Chiara Tognola, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Paola Rebora+18 more · 2026 · High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · Springer · added 2026-04-24
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels have been strongly related to cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, its association with Hypertension Mediated Organ Damage (HMOD) and CV events in the primary prev Show more
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels have been strongly related to cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, its association with Hypertension Mediated Organ Damage (HMOD) and CV events in the primary prevention setting remains unclear. To evaluate in these patients, the correlation between Lp(a) levels and: (i) heart, vessels and kidney HMOD and; (ii) CV events and all-cause mortality in a primary prevention setting. 747 low CV risk subjects were recruited between 2009 and 2014. HMOD was assessed through Pulse Wave Velocity, carotid Intima-Media Thickness (IMT), presence of carotid plaques, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) and Ejection Fraction and glomerular filtration rate. All-cause mortality and CV events up to 2021 were retrieved by electronic health records, for a median follow-up time of 10 years (I-III quartiles 9.6-11.1). Mean age was 50.8 ± 13.0 years and 63.5% of the subjects were men. The prevalence of hypertension was 37.9%, dyslipidemia 67.2%, smoking 17.8%, and diabetes mellitus 8.7%. Median Lp(a) value was 17 mg/dL (5.9-56.0), and 26.5% of patients had values above 50 mg/dL. Regarding HMOD, 10.3% subjects had arterial stiffness, 7.2% increased IMT, 19.8% carotid plaques while only 0.7% had LVH. No significant correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and indices of subclinical HMOD. Furthermore, no relationship was found between CV events and all-cause mortality and Lp(a) levels. In this primary prevention cohort, elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with significant structural damage to the heart, carotid arteries, or increased aortic stiffness and were not associated with CV events and all-cause mortality. Show less
Treatment of overt form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often unsuccessful. Efforts are focused on a possible early identification in order to prevent or delaying the development of hypertroph Show more
Treatment of overt form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often unsuccessful. Efforts are focused on a possible early identification in order to prevent or delaying the development of hypertrophy. Our aim was to find an echocardiographic marker able to distinguish mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) from healthy subjects. We evaluated 28 patients, members of eight families. Three types of mutation were recognized: MYBPC3 (five families), MYH7 (two families) and TNNT2 (one family). According to genetic (G) and phenotypic (Ph) features, patients were divided in three groups: Group A (10 patients), mutation carriers with LVH (G+/Ph+); Group B (9 patients), mutation carriers without LVH (G+/Ph-); Group C (9 patients), healthy subjects (G-/Ph-). Echocardiography examination was performed acquiring standard 2D, DTI and 2D-strain imaging. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global radial strain (GRS) at basal and mid-level were measured. GRS was significantly different between group B and C at basal level (32.18% ± 9.6 vs. 44.59% ± 12.67 respectively; p-value < 0.0001). In basal posterior and basal inferior segments this difference was particularly evident. ROC curves showed for both the involved segments good AUCs (0.931 and 0.861 for basal posterior and inferior GRS respectively) with the best predictive cut-off for basal posterior GRS at 43.65%, while it was 38.4% for basal inferior GRS. Conversely, GLS values were similar in the three group. 2D longitudinal strain is a valid technique to study HCM. Radial strain and particularly basal posterior and inferior segmental reduction could be able to identify mutation carriers in a pre-clinical phase of disease. Show less