👤 Martin Tomas

Internalisation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can contribute to altered cellular responses by directing signalling from non-canonical locations, such as endosomes. If signalling processes are locally constrained, active receptors in different subcellular locations could produce different downstream effects. This phenomenon may be relevant to the optimal targeting of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a type 2 diabetes and obesity target GPCR for which several ligands with varying internalisation tendency have been discovered. To investigate, we compared the signalling localisation effects of two prototypical GLP-1RAs with opposite signal bias and effects on GLP-1R trafficking: exendin-asp3 (ExD3), a full agonist that drives rapid internalisation, and exendin-phe1 (ExF1), which shows much slower internalisation. After using bioorthogonal labelling and fluorescent agonist conjugates to verify the divergent trafficking patterns of ExF1 and ExD3 in β-cell lines and primary pancreatic islets, we used live cell biosensors to monitor signalling at different subcellular locations. This revealed that cAMP/PKA/ERK signalling in β-cells is in fact distributed widely across the cell over short- (<5 min) and medium-term (up to 60 min) stimulation at pharmacological (>10 pM) concentrations, with no major differences in signal localisation that could be linked to internalised versus cell surface-bound GLP-1R. Moreover, washout experiments highlighted that, whilst fast-internalising ExD3 shows much greater accumulation and binding to GLP-1R in endosomes than slow-internalising ExF1, it is a rather inefficient driver of both cAMP production in β-cells and insulin secretion from perfused rat pancreata. These data provide a greater understanding of the cellular effects of biased GLP-1R agonism. Show less

The use of incretin analogues has emerged as an effective approach to achieve both enhanced insulin secretion and weight loss in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Agonists which bind and stimulate multiple receptors have shown particular promise. However, off-target effects remain a complication of using these agents, and modified versions with optimised pharmacological profiles and/or biased signalling are sought. Ligand synthesis was achieved using standard solid-phase techniques. Assessments of GLP-1R-binding kinetics, G protein recruitment and receptor internalisation were performed using biochemical and imaging approaches. Insulin secretion was measured in purified mouse and human islets, and drug efficacy was assessed in hyperglycaemic db/db mice. We describe the synthesis and properties of a molecule which binds to both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) to enhance insulin secretion. HISHS-2001 shows increased affinity at the GLP-1R, as well as a tendency towards reduced internalisation and recycling at this receptor versus FDA-approved dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonist tirzepatide. HISHS-2001 also displayed significantly greater bias towards cAMP generation versus β-arrestin 2 recruitment compared to tirzepatide. In contrast, G HISHS-2001 represents a novel dual receptor agonist with a promising pharmacological profile and actions. Future clinical studies will be needed to assess the safety and efficacy of this molecule in humans. Show less

The use of incretin analogues has emerged in recent years as an effective approach to achieve both enhanced insulin secretion and weight loss in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Agonists which bind and stimulate multiple receptors have shown particular promise. However, off target effects, including nausea and diarrhoea, remain a complication of using these agents, and modified versions with optimized pharmacological profiles and/or biased signaling at the cognate receptors are increasingly sought. Here, we describe the synthesis and properties of a molecule which binds to both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) to enhance insulin secretion. HISHS-2001 shows increased affinity at the GLP-1R, as well as a tendency towards reduced internalization and recycling at this receptor Show less

[D APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice were treated with saline, acyl-ExD3 or acyl-ExF1 via intraperitoneal injections for 6 weeks or intracerebroventricular infusion for 18 days. Body weight and composition were monitored at regular intervals, as were plasma glucose, triglyceride and cholesterol levels. At endpoint, mice were injected with very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-like particles containing glycerol tri[ Upon peripheral treatment, body weight gain was prevented and plasma glucose levels were reduced by acyl-ExF1, but circulating lipids were not affected by either acyl-ExF1 or acyl-ExD3. In contrast, central administration of either agonist strongly reduced plasma triglyceride and cholesterol levels, but did not affect glucose levels. Acyl-ExD3 and acyl-ExF1 increased [ The oppositely biased GLP-1 receptor agonists acyl-ExD3 and acyl-ExF1 do not differentially affect lipid metabolism in APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice, while effects on glucose homeostasis and prevention of body weight gain are more pronounced upon peripheral acyl-ExF1 treatment. Show less

Central glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) signaling is critical in GIP-based therapeutics' ability to lower body weight, but pathways leveraged by GIPR pharmacology in the brain remain incompletely understood. We explored the role of Gipr neurons in the hypothalamus and dorsal vagal complex (DVC) - brain regions critical to the control of energy balance. Hypothalamic Gipr expression was not necessary for the synergistic effect of GIPR/GLP-1R coagonism on body weight. While chemogenetic stimulation of both hypothalamic and DVC Gipr neurons suppressed food intake, activation of DVC Gipr neurons reduced ambulatory activity and induced conditioned taste avoidance, while there was no effect of a short-acting GIPR agonist (GIPRA). Within the DVC, Gipr neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), but not the area postrema (AP), projected to distal brain regions and were transcriptomically distinct. Peripherally dosed fluorescent GIPRAs revealed that access was restricted to circumventricular organs in the CNS. These data demonstrate that Gipr neurons in the hypothalamus, AP, and NTS differ in their connectivity, transcriptomic profile, peripheral accessibility, and appetite-controlling mechanisms. These results highlight the heterogeneity of the central GIPR signaling axis and suggest that studies into the effects of GIP pharmacology on feeding behavior should consider the interplay of multiple regulatory pathways. Show less

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity have reached epidemic proportions. Incretin therapy is the second line of treatment for T2D, improving both blood glucose regulation and weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-stimulated insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are the incretin hormones that provide the foundations for these drugs. While these therapies have been highly effective for some, the results are variable. Incretin therapies target the class B G protein-coupled receptors GLP-1R and GIPR, expressed mainly in the pancreas and the hypothalamus, while some therapeutical approaches include additional targeting of the related glucagon receptor (GCGR) in the liver. The proper functioning of these receptors is crucial for incretin therapy success and here we review several mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level that influence an individual's response to incretin therapy. Show less

The incretin receptors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), are prime therapeutic targets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. They are expressed in pancreatic beta cells where they potentiate insulin release in response to food intake. Despite GIP being the main incretin in healthy individuals, GLP-1R has been favored as a therapeutic target due to blunted GIPR responses in T2D patients and conflicting effects of GIPR agonists and antagonists in improving glucose tolerance and preventing weight gain. There is, however, a recently renewed interest in GIPR biology, following the realization that GIPR responses can be restored after an initial period of blood glucose normalization and the recent development of dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonists with superior capacity for controlling blood glucose levels and weight. The importance of GLP-1R trafficking and subcellular signaling in the control of receptor outputs is well established, but little is known about the pattern of spatiotemporal signaling from the GIPR in beta cells. Here, we have directly compared surface expression, trafficking, and signaling characteristics of both incretin receptors in pancreatic beta cells to identify potential differences that might underlie distinct pharmacological responses associated with each receptor. Our results indicate increased cell surface levels, internalization, degradation, and endosomal vs plasma membrane activity for the GLP-1R, while the GIPR is instead associated with increased plasma membrane recycling, reduced desensitization, and enhanced downstream signal amplification. These differences might have potential implications for the capacity of each incretin receptor to control beta cell function. Show less

Receptors for the peptide hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1R), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR), and glucagon (GCGR) are important regulators of insulin secretion and energy metabolism. GLP-1R agonists have been successfully deployed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but it has been suggested that their efficacy is limited by target receptor desensitization and downregulation due to recruitment of β-arrestins. Indeed, recently described GLP-1R agonists with reduced β-arrestin-2 recruitment have delivered promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. We therefore aimed to determine if the same phenomenon could apply to the closely related GIPR and GCGR. In HEK293 cells depleted of both β-arrestin isoforms the duration of G protein-dependent cAMP/PKA signaling was increased in response to the endogenous ligand for each receptor. Moreover, in wildtype cells, "biased" GLP-1, GCG, and GIP analogs with selective reductions in β-arrestin-2 recruitment led to reduced receptor endocytosis and increased insulin secretion over a prolonged stimulation period, although the latter effect was only seen at high agonist concentrations. Biased GCG analogs increased the duration of cAMP signaling, but this did not lead to increased glucose output from hepatocytes. Our study provides a rationale for the development of GLP-1R, GIPR, and GCGR agonists with reduced β-arrestin recruitment, but further work is needed to maximally exploit this strategy for therapeutic purposes. Show less

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a gut-derived incretin that, in common with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), has both insulin releasing and extra-pancreatic glucoregulatory actions. GIP is released in response to glucose or fat absorption and acts on the GIP receptor (GIPR) to potentiate insulin release from pancreatic beta cells. GIP has also been shown to promote beta cell survival and stimulate the release of GLP-1 from islet alpha cells. There is now evidence to suggest that low levels of GIP are secreted from alpha cells and may act in a paracrine manner to prime neighboring beta cells for insulin release. In addition, GIP acts on adipocytes to stimulate fat storage and can exert anorexigenic effects via actions in the hypothalamus. Contrary to GLP-1, the development of effective GIP-based T2D treatments has been hindered by poor bioavailability and attenuation of beta cell responses to GIP in some patients with sub-optimally controlled T2D. Recently, longer-acting GIP agonists that exhibit enzymatic stability, as well as dual GLP-1/GIP agonists which provide simultaneous improvement in glucose and weight control have been generated and successfully tested in animal T2D models. This, together with reports on GIP antagonists that may protect against obesity, has revived the interest on the GIP/GIPR axis as a potential anti-diabetic pathway. In this review, we summarize the known aspects of the effects of GIP on beta and other islet cells and discuss the most recent developments on GIP-based therapeutic agents for the improvement of beta cell function in T2D patients. Show less

Postreplicative mismatch repair safeguards the stability of our genome. The defects in its functioning will give rise to microsatellite instability. In this study, 50 meningiomas were investigated for microsatellite instability. Two major mismatch repair genes, MLH1 and MSH2, were analyzed using microsatellite markers D1S1611 and BAT26 amplified by polymerase chain reaction and visualized by gel electrophoresis on high-resolution gels. Furthermore, genes DVL3 (D3S1262), AXIN1 (D16S3399), and CDH1 (D16S752) were also investigated for microsatellite instability. Our study revealed constant presence of microsatellite instability in meningioma patients when compared to their autologous blood DNA. Altogether 38% of meningiomas showed microsatellite instability at one microsatellite locus, 16% on two, and 13.3% on three loci. The percent of detected microsatellite instability for MSH2 gene was 14%, and for MLH1, it was 26%, for DVL3 22.9%, for AXIN1 17.8%, and for CDH1 8.3%. Since markers also allowed for the detection of loss of heterozygosity, gross deletions of MLH1 gene were found in 24% of meningiomas. Genetic changes between MLH1 and MSH2 were significantly positively correlated (p = 0.032). We also noted a positive correlation between genetic changes of MSH2 and DVL3 genes (p = 0.034). No significant associations were observed when MLH1 or MSH2 was tested against specific histopathological meningioma subtype or World Health Organization grade. However, genetic changes in DVL3 were strongly associated with anaplastic histology of meningioma (χ Show less

Centrosomes, the principal microtubule-organising centres in animal cells, contain centrins, small, conserved calcium-binding proteins unique to eukaryotes. Centrin2 binds to xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein (XPC), stabilising it, and its presence slightly increases nucleotide excision repair (NER) activity in vitro. In previous work, we deleted all three centrin isoforms present in chicken DT40 cells and observed delayed repair of UV-induced DNA lesions, but no centrosome abnormalities. Here, we explore how centrin2 controls NER. In the centrin null cells, we expressed centrin2 mutants that cannot bind calcium or that lack sites for phosphorylation by regulatory kinases. Expression of any of these mutants restored the UV sensitivity of centrin null cells to normal as effectively as expression of wild-type centrin. However, calcium-binding-deficient and T118A mutants showed greatly compromised localisation to centrosomes. XPC recruitment to laser-induced UV-like lesions was only slightly slower in centrin-deficient cells than in controls, and levels of XPC and its partner HRAD23B were unaffected by centrin deficiency. Interestingly, we found that overexpression of the centrin interactor POC5 leads to the assembly of linear, centrin-dependent structures that recruit other centrosomal proteins such as PCM-1 and NEDD1. Together, these observations suggest that assembly of centrins into complex structures requires calcium binding capacity, but that such assembly is not required for centrin activity in NER. Show less

The etiology and pathogenesis of tumors of the central nervous system are still inadequately explained. In the present study the expression patterns of a critical molecular component of wnt signaling pathway - axin I was investigated in 42 patients with glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of glial tumors. Immunostaining and image analysis revealed the quantity and localization of the protein. Downregulation of this tumor suppressor expression was observed in 31% of tumors when compared to the levels of axin in healthy brain tissues. Axin was observed in the cytoplasm in 69% of glioblastoma samples, in 21.4% in both the cytoplasm and nucleus and 9.5% had expression solely in the nucleus. Mean values of relative axin's expression obtained by image analysis showed that the highest relative quantity of axin was measured when the protein was in the nucleus and the lowest relative quantity of axin when the protein was localized in the cytoplasm. Investigation on axin's existence at the subcellular level in glioblastomas suggests that axin's expression and spatial regulation is a dynamic process. Despite increasing knowledge on glioma biology and genetics, the prognostic tools for glioblastoma still need improvement. Our findings on expression of axin 1 may contribute to better understanding of glioblastoma molecular profile. Show less

In the present study changes of components of Wnt signaling pathway--axin (AXIN1) and beta-catenin (CTNNB1) in a sample of 72 neuroepithelial brain tumors were investigated. AXIN-1 gene was tested by PCR/loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Immunostaining and image analysis revealed the quantity and localization of relevant proteins. Polymorphic marker for AXIN-1, showed LOH in 11.1% of tumors. LOH was distributed to 6.3% of glioblastomas, one was found in neuroepithelial dysembrioplastic tumor and one in medulloblastoma. Down regulation of axin expression and up regulation of beta-catenin were detected in the analyzed tumors. Axin was observed in the cytoplasm in 68.8% of samples, in 28.1% in both the cytoplasm and nucleus and 3.1% had no expression. Beta-catenin was observed mainly in the nucleus and cytoplasm (59.4%). Expression in 34.4% of samples was in the cytoplasm and 6.3% showed no expression. Comparison of mean values of relative increase of axin and beta-catenin showed that they are significantly reversely proportional (P = 0.014). Relative quantity of beta-catenin in patients with gross deletion of AXIN1 was significantly higher in comparison to patients without LOH (P = 0.040). Our results demonstrate that changes of key components of the Wnt signaling play a role in neuroepithelial brain tumors. Show less