👤 H Jungbluth

Hepatoid lung carcinomas, similar to hepatoid carcinomas of other sites, are defined as extrahepatic tumors exhibiting divergent hepatocellular differentiation. Uniquely, hepatoid carcinomas of lung origin are reported to commonly express only hepatocyte paraffin 1 (HepPar1)-a hepatocellular marker, which recognizes mitochondrial enzyme carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase-1 (CPS1). Recently, HepPar1/CPS1 was found to accumulate in lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) harboring STK11mutations, presumably as a genotype-associated metabolic adaptation. The impact of these insights on the concept of hepatoid lung carcinoma has not been explored. Here, we performed a detailed clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of carcinomas prospectively regarded as hepatoid with isolated HepPar1 expression (n = 17). We found that although robustly positive for HepPar1, these tumors were entirely negative for an extended panel of other hepatocellular markers (alpha-fetoprotein, Arginase1, Glypican3, and albumin-in situ hybridization). Morphologically, tumors exhibited solid-trabecular architecture with expanded granular-vacuolated-clear cytoplasm, thus evoking hepatoid morphology; however, focal-to-moderate intracytoplasmic mucin was consistently present, and hepatoid resemblance was variable. Pneumocytic markers (TTF1 and Napsin A) were entirely negative (except for cytoplasmic TTF1), commonly leading to diagnostic challenges at metastatic sites. Remarkably, next-generation sequencing revealed invariable STK11 mutations/loss (P < .00001 vs unselected LUAD, n > 2.5K). Patient survival was dismal (median, 5.8 vs 25 months for stage-matched LUAD, P = .0002). Tumors harbored high mitochondrial content by electron microscopy and other methods. For comparison, we reviewed conventional, predominantly acinar LUAD with HepPar1 expression (n = 22) and found that they also lacked any other hepatocellular markers, had invariable STK11 mutations/loss, increased granular cytoplasm, lower TTF1, and poor prognosis. We conclude that isolated HepPar1 expression in LUAD reflects mitochondrial adaptation to STK11 mutations rather than bona fide hepatocellular differentiation, and that HepPar1-expressing solid and granular adenocarcinomas represent an undifferentiated (solid, TTF1 negative) variant in this spectrum of tumors. Recognition of these tumors is warranted due to their exceptionally aggressive behavior, distinct pathogenomic features, and common association with diagnostic challenges. Show less

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are often underdiagnosed due to phenotypic overlap with other neuromuscular disorders. Limited epidemiological data and low awareness hinder early diagnosis, which is key for effective treatment. Early recognition of CMS is important as symptomatic treatments often specific for genetic subtypes exist and emerging therapies are in the pipeline. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of genetically confirmed CMS in the United Kingdom and explore geographical variations. Prevalence was calculated as of 31 December 2023, including genetically confirmed CMS patients residing in the United Kingdom and known to be alive. Patients with missing geographic or living status data were excluded. Prevalence was estimated overall and compared between UK regions served by a highly specialized neuromuscular service (hsNMS) and those without such services (non-hsNMS). A cohort of 442 genetically confirmed CMS patients was identified. CHRNE deficiency, DOK7, RAPSN were the most common subtypes. The UK prevalence was 6.5 cases per million overall and 8.5 cases per million in the pediatric population. The overall prevalence was statistically higher in hsNMS (8.8 cases per million) compared to non-hsNMS regions (5.9 cases per million). Homozygous patients had a more clustered distribution particularly around urban area. Our results suggest there is likely underdiagnosis of CMS in many areas of the United Kingdom and hsNMS may play an important diagnostic role. Variations may also be related to other cultural clustering and founder effects. Further research should explore how healthcare access, ethnicity, and consanguinity contribute to regional variation and diagnostic rates. Show less

The Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS), a group of heterogeneous genetic disorders of neuromuscular transmission, are often misdiagnosed as congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) or myopathies and present particular management problems. We present our experience of 46 children with CMS, referred to us between 1992-2007 with provisional diagnoses of congenital myopathy (22/46), CMS or limb-girdle myasthenia (9/46), central hypotonia or neurometabolic disease (5/46), myasthenia gravis (4/46), limb-girdle or congenital muscular dystrophy (4/46) and SMA (2/46). Diagnosis was often considerably delayed (up to 18y4 m), despite the early symptoms in most cases. Diagnostic clues in the neonates were feeding difficulties (29/46), hypotonia with or without limb weakness (21/46), ptosis (19/46), respiratory insufficiency (12/46), contractures (4/46) and stridor (6/46). Twenty-five children had delayed motor milestones. Fatigability developed in 43 and a variable degree of ptosis was eventually present in 40. Over the period of the study, the mainstay of EMG diagnosis evolved from repetitive nerve stimulation to stimulation single fibre EMG. The patients were studied by several different operators. 66 EMGs were performed in 40 children, 29 showed a neuromuscular junction abnormality, 7 were myopathic, 2 had possible neurogenic changes and 28 were normal or inconclusive. A repetitive CMAP was detected in only one of seven children with a COLQ mutation and neither of the two children with Slow Channel Syndrome mutations. Mutations have been identified so far in 32/46 children: 10 RAPSN, 7 COLQ, 6 CHRNE, 7 DOK7, 1 CHRNA1 and 1 CHAT. 24 of 25 muscle biopsies showed myopathic changes with fibre size variation; 14 had type-1 fibre predominance. Three cases showed small type-1 fibres resembling fibre type disproportion, and four showed core-like lesions. No specific myopathic features were associated with any of the genes. Twenty children responded to Pyridostigmine treatment alone, 11 to Pyridostigmine with either 3, 4 DAP or Ephedrine and five to Ephedrine alone. Twenty one children required acute or chronic respiratory support, with tracheostomy in 4 and nocturnal or emergency non-invasive ventilation in 9. Eight children had gastrostomy. Another 11 were underweight for height indicative of failure to thrive and required dietetic input. A high index of clinical suspicion, repeat EMG by an experienced electromyographer and, if necessary, a therapeutic trial of Pyridostigmine facilitates the diagnosis of CMS with subsequent molecular genetic confirmation. This guides rational therapy and multidisciplinary management, which may be crucial for survival, particularly in pedigrees where previous deaths have occurred in infancy. Show less