We sought to create a comprehensive catalog of yeast genes whose transcript levels vary periodically within the cell cycle. To this end, we used DNA microarrays and samples from yeast cultures synchro Show more
We sought to create a comprehensive catalog of yeast genes whose transcript levels vary periodically within the cell cycle. To this end, we used DNA microarrays and samples from yeast cultures synchronized by three independent methods: alpha factor arrest, elutriation, and arrest of a cdc15 temperature-sensitive mutant. Using periodicity and correlation algorithms, we identified 800 genes that meet an objective minimum criterion for cell cycle regulation. In separate experiments, designed to examine the effects of inducing either the G1 cyclin Cln3p or the B-type cyclin Clb2p, we found that the mRNA levels of more than half of these 800 genes respond to one or both of these cyclins. Furthermore, we analyzed our set of cell cycle-regulated genes for known and new promoter elements and show that several known elements (or variations thereof) contain information predictive of cell cycle regulation. A full description and complete data sets are available at http://cellcycle-www.stanford.edu Show less
In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, progress of the cell cycle beyond the major control point in G1 phase, termed START, requires activation of the evolutionarily conserved Cdc28 protein ki Show more
In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, progress of the cell cycle beyond the major control point in G1 phase, termed START, requires activation of the evolutionarily conserved Cdc28 protein kinase by direct association with G1 cyclins. We have used a conditional lethal mutation in CDC28 of S. cerevisiae to clone a functional homologue from the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. The protein sequence, deduced from the nucleotide sequence, is 79% identical to that of S. cerevisiae Cdc28 and as such is the most closely related protein yet identified. We have also isolated from C. albicans two genes encoding putative G1 cyclins, by their ability to rescue a conditional G1 cyclin defect in S. cerevisiae; one of these genes encodes a protein of 697 amino acids and is identical to the product of the previously described CCN1 gene. The second gene codes for a protein of 465 residues, which has significant homology to S. cerevisiae Cln3. These data suggest that the events and regulatory mechanisms operating at START are highly conserved between these two organisms. Show less
G Sherlock, J Rosamond · 1993 · Journal of general microbiology · added 2026-04-24
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, START has been shown to comprise a series of tightly regulated reactions by which the cellular environment is assessed and under appropriate conditions, cells are commited Show more
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, START has been shown to comprise a series of tightly regulated reactions by which the cellular environment is assessed and under appropriate conditions, cells are commited to a further round of mitotic division. The key effector of START is the product of the CDC28 gene and the mechanisms by which the protein kinase activity of this gene product is regulated at START are well characterized. This is in contrast to the events which follow p34CDC28 activation and the way in which progress to S phase is achieved, which are less clear. We suggest two possible models to describe the regulation of these events. Firstly, it is conceivable that the only post-START targets of the p34CDC28/G1 cyclin kinase complex are components of the SBF and DSC1 transcription factors. This would require that either SBF or DSC1 regulates CDC4 function either directly by activating the transcription of CDC4 itself or else indirectly by activating the transcription of a mediator of CDC4 function in a manner analogous to the way in which the control of CDC7 function may be mediated by transcriptional regulation of DBF4 (Jackson et al., 1993). Potential regulatory effectors of CDC4 function include SCM4, which suppresses cdc4 mutations in an allele-specific manner (Smith et al., 1992) or its homologue HFS1 (J. Hartley & J. Rosamond, unpublished). This possibility is supported by the finding that CDC4 has no upstream SCB or MCB elements, whereas SCM4 and HFS1 have either an exact or close match to the SCB. This model would further require that genes needed for bud emergence and spindle pole body duplication are also subject to transcriptional regulation by DSC1 or SBF. An alternative model is that the p34CDC28/G1 cyclin complexes have several targets post-START, one being DSC1 and the others being as yet unidentified components of the pathways leading to CDC4 function, spindle pole body duplication and bud emergence. This model could account for the functional redundancy observed amongst the G1 cyclins with the various cyclins providing substrate specificity for the kinase complex. We suggest that a complex containing Cln3 protein is primarily responsible for, and acts most efficiently on, the targets containing Swi6 protein (SBF and DSC1), with complexes containing other G1 cyclins (Cln1 and/or Cln2 proteins) principally involved in activating the other pathways. However, there must be overlap in the function of these complexes with each cyclin able to substitute for some or all of the functions when necessary, albeit with differing efficiencies. This hypothesis is supported by several observations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) Show less