👤 Julian Cremer

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
3
Articles
3
Name variants
Also published as: Kirsten Cremer, Paul C Cremer
articles
Julian Cremer, Tuan Le, Mohammad M Ghahremanpour +3 more · 2025 · ArXiv · ACS Publications · added 2026-04-24
We present Flowr.root, an
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00083
BACE1
Fabian Brand, Aswinkumar Vijayananth, Tzung-Chien Hsieh +11 more · 2022 · Human mutation · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
Next-generation phenotyping (NGP) is an application of advanced methods of computer vision on medical imaging data such as portrait photos of individuals with rare disorders. NGP on portraits results Show more
Next-generation phenotyping (NGP) is an application of advanced methods of computer vision on medical imaging data such as portrait photos of individuals with rare disorders. NGP on portraits results in gestalt scores that can be used for the selection of appropriate genetic tests, and for the interpretation of the molecular data. Here, we report on an exceptional case of a young girl that was presented at the age of 8 and 15 and enrolled in NGP diagnostics on the latter occasion. The girl had clinical features associated with Koolen-de Vries syndrome (KdVS) and a suggestive facial gestalt. However, chromosomal microarray (CMA), Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis (MLPA), and trio exome sequencing remained inconclusive. Based on the highly indicative gestalt score for KdVS, the decision was made to perform genome sequencing to also evaluate noncoding variants. This analysis revealed a 4.7 kb de novo deletion partially affecting intron 6 and exon 7 of the KANSL1 gene. This is the smallest reported structural variant to date for this phenotype. The case illustrates how NGP can be integrated into the iterative diagnostic process of test selection and interpretation of sequencing results. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1002/humu.24467
KANSL1
Venu Menon, Anirudh Kumar, Divyang R Patel +10 more · 2020 · BMJ open diabetes research & care · added 2026-04-24
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reductio Show more
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We evaluated the impact of treatment with evacetrapib versus placebo in the subset of 8236 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes trial. Time to first occurrence of any component of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina was compared among patients with DM randomized to treatment with evacetrapib (n=4127) or placebo (n=4109) over a median of 26 months of follow-up. The mean baseline LDL at initiation was 80 mg/dL with a mean baseline HDL of 44 mg/dL. In patients with DM, evacetrapib resulted in a 131% mean increase in HDL levels and a 32% mean decrease in LDL at 3 months that was sustained during the course of the trial. At 6 months, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were lower with evacetrapib than placebo (7.08% vs 7.15%, p=0.023). Composite event rates were higher in patients with DM than without DM (Kaplan-Meier estimates: 15.2% vs 10.6%, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.64, p<0.001). In the DM group, event rates for the composite endpoint (14.5% evacetrapib vs 16% placebo, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07, p=0.38) and individual components of the composite were similar for both evacetrapib and placebo groups. No significant treatment interaction between treatment assignment and diabetes status was noted. Despite a favorable increase in HDL, and decreases in LDL and HbA1c levels in patients with DM, we observed no benefits of treatment with evacetrapib on prespecified clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000943
CETP