👤 Neil Poulter

Whether apolipoproteins (apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 [ApoB/ApoA1] ratio) or very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol are better risk predictors than established lipid risk markers, and whether there are sex differences, is uncertain, both in general populations and in patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the association between established risk markers, apolipoproteins and the risk of macro- and microvascular disease and death in a large study of women and men with diabetes and to assess the potential sex differences in the associations. Established lipid risk markers were studied in 11 140 individuals with type 2 diabetes from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified-Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, and apolipoproteins (A1, B, ApoB/ApoA1 ratio) and VLDL cholesterol from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) lipid analyses in biobanked samples from 3586 individuals included in the ADVANCE case-cohort study (ADVANCE CC). Primary outcomes were major macro- and microvascular events and death. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders were used to quantify the associations (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between established lipid risk markers and apolipoproteins with study outcomes. To address potential effect modification by sex, we investigated the association between the lipid risk markers and outcomes in subgroup analyses by sex. There was a lower risk of macrovascular complications for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HR [95%CI] 0.88 [0.82-0.95]), a higher risk for total cholesterol (1.10 [1.04-1.17]), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (1.15 [1.08-1.22]), non-HDL cholesterol (1.13 [1.07-1.20]) and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio (1.20 [1.14-1.27]) but no significant associations with triglycerides from ADVANCE. There was a higher risk of macrovascular complications for the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio (1.13 [1.03-1.24]) from the ADVANCE CC. Only the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio (1.19 [1.06-1.34]), but none of the established lipid risk markers, was associated with a higher risk of microvascular complications. There were no statistically significant sex differences for any of the established lipid risk markers or apolipoproteins with any outcome. Using C-statistics and net reclassification improvement (NRI) did not detect significant improvement in predicting all outcomes by adding lipids or apolipoproteins to the models with confounding factors only. All established lipid risk markers, except triglycerides, were predictors of macrovascular complications, but not microvascular complications, in patients with type 2 diabetes. The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was associated with major macro- and microvascular complications, but there was no evidence that apolipoproteins are better than established lipid risk markers in predicting cardiovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Show less

We screened variants on an exome-focused genotyping array in >300,000 participants (replication in >280,000 participants) and identified 444 independent variants in 250 loci significantly associated with total cholesterol (TC), high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and/or triglycerides (TG). At two loci (JAK2 and A1CF), experimental analysis in mice showed lipid changes consistent with the human data. We also found that: (i) beta-thalassemia trait carriers displayed lower TC and were protected from coronary artery disease (CAD); (ii) excluding the CETP locus, there was not a predictable relationship between plasma HDL-C and risk for age-related macular degeneration; (iii) only some mechanisms of lowering LDL-C appeared to increase risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D); and (iv) TG-lowering alleles involved in hepatic production of TG-rich lipoproteins (TM6SF2 and PNPLA3) tracked with higher liver fat, higher risk for T2D, and lower risk for CAD, whereas TG-lowering alleles involved in peripheral lipolysis (LPL and ANGPTL4) had no effect on liver fat but decreased risks for both T2D and CAD. Show less