👤 Eric Westman

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
3
Articles
articles
Giulia Lorenzon, Gemma García-Lluch, Gillian Coughlan +12 more · 2026 · medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · added 2026-04-24
Women face greater vulnerability to dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD), potentially due to estrogen fluctuations across the lifespan. However, its role in vascular brain health is unclear. We inves Show more
Women face greater vulnerability to dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD), potentially due to estrogen fluctuations across the lifespan. However, its role in vascular brain health is unclear. We investigated associations between lifelong estrogen exposure-endogenous (reproductive span) and exogenous (oral contraceptives [OC], menopausal hormone therapy [MHT])-and late-life vascular brain injury, AD-related atrophy, and We included 352 cognitively unimpaired 70-years-old women from the Gothenburg H70-1944 Birth Cohort with brain MRI and 5-year follow-up. Reproductive lifespan was calculated as age at menopause or oophorectomy minus age at menarche. OC and MHT use were self-reported. Outcomes included cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), AD-related cortical thickness, and white-matter integrity (fractional anisotropy). Linear and multinomial regression and mixed-effects models were adjusted for confounders and stratified by Extended estrogen exposure throughout life-both endogenous and exogenous-appear to support late-life cerebrovascular health in women, with potential genotype-specific neuroprotective effects. Given the current absence of sex-specific prevention guidelines for cognitive disorders, future research should clarify estrogen's longterm impact on brain health and cognition to inform personalized medicine. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.64898/2026.02.04.26345605
APOE
Alessandro Zilioli, Rosaleena Mohanty, Anna Rosenberg +7 more · 2026 · Alzheimer's research & therapy · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
Brain atrophy subtypes are increasingly recognized in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. However, their relevance across the real-world memory clinic spectrum, from subjective cognitive impairment (SC Show more
Brain atrophy subtypes are increasingly recognized in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. However, their relevance across the real-world memory clinic spectrum, from subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD and non-AD dementias, remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify MRI-based atrophy subtypes in a relatively young memory clinic and examine associations with demographic, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and cerebrovascular burden to inform precision medicine approaches. We included all consecutive patients (SCI to dementia), evaluated at the Karolinska University-Hospital Memory Clinic (Stockholm, Sweden) between 2018 and 2023 with available clinical and 3T MRI data. Subtypes were defined using FreeSurfer-derived volumetric measures and a validated algorithm combining categorical classification (typical, limbic predominant, cortical predominant, minimal atrophy) with continuous indices of typicality (cortical predominant–limbic predominant) and severity (minimal atrophy–typical). Demographics, cognitive profiles, Among 809 patients (median age 60.0 years [interquartile-range 56.0–63.0], 56.1% female), 38.2% had SCI, 44.4% MCI, and 17.4% dementia. CSF biomarkers were available in 596 (73.7%). Limbic predominant and typical subtypes had more males (59.3% and 50.0%, respectively; group-wise p < 0.001), higher APOE ε4 frequency (47.7% and 41.0%, p = 0.02), greater cerebrovascular burden, and poorer memory. These subtypes were more often Aβ positive (46.1% and 46.5%, p = 0.01). A cortical predominant pattern was frequent in females (66.0%, p < 0.001), while minimal atrophy was associated with milder cognitive impairment (49.0% SCI, 45.5% MCI) and higher depressive symptoms. In Aβ-positive patients (n = 231), typical and limbic subtypes had higher p-tau181 (median: 83.0 and 84.5 pg/mL, respectively; p < 0.001), NFL (1120.0 and 1125.0 pg/mL, p < 0.001), and lower Aβ42/40 ratios (0.051 and 0.049, p = 0.02). Findings remained consistent across continuous atrophy measures and in the 14.9% (n = 89) eligible for anti-Aβ therapy. MRI-based atrophy subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles, consistently observed in Aβ-positive and anti-Aβ-therapy-eligible patients. These findings support their diagnostic utility in memory clinics and relevance for biologically targeted AD trials. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-026-01972-2. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s13195-026-01972-2
APOE
Anna Rosenberg, Alina Solomon, Alexandre Bonnard +7 more · 2026 · The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healt Show more
Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healthcare hinges on accurate estimates of eligibility rates in settings which will be the first to roll out the treatments (specialized memory clinics with early disease stages). We applied the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) to assess treatment eligibility in a Swedish tertiary memory clinic where Aβ and APOE assessments are routinely performed. Of the full cohort (N = 410), 26 and 25 patients met the AUR criteria for lecanemab and donanemab, respectively (6 %; partial overlap between the groups). After excluding APOE ε4/4 carriers in line with the European guidelines, only 14 and 13 patients remained eligible (3 %). In clinics with younger populations, a significant percentage of potentially eligible patients are likely to have the APOE ε4/4 genotype. These findings are important to inform the implementation of anti-Aβ treatments. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476
APOE