👤 C D'Elia

Inverse associations between systemic inflammation and cholesterol ('the lipid paradox') have been reported in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and, in established axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but little is known about this relationship in early axSpA, which is the focus of the present study. In the Swedish part of the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE) cohort (patients with chronic back pain for ≥3 months, ≤2 years; age at onset <45 years), serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) and apolipoproteins ApoA1 and ApoB were measured at inclusion, together with parameters reflecting inflammatory disease activity [C-reactive protein (CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and sacroiliitis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria]. All patients included in the analysis either had axSpA based on a high physician's level of confidence or fulfilled the ASAS criteria for axSpA. Associations between lipids/lipoproteins and inflammation were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. In the 64 patients included, there were inverse associations for CRP with TC, ApoA1, and ApoB in age-sex-adjusted models. The negative associations with CRP remained significant for TC and ApoB in multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, BASDAI, and current smoking (p = 0.048). There were no significant associations for the lipid parameters with BASDAI or inflammation on MRI of the sacroiliac joints. Inverse associations between systemic inflammation and lipids, particularly TC and ApoB, are present in early axSpA, similar to those shown for other inflammatory joint diseases. These patterns must be considered when including lipids in the evaluation of cardiovascular disease risk. Show less

Cardiovascular diseases represent one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide despite tremendous advancements in therapeutic interventions. Prevention remains one of the most effective strategies to reduce individual risk. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), through its genetic variants ( Show less

FGFR3 mutations are among the most frequent genomic alterations in urothelial cancer (UC) being mainly associated with the luminal papillary (LumP) subtype. With the establishment of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, the treatment of UC is now shifting more and more towards personalized medicine. A systematic review using Medline and scientific meeting records was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines to assess the potential role of FGFR inhibitors in combination with additional therapies for the management of UC. Ongoing trials were identified via a systematic search on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of eleven full-text papers, ten congress abstracts, and 5 trials on ClinicalTrials.gov were identified. Following the BLC2001 and THOR study, erdafitinib is the only approved FGFR1-4 inhibitor for metastatic UC with susceptible FGFR2/3 alterations following platinum-based chemotherapy. According to the THOR data of cohort 2, erdafitinib should not be recommended in patients who are eligible for and have not received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). One phase 3 trial is currently evaluating the intravesical device system (TAR210) in FGFR-altered intermediate non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (MoonRISe-1). Preclinical evidence suggests that combination-based approaches could be considered to improve the efficacy of FGFR inhibitors in patients with UC. Nine phase 1b/2 trials are focusing on the combination of FGFR inhibitors with ICIs, chemotherapy, or enfortumab vedotin. In metastatic disease, some preliminary analyses have reported promising results from these combinations (e.g. NORSE and FORT-2 trial). However, no phase 3 trial is terminated, so there is currently no level 1 evidence with long-term outcomes to support the combination of FGFR inhibitors with ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted therapies. A better understanding of the different mechanisms of action to inhibit FGFR signaling pathways, optimal patient selection and treatment approaches is still needed. Show less