The agreement between plasma Aβ42/40 and Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) is approximately 75 %, with ∼85 % of discrepancies due to positive plasma but negative PET results. It is unclear whether Show more
The agreement between plasma Aβ42/40 and Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) is approximately 75 %, with ∼85 % of discrepancies due to positive plasma but negative PET results. It is unclear whether this reflects Aβ changes in plasma before PET-detectable. To assess the influence of Aβ42/40 positivity on risk of progression to Aβ PET positivity, and feasibility of using plasma Aβ42/40 tests to enrich a primary prevention trial. A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Participants of Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle study (AIBL), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and Open Access Series of Imaging Studies 3 (OASIS3). 507 cognitively unimpaired adults at baseline, with a baseline Aβ PET < 20 Centiloid (CL) and available longitudinal Aβ PET data. Baseline Aβ PET and plasma Aβ42/40 measurement by mass-spectrometry, followed by 1-6 additional Aβ PET scans every 1.5-3 years. Those < 5 CL were classified as PET- and 5-20 CL as PET At baseline, 283 were Plasma-/PET-, 97 Plasma+/PET-, 76 Plasma-/PET Cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal Aβ42/40 are at increased risk for future Aβ PET positivity. In the 5-20 CL subgroup, baseline CL is the main driver of this risk. Combining blood-based pre-screening with PET imaging may help efficiently enrich primary prevention trials. Show less