👤 Wael Almahmeed

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
3
Articles
articles
Bahman Razi, Masoud Eslami, Saeed Aslani +5 more · 2026 · European journal of preventive cardiology · Oxford University Press · added 2026-04-24
Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the i Show more
Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of lipid apheresis therapy on serum Lp(a) levels in a wide array of disorders, particularly CVDs. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to May 2025. Studies reporting pre- and post-treatment Lp(a) levels in participants undergoing lipid apheresis were included. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was significant. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 43 publications comprising 67 studies with 2466 participants were analysed. Lipid apheresis significantly reduced serum Lp(a) levels (SMD = -1.52; 95% CI = -1.76 to -1.29; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed significant reductions across various methods of Lp(a) detection, disease backgrounds, and initial Lp(a) levels. One-session lipid apheresis studies (n = 6) also demonstrated a significant reduction (SMD = -1.51; 95% CI = -1.72 to -1.29; P < 0.001). Meta-regression suggested that publication year and disease background contributed to heterogeneity. Lipid apheresis is effective in significantly lowering serum Lp(a) concentrations across a range of patient groups and treatment modalities. These findings support the therapeutic role of lipid apheresis in managing elevated Lp(a). Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag089
LPA
Julia Brandts, Fotios Barkas, Dirk De Bacquer +34 more · 2025 · European journal of preventive cardiology · Oxford University Press · added 2026-04-24
To quantify international variations in lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) use among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and attainment of European guideline-recommended lipid goals. INTERASPIRE is Show more
To quantify international variations in lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) use among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and attainment of European guideline-recommended lipid goals. INTERASPIRE is an observational study (2020-23) covering 14 countries from all WHO regions. Patients (18-79 years) hospitalized in the preceding 6-36 months with CHD were invited for standardized interviews and examination, with central laboratory analyses for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (apoB). Valid lipid data meeting quality control standards were available from 13 countries. Lipid goals followed the 2019 guidelines of the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Cardiology: LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L, non-HDL-C < 2.2 mmol/L, and apoB <65 mg/dL.Among 4061 patients (78.8% male, mean age 60.3 years), between index event and interview, 66.3% had no change in treatment intensity. LLT use at interview was largely statin monotherapy: 49.6% high-intensity (inter-country range 5.3%-77.3%) and 24.1% low/moderate-intensity (inter-country range 5.1%-70.1%). Otherwise, 12.2% (inter-country range 0.2%-41.1%) were on combination therapy, and 12.7% on no LLT (inter-country range 3.5%-36.7%). Goal attainment for LDL-C was 17.5%. Corresponding non-HDL-C and apoB goals were achieved by 29.9% and 29.2%, respectively. Higher-income countries (defined by the World Bank's 2024-25 classification of income levels) did better in goal attainment than lower-middle-income countries. In this international study, contemporary lipid goals were not achieved in most CHD patients, with lower-middle-income countries having the worst goal attainment. Contributory factors include absence of any LLT use, low use of combinations and a failure to up-titrate LLT to achieve guideline targets. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf388
APOB
Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Elaheh Mirhadi, Željko Reiner +4 more · 2025 · Current atherosclerosis reports · Springer · added 2026-04-24
To evaluate the effect of pioglitazone, a member of the thiazolidinedione family of drugs known for its antihyperglycemic properties, on lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. Pioglitazone is recognized for enhanci Show more
To evaluate the effect of pioglitazone, a member of the thiazolidinedione family of drugs known for its antihyperglycemic properties, on lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. Pioglitazone is recognized for enhancing insulin sensitivity and β-cell function, and it also has a positive influence on the overall lipid profile. Meta-analysis of 7 studies (4 RCTs and three non-RCTs) including 254 patients showed a significant decrease of circulating Lp(a) levels after treatment with pioglitazone (SMD: -0.373, 95% CI: -0.642, -0.104, p = 0.007). The reduction in circulating Lp(a) was robust in the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The presented results were obtained following a comprehensive literature search conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, covering studies from their inception up to March 1, 2025. Pioglitazone significantly decreases circulating Lp(a) concentrations. This decrease might have a beneficial effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in high-risk patients. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1007/s11883-025-01346-3
LPA