👤 E M Ciruelos

🔍 Search 📋 Browse 🏷️ Tags ❤️ Favourites ➕ Add 🧬 Extraction
2
Articles
2
Name variants
Also published as: Eva Ciruelos
articles
D Juric, H S Rugo, A Reising +14 more · 2026 · Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · Elsevier · added 2026-04-24
Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), advanced breast cancer (ABC) have PIK3CA alterations, which contributes t Show more
Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), advanced breast cancer (ABC) have PIK3CA alterations, which contributes to endocrine therapy resistance. Alpelisib, an α-selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor and degrader, given in combination with fulvestrant, is approved for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC, based on the SOLAR-1 trial. Aside from PIK3CA, other gene alterations are associated with poor prognosis and limited response to treatment in this patient population. In this retrospective analysis, we performed tissue-based next-generation sequencing of 398 patients (237 PIK3CA-altered, 161 PIK3CA-wild type) from SOLAR-1. Progression-free survival (PFS) correlative analysis was performed in the PIK3CA-altered cohort. PIK3CA-altered and PIK3CA-wild type tumors had distinct genomic profiles. In the PIK3CA-altered cohort, patients who received alpelisib plus fulvestrant had a median PFS (mPFS) of 11.01 months versus 5.55 months for those receiving placebo plus fulvestrant (P=0.0004). Patients in the lowest tumor mutational burden quartile as well as those with FGFR1 or FGFR2 alterations derived greater PFS benefit from alpelisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant (18.5 versus 3.22 months; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.68. FGFR1 12.71 versus 3.75 months; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.17-0.81; P=0.32. FGFR2: 9.63 versus 2.78 months; HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.1-0.94; P=0.29); patients with MYC or RAD21 alterations derived limited PFS benefit. Cox and multi-task machine learning models identified lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment, and PTEN or TP53 alterations among the most deleterious factors for PFS in the PIK3CA-altered cohort. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant provides clinical benefit for patients with PIK3CA-altered, HR+, HER2- ABC across a range of concomitant alterations, including those previously implicated in endocrine therapy or CDK4/6i resistance. Machine learning models identified factors including gene mutations that influenced PFS. Show less
no PDF DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2026.04.003
FGFR1
Noelia Martinez-Jañez, José Ángel García-Saenz, Sonia Pernas +17 more · 2025 · NPJ precision oncology · Nature · added 2026-04-24
Management of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer after progression on endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors is challenging due to mutational heterogeneity. Current ther Show more
Management of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer after progression on endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors is challenging due to mutational heterogeneity. Current therapies yield limited efficacy, achieving 4-6 months PFS. FGFR signaling is implicated in resistance to endocrine plus CDK4/6 inhibitors, but FGFR inhibitors have shown limited activity in unselected populations. Co-clinical trials bridge preclinical and clinical findings, optimize resources, and enable biomarker identification. Using patient-derived organoids (PDOs), we demonstrated that FGFR-amplified PDOs respond to fulvestrant, palbociclib, and rogaratinib only when PIK3CA and ESR1 are wild-type. In a dose-escalation trial pre-screening 66 patients with FGFR1/2-amplification (FISH) and/or overexpression (RNAScope) patients, >40% harbored FGFR alterations. Nine patients were enrolled; the combination showed activity specifically in PIK3CA- and ESR1-wild type patients (9.1 vs. 1.9 months PFS; P = 0.0005). Toxicity was manageable and consistent with prior data. Our findings highlight biomarker-driven approaches as essential for refining FGFR-targeted strategies in this resistant population. Show less
📄 PDF DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-01106-1
FGFR1