👤 Kayoko Tsukita

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
4
Articles
3
Name variants
Also published as: Sachiko Tsukita, Shoichiro Tsukita
articles
Dayoung Kim, Takayuki Kondo, Keiko Imamura +4 more · 2026 · Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · Blackwell Publishing · added 2026-04-24
The APOE gene, which encodes Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), is the strongest genetic risk locus for Alzheimer's disease (AD). A substantial fraction of AD risk genes converges on pathways controlling lipid Show more
The APOE gene, which encodes Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), is the strongest genetic risk locus for Alzheimer's disease (AD). A substantial fraction of AD risk genes converges on pathways controlling lipid metabolism and immune regulation, in which microglia serve as a central integrative hub in the brain. Although microglial phenotypes linked to different APOE genotypes have been extensively characterised, the fundamental question of how ApoE shapes the core functions of human microglia remains unresolved. Here, we generated APOE knockout (KO) microglia from AD patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and characterised their cellular and molecular phenotypes. Ablation of APOE resulted in marked lipid droplet accumulation and increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Transcriptomic analysis further revealed downregulation of cell cycle-related pathways, accompanied by enrichment of an oxidative stress-associated pathway. Consistent with these transcriptomic signatures, APOE KO microglia exhibited elevated intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and a marked reduction in proliferative capacity. Given the importance of microglial proliferation for maintaining immune homeostasis in the brain, our findings highlight ApoE as being an important regulator of this process, with potential consequences for the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.71074
APOE
Makoto Adachi, Yoko Hamazaki, Yuka Kobayashi +4 more · 2009 · Molecular and cellular biology · added 2026-04-24
MUPP1 and Patj are both composed of an L27 domain and multiple PDZ domains (13 and 10 domains, respectively) and are localized to tight junctions (TJs) in epithelial cells. Although Patj is known to b Show more
MUPP1 and Patj are both composed of an L27 domain and multiple PDZ domains (13 and 10 domains, respectively) and are localized to tight junctions (TJs) in epithelial cells. Although Patj is known to be responsible for the organization of TJs and epithelial polarity, characterization of MUPP1 is lacking. In this study, we found that MUPP1 and Patj share several binding partners, including JAM1, ZO-3, Pals1, Par6, and nectins (cell-cell adhesion molecules at adherens junctions). MUPP1 and Patj exhibited similar subcellular distributions, and the mechanisms with which they localize to TJs also appear to overlap. Despite these similarities, functional studies have revealed that Patj is indispensable for the establishment of TJs and epithelial polarization, whereas MUPP1 is not. Thus, although MUPP1 and Patj share several molecular properties, their functions are entirely different. We present evidence that the signaling mediated by Pals1, which has a higher affinity for Patj than for MUPP1 and is involved in the activation of the Par6-aPKC complex, is of principal importance for the function of Patj in epithelial cells. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01505-08
PATJ
Atsushi Kamiya, Perciliz L Tan, Ken-ichiro Kubo +9 more · 2008 · Archives of general psychiatry · added 2026-04-24
A role for the centrosome has been suggested in the pathology of major mental illnesses, especially schizophrenia (SZ). To show that pericentriolar material 1 protein (PCM1) forms a complex at the cen Show more
A role for the centrosome has been suggested in the pathology of major mental illnesses, especially schizophrenia (SZ). To show that pericentriolar material 1 protein (PCM1) forms a complex at the centrosome with disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) and Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4 protein (BBS4), which provides a crucial pathway for cortical development associated with the pathology of SZ. To identify mutations in the PCM1 gene in an SZ population. Interaction of DISC1, PCM1, and BBS proteins was assessed by immunofluorescent staining and coimmunoprecipitation. Effects of PCM1, DISC1, and BBS on centrosomal functions and corticogenesis in vivo were tested by RNA interference. The PCM1 gene was examined by sequencing 39 exons and flanking splice sites. Probands and controls were from the collection of one of us (A.E.P.). Thirty-two probands with SZ from families that had excess allele sharing among affected individuals at 8p22 and 219 white controls. Protein interaction and recruitment at the centrosome in cells; neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex; and variant discovery in PCM1 in patients with SZ. PCM1 forms a complex with DISC1 and BBS4 through discrete binding domains in each protein. DISC1 and BBS4 are required for targeting PCM1 and other cargo proteins, such as ninein, to the centrosome in a synergistic manner. In the developing cerebral cortex, suppression of PCM1 leads to neuronal migration defects, which are phenocopied by the suppression of either DISC1 or BBS4 and are exacerbated by the concomitant suppression of both. Furthermore, a nonsense mutation that segregates with SZ spectrum psychosis was found in 1 family. Our data further support for the role of centrosomal proteins in cortical development and suggest that perturbation of centrosomal function contributes to the development of mental diseases, including SZ. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.996
BBS4
Yuko Sugihara-Mizuno, Makoto Adachi, Yuka Kobayashi +5 more · 2007 · Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · Blackwell Publishing · added 2026-04-24
We have previously shown that MUPP1, which has an MRE domain and 13 PDZ domains, is expressed in epithelial cells and localize at tight junctions (TJs) and apical membranes. Using yeast two-hybrid scr Show more
We have previously shown that MUPP1, which has an MRE domain and 13 PDZ domains, is expressed in epithelial cells and localize at tight junctions (TJs) and apical membranes. Using yeast two-hybrid screening, we found here that MUPP1 interacts with angiomotin (Amot), JEAP/Amot-like 1 and MASCOT/Amot-like 2, which we refer to as Amot/JEAP family proteins. PDZ2 and -3 were responsible for MUPP1's interaction with Amot and MASCOT, whereas only PDZ3 was responsible for its interaction with JEAP. All the Amot/JEAP family proteins also interacted with Patj, a close relative of MUPP1. The C-terminal PDZ-binding motives of the Amot/JEAP family were required for these interactions. We successfully generated specific antibodies for these proteins and analyzed the endogenous molecular properties of the family in parallel. Immunofluorescence microscopy of cultured epithelial cells showed that in subcellular distribution, the Amot/JEAP family proteins were indistinguishable; they were apparent at TJs as well as apical membranes, and mostly co-localized with MUPP1. They were also located at TJs in several mouse tissues, but each protein showed a distinct tissue distribution. In biochemical fractionation assays, the Amot/JEAP family behaved not as transmembrane but as peripheral membrane proteins. Unexpectedly, the PDZ-binding motives were not necessarily required for their localization to TJs, and dominant negative MUPP1 or Patj did not affect the localization of Amot/JEAP family proteins, suggesting that the interaction with MUPP1/Patj is not necessarily responsible for their proper subcellular distribution. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01066.x
PATJ