👤 Stavros Kyriakidis

Previous studies indicate that ambulance personnel have an increased risk of ill health. Shift work and time spent on physical behaviours during work and leisure are factors that could be related to health, however the research is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe patterns of physical behaviours during and after work among Swedish ambulance personnel and to analyse the associations between physical behaviours and different work shifts. In this observational study, the physical behaviours of 63 ambulance personnel were measured over seven days using two accelerometers. Accelerometer data was processed using the MATLAB program Acti4, to identify physical behaviours i.e. sleep, being sedentary, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), during and after work. To determine the association between shift types (independent) and patterns of physical behaviours (dependent), a Multivariate Analysis of Variance was performed on data processed according to compositional data analysis. At work, the highest proportion of both MVPA and being sedentary occurred during day shifts, compared to night and 24-h shifts (MVPA: 7% vs 4% and 5%; sedentary time: 62% vs 44% and 54% respectively). Night and 24-h shifts included 31% and 18% sleep, respectively. During the after-work periods, the highest proportions of MVPA were observed after 24-h shifts (8%). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in physical behaviours during work and after work for various shift types. However, in a sub-analysis restricted to night and 24-h shifts, a statistically significant association between shift type and composition of physical behaviours during work was observed (η In general, ambulance personnel were physically active both during and after work. At the same time, work hours entailed a substantial amount of sedentary time. Shift type was not associated with the pattern of physical behaviours among ambulance personnel. However, during 24-h shift a lower proportion of the time was spent sleeping compared to during night shift. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-026-27335-y. Show less

The aim of this study was to explore the prospective association between compositions of accelerometry-measured occupational physical behaviors and the risk of knee pain among eldercare workers. We performed a prospective study among 377 eldercare workers employed across 20 Danish nursing homes. Occupational physical behaviors were measured using thigh-worn accelerometers over 1-4 working days. Workers reported intensity of and days with knee pain in a questionnaire at baseline and after one year. We explored associations between compositions of occupational physical behaviors [ie, sedentary, standing, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)] and knee pain, adjusting for potential confounders. No significant associations were found. Trends were found for increased occupational time spent in MVPA and decreased risk of days with knee pain [relative risk (RR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-1.05, P=0.07] in main analyses, and for decreased risk of knee pain intensity among non-knee pain cases (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.12-1.13, P=0.08) in sensitivity analyses. No significant associations were found between baseline occupational physical behaviors and knee pain at one-year follow-up. However, a non-significant trend suggested that increasing occupational MVPA might be associated with reduced risk of knee pain at follow-up, though studies with larger samples are needed to confirm this finding. Show less