👤 Gandhari Maity

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now known by the name of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), with increased global incidence, has been recognized as a significant metabolic disorder. NAFLD includes a spectrum liver disease from hepatocellular fat accumulation (isolated steatosis) to an advanced form of liver injury known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which refers to distinct histologic features, including hepatocellular steatosis and injury, necroinflammation, and eventually fibrosis. Nonobese or lean individuals associated with metabolic dysregulation usually demonstrated diverse risk factors compared to obese MAFLD. The presence of normal range body mass index (BMI) and excess visceral adiposity with increased cardiometabolic and renal comorbidities, along with sarcopenia, has been evidenced to be associated with lean MASH. Genetic predispositions accompanying lifestyle and environmental factors contribute to disease initiation and progression. The genetic influence in pathophysiology indicated the significant contributions of the following genes: PNPLA3, TM6SF2, APOB, LIPA, MBOAT7, and HSD17B13, and the impact of their disease-specific variants in the development of obesity-independent MASH. The epigenetic modifications exhibited differential DNA methylation patterns in the genes involved in lipid metabolism, particularly hypomethylation of PEMT. Diet-induced and genetic animal models of lean MASH, including Slc: Wistar/ST rats, PPAR-α, PTEN, and MAT1A knockout mice models, are indicated to be pivotal in the exploration of disease progression and observing the effect of therapeutic interventions. This comprehensive review comprises the molecular and genetic pathophysiology, molecular diagnostics, and therapeutic aspects of lean MASH to enunciate a diagnostic approach that combines detailed clinical phenotyping regarding genomic analysis. Show less

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) decreases body weight via central GIP receptor (GIPR) signaling, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we assessed whether GIP regulates body weight and glucose control via GIPR signaling in cells that express the leptin receptor (Lepr). Hypothalamic, hindbrain, and pancreatic co-expression of Gipr and Lepr was assessed using single cell RNAseq analysis. Mice with deletion of Gipr in Lepr cells were generated and metabolically characterized for alterations in diet-induced obesity (DIO), glucose control and leptin sensitivity. Long-acting single- and dual-agonists at GIPR and GLP-1R were further used to assess drug effects on energy and glucose metabolism in DIO wildtype (WT) and Lepr-Gipr knock-out (KO) mice. Gipr and Lepr show strong co-expression in the pancreas, but not in the hypothalamus and hindbrain. DIO Lepr-Gipr KO mice are indistinguishable from WT controls related to body weight, food intake and diet-induced leptin resistance. Acyl-GIP and the GIPR:GLP-1R co-agonist MAR709 remain fully efficacious to decrease body weight and food intake in DIO Lepr-Gipr KO mice. Consistent with the demonstration that Gipr and Lepr highly co-localize in the endocrine pancreas, including the β-cells, we find the superior glycemic effect of GIPR:GLP-1R co-agonism over single GLP-1R agonism to vanish in Lepr-Gipr KO mice. GIPR signaling in cells/neurons that express the leptin receptor is not implicated in the control of body weight or food intake, but is of crucial importance for the superior glycemic effects of GIPR:GLP-1R co-agonism relative to single GLP-1R agonism. Show less

The COVID-19 pandemic, triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected millions of people worldwide. Much research has been dedicated to our understanding of COVID-19 disease heterogeneity and severity, but less is known about recovery associated changes. To address this gap in knowledge, we quantified the proteome from serum samples from 29 COVID-19 convalescents and 29 age-, race-, and sex-matched healthy controls. Samples were acquired within the first months of the pandemic. Many proteins from pathways known to change during acute COVID-19 illness, such as from the complement cascade, coagulation system, inflammation and adaptive immune system, had returned to levels seen in healthy controls. In comparison, we identified 22 and 15 proteins with significantly elevated and lowered levels, respectively, amongst COVID-19 convalescents compared to healthy controls. Some of the changes were similar to those observed for the acute phase of the disease, i.e. elevated levels of proteins from hemolysis, the adaptive immune systems, and inflammation. In contrast, some alterations opposed those in the acute phase, e.g. elevated levels of CETP and APOA1 which function in lipid/cholesterol metabolism, and decreased levels of proteins from the complement cascade (e.g. C1R, C1S, and VWF), the coagulation system (e.g. THBS1 and VWF), and the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (e.g. PFN1 and CFL1) amongst COVID-19 convalescents. We speculate that some of these shifts might originate from a transient decrease in platelet counts upon recovery from the disease. Finally, we observed race-specific changes, e.g. with respect to immunoglobulins and proteins related to cholesterol metabolism. Show less