๐Ÿ‘ค Marta Calatroni

๐Ÿ” Search ๐Ÿ“‹ Browse ๐Ÿท๏ธ Tags โค๏ธ Favourites โž• Add ๐Ÿงฌ Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Agustin Calatroni,
articles
Martina Uzzo, Marta Calatroni, Gabriella Luisa Moroni ยท 2025 ยท Journal of personalized medicine ยท MDPI ยท added 2026-04-24
Pure membranous lupus nephritis (pMLN, ISN/RPS-class V) is a rare form of lupus nephritis (LN). Despite being associated with significant comorbidities, it has traditionally been considered a less agg Show more
Pure membranous lupus nephritis (pMLN, ISN/RPS-class V) is a rare form of lupus nephritis (LN). Despite being associated with significant comorbidities, it has traditionally been considered a less aggressive subtype. Emerging data challenges this perception, highlighting its potential for chronic kidney disease progression and kidney failure. pMLN is pathologically defined by subepithelial immune-complex deposits and typically presents with nephrotic syndrome, preserved renal function, and fewer systemic/immunologic manifestations compared to proliferative LN (ISN/RPS-classes III/IV). Repeat biopsies reveal frequent histological class switching from pMLN to proliferative and mixed LN forms, underscoring the dynamic nature of the disease and the limitations of clinical markers in reflecting histological activity. While the ISN/RPS kidney biopsy classification provides important prognostic insight, it does not fully capture underlying molecular heterogeneity. Recent advances in precision medicine, including proteomic and biomarker studies (e.g., EXT1/2, NCAM1), offer promising tools for patient stratification and tailored treatments. International guidelines now recommend immunosuppressive therapy for pMLN, aligning treatment strategies more closely with those for proliferative and mixed LN. Overall, pMLN should be considered a distinct but clinically relevant LN subtype requiring personalized management based on clinical, histological and molecular features. Long-term monitoring is essential, as baseline presentation does not reliably predict treatment response or disease trajectory. Show less
๐Ÿ“„ PDF DOI: 10.3390/jpm15120580
EXT1
Robert A Wood, Alkis Togias, Scott H Sicherer +36 more ยท 2024 ยท The New England journal of medicine ยท added 2026-04-24
Food allergies are common and are associated with substantial morbidity; the only approved treatment is oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. In this trial, we assessed whether omalizumab, a monoclon Show more
Food allergies are common and are associated with substantial morbidity; the only approved treatment is oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. In this trial, we assessed whether omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, would be effective and safe as monotherapy in patients with multiple food allergies. Persons 1 to 55 years of age who were allergic to peanuts and at least two other trial-specified foods (cashew, milk, egg, walnut, wheat, and hazelnut) were screened. Inclusion required a reaction to a food challenge of 100 mg or less of peanut protein and 300 mg or less of the two other foods. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive omalizumab or placebo administered subcutaneously (with the dose based on weight and IgE levels) every 2 to 4 weeks for 16 to 20 weeks, after which the challenges were repeated. The primary end point was ingestion of peanut protein in a single dose of 600 mg or more without dose-limiting symptoms. The three key secondary end points were the consumption of cashew, of milk, and of egg in single doses of at least 1000 mg each without dose-limiting symptoms. The first 60 participants (59 of whom were children or adolescents) who completed this first stage were enrolled in a 24-week open-label extension. Of the 462 persons who were screened, 180 underwent randomization. The analysis population consisted of the 177 children and adolescents (1 to 17 years of age). A total of 79 of the 118 participants (67%) receiving omalizumab met the primary end-point criteria, as compared with 4 of the 59 participants (7%) receiving placebo (P<0.001). Results for the key secondary end points were consistent with those of the primary end point (cashew, 41% vs. 3%; milk, 66% vs. 10%; egg, 67% vs. 0%; P<0.001 for all comparisons). Safety end points did not differ between the groups, aside from more injection-site reactions in the omalizumab group. In persons as young as 1 year of age with multiple food allergies, omalizumab treatment for 16 weeks was superior to placebo in increasing the reaction threshold for peanut and other common food allergens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03881696.). Show less
๐Ÿ“„ PDF DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312382
DYM