusted OR: 1.43 [per 100 nmol/L]; 95% CI: 1.04-1.96; P = 0.028), but not with an intermediate or high SYNergy Between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery-1 score (adjusted OR: 1.28 [per 100 nmol/L]; 95% CI: 0.82-1.99, P = 0.279). Individuals with very high Lp(a) levels had a 2.4-fold higher risk of ST-segment elevation MI and a 15.9-fold higher risk of recurrent MI compared to those with low Lp(a). Very high Lp(a) is associated with earlier diagnosis of obstructive CAD and MI, predominantly ST-segment elevation MI. In addition, individuals with very high Lp(a) levels seem at a particular high risk of recurrent MI. Show less

Individuals with obesity caused by biallelic pathogenic LEPR (leptin receptor) variants can benefit from setmelanotide, the novel MC4R agonist. An ongoing phase 3 clinical trial (NCT05093634) includes individuals with obesity who carry a heterozygous LEPR variant, although the obesogenic impact of these variants remains incompletely evaluated. The aim of this study was to functionally assess heterozygous variants in LEPR and to evaluate their effect on obesity. We sequenced LEPR in ∼10,000 participants from the French RaDiO study. We found 86 rare heterozygous variants. Each identified variant was then investigated in vitro using luciferase and western blot assays. Using the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), including the strong criterion related to functional assays, we found 12 pathogenic LEPR variants. Most heterozygotes did not present with obesity, and we found no association between these pathogenic variants and body mass index (BMI). This lack of association between pathogenic LEPR variants and obesity risk or BMI was confirmed using exome data from 200,000 individuals in the UK Biobank. In the literature, among 55 reported heterozygotes for of a rare pathogenic LEPR variant, only 27% had obesity. In conclusion, monoallelic pathogenic LEPR variants were functionally tested, and they do not elevate the risk of obesity or BMI levels. This raises questions about the use of setmelanotide, a costly drug with potential side effects, based solely on the presence of a heterozygous LEPR variant. Show less

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare disease. The genomic profiling tumours according to clinical characteristics and its impact on the prognosis remains unclear. A pooled analysis of clinical data, genomic profiling and MisMatch Repair (MMR) status from three databases was performed. A total of 188 tumour samples were analysed. A predisposing disease was reported in 22.3%, mainly Lynch syndrome and Crohn's disease. The tumours were localized in 80.2% and metastatic in 18.8%. The most frequent mutations were KRAS (42.0%) among them 7/79 are G12C, TP53 (40.4%), APC (19.1%), PIK3CA (18.6%), SMAD4 (12.8%) and ERBB2 (9.6%). Mutation distribution differed according to predisposing disease for TP53, ERBB2, IDH1, FGFR3, FGFR1 and KDR. KRAS and SMAD4 mutations were more frequent in metastatic tumour, whereas ERBB2 mutations were absent in metastatic tumour. For localized tumour, APC mutation was independently associated with a poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0254). 31.8% of localized tumours and 11.3% of metastatic tumours were dMMR (29.8% of the entire cohort). A dMMR status was associated with a better OS (HR = 0.61 [0.39-0.96], p = 0.0316). There is a different genomic profile according to the stage and predisposing disease. dMMR and APC mutation in localized tumour predict a better prognosis. Show less