👤 Adeline Seow

The assessment of serious illness communication (SIC) competence has, to date, primarily utilized tools that are profession-specific and not explicitly designed using competency-based or person-centered frameworks. To address these gaps, we developed and validated a new tool, the Assessment of Clinical Encounters - Communication Tool (ACE-CT). We convened a national panel of interprofessional SIC experts to develop and validate the ACE-CT using a three-phase multi-method approach. Phase 1 focused on item development through review of existing validated tools, and a Bayesian process in which panel members assessed item quality and item-domain correlation. Phase 2 involved item refinement and preliminary validation through stimulated recall interviews using a think-aloud technique. Phase 3 consisted of psychometric analyses for which panel members used the tool to assess video-recorded standardized patient encounters from interprofessional clinicians completing a SIC professional development intervention. In Phase 1, 37 relevant items from previously validated tools were identified, of which 11 items were removed due to redundance. Through the Bayesian process, 14 items were removed and 1 item was generated. Through Phase 2, 2 items were generated, 2 items were combined into 1, and remaining items were refined to optimize measurability and understandability. In Phase 3, reliability was demonstrated through evidence of high internal consistency and moderate reproducibility, both over time and across raters. The tool was found to be responsive and have sound construct validity through evidence of congruence, convergence and credibility. Raters found the tool to be intuitive, easy to complete, and that it accurately captured their perception of the quality of communication observed. The ACE-CT provides a reliable and valid approach to assessing SIC competence among interprofessional clinicians. Through its person-centered orientation, the ACE-CT provides an opportunity to objectively assess elements of SIC that patients and families value. Show less

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common type of lung cancer. Known risk variants explain only a small fraction of lung adenocarcinoma heritability. Here, we conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study of lung adenocarcinoma of East Asian ancestry (21,658 cases and 150,676 controls; 54.5% never-smokers) and identified 12 novel susceptibility variants, bringing the total number to 28 at 25 independent loci. Transcriptome-wide association analyses together with colocalization studies using a Taiwanese lung expression quantitative trait loci dataset (n = 115) identified novel candidate genes, including FADS1 at 11q12 and ELF5 at 11p13. In a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of East Asian and European studies, four loci were identified at 2p11, 4q32, 16q23, and 18q12. At the same time, most of our findings in East Asian populations showed no evidence of association in European populations. In our studies drawn from East Asian populations, a polygenic risk score based on the 25 loci had a stronger association in never-smokers vs. individuals with a history of smoking (P Show less

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on Parkinson's disease (PD) have mostly been done in Europeans and Japanese. No study has been done in Han Chinese, which make up nearly a fifth of the world population. We conducted the first Han Chinese GWAS analysing a total of 22,729 subjects (5,125 PD cases and 17,604 controls) from Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Korea, mainland China and Taiwan. We performed imputation, merging and logistic regression analyses of 2,402,394 SNPs passing quality control filters in 779 PD cases, 13,227 controls, adjusted for the first three principal components. 90 SNPs with association P < 10-4 were validated in 9 additional sample collections and the results were combined using fixed-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis. We observed strong associations reaching genome-wide significance at SNCA, LRRK2 and MCCC1, confirming their important roles in both European and Asian PD. We also identified significant (P < 0.05) associations at 5 loci (DLG2, SIPA1L2, STK39, VPS13C and RIT2), and observed the same direction of associations at 9 other loci including BST1 and PARK16. Allelic heterogeneity was observed at LRRK2 while European risk SNPs at 6 other loci including MAPT and GBA-SYT11 were non-polymorphic or very rare in our cohort. Overall, we replicate associations at SNCA, LRRK2, MCCC1 and 14 other European PD loci but did not identify Asian-specific loci with large effects (OR > 1.45) on PD risk. Our results also demonstrate some differences in the genetic contribution to PD between Europeans and Asians. Further pan-ethnic meta-analysis with European GWAS cohorts may unravel new PD loci. Show less

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are among the most important targets in drug discovery. In this study, we used TaqMan Low Density Arrays to profile the full GPCR repertoire of primary human macrophages differentiated from monocytes using either colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1/M-CSF) (CSF-1 Mϕ) or granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (GM-CSF Mϕ). The overall trend was a downregulation of GPCRs during monocyte to macrophage differentiation, but a core set of 10 genes (e.g. LGR4, MRGPRF and GPR143) encoding seven transmembrane proteins were upregulated, irrespective of the differentiating agent used. Several of these upregulated GPCRs have not previously been studied in the context of macrophage biology and/or inflammation. As expected, CSF-1 Mϕ and GM-CSF Mϕ exhibited differential inflammatory cytokine profiles in response to the Toll-like Receptor (TLR)4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Moreover, 15 GPCRs were differentially expressed between these cell populations in the basal state. For example, EDG1 was expressed at elevated levels in CSF-1 Mϕ versus GM-CSF Mϕ, whereas the reverse was true for EDG6. 101 GPCRs showed differential regulation over an LPS time course, with 65 of these profiles being impacted by the basal differentiation state (e.g. GPRC5A, GPRC5B). Only 14 LPS-regulated GPCRs showed asynchronous behavior (divergent LPS regulation) with respect to differentiation status. Thus, the differentiation state primarily affects the magnitude of LPS-regulated expression, rather than causing major reprogramming of GPCR gene expression profiles. Several GPCRs showing differential profiles between CSF-1 Mϕ and GM-CSF Mϕ (e.g. P2RY8, GPR92, EMR3) have not been widely investigated in macrophage biology and inflammation. Strikingly, several closely related GPCRs displayed completely opposing patterns of regulation during differentiation and/or activation (e.g. EDG1 versus EDG6, LGR4 versus LGR7, GPRC5A versus GPRC5B). We propose that selective regulation of GPCR5A and GPCR5B in CSF-1 Mϕ contributes to skewing toward the M2 macrophage phenotype. Our analysis of the GPCR repertoire expressed during primary human monocyte to macrophage differentiation and TLR4-mediated activation provides a valuable new platform for conducting future functional analyses of individual GPCRs in human macrophage inflammatory pathways. Show less