👤 Borek Foldyna

Whether lowering triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnant cholesterol favorably modifies coronary atherosclerosis is unclear. Olezarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide that targets apolipoprotein C-III, reduces triglycerides by ~60% and remnant cholesterol by ~70%, has a neutral effect on LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and reduces apolipoprotein B (apoB) by ~15% in moderate hypertriglyceridemia. We investigated the effect of olezarsen on coronary plaque in adults with largely moderate hypertriglyceridemia. We conducted a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) study within Essence-TIMI 73b, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of olezarsen vs. placebo that enrolled patients between November 2022 and February 2024. Inclusion criteria were triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L), presence or high risk for cardiovascular disease, and non-calcified plaque on baseline CCTA. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline to 12 months in non-calcified plaque volume (NCPV). Of 468 participants (349 olezarsen, 119 placebo), the median age was 63 years (IQR 56-70); 31% were women, and 97% received lipid-lowering therapy. Median baseline triglycerides were 249 mg/dL (IQR 197-331), and remnant cholesterol was 53 mg/dL (IQR 38-76). Median baseline NCPV was 125.3 mm Despite substantial triglyceride and remnant cholesterol lowering, treatment with olezarsen for 12 months on top of standard-of-care lipid-lowering therapy in patients with largely moderate hypertriglyceridemia did not affect noncalcified coronary plaque volume. Show less

Risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL) estimates the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients without known CAD. We examined whether adding lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] measurements to the RF-CL model improves predictions of obstructive CAD. In a derivation cohort (N = 4262; 54% male; mean age 58 years), the prevalence of obstructive CAD at invasive angiography with fractional flow reserve was assessed by Lp(a)-strata. On the basis of initial results, an Lp(a)-adjusted model (RF-CLLp(a)) was developed: RF-CL was multiplied by 1.5 in patients with elevated Lp(a) (≥125 nmol/L) and otherwise unchanged. Discrimination, calibration, and reclassification were compared. Findings were validated in an external validation cohort (N = 1595; 49% male; mean age 60 years) using a comparative endpoint; significant stenosis at invasive angiography or coronary computed tomography.In the derivation cohort, 473 patients (11.1%) had obstructive CAD; in the validation cohort, 206 patients (12.9%) had significant stenosis. The relative risk in patients with elevated Lp(a) was 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.86] and 1.19 (95% CI 0.88-1.60) in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the RF-CLLp(a) model showed a higher area under the receiver operating curve than the RF-CL model [0.743 (standard error 0.011) vs. 0.740 (0.013)] and better calibration in patients with elevated Lp(a). Reclassification from RF-CL to RF-CLLp(a) improved likelihood stratification in the derivation cohort but not in the validation cohort. Adding elevated Lp(a) as a risk factor to the RF-CL model improves accuracy of obstructive CAD in patients with high Lp(a). Show less