👤 Trevor J B Dummer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed melanoma therapy but frequently cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including colitis, that limit treatment. Reliable biomarkers predicting toxicity remain lacking. In this retrospective, multicenter study, we analyzed pretreatment serum samples from 331 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), or combination ipilimumab/nivolumab. IgG autoantibody reactivity against 832 human protein antigens, including autoimmune targets, cytokines, tumor-associated antigens, and cancer pathway proteins, was profiled using multiplex bead-based arrays. Statistical analysis (Significance Analysis of Microarrays and Cox regression) identified autoantibody signatures associated with subsequent irAEs and immune-related colitis (ir-colitis). We detected 47 autoantibodies predictive of irAEs, with KRT7, RPLP2, UBE2Z, and GPHN emerging as the strongest markers. Anti-KRT7 and anti-GPHN were specifically predictive in patients receiving PD-1 monotherapy, whereas anti-RPLP2 was associated with irAEs in ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy. For ir-colitis, 38 autoantibodies were identified, with five (PIAS3, RPLP0, UBE2Z, KRT7, and SDCBP) showing consistent predictive value across treatment groups. Anti-PIAS3 and anti-RPLP0 increased ir-colitis risk, while anti-SDCBP conferred protection. Notably, predictive profiles differed between PD-1-based and CTLA-4-based regimens, underscoring divergent mechanisms of toxicity. Several autoantibodies predictive of irAEs or ir-colitis also correlated with clinical outcome. ATG4D, MAGEB4, and IL4R were associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival, whereas FGFR1 predicted both reduced irAE risk and inferior survival, consistent with the link between heightened immune activation, toxicity, and therapeutic benefit. This study, to our knowledge, is the largest pretreatment autoantibody screen in melanoma immunotherapy, demonstrates that serum autoantibody profiles can stratify patients at risk for irAEs and ir-colitis. The identified signatures connect tumor-related and immunity-related antigens, stress-response pathways, and autoimmune mechanisms. Pretreatment autoantibody profiling offers a promising biomarker-driven approach for individualizing risk assessment, improving patient selection, and guiding early intervention strategies to enhance the safety of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma. Beyond toxicity prediction, our findings also suggest that specific autoantibodies may reflect underlying immune activation states linked to therapeutic response. Show less

Long-term exposure to air pollution has been associated with higher risk of cardiovascular mortality. Less is known about the association of air pollution with initial development of cardiovascular disease. Herein, the association between low-level exposure to air pollutants and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in adults without known clinical cardiovascular disease was investigated. Cross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort study. The Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds Cohort Study; a pan-Canadian cohort of cohorts. Canadian adults (n = 6645) recruited between 2014-2018 from the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia, were studied, for whom averages of exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) were estimated for the years 2008-2012. Carotid vessel wall volume (CWV) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In adjusted linear mixed models, PM2.5 was not consistently associated with CWV (per 5 μg/m3 PM2.5; adjusted estimate = -8.4 mm3; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) -23.3 to 6.48; p = 0.27). A 5 ppb higher NO2 concentration was associated with 11.8 mm3 lower CWV (95% CI -16.2 to -7.31; p<0.0001). A 3 ppb increase in O3 was associated with 9.34 mm3 higher CWV (95% CI 4.75 to 13.92; p<0.0001). However, the coarse/insufficient O3 resolution (10 km) is a limitation. In a cohort of healthy Canadian adults there was no consistent association between PM2.5 or NO2 and increased CWV as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis by MRI. The reasons for these inconsistent associations warrant further study. Show less

We investigated naporafenib (LXH254), a pan-RAF kinase inhibitor, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations. This first-in-human phase 1 study had two dose-escalation arms: single-agent naporafenib (starting at 100 mg once-daily [QD]) and naporafenib (starting at the recommended dose/regimen)/spartalizumab (400 mg every 4 weeks). The naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion part enrolled patients with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and NRAS-mutated melanoma. The primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTD)/recommended doses for expansion (RDE) and evaluate tolerability and safety. A total of 142 patients were included in the naporafenib dose-escalation (n = 87), naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-escalation (n = 12) and naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion (n = 43) arms. The MTD/RDE of naporafenib was 600 mg twice-daily (BID). In naporafenib escalation, five patients experienced 7 dose-limiting toxicities: decreased platelet count (1200 mg QD); neuralgia, maculopapular rash, pruritus (600 mg BID); increased blood bilirubin, hyponatremia, peripheral sensory neuropathy (800 mg BID). No DLTs occurred in the naporafenib/spartalizumab arm: the RDE was established at 400 mg BID. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash and dermatitis acneiform (each 24.1%; naporafenib), nausea and pruritus (each 33.3%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; escalation) and rash (39.5%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; expansion). Naporafenib reduced DUSP6 expression in tumors. Two partial responses (PRs) occurred in naporafenib escalation, and 1 complete response and 3 PRs in the naporafenib/spartalizumab NRAS-mutated melanoma and KRAS-mutated NSCLC arms, respectively. Naporafenib, with or without spartalizumab, showed an acceptable safety profile, pharmacodynamic activity and limited antitumor activity. Additional naporafenib combination therapies are currently under investigation. Show less

Excess adipose tissue increases other cardiovascular risk factors, which may be associated with vascular brain injury and cognitive impairment. However, the extent to which the amount and distribution of adipose tissue may be associated with lower cognitive scores, independent of its association with cardiovascular risk factors, is not well characterized. To investigate the association of adiposity on vascular brain injury and cognitive scores. A total of 9189 participants from the Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) and the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological-Mind (PURE-MIND) cohort studies were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Of these adults, 9166 underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess body fat (BF) percentage, and 6773 underwent magnetic resonance imaging to assess vascular brain injury and measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume. Participants from CAHHM were recruited from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, and PURE-MIND participants were recruited from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. Both CAHHM and PURE-MIND comprise multisite, population-based cohorts. Participants from CAHHM are from Canada, and PURE-MIND participants are from Canada or Poland. Data analysis was performed from May 3 to November 24, 2021. The percentage of BF and VAT were modeled as sex-specific quartiles. Vascular brain injury was defined as high white matter hyperintensities or silent brain infarction. Multivariable mixed models were used to examine factors associated with reduced cognitive scores. Cognitive function was assessed using the Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST; scores range from 0 to 133, with lower scores indicating lower cognitive function) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (scores range from 0 to 30, with a score of ≥26 denoting normal cognitive function). Reduced cognition was defined as a DSST score less than 1 SD below the mean. Cardiovascular risk was assessed using the INTERHEART Risk Score (IHRS; scores range from 0 to 48; low risk is defined as a score of 0 to 9, moderate risk as 10 to 16, and high risk as 17 or higher). A total of 9189 adults (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [8.8] years; 5179 [56.4%] women; and 1013 [11.0%] East and Southeast Asian; 295 [3.2%] South Asian; 7702 [83.8%] White European; and 179 [1.9%] other, including Black, Indigenous, mixed, and unknown ethnicity) participated in the study. Visceral adipose tissue was highly correlated with body adiposity measured by BF percentage (r = 0.76 in women; r = 0.70 in men). Cardiovascular risk factors increased with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile IHRS at 13.8 (95% CI, 13.5-14.0; P < .001 for trend) and with VAT with the fourth quartile IHRS at 13.3 (95% CI, 13.0-13.5; P < .001 for trend). Vascular brain injury increased with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile value at 8.6% (95% CI, 7.5%-9.8%; P = .007 for trend) and with increasing VAT with fourth quartile value at 7.2% (95% CI, 6.0-8.4; P = .05 for trend). Cognitive scores were lower with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile score of 70.9 (95% CI, 70.4-71.5; P < .001 for trend) and for VAT with the fourth quartile score of 72.8 (95% CI, 72.1-73.4; P < .001 for trend). For every 1-SD increase in BF percentage (9.2%) or VAT (36 mL), the DSST score was lower by 0.8 points (95% CI, 0.4-1.1; P < .001) for BF percentage and lower by 0.8 points (95% CI, 0.4-1.2; P < .001) for VAT, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and vascular brain injury. The population attributable risk for reduced DSST score for higher BF percentage was 20.5% (95% CI, 7.0%-33.2%) and for VAT was 19.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-36.0%). Higher BF percentage and VAT were not associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. In this cross-sectional study, generalized and visceral adiposity were associated with reduced cognitive scores, after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, educational level, and vascular brain injury. These results suggest that strategies to prevent or reduce adiposity may preserve cognitive function. Show less