👤 Justin E Svendsen

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play key roles in physiology and are central targets for drug discovery and development, yet the design of protein agonists and antagonists has been challenging as GPCRs are integral membrane proteins and conformationally dynamic. Here we describe computational Show less

The incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) augments glucose-dependent insulin secretion through its receptor expressed on islet β-cells. GIP also acts on adipose tissue; yet paradoxically, both enhanced and reduced GIP receptor (GIPR) signaling reduce adipose tissue mass and attenuate weight gain in response to nutrient excess. Moreover, the precise cellular localization of GIPR expression within white adipose tissue (WAT) remains uncertain. We used mouse genetics to target Gipr expression within adipocytes. Surprisingly, targeting Cre expression to adipocytes using the adiponectin (Adipoq) promoter did not produce meaningful reduction of WAT Gipr expression in Adipoq-Cre:Giprflx/flx mice. In contrast, adenoviral expression of Cre under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter, or transgenic expression of Cre using nonadipocyte-selective promoters (Ap2/Fabp4 and Ubc) markedly attenuated WAT Gipr expression. Analysis of single-nucleus RNA-sequencing, adipose tissue data sets localized Gipr/GIPR expression predominantly to pericytes and mesothelial cells rather than to adipocytes. Together, these observations reveal that adipocytes are not the major GIPR+ cell type within WAT-findings with mechanistic implications for understanding how GIP and GIP-based co-agonists control adipose tissue biology. Show less

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) communicates nutrient intake from the gut to islets, enabling optimal levels of insulin secretion via the GIP receptor (GIPR) on β cells. The GIPR is also expressed in α cells, and GIP stimulates glucagon secretion; however, the role of this action in the postprandial state is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that GIP potentiates amino acid-stimulated glucagon secretion, documenting a similar nutrient-dependent action to that described in β cells. Moreover, we demonstrate that GIP activity in α cells contributes to insulin secretion by invoking paracrine α to β cell communication. Last, specific loss of GIPR activity in α cells prevents glucagon secretion in response to a meal stimulus, limiting insulin secretion and driving glucose intolerance. Together, these data uncover an important axis by which GIPR activity in α cells is necessary to coordinate the optimal level of both glucagon and insulin secretion to maintain postprandial homeostasis. Show less

The insulinotropic actions of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) in β-cells have made it a useful target to manage type 2 diabetes. Metabolic stress reduces β-cell sensitivity to GLP-1, yet the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We hypothesized that Show less

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide is an intestinally derived hormone that is essential for normal metabolic regulation. Loss of the GIP receptor (GIPR) through genetic elimination or pharmacological antagonism reduces body weight and adiposity in the context of nutrient excess. Interrupting GIPR signaling also enhances the sensitivity of the receptor for the other incretin peptide, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). The role of GLP-1 compensation in loss of GIPR signaling to protect against obesity has not been directly tested. We blocked the GIPR and GLP-1R with specific antibodies, alone and in combination, in healthy and diet-induced obese (DIO) mice. The primary outcome measure of these interventions was the effect on body weight and composition. Antagonism of either the GIPR or GLP-1R system reduced food intake and weight gain during high-fat feeding and enhanced sensitivity to the alternative incretin signaling system. Combined antagonism of both GIPR and GLP-1R produced additive effects to mitigate DIO. Acute pharmacological studies using GIPR and GLP-1R agonists demonstrated both peptides reduced food intake, which was prevented by co-administration of the respective antagonists. Disruption of either axis of the incretin system protects against diet-induced obesity in mice. However, combined antagonism of both GIPR and GLP-1R produced additional protection against diet-induced obesity, suggesting additional factors beyond compensation by the complementary incretin axis. While antagonizing the GLP-1 system decreases weight gain, GLP-1R agonists are used clinically to target obesity. Hence, the phenotype arising from loss of function of GLP-1R does not implicate GLP-1 as an obesogenic hormone. By extension, caution is warranted in labeling GIP as an obesogenic hormone based on loss-of-function studies. Show less

Several studies have shown an overlap between genes involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) and Brugada Syndrome (BrS). We investigated whether three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs11708996; G>C located intronic to SCN5A, rs10428132; T>G located in SCN10A, and rs9388451; T>C located downstream to HEY2) at loci associated with BrS in a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) also were associated with AF. A total of 657 patients diagnosed with AF and a control group comprising 741 individuals free of AF were included. The three SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan assays. The frequencies of risk alleles in the AF population and the control population were compared in two-by-two models. One variant, rs10428132 at SCN10A, was associated with a statistically significant decreased risk of AF (odds ratio (OR)=0.77, P=0.001). A meta-analysis was performed by enriching the control population with allele frequencies from controls in the recently published BrS GWAS (2230 alleles). In this meta-analysis, both rs10428132 at SCN10A (OR=0.73, P=5.7 × 10(-6)) and rs11708996 at SCN5A (OR=0.80, P=0.02) showed a statistically significant decreased risk of AF. When assessing the additive effect of the three loci, we found that the risk of AF decreased in a dose-responsive manner with increasing numbers of risk alleles (OR=0.50, P=0.001 for individuals carrying ≥4 risk alleles vs ≤1 allele). In conclusion, the prevalence of three risk alleles previously associated with BrS was lower in AF patients than in patients free of AF, suggesting a protective role of these loci in developing AF. Show less