👤 Xi-Yu Liu

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧪 BiometalDB 🧬 Extraction
3182
Articles
1983
Name variants
Also published as: A Liu, Ai Liu, Ai-Guo Liu, Aidong Liu, Aiguo Liu, Aihua Liu, Aijun Liu, Ailing Liu, Aimin Liu, Allen P Liu, Aman Liu, An Liu, An-Qi Liu, Ang-Jun Liu, Anjing Liu, Anjun Liu, Ankang Liu, Anling Liu, Anmin Liu, Annuo Liu, Anshu Liu, Ao Liu, Aoxing Liu, B Liu, Baihui Liu, Baixue Liu, Baiyan Liu, Ban Liu, Bang Liu, Bang-Quan Liu, Bao Liu, Bao-Cheng Liu, Baogang Liu, Baohui Liu, Baolan Liu, Baoli Liu, Baoning Liu, Baoxin Liu, Baoyi Liu, Bei Liu, Beibei Liu, Ben Liu, Bi-Cheng Liu, Bi-Feng Liu, Bihao Liu, Bilin Liu, Bin Liu, Bing Liu, Bing-Wen Liu, Bingcheng Liu, Bingjie Liu, Bingwen Liu, Bingxiao Liu, Bingya Liu, Bingyu Liu, Binjie Liu, Bo Liu, Bo-Gong Liu, Bo-Han Liu, Boao Liu, Bolin Liu, Boling Liu, Boqun Liu, Bowen Liu, Boxiang Liu, Boxin Liu, Boya Liu, Boyang Liu, Brian Y Liu, C Liu, C M Liu, C Q Liu, C-T Liu, C-Y Liu, Caihong Liu, Cailing Liu, Caiyan Liu, Can Liu, Can-Zhao Liu, Catherine H Liu, Chan Liu, Chang Liu, Chang-Bin Liu, Chang-Hai Liu, Chang-Ming Liu, Chang-Pan Liu, Chang-Peng Liu, Changbin Liu, Changjiang Liu, Changliang Liu, Changming Liu, Changqing Liu, Changtie Liu, Changya Liu, Changyun Liu, Chao Liu, Chao-Ming Liu, Chaohong Liu, Chaoqi Liu, Chaoyi Liu, Chelsea Liu, Chen Liu, Chenchen Liu, Chendong Liu, Cheng Liu, Cheng-Li Liu, Cheng-Wu Liu, Cheng-Yong Liu, Cheng-Yun Liu, Chengbo Liu, Chenge Liu, Chengguo Liu, Chenghui Liu, Chengkun Liu, Chenglong Liu, Chengxiang Liu, Chengyao Liu, Chengyun Liu, Chenmiao Liu, Chenming Liu, Chenshu Liu, Chenxing Liu, Chenxu Liu, Chenxuan Liu, Chi Liu, Chia-Chen Liu, Chia-Hung Liu, Chia-Jen Liu, Chia-Yang Liu, Chia-Yu Liu, Chiang Liu, Chin-Chih Liu, Chin-Ching Liu, Chin-San Liu, Ching-Hsuan Liu, Ching-Ti Liu, Chong Liu, Christine S Liu, ChuHao Liu, Chuan Liu, Chuanfeng Liu, Chuanxin Liu, Chuanyang Liu, Chun Liu, Chun-Chi Liu, Chun-Feng Liu, Chun-Lei Liu, Chun-Ming Liu, Chun-Xiao Liu, Chun-Yu Liu, Chunchi Liu, Chundong Liu, Chunfeng Liu, Chung-Cheng Liu, Chung-Ji Liu, Chunhua Liu, Chunlei Liu, Chunliang Liu, Chunling Liu, Chunming Liu, Chunpeng Liu, Chunping Liu, Chunsheng Liu, Chunwei Liu, Chunxiao Liu, Chunyan Liu, Chunying Liu, Chunyu Liu, Cici Liu, Clarissa M Liu, Cong Cong Liu, Cong Liu, Congcong Liu, Cui Liu, Cui-Cui Liu, Cuicui Liu, Cuijie Liu, Cuilan Liu, Cun Liu, Cun-Fei Liu, D Liu, Da Liu, Da-Ren Liu, Daiyun Liu, Dajiang J Liu, Dan Liu, Dan-Ning Liu, Dandan Liu, Danhui Liu, Danping Liu, Dantong Liu, Danyang Liu, Danyong Liu, Daoshen Liu, David Liu, David R Liu, Dawei Liu, Daxu Liu, Dayong Liu, Dazhi Liu, De-Pei Liu, De-Shun Liu, Dechao Liu, Dehui Liu, Deliang Liu, Deng-Xiang Liu, Depei Liu, Deping Liu, Derek Liu, Deruo Liu, Desheng Liu, Dewu Liu, Dexi Liu, Deyao Liu, Deying Liu, Dezhen Liu, Di Liu, Didi Liu, Ding-Ming Liu, Dingding Liu, Dinglu Liu, Dingxiang Liu, Dong Liu, Dong-Yun Liu, Dongang Liu, Dongbo Liu, Dongfang Liu, Donghui Liu, Dongjuan Liu, Dongliang Liu, Dongmei Liu, Dongming Liu, Dongping Liu, Dongxian Liu, Dongxue Liu, Dongyan Liu, Dongyang Liu, Dongyao Liu, Dongzhou Liu, Dudu Liu, Dunjiang Liu, Edison Tak-Bun Liu, En-Qi Liu, Enbin Liu, Enlong Liu, Enqi Liu, Erdong Liu, Erfeng Liu, Erxiong Liu, F Liu, F Z Liu, Fan Liu, Fan-Jie Liu, Fang Liu, Fang-Zhou Liu, Fangli Liu, Fangmei Liu, Fangping Liu, Fangqi Liu, Fangzhou Liu, Fani Liu, Fayu Liu, Fei Liu, Feifan Liu, Feilong Liu, Feiyan Liu, Feiyang Liu, Feiye Liu, Fen Liu, Fendou Liu, Feng Liu, Feng-Ying Liu, Fengbin Liu, Fengchao Liu, Fengen Liu, Fengguo Liu, Fengjiao Liu, Fengjie Liu, Fengjuan Liu, Fengqiong Liu, Fengsong Liu, Fonda Liu, Foqiu Liu, Fu-Jun Liu, Fu-Tong Liu, Fubao Liu, Fuhao Liu, Fuhong Liu, Fujun Liu, Gan Liu, Gang Liu, Gangli Liu, Ganqiang Liu, Gaohua Liu, Ge Liu, Ge-Li Liu, Gen Sheng Liu, Geng Liu, Geng-Hao Liu, Geoffrey Liu, George E Liu, George Liu, Geroge Liu, Gexiu Liu, Gongguan Liu, Guang Liu, Guangbin Liu, Guangfan Liu, Guanghao Liu, Guangliang Liu, Guangqin Liu, Guangwei Liu, Guangxu Liu, Guannan Liu, Guantong Liu, Gui Yao Liu, Gui-Fen Liu, Gui-Jing Liu, Gui-Rong Liu, Guibo Liu, Guidong Liu, Guihong Liu, Guiju Liu, Guili Liu, Guiqiong Liu, Guiquan Liu, Guisheng Liu, Guiyou Liu, Guiyuan Liu, Guning Liu, Guo-Liang Liu, Guochang Liu, Guodong Liu, Guohao Liu, Guojun Liu, Guoke Liu, Guoliang Liu, Guopin Liu, Guoqiang Liu, Guoqing Liu, Guoquan Liu, Guowen Liu, Guoyong Liu, H Liu, Hai Feng Liu, Hai-Jing Liu, Hai-Xia Liu, Hai-Yan Liu, Haibin Liu, Haichao Liu, Haifei Liu, Haifeng Liu, Hailan Liu, Hailin Liu, Hailing Liu, Haitao Liu, Haiyan Liu, Haiyang Liu, Haiying Liu, Haizhao Liu, Han Liu, Han-Fu Liu, Han-Qi Liu, Hancong Liu, Hang Liu, Hanhan Liu, Hanjiao Liu, Hanjie Liu, Hanmin Liu, Hanqing Liu, Hanxiang Liu, Hanyuan Liu, Hao Liu, Haobin Liu, Haodong Liu, Haogang Liu, Haojie Liu, Haokun Liu, Haoling Liu, Haowei Liu, Haowen Liu, Haoyue Liu, He-Kun Liu, Hehe Liu, Hekun Liu, Heliang Liu, Heng Liu, Hengan Liu, Hengru Liu, Hengtong Liu, Heyi Liu, Hong Juan Liu, Hong Liu, Hong Wei Liu, Hong-Bin Liu, Hong-Li Liu, Hong-Liang Liu, Hong-Tao Liu, Hong-Xiang Liu, Hong-Ying Liu, Hongbin Liu, Hongbing Liu, Hongfa Liu, Honghan Liu, Honghe Liu, Hongjian Liu, Hongjie Liu, Hongjun Liu, Hongli Liu, Hongliang Liu, Hongmei Liu, Hongqun Liu, Hongtao Liu, Hongwei Liu, Hongxiang Liu, Hongxing Liu, Hongyan Liu, Hongyang Liu, Hongyao Liu, Hongyu Liu, Hongyuan Liu, Houbao Liu, Hsiao-Ching Liu, Hsiao-Sheng Liu, Hsiaowei Liu, Hsu-Hsiang Liu, Hu Liu, Hua Liu, Hua-Cheng Liu, Hua-Ge Liu, Huadong Liu, Huaizheng Liu, Huan Liu, Huan-Yu Liu, Huanhuan Liu, Huanliang Liu, Huanyi Liu, Huatao Liu, Huawei Liu, Huayang Liu, Huazhen Liu, Hui Liu, Hui-Chao Liu, Hui-Fang Liu, Hui-Guo Liu, Hui-Hui Liu, Hui-Xin Liu, Hui-Ying Liu, Huibin Liu, Huidi Liu, Huihua Liu, Huihui Liu, Huijuan Liu, Huijun Liu, Huikun Liu, Huiling Liu, Huimao Liu, Huimin Liu, Huiming Liu, Huina Liu, Huiping Liu, Huiqing Liu, Huisheng Liu, Huiying Liu, Huiyu Liu, Hulin Liu, J Liu, J R Liu, J W Liu, J X Liu, J Z Liu, James K C Liu, Jamie Liu, Jay Liu, Ji Liu, Ji-Kai Liu, Ji-Long Liu, Ji-Xing Liu, Ji-Xuan Liu, Ji-Yun Liu, Jia Liu, Jia-Cheng Liu, Jia-Jun Liu, Jia-Qian Liu, Jia-Yao Liu, JiaXi Liu, Jiabin Liu, Jiachen Liu, Jiahao Liu, Jiahua Liu, Jiahui Liu, Jiajie Liu, Jiajuan Liu, Jiakun Liu, Jiali Liu, Jialin Liu, Jiamin Liu, Jiaming Liu, Jian Liu, Jian-Jun Liu, Jian-Kun Liu, Jian-hong Liu, Jian-shu Liu, Jianan Liu, Jianbin Liu, Jianbo Liu, Jiandong Liu, Jianfang Liu, Jianfeng Liu, Jiang Liu, Jiangang Liu, Jiangbin Liu, Jianghong Liu, Jianghua Liu, Jiangjiang Liu, Jiangjin Liu, Jiangling Liu, Jiangxin Liu, Jiangyan Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jianhui Liu, Jiani Liu, Jianing Liu, Jianjiang Liu, Jianjun Liu, Jiankang Liu, Jiankun Liu, Jianlei Liu, Jianmei Liu, Jianmin Liu, Jiannan Liu, Jianping Liu, Jiantao Liu, Jianwei Liu, Jianxi Liu, Jianxin Liu, Jianyong Liu, Jianyu Liu, Jianyun Liu, Jiao Liu, Jiaojiao Liu, Jiaoyang Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Jiaqing Liu, Jiawen Liu, Jiaxian Liu, Jiaxiang Liu, Jiaxin Liu, Jiayan Liu, Jiayi Liu, Jiayin Liu, Jiaying Liu, Jiayu Liu, Jiayun Liu, Jiazhe Liu, Jiazheng Liu, Jiazhuo Liu, Jidan Liu, Jie Liu, Jie-Qing Liu, Jierong Liu, Jiewei Liu, Jiewen Liu, Jieying Liu, Jieyu Liu, Jihe Liu, Jiheng Liu, Jin Liu, Jin-Juan Liu, Jin-Qing Liu, Jinbao Liu, Jinbo Liu, Jincheng Liu, Jindi Liu, Jinfeng Liu, Jing Liu, Jing Min Liu, Jing-Crystal Liu, Jing-Hua Liu, Jing-Ying Liu, Jing-Yu Liu, Jingbo Liu, Jingchong Liu, Jingfang Liu, Jingfeng Liu, Jingfu Liu, Jinghui Liu, Jingjie Liu, Jingjing Liu, Jingmeng Liu, Jingmin Liu, Jingqi Liu, Jingquan Liu, Jingqun Liu, Jingsheng Liu, Jingwei Liu, Jingwen Liu, Jingxing Liu, Jingyi Liu, Jingying Liu, Jingyun Liu, Jingzhong Liu, Jinjie Liu, Jinlian Liu, Jinlong Liu, Jinman Liu, Jinpei Liu, Jinpeng Liu, Jinping Liu, Jinqin Liu, Jinrong Liu, Jinsheng Liu, Jinsong Liu, Jinsuo Liu, Jinxiang Liu, Jinxin Liu, Jinxing Liu, Jinyue Liu, Jinze Liu, Jinzhao Liu, Jinzhi Liu, Jiong Liu, Jishan Liu, Jitao Liu, Jiwei Liu, Jixin Liu, Jonathan Liu, Joyce F Liu, Joyce Liu, Ju Liu, Ju-Fang Liu, Juan Liu, Juanjuan Liu, Juanxi Liu, Jue Liu, Jui-Tung Liu, Jun Liu, Jun O Liu, Jun Ting Liu, Jun Yi Liu, Jun-Jen Liu, Jun-Yan Liu, Jun-Yi Liu, Junbao Liu, Junchao Liu, Junfen Liu, Junhui Liu, Junjiang Liu, Junjie Liu, Junjin Liu, Junjun Liu, Junlin Liu, Junling Liu, Junnian Liu, Junpeng Liu, Junqi Liu, Junrong Liu, Juntao Liu, Juntian Liu, Junwen Liu, Junwu Liu, Junxi Liu, Junyan Liu, Junye Liu, Junying Liu, Junyu Liu, Juyao Liu, Kai Liu, Kai-Zheng Liu, Kaidong Liu, Kaijing Liu, Kaikun Liu, Kaiqi Liu, Kaisheng Liu, Kaitai Liu, Kaiwen Liu, Kang Liu, Kang-le Liu, Kangdong Liu, Kangwei Liu, Kathleen D Liu, Ke Liu, Ke-Tong Liu, Kechun Liu, Kehui Liu, Kejia Liu, Keng-Hau Liu, Keqiang Liu, Kexin Liu, Kiang Liu, Kuangyi Liu, Kun Liu, Kun-Cheng Liu, Kwei-Yan Liu, L L Liu, L Liu, L W Liu, Lan Liu, Lan-Xiang Liu, Lang Liu, Lanhao Liu, Le Liu, Lebin Liu, Lei Liu, Lele Liu, Leping Liu, Li Liu, Li-Fang Liu, Li-Min Liu, Li-Rong Liu, Li-Wen Liu, Li-Xuan Liu, Li-Ying Liu, Li-ping Liu, Lian Liu, Lianfei Liu, Liang Liu, Liang-Chen Liu, Liang-Feng Liu, Liangguo Liu, Liangji Liu, Liangjia Liu, Liangliang Liu, Liangyu Liu, Lianxin Liu, Lianyong Liu, Libin Liu, Lichao Liu, Lichun Liu, Lidong Liu, Liegang Liu, Lifang Liu, Ligang Liu, Lihua Liu, Lijuan Liu, Lijun Liu, Lili Liu, Liling Liu, Limin Liu, Liming Liu, Lin Liu, Lina Liu, Ling Liu, Ling-Yun Liu, Ling-Zhi Liu, Lingfei Liu, Lingjiao Liu, Lingjuan Liu, Linglong Liu, Lingyan Liu, Lining Liu, Linlin Liu, Linqing Liu, Linwen Liu, Liping Liu, Liqing Liu, Liqiong Liu, Liqun Liu, Lirong Liu, Liru Liu, Liu Liu, Liumei Liu, Liusheng Liu, Liwen Liu, Lixia Liu, Lixian Liu, Lixiao Liu, Liying Liu, Liyue Liu, Lizhen Liu, Long Liu, Longfei Liu, Longjian Liu, Longqian Liu, Longyang Liu, Longzhou Liu, Lu Liu, Luhong Liu, Lulu Liu, Luming Liu, Lunxu Liu, Luping Liu, Lushan Liu, Lv Liu, M L Liu, M Liu, Man Liu, Man-Ru Liu, Manjiao Liu, Manqi Liu, Manran Liu, Maolin Liu, Mei Liu, Mei-mei Liu, Meicen Liu, Meifang Liu, Meijiao Liu, Meijing Liu, Meijuan Liu, Meijun Liu, Meiling Liu, Meimei Liu, Meixin Liu, Meiyan Liu, Meng Han Liu, Meng Liu, Meng-Hui Liu, Meng-Meng Liu, Meng-Yue Liu, Mengduan Liu, Mengfan Liu, Mengfei Liu, Menggang Liu, Menghan Liu, Menghua Liu, Menghui Liu, Mengjia Liu, Mengjiao Liu, Mengke Liu, Menglin Liu, Mengling Liu, Mengmei Liu, Mengqi Liu, Mengqian Liu, Mengxi Liu, Mengxue Liu, Mengyang Liu, Mengying Liu, Mengyu Liu, Mengyuan Liu, Mengzhen Liu, Mi Liu, Mi-Hua Liu, Mi-Min Liu, Miao Liu, Miaoliang Liu, Min Liu, Minda Liu, Minetta C Liu, Ming Liu, Ming-Jiang Liu, Ming-Qi Liu, Mingcheng Liu, Mingchun Liu, Mingfan Liu, Minghui Liu, Mingjiang Liu, Mingjing Liu, Mingjun Liu, Mingli Liu, Mingming Liu, Mingna Liu, Mingqin Liu, Mingrui Liu, Mingsen Liu, Mingsong Liu, Mingxiao Liu, Mingxing Liu, Mingxu Liu, Mingyang Liu, Mingyao Liu, Mingying Liu, Mingyu Liu, Minhao Liu, Minxia Liu, Mo-Nan Liu, Modan Liu, Mouze Liu, Muqiu Liu, Musang Liu, N A Liu, N Liu, Na Liu, Na-Nv Liu, Na-Wei Liu, Nai-feng Liu, Naihua Liu, Naili Liu, Nan Liu, Nan-Song Liu, Nana Liu, Nannan Liu, Nanxi Liu, Ni Liu, Nian Liu, Ning Liu, Ning'ang Liu, Ningning Liu, Niya Liu, Ou Liu, Ouxuan Liu, P C Liu, Pan Liu, Panhong Liu, Panting Liu, Paul Liu, Pei Liu, Pei-Ning Liu, Peijian Liu, Peijie Liu, Peijun Liu, Peilong Liu, Peiqi Liu, Peiqing Liu, Peiwei Liu, Peixi Liu, Peiyao Liu, Peizhong Liu, Peng Liu, Pengcheng Liu, Pengfei Liu, Penghong Liu, Pengli Liu, Pengtao Liu, Pengyu Liu, Pengyuan Liu, Pentao Liu, Peter S Liu, Piaopiao Liu, Pinduo Liu, Ping Liu, Ping-Yen Liu, Pinghuai Liu, Pingping Liu, Pingsheng Liu, Q Liu, Qi Liu, Qi-Xian Liu, Qian Liu, Qian-Wen Liu, Qiang Liu, Qiang-Yuan Liu, Qiangyun Liu, Qianjin Liu, Qianqi Liu, Qianshuo Liu, Qianwei Liu, Qiao-Hong Liu, Qiaofeng Liu, Qiaoyan Liu, Qiaozhen Liu, Qiji Liu, Qiming Liu, Qin Liu, Qinfang Liu, Qing Liu, Qing-Huai Liu, Qing-Rong Liu, Qingbin Liu, Qingbo Liu, Qingguang Liu, Qingguo Liu, Qinghao Liu, Qinghong Liu, Qinghua Liu, Qinghuai Liu, Qinghuan Liu, Qinglei Liu, Qingping Liu, Qingqing Liu, Qingquan Liu, Qingsong Liu, Qingxia Liu, Qingxiang Liu, Qingyang Liu, Qingyou Liu, Qingyun Liu, Qingzhuo Liu, Qinqin Liu, Qiong Liu, Qiu-Ping Liu, Qiulei Liu, Qiuli Liu, Qiulu Liu, Qiushi Liu, Qiuxu Liu, Qiuyu Liu, Qiuyue Liu, Qiwei Liu, Qiyao Liu, Qiye Liu, Qizhan Liu, Quan Liu, Quan-Jun Liu, Quanxin Liu, Quanying Liu, Quanzhong Liu, Quentin Liu, Qun Liu, Qunlong Liu, Qunpeng Liu, R F Liu, R Liu, R Y Liu, Ran Liu, Rangru Liu, Ranran Liu, Ren Liu, Renling Liu, Ri Liu, Rong Liu, Rong-Zong Liu, Rongfei Liu, Ronghua Liu, Rongxia Liu, Rongxun Liu, Rui Liu, Rui-Jie Liu, Rui-Tian Liu, Rui-Xuan Liu, Ruichen Liu, Ruihua Liu, Ruijie Liu, Ruijuan Liu, Ruilong Liu, Ruiping Liu, Ruiqi Liu, Ruitong Liu, Ruixia Liu, Ruiyi Liu, Ruizao Liu, Runjia Liu, Runjie Liu, Runni Liu, Runping Liu, Ruochen Liu, Ruotian Liu, Ruowen Liu, Ruoyang Liu, Ruyi Liu, Ruyue Liu, S Liu, Saiji Liu, Sasa Liu, Sen Liu, Senchen Liu, Senqi Liu, Sha Liu, Shan Liu, Shan-Shan Liu, Shandong Liu, Shang-Feng Liu, Shang-Xin Liu, Shangjing Liu, Shangxin Liu, Shangyu Liu, Shangyuan Liu, Shangyun Liu, Shanhui Liu, Shanling Liu, Shanshan Liu, Shao-Bin Liu, Shao-Jun Liu, Shao-Yuan Liu, Shaobo Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Shaohua Liu, Shaojun Liu, Shaoqing Liu, Shaowei Liu, Shaoying Liu, Shaoyou Liu, Shaoyu Liu, Shaozhen Liu, Shasha Liu, Sheng Liu, Shengbin Liu, Shengjun Liu, Shengnan Liu, Shengyang Liu, Shengzhi Liu, Shengzhuo Liu, Shenhai Liu, Shenping Liu, Shi Liu, Shi-Lian Liu, Shi-Wei Liu, Shi-Yong Liu, Shi-guo Liu, ShiWei Liu, Shih-Ping Liu, Shijia Liu, Shijian Liu, Shijie Liu, Shijun Liu, Shikai Liu, Shikun Liu, Shilin Liu, Shing-Hwa Liu, Shiping Liu, Shiqian Liu, Shiquan Liu, Shiru Liu, Shixi Liu, Shiyan Liu, Shiyang Liu, Shiying Liu, Shiyu Liu, Shiyuan Liu, Shou-Sheng Liu, Shouguo Liu, Shoupei Liu, Shouxin Liu, Shouyang Liu, Shu Liu, Shu-Chen Liu, Shu-Jing Liu, Shu-Lin Liu, Shu-Qiang Liu, Shu-Qin Liu, Shuai Liu, Shuaishuai Liu, Shuang Liu, Shuangli Liu, Shuangzhu Liu, Shuhong Liu, Shuhua Liu, Shui-Bing Liu, Shujie Liu, Shujing Liu, Shujun Liu, Shulin Liu, Shuling Liu, Shumin Liu, Shun-Mei Liu, Shunfang Liu, Shuning Liu, Shunming Liu, Shuqian Liu, Shuqing Liu, Shuwen Liu, Shuxi Liu, Shuxian Liu, Shuya Liu, Shuyan Liu, Shuyu Liu, Si-Jin Liu, Si-Xu Liu, Si-Yan Liu, Si-jun Liu, Sicheng Liu, Sidan Liu, Side Liu, Sihao Liu, Sijing Liu, Sijun Liu, Silvia Liu, Simin Liu, Sipu Liu, Siqi Liu, Siqin Liu, Siru Liu, Sirui Liu, Sisi Liu, Sitian Liu, Siwen Liu, Sixi Liu, Sixin Liu, Sixiu Liu, Sixu Liu, Siyao Liu, Siyi Liu, Siyu Liu, Siyuan Liu, Song Liu, Song-Fang Liu, Song-Mei Liu, Song-Ping Liu, Songfang Liu, Songhui Liu, Songqin Liu, Songsong Liu, Songyi Liu, Su Liu, Su-Yun Liu, Sudong Liu, Suhuan Liu, Sui-Feng Liu, Suling Liu, Suosi Liu, Sushuang Liu, Susu Liu, Szu-Heng Liu, T H Liu, T Liu, Ta-Chih Liu, Taihang Liu, Taixiang Liu, Tang Liu, Tao Liu, Taoli Liu, Taotao Liu, Te Liu, Teng Liu, Tengfei Liu, Tengli Liu, Teresa T Liu, Tian Liu, Tian Shu Liu, Tianhao Liu, Tianhu Liu, Tianjia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Tianlai Liu, Tianlang Liu, Tianlong Liu, Tianqiang Liu, Tianrui Liu, Tianshu Liu, Tiantian Liu, Tianyao Liu, Tianyi Liu, Tianyu Liu, Tianze Liu, Tiemin Liu, Tina Liu, Ting Liu, Ting-Li Liu, Ting-Ting Liu, Ting-Yuan Liu, Tingjiao Liu, Tingting Liu, Tong Liu, Tonglin Liu, Tongtong Liu, Tongyan Liu, Tongyu Liu, Tongyun Liu, Tongzheng Liu, Tsang-Wu Liu, Tsung-Yun Liu, Vincent W S Liu, W Liu, W-Y Liu, Wan Liu, Wan-Chun Liu, Wan-Di Liu, Wan-Guo Liu, Wan-Ying Liu, Wang Liu, Wangrui Liu, Wanguo Liu, Wangyang Liu, Wanjun Liu, Wanli Liu, Wanlu Liu, Wanqi Liu, Wanqing Liu, Wanting Liu, Wei Liu, Wei-Chieh Liu, Wei-Hsuan Liu, Wei-Hua Liu, Weida Liu, Weifang Liu, Weifeng Liu, Weiguo Liu, Weihai Liu, Weihong Liu, Weijian Liu, Weijie Liu, Weijun Liu, Weilin Liu, Weimin Liu, Weiming Liu, Weina Liu, Weiqin Liu, Weiqing Liu, Weiren Liu, Weisheng Liu, Weishuo Liu, Weiwei Liu, Weiyang Liu, Wen Liu, Wen Yuan Liu, Wen-Chun Liu, Wen-Di Liu, Wen-Fang Liu, Wen-Jie Liu, Wen-Jing Liu, Wen-Qiang Liu, Wen-Tao Liu, Wen-ling Liu, Wenbang Liu, Wenbin Liu, Wenbo Liu, Wenchao Liu, Wenen Liu, Wenfeng Liu, Wenhan Liu, Wenhao Liu, Wenhua Liu, Wenjie Liu, Wenjing Liu, Wenlang Liu, Wenli Liu, Wenling Liu, Wenlong Liu, Wenna Liu, Wenping Liu, Wenqi Liu, Wenrui Liu, Wensheng Liu, Wentao Liu, Wenwu Liu, Wenxiang Liu, Wenxuan Liu, Wenya Liu, Wenyan Liu, Wenyi Liu, Wenzhong Liu, Wu Liu, Wuping Liu, Wuyang Liu, X C Liu, X Liu, X P Liu, X-D Liu, Xi Liu, Xia Liu, Xia-Meng Liu, Xialin Liu, Xian Liu, Xianbao Liu, Xianchen Liu, Xianda Liu, Xiang Liu, Xiang-Qian Liu, Xiang-Yu Liu, Xiangchen Liu, Xiangfei Liu, Xianglan Liu, Xiangli Liu, Xiangliang Liu, Xianglu Liu, Xiangning Liu, Xiangping Liu, Xiangsheng Liu, Xiangtao Liu, Xiangting Liu, Xiangxiang Liu, Xiangxuan Liu, Xiangyong Liu, Xiangyu Liu, Xiangyun Liu, Xianli Liu, Xianling Liu, Xiansheng Liu, Xianyang Liu, Xiao Dong Liu, Xiao Liu, Xiao Yan Liu, Xiao-Cheng Liu, Xiao-Dan Liu, Xiao-Gang Liu, Xiao-Guang Liu, Xiao-Huan Liu, Xiao-Jiao Liu, Xiao-Li Liu, Xiao-Ling Liu, Xiao-Ning Liu, Xiao-Qiu Liu, Xiao-Qun Liu, Xiao-Rong Liu, Xiao-Song Liu, Xiao-Xiao Liu, Xiao-lan Liu, Xiaoan Liu, Xiaobai Liu, Xiaobei Liu, Xiaobing Liu, Xiaocen Liu, Xiaochuan Liu, Xiaocong Liu, Xiaodan Liu, Xiaoding Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Xiaofan Liu, Xiaofang Liu, Xiaofei Liu, Xiaogang Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Xiaoguang Margaret Liu, Xiaohan Liu, Xiaoheng Liu, Xiaohong Liu, Xiaohua Liu, Xiaohuan Liu, Xiaohui Liu, Xiaojie Liu, Xiaojing Liu, Xiaoju Liu, Xiaojun Liu, Xiaole Shirley Liu, Xiaolei Liu, Xiaoli Liu, Xiaolin Liu, Xiaoling Liu, Xiaoman Liu, Xiaomei Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Xiaoming Liu, Xiaona Liu, Xiaonan Liu, Xiaopeng Liu, Xiaoping Liu, Xiaoqian Liu, Xiaoqiang Liu, Xiaoqin Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Xiaoran Liu, Xiaosong Liu, Xiaotian Liu, Xiaoting Liu, Xiaowei Liu, Xiaoxi Liu, Xiaoxia Liu, Xiaoxiao Liu, Xiaoxu Liu, Xiaoxue Liu, Xiaoya Liu, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoyang Liu, Xiaoye Liu, Xiaoying Liu, Xiaoyong Liu, Xiaoyu Liu, Xiawen Liu, Xibao Liu, Xibing Liu, Xie-hong Liu, Xiehe Liu, Xiguang Liu, Xijun Liu, Xili Liu, Xin Liu, Xin-Hua Liu, Xin-Yan Liu, Xinbo Liu, Xinchang Liu, Xing Liu, Xing-De Liu, Xing-Li Liu, Xing-Yang Liu, Xingbang Liu, Xingde Liu, Xinghua Liu, Xinghui Liu, Xingjing Liu, Xinglei Liu, Xingli Liu, Xinglong Liu, Xinguo Liu, Xingxiang Liu, Xingyi Liu, Xingyu Liu, Xinhua Liu, Xinjun Liu, Xinlei Liu, Xinli Liu, Xinmei Liu, Xinmin Liu, Xinran Liu, Xinru Liu, Xinrui Liu, Xintong Liu, Xinxin Liu, Xinyao Liu, Xinyi Liu, Xinying Liu, Xinyong Liu, Xinyu Liu, Xinyue Liu, Xiong Liu, Xiqiang Liu, Xiru Liu, Xishan Liu, Xiu Liu, Xiufen Liu, Xiufeng Liu, Xiuheng Liu, Xiuling Liu, Xiumei Liu, Xiuqin Liu, Xiyong Liu, Xu Liu, Xu-Dong Liu, Xu-Hui Liu, Xuan Liu, Xuanlin Liu, Xuanyu Liu, Xuanzhu Liu, Xue Liu, Xue-Lian Liu, Xue-Min Liu, Xue-Qing Liu, Xue-Zheng Liu, Xuefang Liu, Xuejing Liu, Xuekui Liu, Xuelan Liu, Xueling Liu, Xuemei Liu, Xuemeng Liu, Xuemin Liu, Xueping Liu, Xueqin Liu, Xueqing Liu, Xueru Liu, Xuesen Liu, Xueshibojie Liu, Xuesong Liu, Xueting Liu, Xuewei Liu, Xuewen Liu, Xuexiu Liu, Xueying Liu, Xueyuan Liu, Xuezhen Liu, Xuezheng Liu, Xuezhi Liu, Xufeng Liu, Xuguang Liu, Xujie Liu, Xulin Liu, Xuming Liu, Xunhua Liu, Xunyue Liu, Xuxia Liu, Xuxu Liu, Xuyi Liu, Xuying Liu, Y H Liu, Y L Liu, Y Liu, Y Y Liu, Ya Liu, Ya-Jin Liu, Ya-Kun Liu, Ya-Wei Liu, Yadong Liu, Yafei Liu, Yajing Liu, Yajuan Liu, Yaling Liu, Yalu Liu, Yan Liu, Yan-Li Liu, Yanan Liu, Yanchao Liu, Yanchen Liu, Yandong Liu, Yanfei Liu, Yanfen Liu, Yanfeng Liu, Yang Liu, Yange Liu, Yangfan Liu, Yangfan P Liu, Yangjun Liu, Yangkai Liu, Yangruiyu Liu, Yangyang Liu, Yanhong Liu, Yanhua Liu, Yanhui Liu, Yanjie Liu, Yanju Liu, Yanjun Liu, Yankuo Liu, Yanli Liu, Yanliang Liu, Yanling Liu, Yanman Liu, Yanmin Liu, Yanping Liu, Yanqing Liu, Yanqiu Liu, Yanquan Liu, Yanru Liu, Yansheng Liu, Yansong Liu, Yanting Liu, Yanwu Liu, Yanxiao Liu, Yanyan Liu, Yanyao Liu, Yanying Liu, Yanyun Liu, Yao Liu, Yao-Hui Liu, Yaobo Liu, Yaoquan Liu, Yaou Liu, Yaowen Liu, Yaoyao Liu, Yaozhong Liu, Yaping Liu, Yaqiong Liu, Yarong Liu, Yaru Liu, Yating Liu, Yaxin Liu, Ye Liu, Ye-Dan Liu, Yehai Liu, Yen-Chen Liu, Yen-Chun Liu, Yen-Nien Liu, Yeqing Liu, Yi Liu, Yi-Chang Liu, Yi-Chien Liu, Yi-Han Liu, Yi-Hung Liu, Yi-Jia Liu, Yi-Ling Liu, Yi-Meng Liu, Yi-Ming Liu, Yi-Yun Liu, Yi-Zhang Liu, YiRan Liu, Yibin Liu, Yibing Liu, Yicun Liu, Yidan Liu, Yidong Liu, Yifan Liu, Yifu Liu, Yihao Liu, Yiheng Liu, Yihui Liu, Yijing Liu, Yilei Liu, Yili Liu, Yilin Liu, Yimei Liu, Yiming Liu, Yin Liu, Yin-Ping Liu, Yinchu Liu, Yinfang Liu, Ying Liu, Ying Poi Liu, Yingchun Liu, Yinghua Liu, Yinghuan Liu, Yinghui Liu, Yingjun Liu, Yingli Liu, Yingwei Liu, Yingxia Liu, Yingyan Liu, Yingyi Liu, Yingying Liu, Yingzi Liu, Yinhe Liu, Yinhui Liu, Yining Liu, Yinjiang Liu, Yinping Liu, Yinuo Liu, Yiping Liu, Yiqing Liu, Yitian Liu, Yiting Liu, Yitong Liu, Yiwei Liu, Yiwen Liu, Yixiang Liu, Yixiao Liu, Yixuan Liu, Yiyang Liu, Yiyi Liu, Yiyuan Liu, Yiyun Liu, Yizhi Liu, Yizhuo Liu, Yong Liu, Yong Mei Liu, Yong-Chao Liu, Yong-Hong Liu, Yong-Jian Liu, Yong-Jun Liu, Yong-Tai Liu, Yong-da Liu, Yongchao Liu, Yonggang Liu, Yonggao Liu, Yonghong Liu, Yonghua Liu, Yongjian Liu, Yongjie Liu, Yongjun Liu, Yongli Liu, Yongmei Liu, Yongming Liu, Yongqiang Liu, Yongshuo Liu, Yongtai Liu, Yongtao Liu, Yongtong Liu, Yongxiao Liu, Yongyue Liu, You Liu, You-ping Liu, Youan Liu, Youbin Liu, Youdong Liu, Youhan Liu, Youlian Liu, Youwen Liu, Yu Liu, Yu Xuan Liu, Yu-Chen Liu, Yu-Ching Liu, Yu-Hui Liu, Yu-Li Liu, Yu-Lin Liu, Yu-Peng Liu, Yu-Wei Liu, Yu-Zhang Liu, YuHeng Liu, Yuan Liu, Yuan-Bo Liu, Yuan-Jie Liu, Yuan-Tao Liu, YuanHua Liu, Yuanchu Liu, Yuanfa Liu, Yuanhang Liu, Yuanhui Liu, Yuanjia Liu, Yuanjiao Liu, Yuanjun Liu, Yuanliang Liu, Yuantao Liu, Yuantong Liu, Yuanxiang Liu, Yuanxin Liu, Yuanxing Liu, Yuanying Liu, Yuanyuan Liu, Yubin Liu, Yuchen Liu, Yue Liu, Yuecheng Liu, Yuefang Liu, Yuehong Liu, Yueli Liu, Yueping Liu, Yuetong Liu, Yuexi Liu, Yuexin Liu, Yuexing Liu, Yueyang Liu, Yueyun Liu, Yufan Liu, Yufei Liu, Yufeng Liu, Yuhao Liu, Yuhe Liu, Yujia Liu, Yujiang Liu, Yujie Liu, Yujun Liu, Yulan Liu, Yuling Liu, Yulong Liu, Yumei Liu, Yumiao Liu, Yun Liu, Yun-Cai Liu, Yun-Qiang Liu, Yun-Ru Liu, Yun-Zi Liu, Yunfen Liu, Yunfeng Liu, Yuning Liu, Yunjie Liu, Yunlong Liu, Yunqi Liu, Yunqiang Liu, Yuntao Liu, Yunuan Liu, Yunuo Liu, Yunxia Liu, Yunyun Liu, Yuping Liu, Yupu Liu, Yuqi Liu, Yuqiang Liu, Yuqing Liu, Yurong Liu, Yuru Liu, Yusen Liu, Yutao Liu, Yutian Liu, Yuting Liu, Yutong Liu, Yuwei Liu, Yuxi Liu, Yuxia Liu, Yuxiang Liu, Yuxin Liu, Yuxuan Liu, Yuyan Liu, Yuyi Liu, Yuyu Liu, Yuyuan Liu, Yuzhen Liu, Yv-Xuan Liu, Z H Liu, Z Q Liu, Z Z Liu, Zaiqiang Liu, Zan Liu, Zaoqu Liu, Ze Liu, Zefeng Liu, Zekun Liu, Zeming Liu, Zengfu Liu, Zeyu Liu, Zezhou Liu, Zhangyu Liu, Zhangyuan Liu, Zhansheng Liu, Zhao Liu, Zhaoguo Liu, Zhaoli Liu, Zhaorui Liu, Zhaotian Liu, Zhaoxiang Liu, Zhaoxun Liu, Zhaoyang Liu, Zhe Liu, Zhekai Liu, Zheliang Liu, Zhen Liu, Zhen-Lin Liu, Zhendong Liu, Zhenfang Liu, Zhenfeng Liu, Zheng Liu, Zheng-Hong Liu, Zheng-Yu Liu, ZhengYi Liu, Zhengbing Liu, Zhengchuang Liu, Zhengdong Liu, Zhenghao Liu, Zhengkun Liu, Zhengtang Liu, Zhengting Liu, Zhenguo Liu, Zhengxia Liu, Zhengye Liu, Zhenhai Liu, Zhenhao Liu, Zhenhua Liu, Zhenjiang Liu, Zhenjiao Liu, Zhenjie Liu, Zhenkui Liu, Zhenlei Liu, Zhenmi Liu, Zhenming Liu, Zhenna Liu, Zhenqian Liu, Zhenqiu Liu, Zhenwei Liu, Zhenxing Liu, Zhenxiu Liu, Zhenzhen Liu, Zhenzhu Liu, Zhi Liu, Zhi Y Liu, Zhi-Fen Liu, Zhi-Guo Liu, Zhi-Jie Liu, Zhi-Kai Liu, Zhi-Ping Liu, Zhi-Ren Liu, Zhi-Wen Liu, Zhi-Ying Liu, Zhicheng Liu, Zhifang Liu, Zhigang Liu, Zhiguo Liu, Zhihan Liu, Zhihao Liu, Zhihong Liu, Zhihua Liu, Zhihui Liu, Zhijia Liu, Zhijie Liu, Zhikui Liu, Zhili Liu, Zhiming Liu, Zhipeng Liu, Zhiping Liu, Zhiqian Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhiru Liu, Zhirui Liu, Zhishuo Liu, Zhitao Liu, Zhiteng Liu, Zhiwei Liu, Zhixiang Liu, Zhixue Liu, Zhiyan Liu, Zhiying Liu, Zhiyong Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Zhong Liu, Zhong Wu Liu, Zhong-Hua Liu, Zhong-Min Liu, Zhong-Qiu Liu, Zhong-Wu Liu, Zhong-Ying Liu, Zhongchun Liu, Zhongguo Liu, Zhonghua Liu, Zhongjian Liu, Zhongjuan Liu, Zhongmin Liu, Zhongqi Liu, Zhongqiu Liu, Zhongwei Liu, Zhongyu Liu, Zhongyue Liu, Zhongzhong Liu, Zhou Liu, Zhou-di Liu, Zhu Liu, Zhuangjun Liu, Zhuanhua Liu, Zhuo Liu, Zhuoyuan Liu, Zi Hao Liu, Zi-Hao Liu, Zi-Lun Liu, Zi-Ye Liu, Zi-wen Liu, Zichuan Liu, Zihang Liu, Zihao Liu, Zihe Liu, Ziheng Liu, Zijia Liu, Zijian Liu, Zijing J Liu, Zimeng Liu, Ziqian Liu, Ziqin Liu, Ziteng Liu, Zitian Liu, Ziwei Liu, Zixi Liu, Zixuan Liu, Ziyang Liu, Ziying Liu, Ziyou Liu, Ziyuan Liu, Ziyue Liu, Zong-Chao Liu, Zong-Yuan Liu, Zonghua Liu, Zongjun Liu, Zongtao Liu, Zongxiang Liu, Zu-Guo Liu, Zuguo Liu, Zuohua Liu, Zuojin Liu, Zuolu Liu, Zuyi Liu, Zuyun Liu
articles

Impact of an extended light regimen imposed during nursery period on the performance and lipid metabolism of weanling pigs.

Guangfan Liu, Fen Su, Xingyue Zou +2 more · 2025 · Animal bioscience · added 2026-04-24
This study aimed to assess the impact of a prolonged photoperiod on the growth performance and lipid metabolism of weaned piglets. Twenty-four piglets weaned at 28 days of age were randomly dichotomiz Show more
This study aimed to assess the impact of a prolonged photoperiod on the growth performance and lipid metabolism of weaned piglets. Twenty-four piglets weaned at 28 days of age were randomly dichotomized into two groups that were alternatively subjected to either long photoperiod (LP) group (16 L:8 D) or short photoperiod (SP) group (10 L:14 D) for 42days. Four replicates of three animals per replicates were used per experimental treatment. Our results demonstrated that prolonged photoperiod increased piglet body weight, average daily weight gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BF), backfat index during the nursery period, and increased ADG, average daily feed intake (ADFI), and decreased the F/G of piglets during the experiment days 29 to 42. Meanwhile, we observed LP piglets' plasma melatonin, growth hormone and serotonin levels were decreased at 14 d and 42 d compared to SP piglets. Moreover, up-regulated mRNA or protein expression of PPARγ and CEBPα, and lower mRNA or protein expression of MTR1, ATGL, HSL, PPARα, and CPT1α, were observed in back subcutaneous fat of LP group compared with that of SP group. Significant increases were observed in the mRNA or protein contents of lipogenic genes, including C/EBPα, SREBP-1c, ACCα, and FAS, in the liver of LP piglets, whereas CPT1α and ACOX1 mRNA levels and PPARα and MTR1 protein expression were significantly downregulated in LP group compared to SP group. Extended photoperiod also increased lipid content in longissimus dorsi muscle that was associated with higher mRNA or protein levels of SREBP-1c, ACCα, FAS, Pref1, and LPL, decreased mRNA or protein contents of LeptinR, MTR1, HSL, and ACOX1. Together, these findings suggest that there is an advantage, in terms of growth performance and fat deposition, in imposing a prolonged light program (16-h light/d) on nursery piglets to alleviate the negative aspects of weaning stress. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.5713/ab.24.0270
LPL

Retraction Note: Interleukin-27 ameliorates coxsackievirus-B3-induced viral myocarditis by inhibiting Th17 cells.

Hengshan Zhu, Chuang Lou, Ping Liu · 2025 · Virology journal · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s12985-025-02824-5
IL27

Clinical Relationship Between Serum ApoB, HER2, and Myocardial Ischemia Risk in Breast Cancer Patients.

Yeyan Lei, Dongmei Li, Shuang Bai +3 more · 2025 · Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
The risk factors and clinical prediction of cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with breast cancer have not been fully clarified. This retrospective case-control study was designed to investigate Show more
The risk factors and clinical prediction of cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with breast cancer have not been fully clarified. This retrospective case-control study was designed to investigate the factors affecting myocardial ischemia occurrence in breast cancer patients. A total of 194 cases (144 breast cancer and 50 benign breast tumor patients) were included. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression found that ApoB, age, and HER2 were significant factors responsible for the myocardial ischemia occurrence in breast cancer patients. By comparing the significance of ApoB in breast cancer patients versus benign breast tumor patients, it was observed that ApoB and HER2 were crucial predictors of myocardial ischemia in breast cancer patients compared to those with benign breast tumors. These factors were utilized to construct the clinical prediction model, achieving a combined area under the curve (AUC) of 0.583. The decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the model-predicted population, within a threshold ranging from 0.35 to 0.70, would experience a therapeutically clinical net benefit. Kaplan-Meier plot indicated that ApoB We demonstrated that ApoB and HER2 were potential factors in predicting the myocardial ischemia occurrence in breast cancer patients. This study will help provide clinical evidence for the early prediction of cardiovascular comorbidities in breast cancer patients. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.70075
APOB

LXRα agonists ameliorates acute rejection after liver transplantation via ABCA1/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis in macrophages.

Xiaoyan Qin, Dingheng Hu, Qi Li +6 more · 2025 · Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
Liver X receptor α (LXRα) plays an important role in inflammatory immune response induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and acute rejection (AR). Macrophage M1-polarization play an impo Show more
Liver X receptor α (LXRα) plays an important role in inflammatory immune response induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and acute rejection (AR). Macrophage M1-polarization play an important role in the occurrence and development of AR. Although the activation of LXR has anti-inflammatory effects, the role of LXRα in AR after liver transplantation (LT) has not been elucidated. We aimed to investigate LXRα anti-inflammatory and macrophage polarization regulation effects and mechanisms in acute rejection rat models. LXRα anti-inflammatory and liver function protective effects was initially measured in primary Kupffer cells and LT rat models. Subsequently, a flow cytometry assay was used to detect the regulation effect of LXRα in macrophage polarization. HE staining, TUNEL and ELISA were used to evaluate the co-treatment effects of TO901317 and tacrolimus on hepatic apoptosis and liver acute rejection after LT. In this study, we found that LPS can inhibit the expression of LXRα and activate MAPK pathway and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. We also found that LXRα agonist (TO901317) could improve liver function and rat survival after LT by activating the level of ABCA1 and inhibiting MAPK. TO901317 could inhibit macrophage M1-polarization by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway to improve the liver lesion of AR rats after liver transplantation. Additionally, co-treatment with TO901317 and tacrolimus more effectively alleviated the damaging effects of AR following LT than either drug alone. Our results suggest that the activation of LXRα can improve liver function and rat survival after LT by regulate ABCA1/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis in macrophages. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1186/s10020-025-01153-1
NR1H3

3D printing combined with thermally induced phase separation for engineering hierarchical osteogenic PLA scaffolds.

Xinyi Yun, Ziyue Li, Zi Yan +13 more · 2025 · Materials today. Bio · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Accelerated population aging and rising incidence of bone defects have intensified the need for advanced bone regeneration strategies. While tissue-engineered scaffolds fabricated via 3D printing offe Show more
Accelerated population aging and rising incidence of bone defects have intensified the need for advanced bone regeneration strategies. While tissue-engineered scaffolds fabricated via 3D printing offer promising alternatives to conventional grafts, most techniques fail to replicate the multi-scale fibrous architecture of native bone extracellular matrix, limiting their biofunctionality. To address this, we developed a hybrid manufacturing strategy integrating low-temperature thermally induced phase separation with extrusion-based 3D printing of polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds. By optimizing solvent ratios (THF: DMF = 3:1) and freezing temperatures (-196 °C-4 °C), we produced scaffolds with tunable micro-nano fibrous surfaces and macroporous structures. Key findings revealed that scaffolds processed at -196 °C (PLA-196) exhibited the highest porosity (pore size: 6.01 ± 2.06 μm), superior hydrophilicity, and enhanced compressive modulus. These scaffolds significantly promoted BMSC adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation via activation of Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102621
MACF1

Genetic Crosstalk Between Type 1 Diabetes and Sjögren's Syndrome: A Systematic Exploration of Risk Genes and Common Pathways.

Aamir Fahira, Kai Zhuang, Xuemin Jian +5 more · 2025 · Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · Blackwell Publishing · added 2026-04-24
Sjögren's Syndrome (SS) and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) are autoimmune disorders that can co-occur in patients, leading to complex clinical presentations. Despite observational evidence of their co-occurren Show more
Sjögren's Syndrome (SS) and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) are autoimmune disorders that can co-occur in patients, leading to complex clinical presentations. Despite observational evidence of their co-occurrence, the underlying genetic mechanisms remain poorly understood. To investigate the shared genetic factors and pathways between SS and T1D, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using multiomic approaches. Conditional and conjunctional false discovery rate analyses were performed to identify genetic polygenicity and overlap between the two diseases. Functional annotation and pathway analysis identified SNPs with regulatory potential. Furthermore, Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses were employed to investigate causal associations between gene expression and disease risk. Single-cell differential gene expression analysis was also employed to validate the associations of risk genes with T1D and SS. Our analysis identified 36 shared loci, revealing common genetic enrichment between SS and T1D. Functional annotation and pathway analysis revealed 52 credible genes involved in cysteine-related processes, apoptotic signalling and immune responses. MR analyses revealed that AC007283.5 was positively linked with both SS and T1D, while PLEKHM1 and CRHR1-T1 were negatively associated. Additionally, CERS2 was positively associated with SS, DEF6 was positively associated with T1D, and KANSL1-AS1 was negatively associated with T1D, indicating the presence of complex regulatory mechanisms. Moreover, Single-cell differential gene expression analysis confirmed the dysregulation of risk genes in SS and T1D. This study identified shared genetic factors and pathways underlying SS and T1D, highlighting cysteine-related processes and apoptotic signalling. The findings underscore the complex interplay of autoimmunity and the need for targeted treatments addressing their common mechanisms. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70930
KANSL1

GIPR-Ab/GLP-1 peptide-antibody conjugate requires brain GIPR and GLP-1R for additive weight loss in obese mice.

Clarissa M Liu, Elizabeth A Killion, Rola Hammoud +15 more · 2025 · Nature metabolism · Nature · added 2026-04-24
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and regulate food intake. Here, we demonstr Show more
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and regulate food intake. Here, we demonstrate that a peptide-antibody conjugate that blocks GIPR while simultaneously activating GLP-1R (GIPR-Ab/GLP-1) requires both CNS GIPR and CNS GLP-1R for maximal weight loss in obese, primarily male, mice. Moreover, dulaglutide produces greater weight loss in CNS GIPR knockout (KO) mice, and the weight loss achieved with dulaglutide + GIPR-Ab is attenuated in CNS GIPR KO mice. Wild-type mice treated with GIPR-Ab/GLP-1 and CNS GIPR KO mice exhibit similar changes in gene expression related to tissue remodelling, lipid metabolism and inflammation in white adipose tissue and liver. Moreover, GIPR-Ab/GLP-1 is detected in circumventricular organs in the brain and activates c-FOS in downstream neural substrates involved in appetite regulation. Hence, both CNS GIPR and GLP-1R signalling are required for the full weight loss effect of a GIPR-Ab/GLP-1 peptide-antibody conjugate. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1038/s42255-025-01295-w
GIPR

Multi-omics analysis reveals that alginate oligosaccharides mitigate ochratoxin A-induced renal impairment in mice and is relevant to the regulation of PPAR signaling.

Xueqing Ye, Yue Zhao, Qinghua Yao +3 more · 2025 · Frontiers in veterinary science · Frontiers · added 2026-04-24
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a core environmental toxin that induces kidney injury by interfering with glomerular filtration, antioxidant defense, and tubular transport functions. Alginate oligosaccharides ( Show more
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a core environmental toxin that induces kidney injury by interfering with glomerular filtration, antioxidant defense, and tubular transport functions. Alginate oligosaccharides (AOS), as active substances from marine, carry natural antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and other biological activities. The purpose of this study is to explore the molecular network of AOS against nephrotoxicity caused by OTA. A total of 36 5-week male mice were randomly divided into three groups: the CON group, the OTA group (250 μg/kg B.W. OTA) and the AOS + OTA group (400 mg/kg B.W. AOS +250 μg/kg B.W. OTA). The treatment was continued for 21 d. OTA induced renal injury in mice, manifested by glomerular capsule blurring, lymphocytic infiltration, and mitochondrial damage in tubular epithelial cells. Treatment with AOS significantly alleviated these pathological changes. Multi‑omics analysis revealed that AOS activated the PPAR signaling pathway, upregulating key genes (Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family Member A3 ( This study reveal that AOS antagonizes OTA-induced nephrotoxicity in mice through PPAR signaling axis, thus providing new insight into the renal protection mechanism of marine active substances. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1702799
CPS1

Absence of the intracellular lipolytic inhibitor G0S2 enhances intravascular triglyceride clearance and abolishes diet-induced hypertriglyceridemia.

Yongbin Chen, Scott M Johnson, Stephanie D Burr +4 more · 2025 · The Journal of clinical investigation · added 2026-04-24
The interplay between intracellular and intravascular lipolysis is crucial for maintaining circulating lipid levels and systemic energy homeostasis. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and lipoprotein Show more
The interplay between intracellular and intravascular lipolysis is crucial for maintaining circulating lipid levels and systemic energy homeostasis. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the primary triglyceride (TG) lipases responsible for these two spatially separate processes, are highly expressed in adipose tissue. Yet the mechanisms underlying their coordinated regulation remain undetermined. Here, we demonstrate that genetic ablation of G0S2, a specific inhibitory protein of ATGL, completely abolished diet-induced hypertriglyceridemia and significantly attenuated atherogenesis in mice. These effects were attributable to enhanced whole-body TG clearance, not altered hepatic TG secretion. Specifically, G0S2 deletion increased circulating LPL concentration and activity, predominantly through LPL production from white adipose tissue (WAT). Strikingly, transplantation of G0S2-deficient WAT normalized plasma TG levels in mice with hypertriglyceridemia. In conjunction with improved insulin sensitivity and decreased ANGPTL4 expression, the absence of G0S2 enhanced the stability of LPL protein in adipocytes, a phenomenon that could be reversed upon ATGL inhibition. Collectively, these findings highlight the pivotal role of adipocyte G0S2 in regulating both intracellular and intravascular lipolysis, and the possibility of targeting G0S2 as a viable pharmacological approach to reducing levels of circulating TGs. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1172/JCI181754
ANGPTL4

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and nuclear factor I A in type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment: biomarkers and mechanistic insights.

Jin Zhao, Tingying Zhang, Yunling Zhu +5 more · 2025 · Archives of medical science : AMS · added 2026-04-24
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are interrelated conditions that significantly impair quality of life. This study aimed to identify a feasible biomarker for assessing T2D-MCI Show more
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are interrelated conditions that significantly impair quality of life. This study aimed to identify a feasible biomarker for assessing T2D-MCI risk and to evaluate a potential therapeutic strategy. We integrated data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate genetic causal relationships between T2D, MCI, and their shared biomarkers. Transcriptomic analysis identified T2D-associated genes. Clinical trials evaluated the short-term effects of modified fasting therapy (MFT) on glucose regulation and cognitive function. Cellular assays and patient samples were used to validate the regulatory roles of key genes in biochemical markers and downstream signaling pathways. Among 6,356 T2D and 1,138 MCI subjects, vitamin D, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), globulin, and creatinine were associated with both conditions. MR analysis showed that higher HDL-C levels reduced T2D risk (0.9059, 95% CI: 0.8666-0.9470) but increased MCI risk (OR = 1.0482, 95% CI: 1.0216-1.0755). Nuclear factor I A ( HDL-C has divergent genetic effects on T2D and MCI. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.5114/aoms/208529
APOE

Exosomal SNHG26 mediates immunosuppression by impairing NK cells in tongue cancer.

Qingkun Jiang, Yuqin Xin, Fei He +2 more · 2025 · NPJ precision oncology · Nature · added 2026-04-24
Cisplatin resistance in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) correlates with poor prognosis, where natural killer (NK) cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a crucial role. This study invest Show more
Cisplatin resistance in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) correlates with poor prognosis, where natural killer (NK) cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a crucial role. This study investigated the mechanism by which exosomes from cisplatin-resistant TSCC cells suppress NK cell function. We found that exosomal long non-coding RNA SNHG26, highly enriched in cisplatin-resistant TSCC cells and their exosomes, was transferred to NK cells. Within NK cells, SNHG26 acted as a scaffold promoting WWP2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of the transcription factor SOX2, thereby inhibiting HLA-DRA transcription and subsequent IL-2/JAK-STAT5 signaling. Concurrently, SNHG26 competitively bound miR-515-5p, relieving its suppression of TGFB1 mRNA and activating the TGF-β1/Smad2 pathway. These dual mechanisms significantly impaired NK cell proliferation, activation, and cytotoxicity. SNHG26 depletion reversed NK cell suppression and cisplatin resistance in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our study identifies exosomal SNHG26 as a key mediator of cisplatin resistance and NK cell dysfunction in TSCC, suggesting its potential as a promising therapeutic target. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-01185-0
WWP2

Endothelial cells-derived SEMA3G suppresses glioblastoma stem cells by inducing c-Myc degradation.

Peng-Xiang Min, Li-Li Feng, Yi-Xuan Zhang +12 more · 2025 · Cell death and differentiation · Nature · added 2026-04-24
The poor prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) patients is attributed mainly to abundant neovascularization and presence of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). GSCs are preferentially localized to the perivascu Show more
The poor prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) patients is attributed mainly to abundant neovascularization and presence of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). GSCs are preferentially localized to the perivascular niche to maintain stemness. However, the effect of abnormal communication between endothelial cells (ECs) and GSCs on GBM progression remains unknown. Here, we reveal that ECs-derived SEMA3G, which is aberrantly expressed in GBM patients, impairs GSCs by inducing c-Myc degradation. SEMA3G activates NRP2/PLXNA1 in a paracrine manner, subsequently inducing the inactivation of Cdc42 and dissociation of Cdc42 and WWP2 in GSCs. Once released, WWP2 interacts with c-Myc and mediates c-Myc degradation via ubiquitination. Genetic deletion of Sema3G in ECs accelerates GBM growth, whereas SEMA3G overexpression or recombinant SEMA3G protein prolongs the survival of GBM bearing mice. These findings illustrate that ECs play an intrinsic inhibitory role in GSCs stemness via the SMEA3G-c-Myc distal regulation paradigm. Targeting SEMA3G signaling may have promising therapeutic benefits for GBM patients. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1038/s41418-025-01534-3
WWP2

Chronic inflammation response as a key factor in polycystic ovary syndrome among patients with bipolar disorder.

Jieyu Liu, Zhuohui Chen, Ziwei Teng +8 more · 2025 · Journal of affective disorders · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
This study aimed to investigate serum inflammatory factor levels of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in female patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to explore the related inflammatory molecular mechani Show more
This study aimed to investigate serum inflammatory factor levels of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in female patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to explore the related inflammatory molecular mechanisms preliminarily. The study recruited 72 female drug-naïve patients with BD and 98 female healthy controls (HCs). Demographic information, menstrual cycles, sex hormone levels, and ovarian ultrasound data were collected from them. Additionally, their serum inflammatory factor levels and the proteomics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed. The levels of interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-13 were significantly higher in patients with BD than in HCs (p < 0.05), and the IL-8 level was higher in BD patients with PCOS than in those without (adjusted p = 0.07). Bioinformatics analysis revealed that downregulated genes with significant differences between the two groups were all involved in immune-inflammatory-related pathways, and the expression of downregulated genes BTN3A2, MAP2K5, JCHAIN-B, and DMAP1 showed substantial differences and consistent trends between the two groups. IL-8-related chronic inflammatory response is closely associated with PCOS in BD patients, and genes such as BTN3A2 may mediate this chronic inflammatory response by negatively regulating the abnormal differentiation of T helper 17 cells, serving as one of the mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.072
MAP2K5

DCTP-Net: Dual-Branch CLIP-Enhance Textual Prompt-Aware Network for Acute Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation From CT Image.

Jiahao Liu, Hongqing Zhu, Ziying Wang +6 more · 2025 · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · IEEE · added 2026-04-24
Detecting early ischemic lesions (EIL) in computed tomography (CT) images is crucial for reducing diagnostic time and minimizing neuron loss due to oxygen deprivation. This paper introduces DCTP-Net, Show more
Detecting early ischemic lesions (EIL) in computed tomography (CT) images is crucial for reducing diagnostic time and minimizing neuron loss due to oxygen deprivation. This paper introduces DCTP-Net, a dual-branch network for segmenting acute ischemic stroke lesions in CT images, consisting of a segmentation branch and a prompt-aware branch. The segmentation branch uses an encoder-decoder network as the backbone to identify lesions, where the encoder fuses CT image features with prompt features from the prompt-aware branch. To enhance semantic feature extraction and reduce the impact of cerebral structural details, we introduce a cross-collaboration dynamic connection (CCDC) module to link the encoder and decoder. The prompt-aware branch includes a learnable prompt (LP) block to incorporate cerebral prior knowledge, and the prompt-aware encoder (PAE) combines the LP block with multi-level features from the segmentation branch for more precise representation. Additionally, we propose a CLIP-enhance textual prompt (CETP) module that utilizes the CLIP text encoder to generate specialized convolutional parameters for the segmentation head. These parameters are tailored to the unique characteristics of each input image, improving segmentation performance. Qualitative and quantitative studies reveal that DCTP-Net outperforms the current state-of-the-art, IS-Net, with Dice score increases of 3.9% on AISD and 3.8% on ISLES2018, demonstrating its superiority in EIL segmentation. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3471627
CETP

Risk Assessment of Serum Biomarkers with Perioperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Zhijing Zhang, Di Wang, Riguang Zhong +6 more · 2025 · Cellular and molecular neurobiology · Springer · added 2026-04-24
Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is a common complication following thoracic surgery and often leading to poor outcomes. Despite ongoing research, effective treatments for late PND remain l Show more
Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is a common complication following thoracic surgery and often leading to poor outcomes. Despite ongoing research, effective treatments for late PND remain limited. Identifying reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis is, therefore, essential. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 60 elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Serum samples were collected within 10 minutes prior to anesthesia and following extubation to measure adiponectin (APN), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), protein kinase A (PKA), aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Among PND patients, serum APN, PKA, AQP4, and BDNF levels were markedly decreased compared with the normal group. While serum cAMP (HR = 1.087, p = 0.695, 95% CI [0.284-4.166]) and PKA (HR = 0.996, p = 0.09, 95% CI [0.491-0.947]) were not significantly correlated with PND, serum APN (HR = 0.307, 95% CI [0.113-0.835], p = 0.021), AQP4 (HR = 0.204, 95% CI [0.060-0.697], p = 0.011), and BDNF (HR = 0.382, 95% CI [0.177-0.823], p = 0.014) were protective factors against PND. ROC analysis demonstrated that APN (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI [0.51-0.87]), AQP4 (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59-0.87]), BDNF (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59-0.87]), and the model of combining those biomarkers (AUC = 0.91, 95% CI [0.83-0.99]) could predict PND. PND patients exhibited a lower protective stress response to surgical trauma. High serum APN, AQP4, and BDNF levels were independent protective factors for PND, and a combined model of these biomarkers showed predictive potential for PND. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1007/s10571-025-01636-z
BDNF

Epigenetic repression of hepatocyte FoxO1 disrupts local immune homeostasis and promotes liver inflammation.

Zhigang Lei, Yu Wu, Weijie Xue +15 more · 2025 · Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · added 2026-04-24
Disrupting liver immune homeostasis drives inflammation. Recent evidence shifts immunoregulatory focus to hepatocytes, though the mechanisms remain poorly defined. Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) is a critica Show more
Disrupting liver immune homeostasis drives inflammation. Recent evidence shifts immunoregulatory focus to hepatocytes, though the mechanisms remain poorly defined. Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) is a critical homeostasis regulator, but its function in liver immune homeostasis is unknown. We aimed to clarify the role of hepatocyte FoxO1 in liver immune homeostasis and inflammation. Human liver FoxO1 expression and its association with inflammation were analyzed in patients with various inflammation-related liver diseases. Hepatocyte-specific Foxo1 knockout (FoxO1 △hepa ) mice were established. Hepatocyte-specific gene interference was employed in alcoholic hepatitis and hepatic schistosomiasis murine models. Transcriptomic, single-cell RNA sequencing, and CUT&Tag analyses were performed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Hepatocyte FoxO1 levels in human inflammatory livers declined prevalently and were inversely correlated with inflammation and fibrosis. Around 15-18 weeks after birth, FoxO1 △hepa mice exhibited mild spontaneous hepatic inflammation with natural killer T (NKT) cell and neutrophil accumulation. NKT cell depletion in FoxO1 △hepa mice with alcoholic hepatitis or hepatic schistosomiasis (HS) significantly reduced neutrophil accumulation and protected against liver inflammation and damage. Mechanistically, FoxO1 promoted retinoic acid synthesis to induce hepatocyte CD1d expression, which is necessary for regulating NKT cell apoptosis. Innovatively, decreased JMJD1C expression in hepatocytes caused histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) dimethylation at the Foxo1 promoter, repressing its transcription and disrupting local immune homeostasis. Our findings uncover a hitherto unrecognized mechanism for hepatocyte-based control of liver inflammation, in which hepatocyte FoxO1 maintained by JMJD1C restrains local NKT cells and neutrophils via CD1d induction, providing promising targets for inflammatory liver diseases. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001590
JMJD1C

Exercise-Induced Changes in Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhuolin Tang, Mingyue Yin, Kai Xu +4 more · 2025 · Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · SAGE Publications · added 2026-04-24
ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise interventions on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and to explore regu Show more
ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise interventions on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and to explore regulatory factors.MethodsSearched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI and Cochrane Library databases up to March 15, 2025. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using R software, and meta-regression analyzed the moderating effects of training period and frequency.Results42 randomized controlled trials covering 1482 patients were included. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) indicated that stretching training (SUCRA = 78.92) and high-intensity interval training (SUCRA = 69.73) were ranked higher than other exercise modalities and exhibited more favorable effect on BDNF enhancement, although neither demonstrated statistically significant superiority over the blank control. In contrast, combined training (SUCRA = 35.58), aerobic training (SUCRA = 35.17), and resistance training (SUCRA = 12.98) showed relatively lower potential for BDNF enhancement (blank control SUCRA = 67.62). Meta-regression analysis showed that the effect of combined training was significantly and positively correlated with intervention period ( Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1177/08919887251409415
BDNF bayesian network meta-analysis brain-derived neurotrophic factor exercise interventions meta-regression neurodegenerative diseases neuroscience neurotrophic factors

Prenatal bisphenol analogs exposure and placental DNA hypomethylation of genes in the PPAR signaling pathway: Insights for bisphenol analogs' effects on infant anthropometry.

Honglei Ji, Haijun Zhu, Ziliang Wang +7 more · 2025 · Environmental research · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Prenatal exposure to bisphenol analogs (BPs) may pose hazards to offspring's health; however, their underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. DNA methylation, a major epigenetic mechanism, may be Show more
Prenatal exposure to bisphenol analogs (BPs) may pose hazards to offspring's health; however, their underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. DNA methylation, a major epigenetic mechanism, may be involved in early programming following environmental disturbances. In this prospective study, we investigated associations between prenatal BPs exposure and the placental DNA methylation levels of 14 candidate genes in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway among 205 mother-infant pairs and explored the potential mediating role of the DNA methylation in the association of prenatal BPs exposure with anthropometric measurements of infants aged 1 year. We observed a general pattern that prenatal BPs exposure was associated with the DNA hypomethylation of candidate genes, with associations consistently and notably observed for PPAR α (PPARA), retinoid X receptor α (RXRA), acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 1, and acyl-CoA dehydrogenase medium chain (ACADM) in linear regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression. Both models identified bisphenol F (BPF) as the predominant compound. We found inverse associations between the placental DNA methylation levels of most candidate genes, such as PPARA, RXRA, ACADM, and nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H member 3 (NR1H3), and the length-for-age z-score, arm circumference-for-age z-score, subscapular skinfold-for-age z-score, and abdominal skinfold thickness of the infants. The DNA methylation levels of RXRA and NR1H3 could mediate the associations between prenatal BPF exposure and increased infant anthropometric measurements, with mediating portions ranging from 23.02% to 30.53%. Our findings shed light on the potential mechanisms underlying the effects of prenatal BPs exposure on infant growth and call for urgent actions for risk assessment and regulation of BPF. Future cohort studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm our findings. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120476
NR1H3

Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the chicken cecum reveals cellular responses and state shifts during Eimeria tenella infection.

Jun-Hao Tu, Bo-Gong Liu, Bing-Jin Lin +7 more · 2025 · BMC genomics · BioMed Central · added 2026-04-24
Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) infection is a major cause of coccidiosis in chickens, leading to significant economic losses in the poultry industry due to its impact on the cecum. This study presents a Show more
Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) infection is a major cause of coccidiosis in chickens, leading to significant economic losses in the poultry industry due to its impact on the cecum. This study presents a comprehensive single-cell atlas of the chicken cecal epithelium by generating 7,394 cells using 10X Genomics single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). We identified 13 distinct cell types, including key immune and epithelial populations, and characterized their gene expression profiles and cell-cell communication networks. Integration of this single-cell data with bulk RNA-seq data from E. tenella-infected chickens revealed significant alterations in cell type composition and state, particularly a marked decrease in APOB Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11302-9
APOB

The Impact of Cannabidiol (CBD) on Lipid Absorption and Lymphatic Transport in Rats.

Qi Zhu, Qing Yang, Ling Shen +2 more · 2025 · Nutrients · MDPI · added 2026-04-24
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3390/nu17061034
APOA4

Pediatric diffuse low-grade glioma with oligodendroglioma-like features: A case report.

Pengwei Hou, Chengzhu Cai, Meiyan Liu +2 more · 2025 · Experimental and therapeutic medicine · added 2026-04-24
The present case report presents the diagnostic challenges of pediatric diffuse low-grade glioma (pDLGG) with oligodendroglioma-like features. The patient, an 11-year-old girl, presented with refracto Show more
The present case report presents the diagnostic challenges of pediatric diffuse low-grade glioma (pDLGG) with oligodendroglioma-like features. The patient, an 11-year-old girl, presented with refractory epilepsy and brain imaging did not provide a clear diagnosis. Intraoperatively, the tumor appeared gray-yellow to gray-red, with moderate texture and unclear borders, consistent with LGG. Postoperative pathology showed diffuse infiltrative growth of the tumor, with pleomorphic cell morphology and oligodendroglioma-like gliocyte proliferation. Staining was positive for markers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein and Olig-2. Genomic analysis revealed BRAF V600E, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1 and FGFR4 mutations, but no IDH mutations or other related mutations. The final diagnosis was pDLGG with alterations in the MAPK pathway. The present case underscores the importance of molecular and histological features in the diagnosis of pDLGG, especially when clinical and imaging characteristics are atypical, as molecular diagnostics provide key insights for disease classification. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.3892/etm.2025.12985
FGFR1

Osteoclast-derived arachidonic acid triggers dormant lung adenocarcinoma cell activation.

Xingyu Liu, Rong Qiu, Pengcheng Gui +7 more · 2025 · iScience · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Dormant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells in the bone microenvironment can re-emerge as metastatic disease through osteoclast interactions. Using a 3D dormancy model and a mouse bone metastasis model, Show more
Dormant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells in the bone microenvironment can re-emerge as metastatic disease through osteoclast interactions. Using a 3D dormancy model and a mouse bone metastasis model, this study reveals that arachidonic acid (AA) is the initiating molecule transferred from osteoclasts to dormant LUAD cells, triggering their activation. Dormant LUAD cells uptake AA through CD36, which activates the PPARγ-ANGPTL4 pathway and activates tumor cells. There is a dose-response relationship in the activation effect of AA, and inhibiting AA metabolism prevents this reactivation. The study also finds that the serum levels of AA and ANGPTL4 are significantly elevated in patients with clinical bone metastases compared to those without. This research confirms that osteoclasts transmit AA via the CD36-PPARγ-ANGPTL4 axis to activate dormant LUAD cells, suggesting that AA and ANGPTL4 may serve as valuable biomarkers and potential clinical applications in treatment and prediction of LUAD bone metastasis. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112167
ANGPTL4

Identifying social isolation profiles among young and middle-aged patients with cancer in Western China: A latent profile analysis.

Lu Yang, Xia Liu, Huiqiong Xu +1 more · 2025 · Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
To identify the various profiles of social isolation among 18-59-year-old patients with cancer in Western China and examine their demographic, clinical, and cultural predictors. This cross-sectional s Show more
To identify the various profiles of social isolation among 18-59-year-old patients with cancer in Western China and examine their demographic, clinical, and cultural predictors. This cross-sectional study included 300 patients from a tertiary hospital who completed standardized assessments of social isolation (Social Avoidance Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale) and family functioning. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify the subgroups, and multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze predictors of the profiles. Three distinct latent profiles were identified: "avoidance-dominant" (52.3%), which was characterized by high levels of social avoidance (12.52 ​± ​1.38) and low loneliness (30.87 ​± ​6.89), "loneliness-dominant" (27.0%), which was characterized by high levels of loneliness (53.15 ​± ​6.24) and low social avoidance (2.07 ​± ​1.38), and "balanced" (20.7%), which was characterized by balanced scores on both the measures. Individuals with fatigue, employment status, personality traits, and family dynamics significantly predicted profile membership ( Social isolation was heterogeneous among young and middle-aged patients with cancer. Fatigue significantly predicted distinct patterns of social isolation. Furthermore, exploratory findings indicated a potential role of religious beliefs in the avoidance-dominant profile; however, replication with larger samples is required. Family dynamics may buffer the risk of isolation in patients prone to avoidance, whereas those dominated by loneliness may lack such safeguards. Health care providers can implement tailored interventions to mitigate social isolation based on these varying profiles. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100794
LPA

The necessity of strengthening glycemic and lipid metabolism management for improving brain structure and cognitive function in people with diabetes: A retrospective study based on UK Biobank.

Li Han, Qijun Li, Lifan Zhang +7 more · 2025 · Diabetes research and clinical practice · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
To investigate the relation of glycemic and lipid metabolism with brain structure and cognitive function in people with diabetes, so as to improve cognitive function in these individuals. Based on the Show more
To investigate the relation of glycemic and lipid metabolism with brain structure and cognitive function in people with diabetes, so as to improve cognitive function in these individuals. Based on the UK Biobank, 26,394 patients, who were diagnosed with diabetes by doctors between 2006 and 2010, were included in the study. The demographic information, clinical data of glycemic and lipid metabolism and cognitive function (brain MRI and cognitive function scores) were collected. Multiple linear regression and non-restricted cubic spline analyses were used to investigate the relations of glycemic and lipid metabolism with brain structure and cognitive function. In this study, the mean age of people with diabetes (containing 39 % females) was 59.58 ± 7.21 years. Higher random blood glucose (β = -0.116, p < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (β = -0.062, p = 0.051) were associated with a smaller brain volume. Higher HbA1c (β = 0.036, p < 0.001; β = 0.023, p = 0.021) was related with worse cognitive function. Further analysis showed that HbA1c < 6.5 % had a protective effect on cognitive function, and HbA1c = 6.5 %∼8.5 % and >8.5 % was unrelated and negatively related with cognitive function, respectively. Different types of lipids had varying effects on cognitive function. Higher total cholesterol (TC) (β = 0.125, p = 0.008), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (β = 0.086, p = 0.025), and ApoB (β = 0.092, p = 0.026) were associated with more significant brain structural abnormalities. Conversely, triglyceride (TG) = 0.75∼8.0 mmol/L was positively correlated with cognitive function (β = -0.036, p < 0.001; β = -0.044, p < 0.001; β = 0.058, p = 0.001), and higher ApoA (β = -0.032, p < 0.001; β = -0.033, p < 0.001; β = 0.047, p = 0.004) was associated with better cognitive function. The age-stratified analysis revealed that the impact of lipids on cognitive function was age-dependent. TC and LDL-C were related to brain structural abnormalities in the 55-60 age group, while TG had a stronger protective effect on cognitive function in older adults, particularly those aged 65-70 years. In people with diabetes, higher HbA1c (>8.5 %), as well as elevated TC, LDL-C, and ApoB, are associated with worse brain structure and cognitive function. Conversely, HbA1c < 6.5 % and elevated TG within the range of 0.75∼8.0 mmol/L have a protective effect on cognitive function, and the later exhibited more evident impact in older adults. To prevent or delay the onset of dementia in people with diabetes, it may be necessary to intensify glycemic control, targeting an HbA1c level of <6.5 %. Additionally, the age-specific lipid-lowering strategies shall be considered, with more flexible triglyceride-lowering goals for elderly patients. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112366
APOB

GIPR agonism and antagonism decrease body weight and food intake via different mechanisms in male mice.

Robert M Gutgesell, Ahmed Khalil, Arkadiusz Liskiewicz +21 more · 2025 · Nature metabolism · Nature · added 2026-04-24
Agonists and antagonists of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) enhance body weight loss induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism. However, while GIPR Show more
Agonists and antagonists of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) enhance body weight loss induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism. However, while GIPR agonism decreases body weight and food intake in a GLP-1R-independent manner via GABAergic GIPR Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1038/s42255-025-01294-x
GIPR

Identification of SEC16B as a novel regulator of glucose homeostasis.

Ruo-Xin Zhang, An-Qi Li, Xin-Yuan Zhao +7 more · 2025 · Diabetologia · Springer · added 2026-04-24
Glucose homeostasis, essential for metabolic health, requires coordinated insulin and glucagon activity to maintain blood glucose balance. Dysregulation of glucose homeostasis causes hyperglycaemia an Show more
Glucose homeostasis, essential for metabolic health, requires coordinated insulin and glucagon activity to maintain blood glucose balance. Dysregulation of glucose homeostasis causes hyperglycaemia and glucose intolerance, hallmark features of type 2 diabetes. While SEC16 homologue B (SEC16B), an endoplasmic reticulum export factor, has been linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes and lipid metabolism, its role in glucose regulation remains poorly defined. This study aims to investigate SEC16B's contribution to glucose homeostasis by systematically dissecting its conserved physiological mechanisms across species. To interrogate SEC16B's role, we combined Drosophila genetics (RNA interference-mediated dSec16 knockdown) with murine models (Sec16b deletion) under standard or high-fat diet conditions. Glucose and insulin tolerance tests assessed glucose homeostasis. Mechanistic insights into beta cell dysfunction were derived from immunostaining, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assays and RNA-seq profiling of murine pancreatic islets. Both disruption of dSec16 in Drosophila and Sec16b deletion in mice triggered glucose intolerance under standard diet conditions, recapitulating conserved metabolic dysfunction. In addition, Sec16b loss impaired glycaemic control in mice fed a high-fat diet. Mechanistically, Sec16b deficiency impairs insulin secretion by downregulating cholinergic signalling and compromising intracellular Ca Our study reveals SEC16B, a genome-wide association study-identified obesity risk gene, as an evolutionarily conserved regulator of glucose homeostasis. By linking SEC16B to cholinergic-driven insulin secretion and calcium dynamics, we resolve a mechanistic gap in beta cell dysfunction and metabolic disease. This finding provides novel insights into the mechanisms underlying glucose homeostasis and may enhance our understanding of potential treatments for metabolic diseases. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1007/s00125-025-06501-8
SEC16B

Comprehensive identification of NRG1 fusions in 25,203 patients with solid tumors.

Shui Xiang, Yiwen Zheng, Mengxiao Wang +6 more · 2025 · NPJ precision oncology · Nature · added 2026-04-24
NRG1 fusion is an emerging oncogenic driver, and the FDA has approved drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer associated with NRG1 fusions. This study retrospective Show more
NRG1 fusion is an emerging oncogenic driver, and the FDA has approved drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer associated with NRG1 fusions. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 25,203 patients with solid tumors who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) and identified 49 patients with NRG1 fusions. The mutation profiles and actionable therapeutic targets were analyzed among patients with fusions. In this study, 0.2% (49/25,203) of patients harbored NRG1 fusions. The frequencies of NRG1 fusions across various cancer types were as follows: prostate cancer, 0.65%; breast cancer, 0.47%; lung cancer, 0.29%; esophageal cancer, 0.25%; colorectal cancer, 0.17%; gastric cancer, 0.13%; pancreatic cancer, 0.11%; and hepatocellular carcinoma, 0.05%). A total of 36 fusion partners were detected, among which CD74 was predominant, accounting for 29.3% of cases. Patients with NRG1 fusions presented a greater frequency of FGFR1 mutations and RET fusions, compared with non-NRG1 fusion patients. Most lung cancer and colorectal cancer patients with NRG1 fusions harbored FDA-approved or potential drug targets, whereas those diagnosed with breast cancer harbored fewer such targets. NRG1 fusion-related drugs can provide additional treatment options. Our study expands the NRG1 fusion gene landscape and provides a valuable reference for the comprehensive treatment of patients with NRG1 fusions. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-01044-y
FGFR1

Genetic Reasons for Phenotypic Diversity in Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses and High-Resolution Imaging as a Marker of Retinal Disease.

Jennifer Huey, Pankhuri Gupta, Benjamin Wendel +9 more · 2024 · Ophthalmology science · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
To describe the clinical characteristics, natural history, genetic landscape, and phenotypic spectrum of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL)-associated retinal disease. Multicenter retrospective coho Show more
To describe the clinical characteristics, natural history, genetic landscape, and phenotypic spectrum of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL)-associated retinal disease. Multicenter retrospective cohort study complemented by a cross-sectional examination. Twelve pediatric subjects with biallelic variants in 5 NCL-causing genes (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein [ Review of clinical notes, retinal imaging, electroretinography (ERG), and molecular genetic testing. Two subjects underwent a cross-sectional examination comprising adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging of the retina and optoretinography (ORG). Clinical/demographic data, multimodal retinal imaging data, electrophysiology parameters, and molecular genetic testing. Our cohort included a diverse set of subjects with Our cohort data demonstrates that the underlying genetic variants drive the phenotypic diversity in different forms of NCL. Genetic testing can provide molecular diagnosis and ensure appropriate disease management and support for children and their families. With intravitreal enzyme replacement therapy on the horizon as a potential treatment option for NCL-associated retinal degeneration, precise structural and functional measures will be required to more accurately monitor disease progression. We show that adaptive optics imaging and ORG can be used as highly sensitive methods to track early retinal changes, which can be used to establish eligibility for future therapies and provide metrics for determining the efficacy of interventions on a cellular scale. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100560
CLN3

Potent and Protease Resistant Azapeptide Agonists of the GLP-1 and GIP Receptors.

Tristan C Dinsmore, Jamie Liu, Jiayuan Miao +5 more · 2024 · Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · Wiley · added 2026-04-24
The gut-derived peptide hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) play important physiological roles including glucose homeostasis and appetite su Show more
The gut-derived peptide hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) play important physiological roles including glucose homeostasis and appetite suppression. Stabilized agonists of the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and dual agonists of GLP-1R and GIP receptor (GIPR) for the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity have generated widespread enthusiasm and have become blockbuster drugs. These therapeutics are refractory to the action of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), that catalyzes rapid removal of the two N-terminal residues of the native peptides, in turn severely diminishing their activity profiles. Here we report that a single atom change from carbon to nitrogen in the backbone of the entire peptide makes them refractory to DPP4 action while still retaining full potency and efficacy at their respective receptors. This was accomplished by use of aza-amino acids, that are bioisosteric replacements for α-amino acids that perturb the structural backbone and local side chain conformations. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that aza-amino acid can populate the same conformational space that GLP-1 adopts when bound to the GLP-1R. The insertion of an aza-amino acid at the second position from the N-terminus in semaglutide and in a dual agonist of GLP-1R and GIPR further demonstrates its capability as a viable alternative to current DPP4 resistance strategies while offering additional structural variation that may influence downstream signaling. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1002/anie.202410237
GIPR

Interruption of KLF5 acetylation promotes PTEN-deficient prostate cancer progression by reprogramming cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Baotong Zhang, Mingcheng Liu, Fengyi Mai +13 more · 2024 · The Journal of clinical investigation · added 2026-04-24
Inactivation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is prevalent in human prostate cancer and causes high-grade adenocarcinoma with a long latency. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a pivota Show more
Inactivation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is prevalent in human prostate cancer and causes high-grade adenocarcinoma with a long latency. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a pivotal role in tumor progression, but it remains elusive whether and how PTEN-deficient prostate cancers reprogram CAFs to overcome the barriers for tumor progression. Here, we report that PTEN deficiency induced Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) acetylation and that interruption of KLF5 acetylation orchestrated intricate interactions between cancer cells and CAFs that enhance FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling and promote tumor growth. Deacetylated KLF5 promoted tumor cells to secrete TNF-α, which stimulated inflammatory CAFs to release FGF9. CX3CR1 inhibition blocked FGFR1 activation triggered by FGF9 and sensitized PTEN-deficient prostate cancer to the AKT inhibitor capivasertib. This study reveals the role of KLF5 acetylation in reprogramming CAFs and provides a rationale for combined therapies using inhibitors of AKT and CX3CR1. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1172/JCI175949
FGFR1