👤 Federica Fogacci

Although recommended for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification in adults, the role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in hypertension is not fully established. To evaluate Lp(a) levels in adult outpatients with essential arterial hypertension. A retrospective, observational study was conducted in outpatients of both sexes, aged ≥ 18 years, with treated or untreated essential hypertension, who were consecutively evaluated at the Hypertension Unit, Excellence Hypertension Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. Participants underwent office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements, as well as assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). BP measurements were performed, and hypertension phenotypes were classified according to 2023 European hypertension guidelines. Lp(a) levels were measured, and the study population was stratified according to a Lp(a) cut-off value of ≥50 mg/dl. Due to the non-uniform distribution, absolute Lp(a) values were logarithmically transformed. A total of 230 patients with available Lp(a) values were included (42.6% women, mean age 66.3 ± 11.5 years, BMI 27.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2, office BP 137.1 ± 18.1/83.7 ± 11.0 mmHg, 24-hour BP 129.8 ± 14.5/79.6 ± 9.8 mmHg, Lp(a) 51.4 ± 65.3 mg/dL), among whom 32.2% had Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl. There were significantly higher proportions of men (74.3% vs. 49.4%; P < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (97.3% vs. 75.0%; P < 0.001) and comorbidities (55.4% vs. 30.8%; P < 0.001) in patients with high Lp(a) than in those with normal Lp(a), who also received more frequently lipid lowering therapies (P < 0.001) and aspirin (P = 0.003). However, lower office systolic BP values (133.5±18.8 vs. 138.8±17.6 mmHg: P = 0.036) were observed in patients with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL than in those with < 50 mg/dl. Also, no significant differences for Lp(a) levels were observed among various hypertension phenotypes, as defined by office (P = 0.156) or out-of-office BP values (P = 0.065). No significant correlations were found between Lp(a) and office or out-of-office BP levels, both in treated and untreated hypertensive outpatients. In our population, Lp(a) levels were not associated with either office or out-of-office BP values, irrespective of antihypertensive treatment status. The role of Lp(a) in hypertension warrants further investigation. Show less

Direct measurement of apolipoprotein B (ApoB) is not always standardized and is relatively expensive, making it unavailable in several low-income settings. To address this issue, several formulas have been developed to estimate ApoB levels. Therefore, our study aims to compare the reliability of 23 formulas for estimating ApoB levels in a large cohort of South-European individuals. We retrospectively assessed 4.577 clinical records in which ApoB measurements were obtained using the same standardized method. Overall concordance was defined as the proportion of cases where the directly measured ApoB level fell within the same category as the estimated ApoB level, based on ApoB quartiles (<80 mg/dL, 80-94 mg/dL, 95-114 mg/dL, and ≥115 mg/dL). In addition, overall concordance was assessed for different lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) sub-levels. Ordinary least squares linear regression analyses were performed to compare estimated and measured ApoB values. Residual error plots were generated to visualize the difference between each estimation method and the actual ApoB measurements, stratified by Lp(a) and non-HDL-C levels. Plasma ApoB levels were best predicted by a non-HDL-C based formula and a formula using Friedewald's low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), regardless of ApoB plasma levels. Non-HDL-C levels did not significantly affect the concordance between measured and estimated ApoB across the different formulas, except at low non-HDL-C levels. Similarly, Lp(a) levels did not significantly impact concordance. However, the highest concordance level was 41 %. Some simple formulas based on low-cost and widely available parameters can estimate ApoB levels independently of ApoB, non-HDL-C, and Lp(a) plasma levels. This approach may be particularly useful for estimating ApoB levels in low-resource settings. Show less

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) increases circulating LDL levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; its levels may be related to the dysregulation of glycemic control and may be affected by estrogens. The aim of this study was to assess factors related to PCSK9 levels, and to evaluate the correlation between PCSK9 levels and CV parameters in post-menopausal diabetic women in primary prevention. Generalized linear models (GLM) were adopted to evaluate predictors of PCSK9 levels as well as factors related to CV outcomes, such as pulse wave velocity (PWV), pulse pressure (PP), and augmentation index (AI). A total of 135 post-menopausal diabetic women, with a median (Q1-Q3) serum PCSK9 levels of 370.3 (344.0-409.4) ng/ml were enrolled. Apolipoprotein B values resulted an independent predictor of PCSK9 levels ( ApoB and LDL may influence PCSK9 levels and PCSK9 directly influence PWV in post-menopausal diabetic women in primary prevention. Therefore, the relationship between PCSK9 and primary prevention cannot be excluded, thus highlighting its role as biomarker of CV risk. Show less

To revise the clinical evidence supporting the use of volanesorsen as new lipid-lowering drug and to assess the efficacy and safety of volanesorsen (ISIS 304801) through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of the available phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies. The meta-analysis of three clinical studies comprising 11 arms (N = l 156 subjects, with 95 in the active-treated arm and 61 in the control one) shows that volanesorsen significantly affects plasma levels of triglycerides (TG) [MD = - 67.90%, 95%CI = - 85.32, - 50.48, P < 0.001], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [MD = 40.06%, 95%CI: 32.79, 47.34, P < 0.001], very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) [MD = - 72.90%, 95%CI = - 82.73, - 63.07, P < 0.001], apolipoprotein B (Apo B) [MD = 8%, 95%CI = 2.17, 13.84, P = 0.007], Apo B-48 [MD = - 64.63, 95%CI = - 105.37, - 23.88, P = 0.002], ApoCIII [MD = - 74.83%, 95%CI = - 85.93, - 63.73, P < 0.001], and VLDL ApoCIII [MD = - 83.69%, 95%CI = - 94.08, - 73.29, P < 0.001], without significant impact on LDL-C [MD = 47.01%, 95%CI = - 1.31, 95.33, P = 0.057] levels. Treatment with volanesorsen was associated with an higher risk of injection site reaction (OR = 32.89, 95%CI = 7.97,135,74, P < 0.001) and with an increased risk of upper respiratory tract infections (OR = 10.58, 95%CI = 1.23, 90.93, P < 0.05) when compared to placebo. Volanesorsen has a relevant impact on plasma TG and related parameters without affecting LDL cholesterolemia and is associated with an acceptable safety profile. Show less