👤 Yohei Tatematsu

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Masae Tatematsu,
articles
Nobuaki Matsubara, Takahiro Osawa, Takashige Abe +10 more · 2025 · Cancer science · Blackwell Publishing · added 2026-04-24
Advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (a/m UC) still has a poor prognosis despite the recent medical advances. Recent studies demonstrated that fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alteration Show more
Advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (a/m UC) still has a poor prognosis despite the recent medical advances. Recent studies demonstrated that fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations (GAs) may be driver genes for UC; however, the proportion of UC genetic panel testing in Japan remains low. We clarified the proportion of patients with FGFR2/3 GAs, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in a/m UC patients in Japan. This study was a descriptive epidemiological study using the MONSTAR-SCREEN database, and 138 patients with a/m UC were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with FGFR2/3 GAs. The secondary endpoints included treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, genomic status before and after treatment, etc. The proportion of FGFR GA-positive patients in a/m UC was 11.9%. The most common FGFR mutation variant and fusion gene were S249C (4.4%) and FGFR3-TACC3 fusion (3.7%), respectively. Fifty-one patients were tested two or more times; a few changes were observed in the FGFR GA status, regardless of the treatment regimen. Co-occurrence association was observed in FGFR1 with TET2, and in FGFR3 with CHEK2 or MLL2. During the first-, second-, and third-line treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) of GA-positive patients was 7.3, 2.9, and 6.2 months, while for GA-negative patients, 6.9, 3.1, and 6.9 months, respectively. This study revealed that one in eight a/m UC patients had FGFR2/3 GAs, and a few changes were observed in FGFR GA status before and after treatment. Genetic testing will be beneficial for the selection of appropriate treatments after a diagnosis of a/m UC. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1111/cas.70000
FGFR1
Satoshi Yamashita, Yoshimi Tsujino, Kazuki Moriguchi +2 more · 2006 · Cancer science · Blackwell Publishing · added 2026-04-24
To identify novel methylation-silenced genes in gastric cancers, we carried out a chemical genomic screening, a genome-wide search for genes upregulated by treatment with a demethylating agent, 5-aza- Show more
To identify novel methylation-silenced genes in gastric cancers, we carried out a chemical genomic screening, a genome-wide search for genes upregulated by treatment with a demethylating agent, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC). After 5-aza-dC treatment of a gastric cancer cell line (AGS) 579 genes were upregulated 16-fold or more, using an oligonucleotide microarray with 39,000 genes. From these genes, we selected 44 known genes on autosomes whose silencing in gastric cancer has not been reported. Thirty-two of these had CpG islands (CGI) in their putative promoter regions, and all of the CGI were methylated in AGS, giving an estimated number of 421+/-75 (95% confidence interval) methylation-silenced genes. Additionally, we analyzed the methylation status of 16 potential tumor-related genes with promoter CGI that were upregulated four-fold or more, and 14 of these were methylated in AGS. Methylation status of the 32 randomly selected and 16 potential tumor-related genes was analyzed in 10 primary gastric cancers, and 42 genes (ABHD9, ADFP, ALDH1A3, ANXA5, AREG, BDNF, BMP7, CAV1, CDH2, CLDN3, CTSL, EEF1A2, F2R, FADS1, FSD1, FST, FYN, GPR54, GREM1, IGFBP3, IGFBP7, IRS2, KISS1, MARK1, MLF1, MSX1, MTSS1, NT5E, PAX6, PLAGL1, PLAU, PPIC, RBP4, RORA, SCRN1, TBX3, TFAP2C, TNFSF9, ULBP2, WIF1, ZNF177 and ZNF559) were methylated in at least one primary gastric cancer. A metastasis suppressor gene, MTSS1, was located in a genomic region with frequent loss of heterozygosity (8q22), and was expressed abundantly in the normal gastric mucosa, suggesting its role in gastric carcinogenesis. (Cancer Sci 2006; 97: 64 -71). Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00136.x
FADS1