👤 Bahriye Aktas

In the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-TN trial, 12-week nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin (nab-pac/carbo) was highly effective and superior to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (nab-pac/gem) in triple-negative breast cancer regarding pathological complete response (pCR). Predictive markers for deescalated taxane/carbo use in TNBC need to be identified. Patients received 4 × nab-pac 125 mg/m Show less

To investigate serum levels of interleukin (IL)-12 (Th1 cytokine), IL-27 (an immunomodulatory cytokine), IL-4 (suppressor of Th1-cell growth), IL-13 (a stimulatory signal for Th2 cytokines), and IL-33 (an epithelial cell-derived cytokine) and their relations with the disease activity in Behcet's Disease (BD). Four groups, each composed of 20 participants were enrolled in the study; active ocular BD (Group-A), ocular BD in remission (Group-B), nonocular BD in remission (Group-C) and healthy controls (Group-D). IL levels were compared between the study groups and their correlation with the disease activity parameters were analyzed. IL-13 and IL-33 were higher in Group-A. IL-27 was lower in all BD groups. Additionally, IL-13 and IL-33 levels were positively correlated with disease activity parameters. These findings show Th2 dominance in the active phase of BD. Besides, decreased levels of IL-27, and presumably, its protective anti-inflammatory effect in all study groups may exert a new pathologic finding in BD. Show less

Multifocal visual evoked potential (MF-VEP) assesses a wider visual field than full-field VEP (FF-VEP) and potentially offers a more precise analysis of optic nerve injury and repair following optic neuritis. MF-VEP may offer advantages over FF-VEP as an endpoint in clinical trials of remyelinating therapies. MF-VEP testing was used to study changes in visual pathways in 48% of RENEW [phase II, opicinumab (anti-LINGO-1; BIIB033) vs. placebo after first acute unilateral optic neuritis] participants. This exploratory MF-VEP RENEW substudy compared mean outcomes at weeks 24 and 32 among participants in the intent-to-treat (ITT; n = 39; 72% female; mean age: 32.3 years) and per-protocol (PP; n = 31; 71% female; mean age: 32.2 years) populations in affected and fellow eye latency from fellow eye baseline latency and affected and fellow eye amplitude from their own baselines. Treatment differences were evaluated using analysis of covariance (week 24) and a mixed-effect model of repeated measures (week 32). Last observation carried forward was used to impute missing data at week 24. A trend for improvement in affected eye MF-VEP latency with opicinumab versus placebo was seen in the ITT and PP populations at weeks 24 and 32. Both treatment groups in the ITT population experienced partial recovery of amplitude in the affected eye at week 32. Notably, the mean change in fellow eye amplitude at weeks 24 and 32 was - 17.57 and - 31.41 nanovolts (nV) in placebo but only - 0.59 and 1.93 nV in the opicinumab group [differences at weeks 24 and 32: 16.98 nV (p = 0.050) and 33.33 nV (p < 0.01), respectively]. Results from this substudy showed advantages of MF-VEP over FF-VEP in multicenter studies of central nervous system reparative therapies and provide novel evidence that fellow eye visual pathway amplitude loss occurs after optic neuritis but can potentially be prevented by opicinumab treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01721161. Show less

The human monoclonal antibody opicinumab (BIIB033, anti-LINGO-1) has shown remyelinating activity in preclinical studies. We therefore assessed the safety and tolerability, and efficacy of opicinumab given soon after a first acute optic neuritis episode. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (RENEW) was done at 33 sites in Australia, Canada, and Europe in participants (aged 18-55 years) with a first unilateral acute optic neuritis episode within 28 days from study baseline. After treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone (1 g/day, intravenously, for 3-5 days), participants were assigned with a computer-generated sequence with permuted block randomisation (1:1) using a centralised interactive voice and web response system to receive 100 mg/kg opicinumab intravenously or placebo once every 4 weeks (six doses) and followed up to week 32. All study participants and all study staff, including the central readers, were masked to treatment assignment apart from the pharmacist responsible for preparing the study treatments and the pharmacy monitor at each site. The primary endpoint was remyelination at 24 weeks, measured as recovery of affected optic nerve conduction latency using full-field visual evoked potential (FF-VEP) versus the unaffected fellow eye at baseline. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT); prespecified per-protocol (PP) analyses were also done. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01721161. The study was done between Dec 21, 2012, and Oct 21, 2014. 82 participants were enrolled, and 41 in each group comprised the ITT population; 33 participants received opicinumab and 36 received placebo in the PP population. Adjusted mean treatment difference of opicinumab versus placebo was -3·5 ms (17·3 vs 20·8 [95% CI -10·6 to 3·7]; 17%; p=0·33) in the ITT population, and -7·6 ms in the PP population (14·7 vs 22·2 [-15·1 to 0·0]; 34%; p=0·050) at week 24 and -6·1 ms (15·1 vs 21·2 [-12·7 to 0·5]; 29%; p=0·071) in the ITT population and -9·1 ms (13·2 vs 22·4 [-16·1 to -2·1]; 41%; p=0·011) in the PP population at week 32. The overall incidence (34 [83%] of 41 in each group) and severity of adverse events (two [5%] of 41 severe adverse events with placebo vs three [7%] of 41 with opicinumab) were similar between groups and no significant effects on brain MRI measures were noted in either group (mean T2 lesion volume change, 0·05 mL [SD 0·21] for placebo vs 0·20 mL [0·52] with opicinumab; 27 [77%] of 35 participants with no change in gadolinium-enhancing [Gd+] lesion number with opicinumab vs 27 [79%] of 34 with placebo; mean 0·4 [SD 0·79 for the placebo group and 0·85 for the opicinumab group] new Gd+ lesions per participant in both groups). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in three (7%) of 41 participants in the opicinumab group (hypersensitivity [n=2], asymptomatic increase in transaminase concentrations [n=1]) and none of the participants in the placebo group. Remyelination did not differ significantly between the opicinumab and placebo groups in the ITT population at week 24. However, results from the prespecified PP population suggest that enhancing remyelination in the human CNS with opicinumab might be possible and warrant further clinical investigation. Biogen. Show less

The 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome is characterized by intellectual disability, epilepsy, facial dysmorphism and friendly behavior. Recently, KANSLJ gene has been considered as a major causal gene for this phenotype. Here we report on two Turkish patients with different seizure types and additional dysmorphic features associated with 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. A 4 year-old female patient with generalized tonic-clonic seizures, mild mental retardation, dysmorphic features and friendly behavior and a 14 years-old female with intractable epilepsy, different dysmorphic features, severe mental and motor retardation and self-mutilation were evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (microarray CGH). Array CGH identified 17q21.31 microdeletion that contains MAP7 CRHR1, KANSLI, PLEKHMI genes in case I and CRHR1, PLEKHM but not KANSLJgenes in case 2. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of a patient with the 17q21.31 microdeletion which does not encompass KANSLI gene. These data imply another gene or genes causing similar phenotype in this patient. Show less

In multiple sclerosis as the most common inflammatory demyelinating disease in Western countries, major therapeutic success has been achieved with regard to strategies targeting immunological master switches. These approaches effectively reduce inflammatory disease activity but fail to address ongoing neurodegeneration or disturbed regeneration. However, intense research efforts investigating molecular mechanisms of disease have identified 'druggable' targets for prevention of inflammatory neurodegeneration and disturbed regeneration. This review covers recent developments in clinical trials using optic neuritis as a model for screening such neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapeutic approaches. Optic neuritis has been used in a series of recent pilot studies investigating the effects of erythropoietin, simvastatin, autologous mesenchymal stem cells, phenytoin, as well as blockade of LINGO-1 (opicinumab). Of note, these studies applied novel outcome measures related to function and structure of the visual pathway, including optical coherence tomography, full-field visual-evoked potentials, multifocal visual-evoked potential, high as well as low-contrast visual acuity. Comparison of these different approaches reveals novel insights into short-term evolution of neurobiological effects during optic neuritis and the window of opportunity for therapeutic interventions. Translation of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative approaches to clinical reality represents a huge challenge. Optic neuritis as a prototypic autoimmune demyelinating disease offers an option for testing new therapies targeting key deleterious processes in multiple sclerosis. Show less