👤 Michel Beylot

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
3
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: M Beylot,
articles
Karine Gauthier, Cyrielle Billon, Marie Bissler +4 more · 2010 · The Journal of biological chemistry · American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · added 2026-04-24
Thyroid hormone (TR) and liver X (LXR) receptors are transcription factors involved in lipogenesis. Both receptors recognize the same consensus DNA-response element in vitro. It was previously shown t Show more
Thyroid hormone (TR) and liver X (LXR) receptors are transcription factors involved in lipogenesis. Both receptors recognize the same consensus DNA-response element in vitro. It was previously shown that their signaling pathways interact in the control of cholesterol elimination in the liver. In the present study, carbohydrate-response element-binding protein (ChREBP), a major transcription factor controlling the activation of glucose-induced lipogenesis in liver, is characterized as a direct target of thyroid hormones (TH) in liver and white adipose tissue (WAT), the two main lipogenic tissues in mice. Using genetic and molecular approaches, ChREBP is shown to be specifically regulated by TRbeta but not by TRalpha in vivo, even in WAT where both TR isoforms are expressed. However, this isotype specificity is not found in vitro. This TRbeta specific regulation correlates with the loss of TH-induced lipogenesis in TRbeta(-/-) mice. Fasting/refeeding experiments show that TRbeta is not required for the activation of ChREBP expression particularly marked in WAT following refeeding. However, TH can stimulate ChREBP expression in WAT even under fasting conditions, suggesting completely independent pathways. Because ChREBP has been described as an LXR target, the interaction of LXR and TRbeta in ChREBP regulation was assayed both in vitro and in vivo. Each receptor recognizes a different response element on the ChREBP promoter, located only 8 bp apart. There is a cross-talk between LXR and TRbeta signaling on the ChREBP promoter in liver but not in WAT where LXR does not regulate ChREBP expression. The molecular basis for this cross-talk has been determined in in vitro systems. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.146241
MLXIPL
D Letexier, O Peroni, C Pinteur +1 more · 2005 · Diabetes & metabolism · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
ChREBP (Carbohydrate response element binding protein) is considered to mediate the stimulatory effect of glucose on the expression of lipogenic genes. Its activity is stimulated by glucose. Less is k Show more
ChREBP (Carbohydrate response element binding protein) is considered to mediate the stimulatory effect of glucose on the expression of lipogenic genes. Its activity is stimulated by glucose. Less is known on the control of its expression. This expression could be controlled by nutritional (glucose, fatty acids) and hormonal (insulin) factors. We examined the in vivo nutritional control of ChREBP expression in liver and adipose tissue of Wistar rats. Compared respectively to the fed state and to a high carbohydrate diet, ChREBP mRNA concentrations were not modified by fasting or a high fat diet in rat liver and adipose tissue. FAS and ACC1 mRNA concentrations were on the contrary decreased as expected by fasting and high fat diets and these variations of FAS and ACC1 mRNA were positively related to those of SREBP-1c mRNA and protein, but not of ChREBP mRNA. Therefore i) ChREBP expression appears poorly responsive to modifications of nutritional condition, ii) modifications of the expression of ChREBP do not seem implicated in the physiological control of lipogenesis. To investigate the possible role of ChREBP in pathological situations we measured its mRNA concentrations in the liver and adipose tissue of obese Zucker rats. ChREBP expression was increased in the liver but not the adipose tissue of obese rats compared to their lean littermates. These results support a role of ChREBP in the development of hepatic steatosis and hypertriglyceridemia but not of obesity in this experimental model. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70231-8
MLXIPL
Dominique Letexier, Claudie Pinteur, Valérie Large +2 more · 2003 · Journal of lipid research · added 2026-04-24
Lipogenesis is considered less active in human than in rat adipose tissue. This could be explained by different nutritional conditions, namely high-carbohydrate (HCHO) diet in rats and high-fat (HF) d Show more
Lipogenesis is considered less active in human than in rat adipose tissue. This could be explained by different nutritional conditions, namely high-carbohydrate (HCHO) diet in rats and high-fat (HF) diet in humans. Adipose tissue was sampled (postabsorptive state) in rats and humans receiving HCHO or HF diets, ad libitum fed humans, and obese subjects. We measured 1) mRNA concentrations of fatty acid synthase (FAS), acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1), sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c), and carbohydrate response element binding protein (ChREBP), 2) SREBP-1c protein, and 3) FAS activity. FAS, ACC1, ChREBP, and SREBP1-c mRNA concentrations were unaffected by diet in humans or in rats. FAS and ACC1 mRNA levels were lower in humans than in rats (P < 0.05). FAS activity was unaffected by diet and was lower in humans (P < 0.05). SREBP-1c mRNA concentrations were similar in rats and humans, but the precursor and mature forms of SREBP-1c protein were less abundant in humans (P < 0.05). ChREBP mRNA concentrations were lower in humans than in rats. In conclusion, the lipogenic capacity of adipose tissue is lower in humans than in rats. This is not related to differences in diet and is probably explained by lower abundance of SREBP-1c protein. A decreased expression of ChREBP could also play a role. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M300235-JLR200
MLXIPL