👤 Mette Christoffersen

Evaluation of weight loss drugs is usually performed in diet-induced obese mice housed at ∼22°C. This is a cold stress that increases energy expenditure by ∼35% compared to thermoneutrality (∼30°C), which may overestimate drug-induced weight loss. We investigated five anti-obesity mechanisms that have been in clinical development, comparing weight loss in mice housed at 22°C vs. 30°C. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), human fibroblast growth factor 21 (hFGF21), and melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonist induced similar weight losses. Peptide YY elicited greater vehicle-subtracted weight loss at 30°C (7.2% vs. 1.4%), whereas growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) was more effective at 22°C (13% vs. 6%). Independent of ambient temperature, GLP-1 and hFGF21 prevented the reduction in metabolic rate caused by weight loss. There was no simple rule for a better prediction of human drug efficacy based on ambient temperature, but since humans live at thermoneutrality, drug testing using mice should include experiments near thermoneutrality. Show less

We tested the association of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and coronary artery disease (CAD) with LDL-C and risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in the Danish general population. We included a total of 21,485 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and Copenhagen City Heart Study. For everyone, LDL-PRS and CAD-PRS were calculated, each based on >400,000 variants. We also genotyped four rare variants in LDLR or APOB known to cause familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Heterozygous carriers of FH-causing variants in APOB or LDLR had a mean LDL-C of 5.40 and 6.09 mmol/L, respectively, and an odds ratio for IHD of 2.27 (95 % CI 1.43-3.51) when compared to non-carriers. The LDL-PRS explained 13.8 % of the total variation in LDL-C in the cohort. Individuals in the lowest and highest 1 % of LDL-PRS had a mean LDL-C of 2.49 and 4.75 mmol/L, respectively. Compared to those in the middle 20-80 %, those in the lowest and highest 1 % of LDL-PRS had odds ratios for IHD of 0.58 (95 % CI, 0.38-0.88) and 1.83 (95 % CI, 1.33-2.53). The corresponding odds ratios for CAD-PRS were 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.41-0.92) and 2.06 (95 % CI, 1.49-2.85). The top 1 % of LDL-PRS and CAD-PRS conferred effects on LDL-C and risk of IHD comparable to those seen for carriers of rare FH-causing variants in APOB or LDLR. These results highlight the potential value of implementing such PRS clinically. Show less

The balance between the potential long-term clinical benefits and harms associated with genetic cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) deficiency, mimicking pharmacologic CETP inhibition, is unknown. To assess the relative benefits and harms associated with genetic CETP deficiency. This study examined 2 similar prospective cohorts of the Danish general population, with data on a total of 102 607 participants collected from October 10, 1991, through December 7, 2018. Weighted CETP allele scores. Incident cardiovascular mortality, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, vascular dementia, Alzheimer disease, all-cause mortality, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The study first tested whether a CETP allele score was associated with morbidity and mortality, when scaled to genetically lower levels of non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (ie, 17 mg/dL), corresponding to the reduction observed for anacetrapib vs placebo in the Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib Through Lipid-Modification (REVEAL) trial. Second, the study assessed how much of the change in morbidity and mortality was associated with genetically lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol. Finally, the balance between the potential long-term clinical benefits and harms associated with genetic CETP deficiency was quantified. For AMD, the analyses also included higher levels of HDL cholesterol associated with genetic CETP deficiency. Of 102 607 individuals in the study, 56 559 (55%) were women (median age, 58 years [IQR, 47-67 years]). Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios showed that a genetically lower level of non-HDL cholesterol (ie, 17 mg/dL) was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.95]), ischemic heart disease (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.68-0.95]), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), peripheral arterial disease (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.63-1.02]), and vascular dementia (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.80]) and an increased risk of AMD (HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.63-3.30]) but was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81-1.02]), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81-1.36]), or Alzheimer disease (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.89-1.76]). When scaled to a higher level of HDL cholesterol, the increased risk of AMD was even larger. A considerable fraction of the lower risk of cardiovascular end points was associated with genetically lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol, while the higher risk of AMD was associated with genetically higher levels of HDL cholesterol. Per 1 million person-years, the projected 1916 more AMD events associated with genetically higher levels of HDL cholesterol was similar to the 1962 fewer events of cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction combined associated with genetically lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol. This study suggests that genetic CETP deficiency, mimicking pharmacologic CETP inhibition, was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but with a markedly higher risk of AMD. Show less