Recent years have seen rapid progress in biological treatments for genetic diseases, as well as conditions like type 1 diabetes that lack an obvious genetic component. The authors sought to explain wh Show more
Recent years have seen rapid progress in biological treatments for genetic diseases, as well as conditions like type 1 diabetes that lack an obvious genetic component. The authors sought to explain why this progress has emerged at this particular moment. The best way to illustrate this is by showcasing a wide range of therapies targeting diverse diseases. This progress has been driven by technological advances in genetically modified CAR-T and CAR-NK cells (e.g., using CRISPR or transgenes), which have led to significant improvements in cancer therapy. A key trend now is the emergence of "off-the-shelf" approaches aimed at generating cellular therapies compatible with a range of recipients by mitigating alloreactivity and immune rejection. Different diseases impose distinct biological and logistical limitations; thus, treatment of each patient requires an appropriate strategy. Emerging advances include the modification of therapeutic cells, either ex vivo or in vivo. Current options for transgene delivery mainly comprise lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, and lentiviral vectors. Researchers also focus on selecting suitable promoters for specific expression in selected cell types. Altogether, these advances have led to remarkable progress in treating various diseases in recent years. This publication discusses the development of biological therapies, with particular emphasis on cell and gene therapies, illustrated by viable examples across various disorders. It covers implemented solutions for several types of cancer, as well as selected hereditary diseases and syndromes, including Huntington's disease, carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) deficiency, hemiplegia, epidermolysis bullosa, chronic granulomatous disease, and congenital deafness. Emerging applications in heart diseases and diabetes are also summarized, along with therapeutic strategies involving tRNA gene editing. Although numerous strategies exist, only the most representative, practical, and up-to-date examples are emphasized. Show less
Embryonal tumors, the most common group of malignant brain tumors in childhood, are heterogeneous and have been associated with a large number of genetic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to co Show more
Embryonal tumors, the most common group of malignant brain tumors in childhood, are heterogeneous and have been associated with a large number of genetic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on regions harboring suppressor genes (PTCH2, PTCH1, APC, PTEN, DMBT1, SUFU, AXIN1, hSNF5/INI1) and to study chromosomal regions in which deletions have been described most frequently (1p, 1q, 11p, 16p, 17p). Twenty-nine children (17 male and 12 female), aged from 1 year 13 years were included in this study. There were 24 medulloblastomas (MB) and 5 supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNET). Tissue samples from 29 primary and 11 recurrent tumors were analyzed according to the LOH standard procedures, which were extended to include fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of isochromosome 17q (i(17q)) and direct sequencing ofTP53 exon 4. LOH on 17p was found in 15 out of 29 tumors. FISH analysis identified the presence of i(17q) in 16 tumors. Comparison of LOH analysis and the FISH data indicated that alterations of 17p were related to be the introduction of an i(17q) formation. LOH on 10q and 9q was observed in 4 and 2 cases, respectively, and was associated with alterations of chromosome 17. These results indicated a connection between alterations of PTCH/SHH genes and abnormalities of chromosome 17. A deleted region on 22q, covering the hSNF5/INI1 locus, was observed in 3 tumors. Progression of the molecular changes occurred in 1 case of recurrent medulloblastoma. LOH on 10q and 17p was found in both primary and recurrent tumor, while losses on 11p, 16p, and 16q occurred only in the recurrent tumor. No evidence of alteration in TP53 exon 4 was identified. Show less