Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing single-level L5-S1 anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2012 and 2024 at a single academic institution, with preoperative and on Show more
Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing single-level L5-S1 anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2012 and 2024 at a single academic institution, with preoperative and one-year postoperative radiographic assessment of sagittal alignment parameters. To quantify changes in lumbar pelvic angle (LPA), pelvic tilt (PT), global lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), regional lumbar lordosis (L4-S1), and segmental lumbar lordosis (L5-S1) among single-level L5-S1 ALIF and TLIF patients. Restoration of sagittal alignment is a primary goal of lumbar fusion. While ALIF is regarded as superior to TLIF in restoring segmental lordosis, its effect on global and regional alignment remains uncertain, and few studies directly compare their impact on spinopelvic parameters. The electronic medical record was queried for patients who underwent single-level L5-S1 ALIF or TLIF with preoperative and one-year postoperative imaging. Sagittal parameters were measured using Surgimap software. Group comparisons were assessed with unpaired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Radiographic measurements were available for 174 patients (ALIF n=73, TLIF n=101). ALIF patients had significantly greater improvement in L4-S1 (+4.2° vs. -1.1°, P=0.002) and L5-S1 lordosis (+4.6° vs. -4.8°, P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative changes for L1-S1 lordosis (+2.2° vs. -1.4°, P=0.250), LPA (-1.9° vs. -1.4°, P=0.743), or PT (-0.9° vs. +0.4°, P=0.093). Permutation testing confirmed that the observed difference in LPA improvement between cohorts (-0.51°) was not statistically significant (P=0.673), and post hoc analysis confirmed adequate power to detect a difference of 3.37°. Sensitivity analyses using ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline radiographic values and covariates, were concordant. ALIF provided superior regional and segmental lordosis but did not improve global alignment compared with TLIF. This study is the first to quantify the effect of ALIF versus TLIF on LPA, highlighting the limited impact of single-level fusion on global spinopelvic alignment. Show less
Liver lobules are typically subdivided into 3 metabolic zones: zones 1, 2, and 3. However, the contribution of zonal differences in hepatocytes to liver regeneration, as well as to carcinogenic suscep Show more
Liver lobules are typically subdivided into 3 metabolic zones: zones 1, 2, and 3. However, the contribution of zonal differences in hepatocytes to liver regeneration, as well as to carcinogenic susceptibility, remains unclear. We developed a new method for sustained genetic labelling of zone 3 hepatocytes and performed fate tracing to monitor these cells in multiple mouse liver tumour models. We first examined changes in the zonal distribution of the Wnt target gene Hepatocytes receiving Wnt/β-catenin signalling from their microenvironment have high neoplastic potential, and Wnt/β-catenin signalling is a potential drug target for the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Lineage tracing revealed that zone 3 hepatocytes residing in the pericentral niche have high neoplastic potential. Under chronic liver injury, hepatocytes receiving Wnt/β-catenin signalling broadly exist across all hepatic zones and significantly contribute to liver tumorigenesis as well as liver regeneration. Wnt/β-catenin signalling is a potential drug target for the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Show less