👤 Ann-Marie Navar

Many adults fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals on statin monotherapy, requiring additional nonstatin lipid-lowering medication. Enlicitide, an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, lowered LDL-C by 60% compared with placebo; its efficacy compared with other oral nonstatin therapies has yet to be examined. This study assessed the efficacy of enlicitide, a novel oral PCSK9 inhibitor, vs other oral nonstatin therapies. In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator trial, statin-treated adults aged ≥18 years with LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL and a previous major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event, or LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL if at intermediate to high risk for a first event, were randomized in 2:1:1:2 fashion to 20 mg enlicitide (n = 101), 180 mg bempedoic acid (n = 50), 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 50), or 180 mg bempedoic acid plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 100) once daily for 56 days. The primary endpoint was mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56; secondary endpoints included mean percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C). Safety endpoints included overall adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs. Among 301 randomized participants (mean age 64.4 years, 37% female, 98% receiving moderate- to high-intensity statin), 298 (99.0%) completed the trial. The mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to day 56 was -64.6% (95% CI: -68.3% to -60.9%) with enlicitide, -6.3% (95% CI: -13.5% to 0.8%) with bempedoic acid, -27.8% (95% CI: -32.3% to -23.4%) with ezetimibe, and -36.5% (95% CI: -40.8% to -32.2%) with bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe; enlicitide was superior to each comparator (all P < 0.001). Reductions in ApoB and nonHDL-C were also greater with enlicitide (all P < 0.001). Proportions of participants with AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across treatment arms. In statin-treated adults with a history of a major ASCVD event or at increased risk for a first event, enlicitide achieved greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, and nonHDL-C than other oral nonstatin therapies, demonstrating its potential role as an important add-on option when LDL-C goals are not met with the use of statins alone. (A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enlicitide Decanoate [MK-0616, Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor] Compared With Ezetimibe or Bempedoic Acid or Ezetimibe and Bempedoic Acid in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia [MK-0616-018] [CORALreef AddOn; NCT06450366). Show less

Enlicitide decanoate, an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, was shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in a phase 2 trial; longer-term data are needed. In this multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with a history of a major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event with an LDL cholesterol level of 55 mg per deciliter or higher and those who were at risk for a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event with an LDL cholesterol level of 70 mg per deciliter or higher. Participants were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive enlicitide at a dose of 20 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline to week 24. Key secondary end points were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level at week 52 and the mean percent change in levels of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B and the percent change in lipoprotein(a) level at week 24. Of the 2909 participants in the intention-to-treat population, 1935 received enlicitide and 969 received placebo (5 did not receive enlicitide or placebo). The mean age of the participants was 63 years, and 39.3% were women. The mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol level at baseline was 96.1±38.9 mg per deciliter. The mean percent change in LDL cholesterol levels at week 24 was -57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -61.8 to -52.5) with enlicitide and 3.0% (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.1) with placebo, representing an adjusted between-group difference of -55.8 percentage points (95% CI, -60.9 to -50.7; P<0.001). The mean percent change in LDL cholesterol level at week 52, the mean percent changes in non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels at week 24, and the percent change in lipoprotein(a) levels at week 24 were significantly greater with enlicitide than with placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The incidence of adverse events did not appear to differ between the groups. Among participants who had a history of or were at risk for a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event, treatment with the oral PCSK9 inhibitor enlicitide resulted in significantly lower LDL cholesterol levels than placebo at 24 weeks. (Funded by MSD [Rahway, NJ]; CORALreef Lipids ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05952856.). Show less

Most patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fail to achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering. Here we carried out a randomized trial to test the safety and efficacy of obicetrapib, a highly selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that lowers LDL cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and an LDL cholesterol level ≥70 mg dl Show less

Persons with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to lifelong elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Many patients with HeFH do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals with the currently available lipid-lowering therapies. To evaluate the efficacy of enlicitide decanoate (an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) vs placebo in adults with HeFH requiring further lowering of LDL-C levels despite use of statin therapy. This phase 3, randomized clinical trial included persons aged 18 years or older with HeFH currently using lipid-lowering therapy (taking at least a moderate- or high-intensity statin) and either an LDL-C level of 55 mg/dL or greater and a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an LDL-C level of 70 mg/dL or greater without a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The trial was conducted at 59 sites across 17 countries; the first participant was screened on August 8, 2023, and the last follow-up visit occurred on April 7, 2025. Participants were randomized (2:1) to 20 mg of enlicitide (n = 202) or placebo (n = 101) once daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24. The secondary outcomes included the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52, the mean percentage change at week 24 in levels of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B, and the median percentage change at week 24 in lipoprotein(a). Of the 303 participants (mean age, 52.4 [SD, 13.5] years; 51% were female) randomized, 293 (96.7%) completed the trial. The mean LDL-C level was 119.0 mg/dL (SD, 41.0 mg/dL) at baseline, all had statin current use (81.5% were taking a high-intensity statin), and 64.4% were taking ezetimibe. The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24 was -58.2% in the enlicitide group vs 2.6% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -59.4% [95% CI, -65.6% to -53.2%]; P < .001). The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52 was -55.3% in the enlicitide group vs 8.7% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -61.5% [95% CI, -69.4% to -53.7%]; P < .001). At week 24, the mean percentage change in non-HDL-C level was -52.3% in the enlicitide group vs 2.1% in the placebo group (between-group difference, -53.0% [95% CI, -58.5% to -47.4%]; P < .001), the mean percentage change in apolipoprotein B level was -48.2% vs 1.8%, respectively (between-group difference, -49.1% [95% CI, -54.0% to -44.3%]; P < .001), and the median percentage change in lipoprotein(a) level was -24.7% vs -1.6% (between-group difference, -27.5% [95% CI, -34.3% to -20.6%]; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and study discontinuation due to adverse events was similar between groups. Among adults with HeFH, treatment with enlicitide was well tolerated and significantly reduced levels of LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL-C, and lipoprotein(a). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05952869. Show less

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant, genetically determined contributor to the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide despite successes in the management of LDL cholesterol. Lipoprotein(a) possesses increased atherogenicity, contributing to residual cardiovascular risk. Elevated Lp(a) levels affect a substantial proportion of the population, rendering this a potentially high-impact therapeutic target, but currently available lipid-lowering agents and lifestyle interventions have minimal impact on lowering Lp(a), and lipoprotein apheresis is the sole effective-but impractical-method to significantly reduce Lp(a). Recent advances in Lp(a)-targeted therapies, notably nucleic acid-based approaches (e.g. antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNAs) and a small molecule inhibitor of Lp(a) synthesis, demonstrated substantial and often durable Lp(a)-lowering effects in Phase II trials. Phase III trials of these agents are now underway to examine the impact of lowering Lp(a) levels on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes, and their results may transform the landscape of cardiovascular risk reduction and management for patients with elevated Lp(a). This review summarizes existing lipid-lowering therapies' limited effects on Lp(a), provides an update on the array of emerging therapeutics and their safety and efficacy, and discusses ongoing Phase III trials as well as other potential benefits of Lp(a)-lowering, such as slowing progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Show less

Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain. To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability. Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023. Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage. Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246. Show less

Obicetrapib is a potent, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additive reductions in LDL-C occur when obicetrapib is combined with ezetimibe. The impact of obicetrapib and ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on coronary plaque burden is unknown. Favorable changes in noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume (NCPV) may indicate a potential beneficial effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. REMBRANDT is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial designed to assess the efficacy of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on coronary plaque burden. Individuals aged 45 years or older with ASCVD (imaging evidence of vascular disease or clinically manifested ASCVD) and an LDL-C of ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapy are eligible to participate. Eligible participants (N = 300) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to obicetrapib 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg FDC once daily or placebo tablet once daily. The primary efficacy outcome of REMBRANDT is percent change in total NCPV from baseline to 18 months as assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Secondary endpoints include absolute change in total NCPV, percent and absolute change in NCPV in the most diseased coronary segment, percent change in LDL-C, and change in perivascular fat attenuation index from baseline to 18 months. The REMBRANDT trial will determine whether the favorable effects of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on LDL-C translate to a reduction in coronary plaque burden as a potential mechanism for ASCVD risk reduction. NCT06305559. Show less

The 2025 American Society for Preventive Cardiology meeting highlighted evolving strategies in cardiovascular disease prevention, spanning risk models based on traditional risk factors, emerging biomarkers, novel therapeutics, and digital health innovations. Key discussions addressed lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and inflammation as a causal risk factor, their clinical management, and readiness for targeted therapies; optimal systolic blood pressure targets informed by recent randomized controlled trials; and ongoing debate regarding apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary lipid target. Advances in digital health emphasized prevention through artificial intelligence, health equity in technology, and the growing role of wearables. Imaging emerged as a central theme, with sessions highlighting its role in risk assessment, monitoring treatment response, and refining prevention strategies, especially in young adults. Sessions on women's cardiovascular health underscored female-specific risk enhancers and limitations of current risk prediction models. Additional debates addressed the use of polygenic risk scores in young adults and strategies for universal screening with LDL-C, hsCRP, and Lp(a). Heart failure prevention was highlighted as a critical frontier, with emphasis on stage-based risk stratification, early identification of subclinical disease, and targeted interventions to avert progression to symptomatic heart failure. Updates on renal denervation reaffirmed its safety, efficacy, and durability as an adjunctive therapy in resistant hypertension. Collectively, these highlights emphasize the rapid evolution of preventive cardiology, integrating precision risk stratification, digital tools, and novel therapies into routine care. Show less

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. An Lp(a) threshold of ≥125 nmol/L is commonly used to identify individuals at higher risk for events, but there is a paucity of data on individuals of Hispanic/Latino descent. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of Lp(a) and its association with 10-year cardiovascular disease risk and mortality among Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States. We evaluated the association between Lp(a) and myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality among 16,117 Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos individuals. Event rates were compared across Lp(a) quintiles. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed the relationship between events and Lp(a) across increasing quintiles, log-transformed Lp(a), and ≥125 nmol/L vs <125 nmol/L. Sampling weights and survey methods were used to account for the stratified probability sampling of the cohort. Among the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos target population (median age 41.1 years, 52.4% women), the median Lp(a) was 19.7 nmol/L (Q1-Q3: 7.3-60.6 nmol/L), with 11.4% having Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L, and the highest Lp(a) quintile defined as >77 nmol/L. Over a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 883 events (135 MI, 99 stroke, 649 all-cause mortality) occurred. The age-adjusted incidence rate of the composite events (MI, stroke, and all-cause mortality) was 505.2 per 100,000 person-years. After multivariable adjustment, each 1-SD increase in log-transformed Lp(a) was associated with a higher risk of MI (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.14-1.89). Compared with Lp(a) <125 nmol/L, elevated Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L conferred an increased risk of MI (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.45-3.63), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05-1.93), and composite events (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.22-2.01), but not stroke. Findings were consistent when comparing the highest Lp(a) quintile to the lower 4 quintiles, but the elevated risk was observed only for MI and composite events. Hispanic/Latino individuals with elevated Lp(a) are at an increased risk of MI and all-cause mortality. Although Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L is a valid risk threshold, Hispanics/Latinos show a continuous relationship between increasing Lp(a) levels and MI risk. Show less

Despite data suggesting that apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement outperforms low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level measurement in predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, apoB measurement has not become widely adopted into routine clinical practice. One barrier for use of apoB measurement is lack of consistent guidance for clinicians on how to interpret and apply apoB results in clinical context. Whereas guidelines have often provided clear low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets or triggers to initiate treatment change, consistent targets for apoB are lacking. In this review, we synthesize existing data regarding the epidemiology of apoB by comparing guideline recommendations regarding use of apoB measurement, describing population percentiles of apoB relative to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, summarizing studies of discordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apoB levels, and evaluating apoB levels in clinical trials of lipid-lowering therapy to guide potential treatment targets. We propose evidence-guided apoB thresholds for use in cholesterol management and clinical care. Show less

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated. Show less

Despite the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), limited pharmacologic options are available for prevention. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors (CETPis) have been studied primarily as a therapy to reduce cardiovascular disease, but have also been shown to reduce new-onset diabetes. As new trial data have become available, this meta-analysis examines the effect of CETP inhibitors on new-onset diabetes and related glycaemic measures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (all articles until 4 March, 2021) for randomised controlled trials (RCT) ≥1-year duration, with at least 500 participants, comparing CETPi to placebo, and that reported data on new-onset diabetes or related glycaemic measures [haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting plasma glucose, insulin, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)]. A fixed effects meta-analysis model was applied to all eligible studies to quantify the effect of CETPi therapy on new-onset diabetes. Four RCTs (n = 75 102) were eligible for quantitative analysis of the effect of CETPi on new-onset diabetes. CETPis were found to significantly decrease the risk of new-onset diabetes by 16% (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.91; P < 0.001), with low between-trial heterogeneity (I2 = 4.1%). Glycaemic measures were also significantly improved or trended towards improvement in those with and without diabetes across most trials. Although RCTs have shown mixed results regarding the impact of CETPi on cardiovascular disease, they have shown a consistent reduction in the risk of new-onset diabetes with CETPi therapy. Future trials of CETPis and potentially other HDL-raising agents should therefore specify new-onset diabetes and reversal of existing T2DM as secondary endpoints. Show less

Adding to the foundation of statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), novel, emerging low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies are under development for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA molecule that inhibits PCSK9, only needs to be dosed twice a year and has the potential to help overcome current barriers to persistence and adherence to lipid-lowering therapies. Bempedoic acid, which lowers LDL-C upstream from statins, provides a novel alternative for patients with statin intolerance. Angiopoetin-like 3 protein (ANGPTL3) inhibitors have been shown to provide potent LDL-C lowering in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia without major adverse effects as seen with lomitapide and mipomersen, and may reduce the need for apheresis. Finally, CETP inhibitors may yet be effective with the development of obicetrapib. These novel agents provide the clinician the tools to effectively lower LDL-C across the entire range of LDL-C-induced elevation of cardiovascular risk, from primary prevention and secondary prevention to null-null homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Show less