👤 Pamela M Rist

Cardiovascular (CV) disease risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is the leading cause of mortality. Improved CV risk stratification tools in RA could enhance use of preventative care and improve outcomes. We previously studied biomarkers of CV disease - adiponectin, hsCRP, Lp(a), osteoprotegerin (OPG), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT), serum amyloid A (SAA), YKL-40, soluble TNF receptor1 (sTNFR1) -- that were associated with CV risk. In the current study, these biomarkers were tested in an unrelated external cohort of RA patients followed at a single academic medical center without a history of CV events. CV events were identified through Medicare and Medicaid administrative data or through medical record review of self-reported events.Biomarkers were assessed at cohort entry among a nested cohort of cases and controls, matched 1:1 on sex and age. Analyses were conducted using conditional logistic regression. We examined whether the candidate biomarkers added to clinical CV risk factors improved model prediction, using the area under the curve (AUC) as well as the net reclassification index (NRI). From a cohort of 1,345 eligible patients with RA, we identified 123 patients with confirmed CV events. Cases and matched controls were typical of RA: median age 63 years, 77% women, RA disease duration 11 years, 72% seropositive, 85% used a biologic or conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, 58% non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 30% oral glucocorticoids. From the candidate biomarkers, LASSO regression selected hsTnT and sTNFR1 as associated with CV events. The AUC for models that included only clinical risk factors was 0.758 (95% CI 0.689-0.829); after adding hsTnT and sTNFR1, the AUC increased to 0.802 (95% CI 0.718-0.998). The NRI of the model with biomarkers was 16.3%, with improvement only observed in patients who did not have CV events during follow-up. Adding selected biomarkers to clinical risk factors enhances the discrimination of models predicting CV events among patients with RA. These risk models require prospective testing to see if they have value in clinical practice decision-making regarding preventative care. Show less

To evaluate phenotypic and genetic relationships between migraine and lipoprotein subfractions. We evaluated phenotypic associations between migraine and 19 lipoprotein subfraction measures in the Women's Genome Health Study (n = 22,788). We then investigated genetic relationships between these traits using summary statistics from the International Headache Genetics Consortium for migraine (n There was a significant phenotypic association (odds ratio 1.27 [95% confidence interval 1.12-1.44]) and a significant genetic correlation at 0.18 ( The study supports the association between certain lipoprotein subfractions, especially for TRLP, and migraine in populations of European ancestry. The corresponding shared genetic components may help identify potential targets for future migraine therapeutics. This study provides Class I evidence that migraine is significantly associated with some lipoprotein subfractions. Show less

Blood pressure (BP) was inconsistently associated with migraine and the mechanisms of BP-lowering medications in migraine prophylaxis are unknown. Leveraging large-scale summary statistics for migraine (N Show less

Adverse levels of lipoproteins are highly heritable and constitute risk factors for cardiovascular outcomes. Hitherto, genome-wide association studies revealed 95 lipid-associated loci. However, due to the small effect sizes of these associations large sample numbers (>100 000 samples) were needed. Here we show that analyzing more refined lipid phenotypes, namely lipoprotein subfractions, can increase the number of significantly associated loci compared with bulk high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein analysis in a study with identical sample numbers. Moreover, lipoprotein subfractions provide novel insight into the human lipid metabolism. We measured 15 lipoprotein subfractions (L1-L15) in 1791 samples using (1)H-NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy. Using cluster analyses, we quantified inter-relationships among lipoprotein subfractions. Additionally, we analyzed associations with subfractions at known lipid loci. We identified five distinct groups of subfractions: one (L1) was only marginally captured by serum lipids and therefore extends our knowledge of lipoprotein biochemistry. During a lipid-tolerance test, L1 lost its special position. In the association analysis, we found that eight loci (LIPC, CETP, PLTP, FADS1-2-3, SORT1, GCKR, APOB, APOA1) were associated with the subfractions, whereas only four loci (CETP, SORT1, GCKR, APOA1) were associated with serum lipids. For LIPC, we observed a 10-fold increase in the variance explained by our regression models. In conclusion, NMR-based fine mapping of lipoprotein subfractions provides novel information on their biological nature and strengthens the associations with genetic loci. Future clinical studies are now needed to investigate their biomedical relevance. Show less