👤 Nadia Petrillo

Depression is a leading cause of global disability and is increasingly recognized as a multifactorial disorder characterized by fundamental disruptions in neuroplasticity, including diminished hippocampal neurogenesis, impaired synaptic plasticity, and dysregulated stress-response systems. Given the limited efficacy of conventional pharmacological treatments, lifestyle-based interventions-most notably physical exercise-have gained considerable attention for their antidepressant effects, partly mediated by secreted exerkines. Among these, adiponectin has emerged as a particularly compelling candidate linking metabolic regulation to neuroplasticity and mood. Recent evidence suggests that adiponectin contributes to the antidepressant effects of exercise by modulating hippocampal neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signalling. Despite these advances, the mechanisms by which adiponectin influences depression remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes current knowledge on adiponectin's role in depression pathophysiology, with emphasis on its capacity to enhance neuroplasticity and hippocampal neurogenesis, and its potential to mediate exercise-induced antidepressant effects via defined molecular pathways. Building on these insights, we discuss adiponectin's translational promise as both a predictive biomarker of treatment response and a novel therapeutic target. By integrating preclinical and clinical evidence, this review offers a comprehensive perspective on adiponectin's involvement in depression while identifying critical gaps to guide future mechanistic research. Show less

We introduce an innovative, non-invasive prenatal screening approach for detecting fetal monogenic alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) from maternal blood. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood and processed using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) performed on a NextSeq550Dx (Illumina). A customized gene panel and bioinformatics tool, named the "VERA Revolution", were developed to detect variants and CNVs in cfDNA samples. Results were compared with genomic DNA (gDNA) extracted from fetal samples, including amniotic fluid and chorionic villus sampling and buccal swabs. The study included pregnant women with gestational ages from 10 + 3 to 15 + 2 weeks (mean: 12.1 weeks). The fetal fraction (FF), a crucial measure of cfDNA test reliability, ranged from 5% to 20%, ensuring adequate DNA amount for analysis. Among 36 families tested, 14 showed a wild-type genotype. Identified variants included two deletions (22q11.2, and 4p16.3), two duplications (16p13 and 5p15), and eighteen single-nucleotide variants (one in The "VERA Revolution" test highlights advancements in prenatal genomic screening, offering potential improvements in prenatal care. Show less

Leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing Nogo receptor-interacting protein 1 (LINGO-1) is a key suppressor of oligodendrocyte differentiation and axonal remyelination and regeneration. This analysis evaluated the potential benefit of opicinumab, a human monoclonal antibody against LINGO-1, vs placebo on exploratory clinical endpoints of patient-reported vision-related functioning and high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) in RENEW participants with acute optic neuritis (AON). Participants were randomized to 100 mg/kg opicinumab intravenous or placebo every 4 weeks (6 infusions). Assessments were conducted in the per-protocol (PP) population and included: 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), 10-item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS-10), and HCVA. The opicinumab group (n = 33) had worse mean (SD) baseline patient-reported vision-related functioning scores vs placebo (n = 36): NEI-VFQ-25 composite, 75.5 (17.6) vs 79.0 (16.6); NOS-10 composite, 63.6 (19.8) vs 69.8 (21.2), respectively. By Week 24, the placebo and opicinumab groups experienced substantial mean improvements from baseline (NEI-VFQ-25 composite, 15.17 vs 13.51 [difference (95% CI): -1.66 (-5.11 to 1.78)]; NOS-10 composite, 17.40 vs 16.04 [difference (95% CI): -1.35 (-7.38 to 4.67)]). Between-treatment differences in mean change from baseline were not significantly different at any time point. Analysis of covariance-adjusted mean recovery from baseline in HCVA at Week 24 for the affected eyes was 11.8 and 8.7 letters for placebo and opicinumab, respectively (P = 0.202). Most participants in the RENEW PP population demonstrated substantial recovery from baseline in patient-reported vision-related functioning and HCVA, regardless of treatment and structural damage. Average scores after recovery remained lower than those of published disease-free control groups. These results provide important information on visual function recovery in patients with AON, as measured by NEI-VFQ-25 and NOS-10. Show less