👤 Abhishek Nag

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for motor symptom management in Parkinson's disease (PD), yet emerging evidence suggests that its effects may extend beyond functional circuit modulation to include cellular and molecular mechanisms with potential neuroprotective significance. This review synthesizes current evidence on the neuroprotective mechanisms of DBS, with an emphasis on preclinical and clinical studies that highlight its effects on neuronal survival, trophic support, oxidative stress, inflammation, synaptic plasticity, and network homeostasis. Preclinical data indicate that DBS reduces dopaminergic neuron degeneration, enhances brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling, preserves mitochondrial function, attenuates neuroinflammation, and fosters synaptic remodeling. Clinical studies provide convergent, though less definitive, evidence from imaging, fluid biomarkers, and long-term outcomes supporting potential disease-modifying effects. These findings underscore a shift in the conceptualization of DBS from purely symptomatic relief toward modulation of underlying pathogenic processes. DBS holds promise as a neuroprotective therapy for PD, but critical gaps remain in validating these mechanisms in patients. Future directions include the development of biomarker-driven longitudinal studies, refinement of adaptive stimulation strategies, integration with adjunctive disease-modifying strategies, and exploration of personalized approaches based on molecular and network signatures. By bridging mechanistic understanding with translational innovation, DBS may evolve into a precision therapy capable of altering the progression trajectory of PD. Show less

In the present study, a comparative global high-throughput proteomic analysis strategy was used to identify proteomic differences between estrus and diestrus stage of estrous cycle in dairy cows. Saliva was collected from cows during estrus and diestrus, and subjected to LC-MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. A total of 2842 proteins were detected in the saliva of cows, out of which, 2437 and 1428 non-redundant proteins were identified in estrous and diestrous saliva, respectively. Further, it was found that 1414 and 405 salivary proteins were specific to estrus and diestrus, respectively while 1023 proteins were common to both groups. Among the significantly dysregulated proteins, the expression of 56 proteins was down-regulated (abundance ratio <0.5) while 40 proteins were up-regulated (abundance ratio > 2) in estrous compared to diestrous saliva. The proteins, such as HSD17B12, INHBA, HSP70, ENO1, SRD5A1, MOS, AMH, ECE2, PDGFA, OPRK1, SYN1, CCNC, PLIN5, CETN1, AKR1C4, NMNAT1, CYP2E1, and CYP19A1 were detected only in the saliva samples derived from estrous cows. Considerable number of proteins detected in the saliva of estrous cows were found to be involved in metabolic pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, toll-like receptor signaling pathway, steroid biosynthesis pathway, insulin signaling pathway, calcium signaling pathway, estrogen signaling pathway, oxytocin signaling pathway, TGF-β signaling pathway and oocyte meiosis. On the other hand, proteins detected in saliva of diestrous cows were involved mainly in metabolic pathway. Collectively, these data provide preliminary evidence of a potential difference in salivary proteins at different stages of estrous cycle in dairy cows. Show less

Supplementation with carotenoids is proposed to protect against age-related macular degeneration. There is, however, considerable variability in retinal macular pigment response, which may be due to underlying genetic variation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether genetic factors, which have been previously associated with cross-sectional macular pigment levels in the retina or serum lutein, also influence response to supplementation. To this end we conducted an association study in 310 subjects from the TwinsUK cohort between variants in 8 candidate genes and serum lutein and retinal macular pigment optical density (MPOD) levels before and after supplementation. Four variants were associated with MPOD response to supplementation (p < 0.05): rs11057841 (SCARB1), rs4926339 (RPE65), rs1929841 (ABCA1) and rs174534 (FADS1). We also confirmed previous associations between rs6564851 near BMCO1 (p < 0.001) and rs11057841 within SCARB1 (p = 0.01) and baseline measures of serum lutein; while the latter was also associated with MPOD response, none of the BMCO1 variants were. Finally, there was evidence for association between variants near RPE65 and ELOVL2 and changes in lutein concentration after supplementation. This study is the first to show association between genetic variants and response to carotenoids supplementation. Our findings suggest an important link between MP response and the biological processes of carotenoids transport and fatty acid metabolism. Show less