πŸ‘€ Paola Mirra

πŸ” Search πŸ“‹ Browse 🏷️ Tags ❀️ Favourites βž• Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Luca Mirra,
articles
Matteo Costantino, Luca Mirra, Padraig D'arcy +10 more Β· 2025 Β· International journal of biological sciences Β· added 2026-04-24
Ovarian carcinoma has still a poor prognosis. CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function screen revealed a relationship between the PSMC6 proteasome subunit expression and survival of cisplatin-sensitive and -resis Show more
Ovarian carcinoma has still a poor prognosis. CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function screen revealed a relationship between the PSMC6 proteasome subunit expression and survival of cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant ovarian carcinoma cells. Increased levels of PSMC6 were evidenced in multiple ovarian carcinoma cell lines versus normal cells. An association between PSMC6 levels and tumour stages as well as with a reduced progression-free survival was found. Since a PSMC6 interactome analysis evidenced limited knowledge on PSMC6 biology, mechanistic studies were carried out. PSMC6 knockdown indicated reduced cell growth and clonogenicity in cisplatin-sensitive IGROV-1 and -resistant IGROV-1/Pt1 cells, with a higher impact in resistant cells. This behaviour was accompanied by the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and down-regulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation mediated by increased DUSP6. PSMC6 silencing increased sensitivity to cisplatin in IGROV-1/Pt1 cells as shown by clonogenic assay and 3D spheroids. Since PSMC6 knockdown did not change sensitivity to 20S and 19S proteasome inhibitors, we suggest a new mode of proteasome targeting by interference with a proteasome ATPase. Overall, a link between PSMC6 and ovarian carcinoma aggressiveness is envisioned, highlighting PSMC6 as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target. Show less
πŸ“„ PDF DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.104612
DUSP6
Luca Ulianich, Paola Mirra, Corrado Garbi +10 more Β· 2020 Β· Frontiers in endocrinology Β· Frontiers Β· added 2026-04-24
The endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response are triggered following an imbalance between protein load and protein folding. Until recently, two possible outcomes of the unfolded Show more
The endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response are triggered following an imbalance between protein load and protein folding. Until recently, two possible outcomes of the unfolded protein response have been considered: life or death. We sought to substantiate a third alternative, dedifferentiation, mesenchymal shift, and activation of the antioxidant response by using typical endocrine cells, i.e. thyroid cells. The thyroid is a unique system both of endoplasmic reticulum stress (a single protein, thyroglobulin represents the majority of proteins synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum by the thyrocyte) and of polarized epithelium (the single layer of thyrocytes delimiting the follicle). Following endoplasmic reticulum stress, in thyroid cells the folding of thyroglobulin was disrupted. The mRNAs of unfolded protein response were induced or spliced (X-box binding protein-1). Differentiation was inhibited: mRNA levels of thyroid specific genes, and of thyroid transcription factors were dramatically downregulated, at least in part, transcriptionally. The dedifferentiating response was accompanied by an upregulation of mRNAs of antioxidant genes. Moreover, cadherin-1, and the thyroid (and kidney)-specific cadherin-16 mRNAs were downregulated, vimentin, and SNAI1 mRNAs were upregulated. In addition, loss of cortical actin and stress fibers formation were observed. Together, these data indicate that ER stress in thyroid cells induces dedifferentiation, loss of epithelial organization, shift towards a mesenchymal phenotype, and activation of the antioxidant response, highlighting, at the same time, a new and wide strategy to achieve survival following ER stress, and, as a sort of the other side of the coin, a possible new molecular mechanism of decline/loss of function leading to a deficit of thyroid hormones formation. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.588685
SNAI1