Laparoscopic stone surgery was historically recommended only for cases involving concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), congenital abnormalities, or when other endourological procedure Show more
Laparoscopic stone surgery was historically recommended only for cases involving concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), congenital abnormalities, or when other endourological procedures had failed as an alternative to open surgery. However, recent randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses involving patients with normal anatomy and large renal stones have shown that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) has a higher success rate and lower complication rates compared to the gold standard, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Furthermore, stone recurrence appears to be lower following LPL compared to PCNL. Therefore, we suggest that current guidelines for stone treatment reconsider laparoscopy as an effective primary treatment for large kidney stones, rather than simply viewing it as an alternative option. Nonetheless, careful case selection and the surgeon's experience are critical for the success of this treatment. Show less