👤 Johannes Krefting

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of three clinical diagnostic criteria [Simon Broome (SB), MEDPED (MP), and guideline-derived (GL-EAS)] in identifying children with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) compared with genetic testing. The evaluation involved 1337 children with elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, focusing on the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical scores in detecting genetically confirmed FH cases. Clinical data were gathered by a self-reporting questionnaire. Clinical FH was defined in accordance with the tested FH score. Genetically confirmed heterozygous FH (HeFH) was defined by a (likely) pathogenic variant. Of the 1337 children undergoing genetic analysis, 211 showed a pathogenic FH mutation. Applying SB, MP, and GL-EAS criteria resulted in 210/1337, 125/1337, and 112/835 children being categorized to have FH clinically. The sensitivity of the clinical scores ranged from 0.44 to 0.54 with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.51-0.79. The specificity was 0.91-0.97 with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.89-0.91. Similar results were observed for the three clinical scores regarding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in subgroup analyses defined by gender, age (<10 years vs. ≥10 years), or weight [≥90th BMI (body mass index) percentile vs. <90th BMI percentile]. Clinical FH scores offer a high degree of specificity for FH diagnosis in children, but at the expense of low sensitivity. Specifically, half of the mutation-positive children in this study would have been missed for early diagnosis and preventive treatment. Given the widespread availability of affordable genetic testing, such analysis should be performed at a lower threshold than that indicated by these clinical scores. Show less

Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) is an important sequela of COVID-19, characterised by symptom persistence for >3 months, post-acute symptom development, and worsening of pre-existing comorbidities. The causes and public health impact of PCS are still unclear, not least for the lack of efficient means to assess the presence and severity of PCS. COVIDOM is a population-based cohort study of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, recruited through public health authorities in three German regions (Kiel, Berlin, Würzburg) between November 15, 2020 and September 29, 2021. Main inclusion criteria were (i) a PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and (ii) a period of at least 6 months between the infection and the visit to the COVIDOM study site. Other inclusion criteria were written informed consent and age ≥18 years. Key exclusion criterion was an acute reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. Study site visits included standardised interviews, in-depth examination, and biomaterial procurement. In sub-cohort Kiel-I, a PCS (severity) score was developed based upon 12 long-term symptom complexes. Two validation sub-cohorts (Würzburg/Berlin, Kiel-II) were used for PCS score replication and identification of clinically meaningful predictors. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679584) and at the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS, DRKS00023742). In Kiel-I ( PCS severity can be quantified by an easy-to-use symptom-based score reflecting acute phase disease burden and general psychological predisposition. The PCS score thus holds promise to facilitate the clinical diagnosis of PCS, scientific studies of its natural course, and the development of therapeutic interventions. The COVIDOM study is funded by the Network University Medicine (NUM) as part of the National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON). Show less