👤 Thomas Streichert

Electronic health records will increasingly aggregate longitudinal laboratory results from multiple providers, but availability alone does not guarantee safe interpretation. We present guidance, developed by laboratory professionals with the DGKL medical informatics division, for cumulative displays that are clinically meaningful. The core principle is to group medically comparable analyses while preserving laboratory provenance so that clinicians can follow true patient trends without conflating them with laboratory-induced variation. Comparability is defined algorithmically from Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) axis: analyses estimating the same patient property (allowing serum/plasma system equivalence and mathematically convertible properties such as substance vs. mass concentration) are grouped; coding of units is harmonized via Unified Code for Units of Measure (UCUM) with consistent conversion of numeric results and corresponding reference intervals, including inequality qualifiers. Analyte-specific conversion factors should come from authoritative sources; for poorly standardized measurands (e.g., tumor markers) or when conversions are inappropriate (e.g., Lp(a)), results remain separated. Methodological distinctions that affect interpretation - such as screening vs. confirmatory drug testing and point-of-care testing - are displayed independently to signal potential analytical discontinuities. A standardized, medically meaningful default result sequence - derived from LOINC metadata and clinical nomenclatures, with alphabetic naming as a pragmatic fallback - supports cross-laboratory aggregation; rare or novel tests lacking robust standardization remain as free text. The rules-based approach updates seamlessly with LOINC releases and remains compatible with the Nomenclature for Properties and Units (NPU), facilitating cross-border exchange within the European Health Data Space. While harmonized presentation improves trend analysis, true comparability ultimately requires measurement procedures traceable to reference methods and materials. Show less

Skeletal pathologies are frequently observed in lysosomal storage disorders, yet the relevance of specific lysosomal enzymes in bone remodeling cell types is poorly defined. Two lysosomal enzymes, ie, cathepsin K (Ctsk) and Acp5 (also known as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase), have long been known as molecular marker proteins of differentiated osteoclasts. However, whereas the cysteine protease Ctsk is directly involved in the degradation of bone matrix proteins, the molecular function of Acp5 in osteoclasts is still unknown. Here we show that Acp5, in concert with Acp2 (lysosomal acid phosphatase), is required for dephosphorylation of the lysosomal mannose 6-phosphate targeting signal to promote the activity of specific lysosomal enzymes. Using an unbiased approach we identified the glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzyme arylsulfatase B (Arsb), mutated in mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS-VI), as an osteoclast marker, whose activity depends on dephosphorylation by Acp2 and Acp5. Similar to Acp2/Acp5 Show less

Mutations in the CLN3 gene lead to juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, a pediatric neurodegenerative disorder characterized by visual loss, epilepsy and psychomotor deterioration. Although most CLN3 patients carry the same 1-kb deletion in the CLN3 gene, their disease phenotype can be variable. The aims of this study were to (i) study the clinical phenotype in CLN3 patients with identical genotype, (ii) identify genes that are dysregulated in CLN3 disease regardless of the clinical course that could be useful as biomarkers, and (iii) find modifier genes that affect the progression rate of the disease. A total of 25 CLN3 patients homozygous for the 1-kb deletion were classified into groups with rapid, average or slow disease progression using an established clinical scoring system. Genome-wide expression profiling was performed in eight CLN3 patients with different disease progression and matched controls. The study showed high phenotype variability in CLN3 patients. Five genes were dysregulated in all CLN3 patients and present candidate biomarkers of the disease. Of those, dual specificity phosphatase 2 (DUSP2) was also validated in acutely CLN3-depleted cell models and in CbCln3(Δex7/8) cerebellar precursor cells. A total of 13 genes were upregulated in patients with rapid disease progression and downregulated in patients with slow disease progression; one gene showed dysregulation in the opposite way. Among these potential modifier genes, guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 for small GTPases of the Ras family (RAPGEF1) and transcription factor Spi-B (SPIB) were validated in an acutely CLN3-depleted cell model. These findings indicate that differential perturbations of distinct signaling pathways might alter disease progression and provide insight into the molecular alterations underlying neuronal dysfunction in CLN3 disease and neurodegeneration in general. Show less