👤 Justice Ene

An increasing number of stroke survivors are burdened by persistent disabilities, requiring long-term rehabilitation. However, the extent of functional gain is highly variable, severely impairing patients' quality of life. This variability highlights a critical gap in current prognostic tools, which rely primarily on clinical and neuroimaging data. The aim of this review is to synthesize the current literature on serum biomarkers in stroke survivors and to evaluate their prognostic value for rehabilitation outcomes. Our synthesis indicates that biomarkers reflecting distinct pathophysiological processes are emerging as key prognostic indicators. Markers of inflammation such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and neuro-glial injury, including S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B (S100B), Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), and Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL), are consistently associated with poorer functional outcomes. Conversely, markers of neuroplasticity, such as Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1), serve as potential indicators of recovery potential, although their predictive accuracy remains inconsistent across studies. Furthermore, emerging biomarkers of synaptic activity, such as Syntaxin-1a (STX1A) and Synaptosomal-Associated Protein, 25kDa (SNAP-25), and neuromuscular junction integrity, such as C-terminal Agrin Fragment (CAF), offer novel insights into brain-periphery communication, though their clinical utility is still under investigation. While promising, the translation of these biomarkers into clinical practice is hindered by methodological limitations, including assay heterogeneity and lack of large-scale validation. Future standardization of these molecular signatures is a critical step toward implementing precision medicine in stroke rehabilitation. Show less

Most brain organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) lack microglia and thus immune function. Microglia-like cells (MGCs) can be differentiated from iPSCs, while the characteristics of isogenic MGC-containing brain organoids in modeling neurodegeneration and cell-cell communications have not been well investigated. In this study, iPSC-derived MGCs are co-cultured with isogenic forebrain cortical organoids (iFCo), which are stimulated with extracellular vesicles (EVs) of brain organoids differentiated from Alzheimer's disease (AD) patient-derived iPSCs (APOE ε4/ε4 and presenilin 1). The AD EV-stimulated co-culture organoids are treated with EVs from healthy MGCs or co-culture. Differential responses of the co-cultured organoids and the MGCs to AD EVs are demonstrated. The co-cultured organoids mitigated pro-inflammatory gene expressions. EVs from healthy MGCs or co-culture reduced the expression of IL-12β, iNOS, TREM2, and CASS4, which are associated with neural inflammation and degeneration, as well as showed regulation on genes involved in microglial activation and carbon metabolism. AD EV cargo analysis by proteomics and microRNA-sequencing revealed APOE and APP proteins and microRNAs regulated pathways such as mitophagy. This study paves the way for understanding the role of microglia and brain organoids in modeling neural degeneration and the development of EV-based cell-free therapeutics for AD treatment. Show less