👀 Nadera N Bismee

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷 Tags ❀ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
1
Articles
articles
Hesham Sheashaa, Kamal Awad, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas +14 more · 2025 · Coronary artery disease · added 2026-04-24
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remain Show more
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed 97 396 patients with measured Lp(a) and HDL-C. Groups were stratified by Lp(a) (≥50 vs. <50 mg/dl) and HDL-C [low (<40), optimal (40-60), high (>60 mg/dl)]. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox models. Over a median of 5.9 years, 7794 deaths occurred. Compared to optimal HDL-C/low Lp(a) (reference), high HDL-C/low Lp(a) had the lowest mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.91], while low HDL-C/high Lp(a) had the highest risk (aHR: 1.55; 1.41-1.71). High HDL-C protective effect was insignificant with elevated Lp(a) (aHR: 0.98; 0.89-1.08). Sex-stratified analyses revealed divergent effects: women with high HDL-C/high Lp(a) retained the HDL-C protective effect (aHR: 0.82; 0.72-0.93), whereas men faced increased risk (aHR: 1.22; 1.05-1.42). Elevated Lp(a) enhances mortality risk despite elevated HDL-C levels, with sex-specific differences: women retain mortality benefits from high HDL-C despite elevated Lp(a), whereas men with concurrent elevations in HDL-C and Lp(a) experienced mortality risks comparable to those with low HDL-C. Findings underscore sex-specific CV risk stratification incorporating HDL-C and Lp(a), challenging the HDL-C universal protective role. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001589
LPA