👤 Rita Coimbra

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Judite R M Coimbra,
articles
Judite R M Coimbra, Rosa Resende, José B A Custódio +2 more · 2024 · Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · added 2026-04-24
Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are highly longed-for. In this quest, anti-amyloid therapies take center stage supported by genetic facts that highlight an imbalance bet Show more
Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are highly longed-for. In this quest, anti-amyloid therapies take center stage supported by genetic facts that highlight an imbalance between production and clearance of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) in AD patients. Indeed, evidence from basic research, human genetic and biomarker studies, suggests the accumulation of Aβ as a driver of AD pathogenesis and progression. The aspartic protease β-site AβPP cleaving enzyme (BACE1) is the initiator for Aβ production. Underpinning a critical role for BACE1 in AD pathophysiology are the elevated BACE1 concentration and activity observed in the brain and body fluids of AD patients. Therefore, BACE1 is a prime drug target for reducing Aβ levels in early AD. Small-molecule BACE1 inhibitors have been extensively developed for the last 20 years. However, clinical trials with these molecules have been discontinued for futility or safety reasons. Most of the observed adverse side effects were due to other aspartic proteases cross-inhibition, including the homologue BACE2, and to mechanism-based toxicity since BACE1 has substrates with important roles for synaptic plasticity and synaptic homeostasis besides amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP). Despite these setbacks, BACE1 persists as a well-validated therapeutic target for which a specific inhibitor with high substrate selectivity may yet to be found. In this review we provide an overview of the evolution in BACE1 inhibitors design pinpointing the molecules that reached advanced phases of clinical trials and the liabilities that precluded adequate trial effects. Finally, we ponder on the challenges that anti-amyloid therapies must overcome to achieve clinical success. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.3233/JAD-240146
BACE1
Cláudia Farinha, Patrícia Barreto, Rita Coimbra +5 more · 2024 · Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · added 2026-04-24
To explore the association between the genetics of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and extramacular drusen (EMD) in patients with and without AMD. We included 1753 eyes (912 subjects) with phen Show more
To explore the association between the genetics of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and extramacular drusen (EMD) in patients with and without AMD. We included 1753 eyes (912 subjects) with phenotypic characterization regarding AMD and EMD. Genetic sequencing and the genetic risk score (GRS) for AMD were performed according to the EYE-RISK consortium methodology. To test for differences in the GRS from EMD cases, AMD cases, and controls, a clustered Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used. The association of AMD, EMD, and the GRS was evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. Individual associations of common risk variants for AMD with EMD were explored. EMD were found in 755 eyes: 252 (14.4%) with AMD and 503 (28.7%) without. In total, 122 eyes (7.0%) had only AMD, and 876 (50.0%) were controls. EMD were strongly associated with AMD (odds ratio [OR], 3.333; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.356-4.623; P < 0.001). The GRS was associated with an increased risk of AMD (OR, 1.416; 95% CI, 1.218-1.646; P < 0.001) but not with EMD. Individually, the common risk variants ARMS2 rs10490924 (P = 0.042), C3 rs2230199 (P = 0.042), and CETP rs5817082 (P = 0.042) were associated with EMD, after adjustment for AMD, sex, and age. We found a strong association between EMD and AMD, suggesting a common pathogenesis. The GRS for AMD was not associated with EMD, but a partially overlapping genetic basis was suggested when assessing individual risk variants. We propose that EMD per se do not represent an increase in the global genetic risk for AMD. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.5.35
CETP