👤 Christie Ballantyne

Many adults fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals on statin monotherapy, requiring additional nonstatin lipid-lowering medication. Enlicitide, an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, lowered LDL-C by 60% compared with placebo; its efficacy compared with other oral nonstatin therapies has yet to be examined. This study assessed the efficacy of enlicitide, a novel oral PCSK9 inhibitor, vs other oral nonstatin therapies. In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator trial, statin-treated adults aged ≥18 years with LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL and a previous major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event, or LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL if at intermediate to high risk for a first event, were randomized in 2:1:1:2 fashion to 20 mg enlicitide (n = 101), 180 mg bempedoic acid (n = 50), 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 50), or 180 mg bempedoic acid plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 100) once daily for 56 days. The primary endpoint was mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56; secondary endpoints included mean percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C). Safety endpoints included overall adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs. Among 301 randomized participants (mean age 64.4 years, 37% female, 98% receiving moderate- to high-intensity statin), 298 (99.0%) completed the trial. The mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56 was -64.6% (95% CI: -68.3% to -60.9%) with enlicitide, -6.3% (95% CI: -13.5% to 0.8%) with bempedoic acid, -27.8% (95% CI: -32.3% to -23.4%) with ezetimibe, and -36.5% (95% CI: -40.8% to -32.2%) with bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe; enlicitide was superior to each comparator (all P < 0.001). Reductions in ApoB and nonHDL-C were also greater with enlicitide (all P < 0.001). Proportions of participants with AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across treatment arms. In statin-treated adults with a history of a major ASCVD event or at increased risk for a first event, enlicitide achieved greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, and nonHDL-C than other oral nonstatin therapies, demonstrating its potential role as an important add-on option when LDL-C goals are not met with the use of statins alone. (A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enlicitide Decanoate [MK-0616, Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor] Compared With Ezetimibe or Bempedoic Acid or Ezetimibe and Bempedoic Acid in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia [MK-0616-018] [CORALreef AddOn; NCT06450366). Show less

Enlicitide decanoate, an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, was shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in a phase 2 trial; longer-term data are needed. In this multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with a history of a major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event with an LDL cholesterol level of 55 mg per deciliter or higher and those who were at risk for a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event with an LDL cholesterol level of 70 mg per deciliter or higher. Participants were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive enlicitide at a dose of 20 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline to week 24. Key secondary end points were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level at week 52 and the mean percent change in levels of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B and the percent change in lipoprotein(a) level at week 24. Of the 2909 participants in the intention-to-treat population, 1935 received enlicitide and 969 received placebo (5 did not receive enlicitide or placebo). The mean age of the participants was 63 years, and 39.3% were women. The mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol level at baseline was 96.1±38.9 mg per deciliter. The mean percent change in LDL cholesterol levels at week 24 was -57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -61.8 to -52.5) with enlicitide and 3.0% (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.1) with placebo, representing an adjusted between-group difference of -55.8 percentage points (95% CI, -60.9 to -50.7; P<0.001). The mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level at week 52, the mean percent changes in non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels at week 24, and the percent change in lipoprotein(a) levels at week 24 were significantly greater with enlicitide than with placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The incidence of adverse events did not appear to differ between the groups. Among participants who had a history of or were at risk for a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event, treatment with the oral PCSK9 inhibitor enlicitide resulted in significantly lower LDL cholesterol levels than placebo at 24 weeks. (Funded by MSD [Rahway, NJ]; CORALreef Lipids ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05952856.). Show less

Most patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fail to achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering. Here we carried out a randomized trial to test the safety and efficacy of obicetrapib, a highly selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that lowers LDL cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and an LDL cholesterol level ≥70 mg dl Show less

Although familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tier 1 condition for genetic testing, the impact of testing on clinical outcomes is unclear. We aimed to assess whether genetic testing alters lipid management in HeartCare participants. For participants with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants for FH observed at Baylor College of Medicine cardiology clinics, data on laboratory values, medication prescriptions, and diagnoses were collected and compared before and after genetic testing. In the 20 participants with APOB/LDLR variants and complete data, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was numerically lower but not significantly different before vs after genetic testing (103 vs 79.5 mg/dL). Sixteen (80%) participants were from the lipid clinic; the majority had a preexisting FH diagnosis. LDL-C levels were numerically lower, and more patients received proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor prescriptions after genetic testing; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The majority of patients with FH achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL after genetic testing; however, most patients with APOB/LDLR variants were from the lipid clinic and had been diagnosed with FH by clinical criteria. Show less

Persons with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to lifelong elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Many patients with HeFH do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals with the currently available lipid-lowering therapies. To evaluate the efficacy of enlicitide decanoate (an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) vs placebo in adults with HeFH requiring further lowering of LDL-C levels despite use of statin therapy. This phase 3, randomized clinical trial included persons aged 18 years or older with HeFH currently using lipid-lowering therapy (taking at least a moderate- or high-intensity statin) and either an LDL-C level of 55 mg/dL or greater and a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an LDL-C level of 70 mg/dL or greater without a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The trial was conducted at 59 sites across 17 countries; the first participant was screened on August 8, 2023, and the last follow-up visit occurred on April 7, 2025. Participants were randomized (2:1) to 20 mg of enlicitide (n = 202) or placebo (n = 101) once daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24. The secondary outcomes included the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52, the mean percentage change at week 24 in levels of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B, and the median percentage change at week 24 in lipoprotein(a). Of the 303 participants (mean age, 52.4 [SD, 13.5] years; 51% were female) randomized, 293 (96.7%) completed the trial. The mean LDL-C level was 119.0 mg/dL (SD, 41.0 mg/dL) at baseline, all had statin current use (81.5% were taking a high-intensity statin), and 64.4% were taking ezetimibe. The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24 was -58.2% in the enlicitide group vs 2.6% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -59.4% [95% CI, -65.6% to -53.2%]; P < .001). The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52 was -55.3% in the enlicitide group vs 8.7% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -61.5% [95% CI, -69.4% to -53.7%]; P < .001). At week 24, the mean percentage change in non-HDL-C level was -52.3% in the enlicitide group vs 2.1% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -53.0% [95% CI, -58.5% to -47.4%]; P < .001), the mean percentage change in apolipoprotein B level was -48.2% vs 1.8%, respectively (between-group difference, -49.1% [95% CI, -54.0% to -44.3%]; P < .001), and the median percentage change in lipoprotein(a) level was -24.7% vs -1.6% (between-group difference, -27.5% [95% CI, -34.3% to -20.6%]; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and study discontinuation due to adverse events was similar between groups. Among adults with HeFH, treatment with enlicitide was well tolerated and significantly reduced levels of LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL-C, and lipoprotein(a). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05952869. Show less

Menopause may coincide with rising Lp(a) levels, a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Characterizing changes in Lp(a) across menopause may inform risk stratification and testing recommendations. . We examined changes in serum Lp(a) levels by menopausal status among women with Lp(a) measured at visits 1 and 2 in the UK Biobank. Lp(a) analyses were examined by menopausal status: those who underwent menopause (N=415), those who remained premenopausal (N=532), and those who remained postmenopausal (N=3,615) between visits. We examined the change in Lp(a) between visits stratified by visit 1 Lp(a) levels. The primary outcome was incident Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L at visit 2, estimated using Poisson regression with adjustment for baseline age. Data were available for 4,562 women (mean age at visit 1 = 57±7 years; median Lp(a) at visit 1 = 22 (IQR: 47) nmol/L; median time between visits = 4 (IQR: 1) years). At visit 1, median Lp(a) was slightly higher in postmenopausal women (23 nmol/L) than premenopausal women (19 nmol/L). Overall, median changes in Lp(a) between visits 1 and 2 were modest. Among women with intermediate visit 1 Lp(a) levels (75-125 nmol/L), those who transitioned through menopause experienced a median increase of 34.9 (-6.7, 53.0) nmol/L between visits, an approximately fourfold greater increase than for women who remained pre- (7.9 nmol/L) or postmenopausal (8.0 nmol/L). Further, 56% of women with intermediate visit 1 Lp(a) levels who transitioned through menopause between visits had incident Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L at visit 2, compared with 29% and 28% of women who remained pre- or postmenopausal, representing an age-adjusted risk ratio of 2.26 (95% CI: 1.31, 3.90). Relying on a single lifetime Lp(a) measurement may miss clinically relevant increases during menopause. Repeat testing in women as they age may improve identification of those at high risk for ASCVD. Show less

Mendelian randomization studies suggest a causal effect of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Noncardiovascular effects (eg, diabetes risk) are inadequately investigated. In this noninterventional phenome-wide association study designed to better understand the potential causal role of Lp(a), direct causal phenotypic effects of exposure to Lp(a) were estimated. Also, the association between LPA null allele rs41272114 with type 2 diabetes was assessed, and ancestry-specific Lp(a) thresholds were determined. In the UK Biobank (n = 425,677 adults, 55% female), we studied 1,456 phenotypes spanning 18 classes using 4 ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores and false discovery rate multiple testing correction. Network deconvolution Mendelian randomization was leveraged to separate direct from indirect (ie, associations via mediating variables) causal phenotypic effects and account for confounding, reverse causation, and bidirectionality. Lp(a) was significantly associated with 80 phenotypes across 7 classes. Higher Lp(a) exposure had significant direct causal effects, independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, on coronary artery disease (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.21-1.54) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; β = 0.099; 95% CI: 0.051-0.15) only. Very low Lp(a) exposure was not associated with type 2 diabetes (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.64-1.31) or HbA1c (β = -0.016; 95% CI: -0.062 to 0.030). Among European and African ancestries, 86 (77th percentile) and 93 (59th percentile) nmol/L optimally discriminated myocardial infarction risk, respectively. Increasing Lp(a) exposure had direct, independent causal effects on coronary artery disease and HbA1c only; very low Lp(a) exposure is suggested to not be causally associated with type 2 diabetes. The optimal European and African ancestry threshold to stratify cardiovascular risk is comparable, and below 125/105 nmol/L in current U.S./European medical professional society guidelines. Show less

Cardiovascular disease remains a major global health challenge, with dyslipidaemia being a key modifiable risk factor. While low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary target for lipid-lowering therapies, recent evidence highlights the importance of triglycerides, apolipoprotein B (apoB), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] for residual cardiovascular risk. Current lipid-lowering therapies target key enzymes and proteins involved in cholesterol and lipid metabolism. Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, reducing cholesterol biosynthesis and increasing LDL receptor (LDLR) expression in the liver. Bempedoic acid inhibits ATP citrate lyase, the enzyme upstream of HMG-CoA reductase in the mevalonate pathway, offering an alternative to statins by selectively acting in the liver, minimizing muscle-related side effects. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors [evolocumab, alirocumab, inclisiran, lerodalcibep, and enlicitide decanoate (MK0616)] prevent LDLR degradation, while ezetimibe limits intestinal cholesterol absorption. Emerging lipid-lowering targets include angiopoietin-like 3 protein (ANGPTL3) and apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III). Inhibiting ANGPTL3 reduces both triglycerides and LDL-C independently of LDL receptor. Inhibition of apoC-III unleashes lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, promoting triglyceride-rich particle catabolism, even in complete LPL deficiency. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition also increases the catabolism of apoB-containing lipoproteins. Ongoing research into strategies to reduce Lp(a), primarily but not exclusively through antisense therapies, aims to demonstrate the cardiovascular benefits of targeting this lipoprotein. In summary, the field of targets for lipid and lipoprotein lowering is constantly evolving and offers new strategies for patients resistant to current therapies or with specific lipid profile abnormalities. Show less

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor obicetrapib decreases levels of atherogenic lipids and raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). In this study, we sought to determine the effect of obicetrapib on cardiovascular events. The effects of 10 mg obicetrapib and placebo daily on major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates were investigated in a pooled analysis of 354 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 2,530 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) over 365 days. The association between on-treatment lipids and MACE were also investigated. The cohort (mean age 66 years, 36% female, ASCVD 82%, HeFH 27%, diabetes 35%) had median baseline levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 92 mg/dL, HDL-C 48 mg/dL, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) 88 mg/dL, non-HDL-C 116 mg/dL, and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) 40.5 nmol/L. Obicetrapib produced greater reductions in LDL-C (-34.0 vs -4.0 mg/dL, -37.8% vs -4.6%), ApoB (-19.0 vs -3.0 mg/dL, -21.7% vs -3.6%), non-HDL-C (-36.0 vs -4.0 mg/dL, -32.4% vs -3.7%), and Lp(a) (-9.8 vs 0 nmol/L, -32.5% vs 0%) and increased HDL-C (+68.0 vs +1.0 mg/dL, +140.0% vs +1.5%). The rate of coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization was lower with obicetrapib (3.9% vs 5.0%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.54-1.11; P = 0.16), with a risk reduction in the second 6 months (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37-0.99; P = 0.04). The rate of coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization was lower with obicetrapib (3.2% vs 4.7%; HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46-1.00; P = 0.048), with a risk reduction in the second 6 months (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26-0.77; P = 0.003). Achieved levels of LDL-C (P = 0.003), ApoB (P = 0.007), non-HDL-C (P = 0.01), Lp(a) (P = 0.003), and HDL-C (P = 0.0001) were associated with event rates. Obicetrapib treatment associated with a reduction in coronary events, evident beyond 6 months of treatment. Show less

Plozasiran, an investigational siRNA targeting hepatic apoC-III, reduces triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs). The impact of plozasiran on lipoprotein particle numbers and sizes is unknown. However, reductions in the number of TRL particles (TRL-P) and a shift to possibly less atherogenic large low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P) are expected. This study aimed to determine the impact of plozasiran on lipoprotein particle concentration and subclass distribution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in 2 phase 2 studies. Patients (N = 403) from SHASTA-2 (severe hypertriglyceridemia) and MUIR (mixed hyperlipidemia) were administered 2 total subcutaneous doses of plozasiran (10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo at baseline and week 12. Comprehensive lipoprotein profiling was conducted with NMR. In SHASTA-2, there was a dose-dependent reduction in TRL-P, with placebo-adjusted total TRL-P reductions of -46% and reductions across all TRL subclasses with plozasiran. While total LDL-P was unchanged, large LDL-P concentration increased by +53% and medium by +56%; small LDL-P trended lower (-13%). Total HDL-P increased by +8%, primarily driven by a +36% increase in large high-density lipoprotein particles (HDL-Ps). Similarly, in MUIR, there were dose-dependent reductions in TRL-P, with total TRL-P significantly reduced by -48% (pooled plozasiran) and reductions across all TRL subclasses with plozasiran. While total LDL-P was unchanged, large and medium LDL-P levels increased by +88% and +46%, respectively; small LDL-P levels decreased by -28%. Total HDL-P increased by +12%, driven by a +83% increase in large HDL-P. Plozasiran induced reductions in apoC-III and showed potentially favorable quantitative and qualitative changes in lipoproteins as assessed by NMR in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. Plozasiran reduced TRL-P by ∼50%, shifted LDL to larger particles, and modestly increased HDL-P concentration. While high-potency TRL-lowering therapies can lead to an overall LDL-C increase, plozasiran did not increase LDL-P or apoB but shifted LDL particle size distribution from small dense LDL toward larger sizes. The ∼50% reduction in TRL-P with no increase in apoB and possibly beneficial qualitative changes in LDL suggests the potential of plozasiran to lower cardiovascular risk, which may be evaluated in a prospective outcomes trial. Show less

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is characterized by plasma triglyceride (TG) levels >500 mg/dL (SI: 5.7 mmol/L) (reference range, <150 mg/dL [SI: <1.7 mmol/L]) and is linked to cardiovascular disease and pancreatitis risk. Treatment typically involves dietary restrictions and lipid-lowering medications. Glycerol kinase deficiency (GKD) is a rare genetic disorder that causes pseudo-HTG. In SHASTA-2, a study of patients with severe HTG, most subjects (>90%) treated with plozasiran, an apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) small interfering RNA (siRNA), achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL (SI: 5.7 mmol/L), below the risk threshold for acute pancreatitis. We report herein a case study of a 65-year-old male apparently not responding to plozasiran. The patient was shown to carry a loss-of-function variant in the Show less

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare, recessive monogenic disorder characterized by severely elevated plasma triglyceride (TG) levels due to absent or markedly impaired lipoprotein lipase activity, leading to a greatly increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Naturally occurring very low levels of apoC-III are associated with low TG levels; thus, apoC-III is a target for TG lowering, and therapies have been developed to reduce apoC-III. Strategies to inhibit hepatic apoC-III synthesis include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). In the last decade, technologies have been developed to enhance hepatic delivery of these potential therapeutic agents by conjugation of the ligand triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine to ASO and siRNA for receptor-mediated uptake by hepatocytes, where apoC-III is predominantly expressed. Enhanced delivery of these pharmacological agents to the target tissue has been found to support lower and/or less frequent dosing with consequent lower total systemic exposure. One antisense agent, the ASO olezarsen, is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunct to diet to lower triglycerides in adults with FCS, and the other, the siRNA plozasiran, is in late-stage clinical development. Both agents have shown effectiveness in reducing both apoC-III and TG levels across several study populations. Reduced TG, lower rates of acute pancreatitis events, and similar proportions of adverse events in placebo and treated patients were recently demonstrated in placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of patients with FCS treated with olezarsen in Balance and with plozasiran in PALISADE. This review discusses causes and consequences of FCS and the rationale and progress made in developing APOC3 RNA-targeted therapeutics for the treatment of FCS. Show less

Obicetrapib is a potent, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additive reductions in LDL-C occur when obicetrapib is combined with ezetimibe. The impact of obicetrapib and ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on coronary plaque burden is unknown. Favorable changes in noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume (NCPV) may indicate a potential beneficial effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. REMBRANDT is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial designed to assess the efficacy of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on coronary plaque burden. Individuals aged 45 years or older with ASCVD (imaging evidence of vascular disease or clinically manifested ASCVD) and an LDL-C of ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapy are eligible to participate. Eligible participants (N = 300) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to obicetrapib 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg FDC once daily or placebo tablet once daily. The primary efficacy outcome of REMBRANDT is percent change in total NCPV from baseline to 18 months as assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Secondary endpoints include absolute change in total NCPV, percent and absolute change in NCPV in the most diseased coronary segment, percent change in LDL-C, and change in perivascular fat attenuation index from baseline to 18 months. The REMBRANDT trial will determine whether the favorable effects of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on LDL-C translate to a reduction in coronary plaque burden as a potential mechanism for ASCVD risk reduction. NCT06305559. Show less

Preclinical data have shown that low levels of metabolites with anti-inflammatory properties may impact metabolic disease processes. However, the association between mid-life levels of such metabolites and long-term ASCVD risk is not known. We characterised the plasma metabolomic profile (1228 metabolites) of 1852 participants (58.1 ± 7.5 years old, 69.6% female, 43.6% self-identified as Black) enrolled in the Heart Strategies Concentrating on Risk Evaluation (Heart SCORE) study. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of metabolite levels on ASCVD risk (nonfatal MI, revascularisation, and cardiac mortality). We additionally explored the effect of genetic variants neighbouring ASCVD-related genes on the levels of metabolites predictive of ASCVD events. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (n = 4790; 75.5 ± 5.1 years old, 57.4% female, 19.5% self-identified as Black) was used as an independent validation cohort. In fully adjusted models, alpha-ketobutyrate [AKB] (OR 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49-0.80]; p < 0.001), and 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-GPI [OR, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.47-0.83; p < 0.001], two metabolites in amino acid and phosphatidylinositol lipid pathways, respectively, showed a significant protective association with incident ASCVD risk in both Heart SCORE and ARIC cohorts. Three plasmalogens and a bilirubin derivative, whose levels were regulated by genetic variants neighbouring FADS1 and UGT1A1, respectively, exhibited a significant protective association with ASCVD risk in the Heart SCORE only. Higher mid-life levels of AKB and 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-GPI metabolites may be associated with lower risk late-life ASCVD events. Further research can determine the causality and therapeutic potential of these metabolites in ASCVD. This study was funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Health (ME-02-384). The department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. Additional funding was provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01HL089292 and UL1 TR001857 (Steven Reis). Further, NIH funded R01HL141824 and R01HL168683 were used for the ARIC study validation (Bing Yu). Show less

The pathways linking lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are unclear. This study aimed to discover Lp(a)-associated plasma proteins and estimate their associations with incident ASCVD. We analyzed 48,859 UK Biobank participants with measured Lp(a) and proteomic profiles, with replication in 9,416 individuals in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study cohort utilizing a separate proteomic platform. Linear models assessed associations between Lp(a) and protein concentrations adjusted for age, sex, cigarette smoking, diabetes diagnosis, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, hypertension, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, estimated glomerular filtration rate, statin prescription, and the first 10 components of genetic ancestry. Multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method (P < 0.05). We examined how the protein effect sizes from the primary analysis using the outcome of Lp(a) aligned with those for the outcomes of an LPA genetic risk score (GRS) and LDL-C. Cox proportional hazards models quantified hazard ratios (HRs) for protein associations with incident ASCVD. Participants were a mean age of 57 years (SD 8.22), 93.9% European, and 53.8% male, with median follow-up of 8.9 years (IQR 8.3-9.7). Of 1,459 circulating proteins, 164 were significantly associated with Lp(a) after FDR correction, with enrichment for lipid degradation, metabolism, and insulin secretion. In the ARIC study, 10 proteins were replicated with consistent effect estimates. Of these replicated proteins, there were no significant associations observed with an Using high-throughput proteomics, we discovered and replicated 10 proteins associated with circulating Lp(a), several of which were independent of genetically-predicted Lp(a). While Lp(a) is highly heritable, these atherogenic proteins represent a non-heritable Lp(a) axis. Show less

Cost-effectiveness of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] testing is not established. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Lp(a) testing in the cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention population from healthcare and societal perspectives. We constructed and validated a multi-state microsimulation Markov model for a population of 10,000 individuals aged between 40 and 69 years without CVD, selected randomly from the UK Biobank. The model evaluated Lp(a) testing in individuals not initially classified as high-risk based on age, diabetes status, or the SCORE-2 algorithm. Those with an Lp(a) level ≥105 nmol/L (50 mg/dL) were treated as high risk (initiation of a statin plus blood pressure lowering). The Lp(a) testing intervention was compared to standard of care. The primary analyses were conducted from the Australian and UK healthcare perspectives in 2023AUD/GBP. A cost adaptation method estimated cost-effectiveness in multiple European countries, Canada, and the USA. Among 10,000 individuals, 1,807 had their treatment modified from Lp(a) testing. This led to 217 and 255 quality-adjusted life years gained in Australia and the UK, respectively, with corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 12,134 (cost-effective) and -3,491 (cost-saving). From a societal perspective, Lp(a) testing saved $85 and £263 per person in Australia and the UK, respectively. Lp(a) testing was cost-saving among all countries tested in the cost adaptation analysis. Lp(a) testing in the primary prevention population to reclassify CVD risk and treatment is cost-saving and warranted to prevent CVD. Show less

Extreme hypertriglyceridemia, defined as triglyceride (TG) levels ≥1000 mg/dL, is almost always indicative of chylomicronemia. The current diagnostic approach categorizes individuals with chylomicronemia into familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS; prevalence 1-10 per million), caused by the biallelic combination of pathogenic variants that impair the lipolytic action of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), or multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS, 1 in 500). A pragmatic framework should emphasize the severity of the phenotype and the risk of complications. Therefore, we endorse the term "persistent chylomicronemia (PC)" defined as TG ≥1000 mg/dL in more than half of the measurements to encompass patients with the highest risk for pancreatitis, regardless of their genetic predisposition. We suggest classification of PC into 4 subtypes: (1) genetic FCS, (2) clinical FCS, (3) PC with "alarm" features, and (4) PC without alarm features. Although patients with FCS most likely have PC, the vast majority with PC do not have genetic FCS. Proposed alarm features are: (a) history of recurrent TG-induced acute pancreatitis, (b) recurrent hospitalizations for severe abdominal pain without another identified cause, (c) childhood pancreatitis, (d) family history of TG-induced pancreatitis, and/or (e) postheparin LPL activity <20% of normal value. Alarm features constitute the strongest risk factors for future acute pancreatitis risk. Patients with PC and alarm features have very high risk of pancreatitis, comparable to that in patients with FCS. Effective, innovative treatments for PC, like apolipoprotein C-III inhibitors, have been developed. Combined with lifestyle modifications, these agents markedly lower TG levels and risk of pancreatitis in the very-high-risk groups, irrespective of the monogenic etiology. Pragmatic definitions, education, and focus on patients with PC, specifically those with alarm features, could help mitigate the risk of acute pancreatitis and other complications. Show less

Extreme hypertriglyceridemia, defined as triglyceride (TG) levels ≥1000 mg/dL, is almost always indicative of chylomicronemia. The current diagnostic approach categorizes individuals with chylomicronemia into familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS; prevalence 1-10 per million), caused by the biallelic combination of pathogenic variants that impair the lipolytic action of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), or multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS, 1 in 500). A pragmatic framework should emphasize the severity of the phenotype and the risk of complications. Therefore, we endorse the term "persistent chylomicronemia" defined as TG ≥1000 mg/dL in more than half of the measurements to encompass patients with the highest risk for pancreatitis, regardless of their genetic predisposition. We suggest classification of PC into four subtypes: 1) genetic FCS, 2) clinical FCS, 3) PC with "alarm" features, and 4) PC without alarm features. Although patients with FCS most likely have PC, the vast majority with PC do not have genetic FCS. Proposed alarm features are: (a) history of recurrent TG-induced acute pancreatitis, (b) recurrent hospitalizations for severe abdominal pain without another identified cause, (c) childhood pancreatitis, (d) family history of TG-induced pancreatitis, and/or (e) post-heparin LPL activity <20 % of normal value. Alarm features constitute the strongest risk factors for future acute pancreatitis risk. Patients with PC and alarm features have very high risk of pancreatitis, comparable to that in patients with FCS. Effective, innovative treatments for PC, like apoC-III inhibitors, have been developed. Combined with lifestyle modifications, these agents markedly lower TG levels and risk of pancreatitis in the very-high-risk groups, irrespective of the monogenic etiology. Pragmatic definitions, education, and focus on patients with PC specifically those with alarm features could help mitigate the risk of acute pancreatitis and other complications. Show less

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of severe hypertriglyceridemia presenting in the form of chylomicronemia that persists despite treatment of secondary causes and the use of conventional lipid-lowering treatment. Persistent chylomicronemia is a rare syndromic disorder that affects carriers of bi-allelic combinations of pathogenic gene variants impairing lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, as well as a significant number of individuals who do not meet this genetic criterion. It is associated with a high risk of acute pancreatitis and other morbidities. Effective innovative treatments for severe hypertriglyceridemia are being developed and are becoming available. Patients with persistent chylomicronemia of any cause respond equally to next-generation therapies with LPL-independent mechanisms of action and do not generally respond to conventional LPL-dependent treatments. Not all individuals with persistent chylomicronemia carry a proven pathogenic combination of gene variants that impair LPL activity. Documenting the clinical characteristics of people with persistent chylomicronemia and their response to emerging therapies is essential to correctly establish their risk trajectory and ensure equitable access to personalized treatment. Show less

This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing. Show less

Persons with mixed hyperlipidemia are at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to an elevated non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, which is driven by remnant cholesterol in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The metabolism and clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are down-regulated through apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3)-mediated inhibition of lipoprotein lipase. We carried out a 48-week, phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of plozasiran, a hepatocyte-targeted APOC3 small interfering RNA, in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (i.e., a triglyceride level of 150 to 499 mg per deciliter and either a low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level of ≥70 mg per deciliter or a non-HDL cholesterol level of ≥100 mg per deciliter). The participants were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive plozasiran or placebo within each of four cohorts. In the first three cohorts, the participants received a subcutaneous injection of plozasiran (10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg) or placebo on day 1 and at week 12 (quarterly doses). In the fourth cohort, participants received 50 mg of plozasiran or placebo on day 1 and at week 24 (half-yearly dose). The data from the participants who received placebo were pooled. The primary end point was the percent change in fasting triglyceride level at week 24. A total of 353 participants underwent randomization. At week 24, significant reductions in the fasting triglyceride level were observed with plozasiran, with differences, as compared with placebo, in the least-squares mean percent change from baseline of -49.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -59.0 to -40.6) with the 10-mg-quarterly dose, -56.0 percentage points (95% CI, -65.1 to -46.8) with the 25-mg-quarterly dose, -62.4 percentage points (95% CI, -71.5 to -53.2) with the 50-mg-quarterly dose, and -44.2 percentage points (95% CI, -53.4 to -35.0) with the 50-mg-half-yearly dose (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Worsening glycemic control was observed in 10% of the participants receiving placebo, 12% of those receiving the 10-mg-quarterly dose, 7% of those receiving the 25-mg-quarterly dose, 20% of those receiving the 50-mg-quarterly dose, and 21% of those receiving the 50-mg-half-yearly dose. In this randomized, controlled trial involving participants with mixed hyperlipidemia, plozasiran, as compared with placebo, significantly reduced triglyceride levels at 24 weeks. A clinical outcomes trial is warranted. (Funded by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals; MUIR ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04998201.). Show less

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) confers increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and acute pancreatitis. Despite available treatments, persistent ASCVD and acute pancreatitis-associated morbidity from sHTG remains. To determine the tolerability, efficacy, and dose of plozasiran, an APOC3-targeted small interfering-RNA (siRNA) drug, for lowering triglyceride and apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3, regulator of triglyceride metabolism) levels and evaluate its effects on other lipid parameters in patients with sHTG. The Study to Evaluate ARO-APOC3 in Adults With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (SHASTA-2) was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2b randomized clinical trial enrolling adults with sHTG at 74 centers across the US, Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada from May 31, 2021, to August 31, 2023. Eligible patients had fasting triglyceride levels in the range of 500 to 4000 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0113) while receiving stable lipid-lowering treatment. Participants received 2 subcutaneous doses of plozasiran (10, 25, or 50 mg) or matched placebo on day 1 and at week 12 and were followed up through week 48. The primary end point evaluated the placebo-subtracted difference in means of percentage triglyceride change at week 24. Mixed-model repeated measures were used for statistical modeling. Of 229 patients, 226 (mean [SD] age, 55 [11] years; 176 male [78%]) were included in the primary analysis. Baseline mean (SD) triglyceride level was 897 (625) mg/dL and plasma APOC3 level was 32 (16) mg/dL. Plozasiran induced significant dose-dependent placebo-adjusted least squares (LS)-mean reductions in triglyceride levels (primary end point) of -57% (95% CI, -71.9% to -42.1%; P < .001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of -77% (95% CI, -89.1% to -65.8%; P < .001) at week 24 with the highest dose. Among plozasiran-treated patients, 144 of 159 (90.6%) achieved a triglyceride level of less than 500 mg/dL. Plozasiran was associated with dose-dependent increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, which was significant in patients receiving the highest dose (placebo-adjusted LS-mean increase 60% (95% CI, 31%-89%; P < .001). However, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels did not increase, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels decreased significantly at all doses, with a placebo-adjusted change of -20% at the highest dose. There were also significant durable reductions in remnant cholesterol and ApoB48 as well as increases in HDL-C level through week 48. Adverse event rates were similar in plozasiran-treated patients vs placebo. Serious adverse events were mild to moderate, not considered treatment related, and none led to discontinuation or death. In this randomized clinical trial of patients with sHTG, plozasiran decreased triglyceride levels, which fell below the 500 mg/dL threshold of acute pancreatitis risk in most participants. Other triglyceride-related lipoprotein parameters improved. An increase in LDL-C level was observed but with no change in ApoB level and a decrease in non-HDL-C level. The safety profile was generally favorable at all doses. Additional studies will be required to determine whether plozasiran favorably modulates the risk of sHTG-associated complications. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04720534. Show less

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated. Show less

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) inhibits triglyceride clearance by reducing lipoprotein lipase–mediated hydrolysis and hepatocyte uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. ARO-APOC3, a hepatocyte-targeting RNA interference therapeutic, inhibits APOC3 messenger ribonucleic acid expression, lowering triglyceride levels. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety, pharmacodynamic variables, and pharmacokinetic variables of ARO-APOC3 treatment. METHODS: Healthy participants and adults with hypertriglyceridemia were randomly assigned to receive escalating single (day 1) or repeat (days 1 and 29) doses, respectively, of subcutaneous injections of ARO-APOC3 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg or placebo; they were followed up until day 113. Additional cohorts of healthy participants and adults with chylomicronemia received repeat doses of open-label ARO-APOC3. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and side effect profile of ARO-APOC3. Key secondary and exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetic variables and changes in serum APOC3, triglyceride, and cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Eighty-eight participants received ARO-APOC3 and 24 participants received placebo across double-blind and open-label cohorts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of transient, mild to moderate liver transaminase changes occurred in 10 participants: 1 patient receiving ARO-APOC3 25 mg, 5 patients receiving ARO-APOC3 50 mg, and 4 participants receiving ARO-APOC3 100 mg (1 healthy participant and 3 patients with hypertriglyceridemia). These events were asymptomatic, and transaminase levels returned to near baseline by the end of the trial. No AEs related to thrombocytopenia or platelet declines were reported. In the hypertriglyceridemia cohorts, the day 113 mean changes from baseline in APOC3 at the 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-mg doses were −62.0%, −81.7%, −90.1%, and −94.4%, respectively, compared with −1.6% with placebo. This corresponded to median changes in triglyceride levels of −65.6%, −69.9%, −81.2%, and −81.0% compared with −2.8% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this small trial of short duration, ARO-APOC3 was associated with few AEs and reduced serum levels of APOC3 and triglycerides in healthy participants and patients with hypertriglyceridemia. (Funded by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03783377.) Show less

Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is associated with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, irrespective of statin therapy. In the overall REDUCE-IT study of statin-treated patients, icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) and the key secondary composite endpoint (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke). REDUCE-IT was an international, double-blind trial that randomized 8179 high CV risk statin-treated patients with controlled LDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides, to IPE 4 g/day or placebo. The current study evaluated the pre-specified patient subgroup with a history of MetSyn, but without diabetes at baseline. Among patients with MetSyn but without diabetes at baseline ( In statin-treated patients with a history of MetSyn, IPE significantly reduced the risk of first and total CV events in REDUCE-IT. The large relative and ARRs observed supports IPE as a potential therapeutic consideration for patients with MetSyn at high CV risk. Show less

Obicetrapib, a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein particles, and apolipoproteins, when added to high-intensity statin in patients with dyslipidemia. To evaluate the safety and lipid-altering efficacy of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe combination therapy as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy. This double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial administered 10 mg obicetrapib plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 40), 10 mg obicetrapib (n = 39), or placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks to patients with LDL-C >70 mg/dL and triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL, on stable high-intensity statin. Endpoints included concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9), safety, and tolerability. Ninety-seven patients were included in the primary analysis (mean age 62.6 years, 63.9% male, 84.5% white, average body mass index of 30.9 kg/m The combination of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe significantly lowered atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and was safe and well tolerated when administered on top of high-intensity statin to patients with elevated LDL-C. Show less

Hypertriglyceridaemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. This clinical trial evaluated olezarsen, an N-acetyl-galactosamine-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide targeted to hepatic APOC3 mRNA to inhibit apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) production, in lowering triglyceride levels in patients at high risk for or with established cardiovascular disease. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted in 114 patients with fasting serum triglycerides 200-500 mg/dL (2.26-5.65 mmol/L). Patients received olezarsen (10 or 50 mg every 4 weeks, 15 mg every 2 weeks, or 10 mg every week) or saline placebo subcutaneously for 6-12 months. The primary endpoint was the percent change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to Month 6 of exposure. Baseline median (interquartile range) fasting triglyceride levels were 262 (222-329) mg/dL [2.96 (2.51-3.71) mmol/L]. Treatment with olezarsen resulted in mean percent triglyceride reductions of 23% with 10 mg every 4 weeks, 56% with 15 mg every 2 weeks, 60% with 10 mg every week, and 60% with 50 mg every 4 weeks, compared with increase by 6% for the pooled placebo group (P-values ranged from 0.0042 to <0.0001 compared with placebo). Significant decreases in apoC-III, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were also observed. There were no platelet count, liver, or renal function changes in any of the olezarsen groups. The most common adverse event was mild erythema at the injection site. Olezarsen significantly reduced apoC-III, triglycerides, and atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia and at high risk for or with established cardiovascular disease. NCT03385239. Show less