👤 Adriana Irizarry

Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker and genetic testing results are increasingly disclosed to cognitively unimpaired adults in research and could in the future inform clinical treatment decisions in this population. To assess psychological outcomes after returning 3 categories of amyloid biomarker results as well as apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes. This cohort study was a secondary analysis of data collected as part of screening for the multisite AHEAD preclinical AD trial. Participants were individuals aged 55 to 80 years undergoing screening from July 14, 2020, to October 15, 2024. Participants were informed whether they had not-detected, intermediate, or elevated amyloid positron emission tomography levels, as well as their APOE genotype, which were categorized as noncarrier, ε4 heterozygote, or ε4 homozygote. Impact of Events Scale (IES; 15 items to assess intrusive thoughts and avoidance; each item is scored as not at all [0], rarely [1], sometimes [3], or often [5]; total range, 0-75), collected 24 to 72 hours after disclosure, and change in a scale measuring concerns about AD dementia (adapted scale using 6 items in which participants indicated their level of agreement with statements related to their perceived probability of developing AD dementia; items scored as strongly disagree [1] through strongly agree [5]; total range, 6-30), calculated by subtracting the score collected before biomarker testing from 1 collected after biomarker and genetic test results disclosure. Among 3414 included individuals, the mean (SD) age was 68.8 (6.0) years and 2116 (62%) were female. Group mean IES scores were below clinically significant thresholds. Nevertheless, across genetic groups, learning an elevated amyloid result (1184 participants) was associated with higher IES (mean [SD], 10.5 [10.9]) than intermediate amyloid (482 participants; mean [SD] IES, 8.8 [9.8]), and intermediate amyloid was associated with higher scores than not-detected amyloid (1748 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.5 [8.4]). Across amyloid groups, learning APOE ε4 homozygosity (337 participants) was associated with higher mean (SD) IES (12.7 [11.6]) than heterozygosity (1609 participants; 9.1 [10.2]), and heterozygosity was associated with higher IES than noncarrier status (1468 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.2 [8.1]). Both types of information were significant in an analysis of covariance model; no interaction effect was observed. In contrast, only biomarker disclosure was associated with differential change in concerns about AD dementia. Those with elevated amyloid showed a mean (SD) increase in concern (0.8 [3.5]), those with intermediate amyloid showed a smaller increase (0.4 [3.7]), and those with not-detected amyloid showed decreased concerns (-1.1 [4.2]). In this cohort study of cognitively unimpaired adults, associations with intrusive thoughts were observed to differ among genetic and biomarker subgroups; such associations were limited to biomarker subgroups for measures of perceived dementia risk. Show less

Lecanemab, an antibody directed at Aβ-protofibrils and plaque, showed meaningful delay in disease progression and biological effects consistent with disease modification in the phase 3 Clarity AD trial. The objective of this paper is to present efficacy and safety results in ApoE ε4 non-carriers or heterozygotes population of Clarity AD. Clarity AD is an 18-month, randomized study (core) in participants with early AD, with an open-label extension phase (OLE) phase. Academic and clinical centers. All eligible ApoE ε4 participants were randomized 1:1 across 2 treatment groups (placebo and lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly); the results presented herein are for the ApoE4 heterozygote or non-carrier participants. Endpoints included change from baseline at 18 months in the global cognitive and functional scale, CDR-SB, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 (ADAS-Cog14), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL), and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) assessments. Amyloid imaging related abnormalities (ARIA) occurrence was monitored throughout the study by central reading of magnetic resonance imaging. Following 18 months treatment in the Core, eligible participants transitioned to the OLE where they received open-label lecanemab. Clinical outcomes (CDR-SB, ADAS-Cog14, and ADCS-MCI-ADL) were evaluated by examining 'delayed start' (core:placebo followed by OLE:lecanemab) and 'early start' (core:lecanemab followed by OLE:lecanemab) cohorts as well as natural history cohorts. Time to progression to next stage of AD was also evaluated through 36 months. 1795 participants with early AD were enrolled in Clarity AD, of which 1521 were ApoE ε4 heterozygotes or non-carriers (85 %). Lecanemab significantly reduced clinical decline on CDR-SB at 18 months compared to placebo in the ApoEε4 heterozygotes or non-carriers subgroup. Amyloid PET, ADAS-Cog14, ADCS-MCI-ADL, and HRQoL results were consistent with the CDR-SB findings. In the analysis subgroup, the most common adverse reactions for lecanemab were infusion-related reactions (26 %), ARIA-H (13 %), fall (11 %), headache (11 %), and ARIA-E (9 %). In the OLE, lecanemab-treated participants continued to accrue benefit in CDR-SB through 36 months, with continued separation through 36 months relative to the ADNI natural history cohort. Delayed start results follow a parallel trajectory relative to early start results, but do not catch up, confirming a disease modifying effect and reflecting importance of early treatment initiation. Results were similar for ADAS-Cog14 and ADCS-MCI-ADL. Lecanemab reduced the risk of progression to next stage of AD by 28 % on lecanemab as compared to the ADNI natural history cohort. In the ApoE ε4 heterozygotes or non-carrier subgroup of Clarity AD, lecanemab slowed decline in disease progression and reduced markers of amyloid, with expanding benefit over time. Clarity AD NCT03887455. Show less

Precision medicine approaches to cancer treatment aim to exploit genomic alterations that are specific to individual patients to tailor therapeutic strategies. Yet, some targetable genes and pathways are essential for tumor cell viability even in the absence of direct genomic alterations. In underrepresented populations, the mutational landscape and determinants of response to existing therapies are poorly characterized because of limited inclusion in clinical trials and studies. One way to reveal tumor essential genes is with genetic screens. Most screens are conducted on cell lines that bear little resemblance to patient tumors, after years of culture under nonphysiologic conditions. To address this problem, we aimed to develop a CRISPR screening pipeline in three-dimensionally grown patient-derived tumor organoid (PDTO) models. A breast cancer PDTO biobank that focused on underrepresented populations, including West African patients, was established and used to conduct a negative-selection kinome-focused CRISPR screen to identify kinases essential for organoid growth and potential targets for combination therapy with EGFR or MEK inhibitors. The screen identified several previously unidentified kinase targets, and the combination of FGFR1 and EGFR inhibitors synergized to block organoid proliferation. Together, these data demonstrate the feasibility of CRISPR-based genetic screens in patient-derived tumor models, including PDTOs from underrepresented patients with cancer, and identify targets for cancer therapy. Significance: Generation of a breast cancer patient-derived tumor organoid biobank focused on underrepresented populations enabled kinome-focused CRISPR screening that identified essential kinases and potential targets for combination therapy with EGFR or MEK inhibitors. See related commentary by Trembath and Spanheimer, p. 407. Show less