Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for more than 2.5 million visits to US emergency departments (EDs) annually. These patients are usually treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminop Show more
Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for more than 2.5 million visits to US emergency departments (EDs) annually. These patients are usually treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, opioids, or skeletal muscle relaxants, often in combination. To compare functional outcomes and pain at 1 week and 3 months after an ED visit for acute LBP among patients randomized to a 10-day course of (1) naproxen + placebo; (2) naproxen + cyclobenzaprine; or (3) naproxen + oxycodone/acetaminophen. This randomized, double-blind, 3-group study was conducted at one urban ED in the Bronx, New York City. Patients who presented with nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP of 2 weeks' duration or less were eligible for enrollment upon ED discharge if they had a score greater than 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The RMDQ is a 24-item questionnaire commonly used to measure LBP and related functional impairment on which 0 indicates no functional impairment and 24 indicates maximum impairment. Beginning in April 2012, a total of 2588 patients were approached for enrollment. Of the 323 deemed eligible for participation, 107 were randomized to receive placebo and 108 each to cyclobenzaprine and to oxycodone/acetaminophen. Follow-up was completed in December 2014. All participants were given 20 tablets of naproxen, 500 mg, to be taken twice a day. They were randomized to receive either 60 tablets of placebo; cyclobenzaprine, 5 mg; or oxycodone, 5 mg/acetaminophen, 325 mg. Participants were instructed to take 1 or 2 of these tablets every 8 hours, as needed for LBP. They also received a standardized 10-minute LBP educational session prior to discharge. The primary outcome was improvement in RMDQ between ED discharge and 1 week later. Demographic characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. At baseline, median RMDQ score in the placebo group was 20 (interquartile range [IQR],17-21), in the cyclobenzaprine group 19 (IQR,17-21), and in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group 20 (IQR,17-22). At 1-week follow-up, the mean RMDQ improvement was 9.8 in the placebo group, 10.1 in the cyclobenzaprine group, and 11.1 in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group. Between-group difference in mean RMDQ improvement for cyclobenzaprine vs placebo was 0.3 (98.3% CI, -2.6 to 3.2; P = .77), for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs placebo, 1.3 (98.3% CI, -1.5 to 4.1; P = .28), and for oxycodone/acetaminophen vs cyclobenzaprine, 0.9 (98.3% CI, -2.1 to 3.9; P = .45). Among patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular LBP presenting to the ED, adding cyclobenzaprine or oxycodone/acetaminophen to naproxen alone did not improve functional outcomes or pain at 1-week follow-up. These findings do not support use of these additional medications in this setting. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01587274. Show less
The proto-oncogene pim-1 is a serine/threonine kinase the over-expression of which promotes lymphoma formation. Neither the normal function of Pim-1 nor the biochemical mechanism for cancer developmen Show more
The proto-oncogene pim-1 is a serine/threonine kinase the over-expression of which promotes lymphoma formation. Neither the normal function of Pim-1 nor the biochemical mechanism for cancer development mediated by the gene has been delineated, although recent studies have provided compelling evidence that Pim-1 is involved in differentiation and cell survival. We now provide the first evidence that Pim-1 may be involved in the proliferative process. By confocal microscopy, we observed a dynamic redistribution of Pim-1 during the cell cycle, the protein moving from the nucleus and cytoplasm in interphase to the spindle poles during mitosis. From a computer search for putative substrates of Pim-1 that are located in the spindle poles, we discovered that the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein has two peptide sequences that contain preferred phosphorylation sites for Pim-1 kinase. Recombinant glutathione-S-transferase-Pim-1 also readily phosphorylates immunoprecipitated NuMA. By confocal microscopy and co-immunoprecipitation we showed the interaction of the Pim-1 and NuMA proteins in HeLa cells that had been arrested during mitosis with nocodazole. Pim-1 also appeared to interact with heterochromatin-associated protein 1beta (HP1beta) and the cytoplasmic proteins dynein and dynactin via complex formation with NuMA. In our studies, overexpressed wild-type-Pim-1-GFP (green fluorescent protein) fusion protein was found to co-localize in the spindle pole with NuMA during mitosis. In contrast, the 'kinase-dead' mut-Pim-1-GFP fusion protein did not co-localize with NuMA, and appeared to promote apoptosis. Further evidence for apoptotic cell death was the observed blebbing and fragmentation of the chromosomes and a decrease in the level of NuMA protein detected by confocal microscopy. These results strongly suggest that Pim-1 kinase plays a role, most likely by phosphorylation, in promoting complex formation between NuMA, HP1beta, dynein and dynactin, a complex that is necessary for mitosis. Show less