👤 Gian Andrea Binda

The surgical management of complicated diverticulitis varies across Europe. EAES members prioritized this topic to be addressed by a clinical practice guideline through an online questionnaire. To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for key stakeholders involved in the treatment of complicated diverticulitis; to improve operative and perioperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life through a systematic evidence-to-decision approach by a diverse, multidisciplinary panel. Informed by a linked individual participant data network meta-analysis of resection and primary anastomosis (PRA) versus Hartmann's resection (HR) versus laparoscopic lavage (LPL), a panel of general and colorectal surgeons, patient partners, trialists, and fellows appraised the certainty of the evidence using GRADE and CINeMA. The panel discussed the evidence using the evidence-to-decision framework during a synchronous consensus meeting. An asynchronous modified Delphi survey was used to establish consensus. The panel suggests that patients with complicated diverticulitis without sepsis receive PRA over HR or LPL when there is availability of a surgeon with skills and experience in colorectal surgery. HR is suggested over PRA or LPL in the subgroups of septic, frail, as well as immunocompromised patients. These recommendations apply to patients with an indication for surgery. Surgeons and patients should first consider conditionally recommended interventions, then conditionally recommended against. Based on the evidence, the key benefit of PRA was a higher likelihood of not having a stoma at 1 year, with similar risks across comparisons. Conditional recommendations call for shared decision-making when considering management options. The full guideline with user-friendly decision aids is available in https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/7490 . This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-informed recommendations on the management of patients with complicated diverticulitis in accordance with the highest methodological standards through a structured framework informed by an international, multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. Show less

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of individualized patient data (IPD) to inform the development of evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central in October 2023 to identify RCTs comparing Hartmann's resection (HR), primary resection and anastomosis (PRA), or laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) among patients with class Ib-IV Hinchey diverticulitis. Outcomes of interest were prioritized by an international, multidisciplinary panel including two patient partners. Article screening, data extraction for IPD, and risk of bias appraisal were performed by two reviewers. We used a random-effects NMA to synthesize direct and indirect evidence. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I Fourteen reports of seven RCTs were derived from 4,659 articles. IPD data were available for 595/678 patients (88.8%) across trials. Patients had a mean age ± SD of 64.61 ± 13.64 years and a mean BMI ± SD of 26.12 ± 5.20 kg/m PRA likely confers a lower stoma rate at 1 year compared to HR, while there may be no difference in 30-day/in-hospital mortality. LPL likely confers a higher in-hospital/30-day mortality rate compared to HR and PRA. Show less