👤 Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep

Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention settings, it remains unclear whether Lp(a) contributes to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD. The current analysis combines the ATHEROREMO and IBIS-3 observational studies, which together enrolled 798 patients undergoing coronary angiography for stable angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy were performed to assess coronary plaque characteristics in a non-culprit study segment. Regression models were applied to relate Lp(a) to coronary plaque characteristics and long-term (up to 10 year) clinical outcomes. Lp(a) was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable (using 75 nmol/L and 125 nmol/L as threshold). Mean age of the patients was 61.6 years (10.8); 75% were male; 19% had elevated Lp(a) levels (>125 nmol/L). Patients with Lp(a) > 125 nmol/L had a significantly higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients demonstrated higher IVUS-derived plaque burden (40.7% (±11.5) vs. 38.6% (±10.7), p = 0.028), though no associations were found with other plaque characteristics, e.g. minimum lumen area, lipid core burden index and thin-cap fibroatheroroma. No association was found between Lp(a) and -5-year major adverse cardiac events (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.70-1.60, p = 0.78) and 10-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06, p = 0.78). Among patients with established ASCVD, Lp(a) was associated with plaque burden, supporting evidence that relates Lp(a) to atherosclerotic disease. However, Lp(a) was not associated with long-term mortality or cardiac adverse events in these patients. Show less

A large proportion of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) do not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels advocated by international guidelines (<70 mg/dL or <100 mg/dL). We set out to model which proportion of patients reach targets using conventional and novel therapies. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a large cohort of genetically identified heFH patients and calculated the proportion reaching treatment targets in four scenarios: (1) after 50% LDL-c reduction (representing maximal dose statin); (2) after 70% LDL-c reduction (maximal dose statin + ezetimibe); (3) additional 40% LDL-c reduction representing cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (CETPi); and (4) 60% LDL-c reduction (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [PCSK9i]), on top of scenario 2. We applied 100% adherence rates and literature-based adherence rates from 62% to 80%. We included 1,059 heFH patients with and 9,420 heFH patients without coronary heart disease (CHD). With maximal dose statin, 8.3% and 48.1% of patients with and without CHD would reach their recommended LDL-c targets, respectively. This increases to 54.3% and 93.2% when ezetimibe is added. Addition of CETPi increases these numbers to 95.7% and 99.7%, whereas adding PCSK9i would result in 99.8% and 100% goal attainment. Using literature-based adherence rates, these numbers decrease to 3.8% and 27.3% for maximal dose statin, 5.8% and 38.9% combined with ezetimibe, 31.4% and 81.2% when adding CETPi, and 40.3% and 87.1% for addition of PCSK9i. Less than 10% with and 50% of heFH patients without CHD would reach treatment targets with maximal dose statin, but this substantially increases on addition of ezetimibe, CETPi, or PCSK9i. However, considering recently published adherence data, this might be lower in real life, especially in heFH patients with CHD. Show less