👤 Megan L Killian

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Michael Killian
articles
Michael Killian, Deepti Ranganathan, Dearbhla Moore +5 more · 2026 · Irish journal of medical science · Springer · added 2026-04-24
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy, affecting 1 in 500 people. With growing access to genetic testing and incorporation of genetics in diagnosis and manageme Show more
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy, affecting 1 in 500 people. With growing access to genetic testing and incorporation of genetics in diagnosis and management of HCM, it is important to identify phenotypic predictors of HCM genotype, to improve genetic targeting and counselling as well as cascade testing for first-degree relatives. This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive probands, aged over 18 years referred to a tertiary centre for HCM gene panel testing. Demographic information was obtained from clinic data. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) pattern was classified based on trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Pathogenicity of variants was classified per the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria. 166 patients were included for analysis. Mean age was 53 years (SD 14.28). 128 (77%) were male. 59 had a history of hypertension and 19 had a family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The most frequent HCM pattern at baseline was concentric HCM (31.9% n = 53). 48 patients had a likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) variant, giving a genetic testing yield of 28.9%. The most common sarcomeric genes were MYBPC3 and MYH7 accounting for 57% of cases. Younger age, female sex, and reverse curve LVH pattern were predictors of a LP or P gene variant identification. Reverse curve morphology was found to be a significant predictor for a sarcomere variant (p < 0.001). Genetic testing was appropriately offered in this cohort. Younger age, female sex, family history of SCD, normal/well controlled blood pressure and reverse pattern LVH on TTE predicted a higher yield of pathogenic variant identification. Reverse curve morphology was found to be a significant predictor for a sarcomere variant. This study has implications for supporting better phenotype-based genetic counselling and resource usage for HCM patients. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1007/s11845-025-04139-4
MYBPC3
Kendra K Wernlé, Michael A Sonnenfelt, Connor C Leek +6 more · 2023 · Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
Tendons and ligaments attach to bone are essential for joint mobility and stability in vertebrates. Tendon and ligament attachments (ie, entheses) are found at bony protrusions (ie, eminences), and th Show more
Tendons and ligaments attach to bone are essential for joint mobility and stability in vertebrates. Tendon and ligament attachments (ie, entheses) are found at bony protrusions (ie, eminences), and the shape and size of these protrusions depend on both mechanical forces and cellular cues during growth. Tendon eminences also contribute to mechanical leverage for skeletal muscle. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling plays a critical role in bone development, and Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 are highly expressed in the perichondrium and periosteum of bone where entheses can be found. We used transgenic mice for combinatorial knockout of Fgfr1 and/or Fgfr2 in tendon/attachment progenitors (ScxCre) and measured eminence size and shape. Conditional deletion of both, but not individual, Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 in Scx progenitors led to enlarged eminences in the postnatal skeleton and shortening of long bones. In addition, Fgfr1/Fgfr2 double conditional knockout mice had more variation collagen fibril size in tendon, decreased tibial slope, and increased cell death at ligament attachments. These findings identify a role for FGFR signaling in regulating growth and maintenance of tendon/ligament attachments and the size and shape of bony eminences. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.600
FGFR1