👤 Evelyn Houtman

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
5
Articles
5
Name variants
Also published as: E Houtman, Jon C D Houtman, Jon C Houtman, René Houtman
articles
M Tuerlings, G M C Janssen, I Boone +10 more · 2023 · Osteoarthritis and cartilage · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
To explore the co-expression network of the osteoarthritis (OA) risk gene WWP2 in articular cartilage and study cartilage characteristics when mimicking the effect of OA risk allele rs1052429-A on WWP Show more
To explore the co-expression network of the osteoarthritis (OA) risk gene WWP2 in articular cartilage and study cartilage characteristics when mimicking the effect of OA risk allele rs1052429-A on WWP2 expression in a human 3D in vitro model of cartilage. Co-expression behavior of WWP2 with genes expressed in lesioned OA articular cartilage (N = 35 samples) was explored. By applying lentiviral particle mediated WWP2 upregulation in 3D in vitro pellet cultures of human primary chondrocytes (N = 8 donors) the effects of upregulation on cartilage matrix deposition was evaluated. Finally, we transfected primary chondrocytes with miR-140 mimics to evaluate whether miR-140 and WWP2 are involved in similar pathways. Upon performing Spearman correlations in lesioned OA cartilage, 98 highly correlating genes (|ρ| > 0.7) were identified. Among these genes, we identified GJA1, GDF10, STC2, WDR1, and WNK4. Subsequent upregulation of WWP2 on 3D chondrocyte pellet cultures resulted in a decreased expression of COL2A1 and ACAN and an increase in EPAS1 expression. Additionally, we observed a decreased expression of GDF10, STC2, and GJA1. Proteomics analysis identified 42 proteins being differentially expressed with WWP2 upregulation, which were enriched for ubiquitin conjugating enzyme activity. Finally, upregulation of miR-140 in 2D chondrocytes resulted in significant upregulation of WWP2 and WDR1. Mimicking the effect of OA risk allele rs1052429-A on WWP2 expression initiates detrimental processes in the cartilage shown by a response in hypoxia associated genes EPAS1, GDF10, and GJA1 and a decrease in anabolic markers, COL2A1 and ACAN. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.09.009
WWP2
Evelyn Houtman, Margo Tuerlings, H Eka D Suchiman +10 more · 2022 · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · Oxford University Press · added 2026-04-24
To investigate whether the deiodinase inhibitor iopanoic acid (IOP) has chondroprotective properties, a mechanical stress induced model of human aged explants was used to test both repeated dosing and Show more
To investigate whether the deiodinase inhibitor iopanoic acid (IOP) has chondroprotective properties, a mechanical stress induced model of human aged explants was used to test both repeated dosing and slow release of IOP. Human osteochondral explants subjected to injurious mechanical stress (65%MS) were treated with IOP or IOP encapsulated in poly lactic-co-glycolic acid-polyethylene glycol nanoparticles (NP-IOP). Changes to cartilage integrity and signalling were determined by Mankin scoring of histology, sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) release and expression levels of catabolic, anabolic and hypertrophic markers. Subsequently, on a subgroup of samples, RNA sequencing was performed on 65%MS (n = 14) and 65%MS+IOP (n = 7) treated cartilage to identify IOP's mode of action. Damage from injurious mechanical stress was confirmed by increased cartilage surface damage in the Mankin score, increased sGAG release, and consistent upregulation of catabolic markers and downregulation of anabolic markers. IOP and, though less effective, NP-IOP treatment, reduced MMP13 and increased COL2A1 expression. In line with this, IOP and NP-IOP reduced cartilage surface damage induced by 65%MS, while only IOP reduced sGAG release from explants subjected to 65%MS. Lastly, differential expression analysis identified 12 genes in IOP's mode of action to be mainly involved in reducing metabolic processes (INSIG1, DHCR7, FADS1 and ACAT2) and proliferation and differentiation (CTGF, BMP5 and FOXM1). Treatment with the deiodinase inhibitor IOP reduced detrimental changes of injurious mechanical stress. In addition, we identified that its mode of action was likely on metabolic processes, cell proliferation and differentiation. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac202
FADS1
Lautaro D Alvarez, María V Dansey, María F Ogara +5 more · 2020 · The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Liver X Receptors (LXRs) are ligand dependent transcription factors activated by oxidized cholesterol metabolites (oxysterols) that play fundamental roles in the transcriptional control of lipid metab Show more
Liver X Receptors (LXRs) are ligand dependent transcription factors activated by oxidized cholesterol metabolites (oxysterols) that play fundamental roles in the transcriptional control of lipid metabolism, cholesterol transport and modulation of inflammatory responses. In the last decade, LXRs have become attractive pharmacological targets for intervention in human metabolic diseases and thus, several efforts have concentrated on the development of synthetic analogues able to modulate LXR transcriptional response. In this sense, we have previously found that cholestenoic acid analogues with a modified side chain behave as LXR inverse agonists. To further investigate the structure-activity relationships and to explore how cholestenoic acid derivatives interact with the LXRs, we evaluated the LXR biological activity of new analogues containing a C24-C25 double bond. Furthermore, a microarray assay was performed to evaluate the recruitment of coregulators to recombinant LXR LBD upon ligand binding. Also, conventional and accelerated molecular dynamics simulations were applied to gain insight on the molecular determinants involved in the inverse agonism. As LXR inverse agonists emerge as very promising candidates to control LXR activity, the cholestenoic acid analogues here depicted constitute a new relevant steroidal scaffold to inhibit LXR action. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105585
NR1H3
Monita Sieng, Michael P Hayes, Joseph B O'Brien +4 more · 2019 · The Journal of biological chemistry · American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · added 2026-04-24
Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling through their ability to act as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for activated G Show more
Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling through their ability to act as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for activated Gα subunits. Members of the RZ subfamily of RGS proteins bind to activated Gα Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006059
RGS17
Christopher R Bodle, Duncan I Mackie, Michael P Hayes +7 more · 2017 · Journal of natural products · ACS Publications · added 2026-04-24
Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) 17 is an overexpressed promoter of cancer survival in lung and prostate tumors, the knockdown of which results in decreased tumor cell proliferation in vitro. Id Show more
Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) 17 is an overexpressed promoter of cancer survival in lung and prostate tumors, the knockdown of which results in decreased tumor cell proliferation in vitro. Identification of drug-like molecules inhibiting this protein could ameliorate the RGS17's pro-tumorigenic effect. Using high-throughput screening, a chemical library containing natural products was interrogated for inhibition of the RGS17-Gα Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00112
RGS17