👤 M B Katan

Dyslipidemia remains a major, modifiable determinant of global stroke burden, accounting for more than one-fifth of ischemic strokes (IS) worldwide. Recent evidence has shifted emphasis from conventional lipid fractions to apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing lipoproteins, including lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which more accurately reflect atherogenic particle burden than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) alone and are increasingly used for stroke risk stratification. While the principle "the faster and the lower, the better" underpins dyslipidemia management, evidence-based, subtype-specific lipid strategies in stroke remain limited. Intensive LDL-C reduction significantly lowers recurrent IS risk; however, uniform lipid targets are often applied without accounting for stroke etiology. High-intensity statins remain first-line therapy, with pleiotropic benefits extending beyond LDL-C reduction. For statin intolerance or suboptimal response, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors provide potent, bleeding-neutral LDL-C lowering. Inclisiran and bempedoic acid broaden therapeutic options, although stroke-specific efficacy data are still pending. Lp(a)-lowering agents, including pelacarsen, olpasiran, and lepodisiran, are under active evaluation and may address residual cardiovascular risk. For triglyceride lowering, recent randomized evidence supports icosapent ethyl for reducing IS risk. In intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the optimal intensity and thresholds of lipid lowering remain uncertain, warranting individualized weighting of ischemic against hemorrhagic risk, particularly in patients with lobar ICH or suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). In such cases, hydrophilic statins, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitors may represent reasonable options. This review synthesizes current evidence and proposes a phenotype-guided, individualized framework for dyslipidemia management across stroke subtypes. Moving beyond uniform targets toward etiologic and genetically informed lipid modulation may improve post-stroke outcomes and refine individualized stroke prevention. Show less

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a causal risk-factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The underlying pathomechanisms mediating this risk are less well understood, especially in AIS caused by large artery atherosclerosis (LAA). In this observational cohort study, we evaluated the association of Lp(a) with markers of LAA, namely carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) and the presence of extra- or intracranial vessel narrowing plaques. Among participants of the BIOSIGNAL cohort study we determined Lp(a) levels within 24 h after symptom onset in 1161 AIS patients from the single center of Zurich. cIMT was determined using a semi-automated computerized edge tracking software, internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria, intracranial ultrasound was performed by transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD). Higher Lp(a) levels were not associated with an increased cIMT in univariable or multivariable regression models containing known cardiovascular risk factors. Higher Lp(a) levels were not associated with the presence of neither extracranial high-grade ICA-stenosis nor significant intracranial stenosis assessed by neurovascular ultrasound. In AIS patients higher Lp(a) levels were not associated with clinical markers of atherosclerotic burden despite its association with LAA-stroke etiology and an increased risk for stroke recurrence. Date of registration: 17–10-2014. Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT-02274727. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12944-026-02913-6. Show less

Little is known about the degree to which behavioural, biological, and genetic traits contribute to within-person variation in serum cholesterol. Materials and Methods The authors studied within-person variation in serum total and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in 458 participants of 27 dietary intervention studies in Wageningen, The Netherlands, from 1976 to 1995. For a median of 4 days between blood draws, the geometric mean of the within-person standard deviation was 0.13 mmol/l ( approximately 5 mg/dl, coefficient of variation = 3.0%) for total cholesterol and 0.04 mmol/l ( approximately 1.5 mg/dl, coefficient of variation = 3.0%) for HDL cholesterol. In mixed-model linear regressions using within-person variance as the dependent variable and including lipid concentration and covariates listed below, within-person variance of both total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol was higher for greater number of days between blood draws and for self-selected diet rather than investigator-controlled diet. Within-person variance of total cholesterol only was higher for non-standardized versus standardized phlebotomy protocol and for female sex. The authors found evidence that the APOA4 -347 (12/22 genotype) and MTP -493 (11 genotype) polymorphisms may increase the within-person variation in total cholesterol. Under certain study design (self-selected diet, use of non-standardized phlebotomy protocol) or participant characteristics (female, certain polymorphisms) within-person lipid variance is increased and required sample size will be greater. These findings may have important implications for the time and cost of such interventions. Show less

The response of serum lipids to dietary changes is to some extent an innate characteristic. One candidate genetic factor that may affect the response of serum lipids to a change in cholesterol intake is variation in the apolipoprotein A4 gene, known as the APOA4-1/2 or apoA-IVGln360His polymorphism. However, previous studies showed inconsistent results. We therefore fed 10 men and 23 women with the APOA4-1/1 genotype and 4 men and 13 women with the APOA4-1/2 or -2/2 genotype (carriers of the APOA4-2 allele) two diets high in saturated fat, one containing cholesterol at 12.4 mg/MJ, 136.4 mg/day, and one containing cholesterol at 86.2 mg/MJ, 948.2 mg/day. Each diet was supplied for 29 days in crossover design. The mean response of serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol was 0.44 mmol/l (17 mg/dl) in both subjects with the APOA4-1/1 genotype and in subjects with the APOA4-2 allele [95% confidence interval of difference in response, -0.20 to 0.19 mmol/l (-8 to 7 mg/dl)]. The mean response of high density lipoprotein cholesterol was also similar, 0.10 mmol/l (4 mg/dl), in the two APOA-4 genotype groups [95% confidence interval of difference in response, -0.07 to 0.08 mmol/l (-3 to 3 mg/dl)]. Thus, the APOA4-1/2 polymorphism did not affect the response of serum lipids to a change in the intake of cholesterol in this group of healthy Dutch subjects who consumed a background diet high in saturated fat. Knowledge of the APOA4-1/2 polymorphism is probably not a generally applicable tool for the identification of subjects who respond to a change in cholesterol intake. Show less