👤 Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse

In contrast to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), targetable genetic alterations are less frequently detected in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUSC). Over the last years, gene fusions have become promising targets in many solid cancers. Here, we analysed a cohort of LUSC, identified recurrent fusion genes and functionally characterised these tumour genomes. A subset of 1608 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung was analysed by means of the FusionPlex® Lung Panel to identify potentially targetable gene fusions using targeted next-generation sequencing. Cases harbouring recurrent gene fusions were further analysed using FISH, Cytoscan HD arrays and cell culture experiments. We found both, known and novel gene fusions in about 3 % of the cases. Known fusions occurring in lung cancer included ALK::EML4, EGFRvIII, EZR::ROS1 and FGFR3::TACC. We further identified recurrent gene fusions of currently unknown biological function, involving EGFR::VSTM2A and NSD3::FGFR1 and showed that the occurrence of the EGFR::VSTM2A fusion is accompanied by high-level amplification of EGFR. Our analyses further revealed that the genomes of these LUSC patients are chromosomally unstable, which leads us to believe that such non-actionable genomic rearrangements may be a result of "chromosomal chaos" most probably not representing exclusive cancer-driving genes in this cancer entity. We emphasise that caution should be taken when novel fusions are found and that the appearance of new gene fusions should always be interpreted in the molecular context of the respective disease. Show less

The discovery of frequent 8p11-p12 amplifications in squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC) has fueled hopes that FGFR1, located inside this amplicon, might be a therapeutic target. In a clinical trial, only 11% of patients with 8p11 amplification (detected by FISH) responded to FGFR kinase inhibitor treatment. To understand the mechanism of FGFR1 dependency, we performed deep genomic characterization of 52 SQLCs with 8p11-p12 amplification, including 10 tumors obtained from patients who had been treated with FGFR inhibitors. We discovered somatically altered variants of FGFR1 with deletion of exons 1-8 that resulted from intragenic tail-to-tail rearrangements. These ectodomain-deficient FGFR1 variants (ΔEC-FGFR1) were expressed in the affected tumors and were tumorigenic in both in vitro and in vivo models of lung cancer. Mechanistically, breakage-fusion-bridges were the source of 8p11-p12 amplification, resulting from frequent head-to-head and tail-to-tail rearrangements. Generally, tail-to-tail rearrangements within or in close proximity upstream of FGFR1 were associated with FGFR1 dependency. Thus, the genomic events shaping the architecture of the 8p11-p12 amplicon provide a mechanistic explanation for the emergence of FGFR1-driven SQLC. Specifically, we believe that FGFR1 ectodomain-deficient and FGFR1-centered amplifications caused by tail-to-tail rearrangements are a novel somatic genomic event that might be predictive of therapeutically relevant FGFR1 dependency. Show less

ROS1 fusions are well treatable aberrations in NSCLC. Besides solvent-front mutations (SFM) in resistance to targeted therapy, small-scale ROS1 mutations are largely unknown. We exploratively analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of small-scale ROS1 mutations in NSCLC patients without activating ROS1 fusions or SFMs. Next-generation sequencing was performed on tissue samples from NSCLC patients within the Network Genomic Medicine. Patients with ROS1 fusions and SFMs were excluded. We analyzed clinical characteristics of patients harboring small-scale ROS1-mutations, ROS1- and co-occurring mutations, and their response to systemic therapy. Of 10,396 patients analyzed, 101 (1.0%) patients harbored small-scale ROS1 mutations. Most patients were male (73.3%) and smokers (96.6%). Nearly half of the patients presented with squamous-cell carcinoma (SqCC, 40.4%). Most mutations were transversions (50.5%), and 66% were in the kinase domain. Besides TP53 mutations (65.3%), KRAS (22.8%), EGFR (5.9%), PIK3CA (9.9%) and FGFR1-4 mutations (8.9%) co-occurred. In 10 (9.9%) patients, ROS1 mutation was the only aberration detected. Median overall survival (mOS) differed significantly in patients with or without KRAS co-mutations (9.7 vs 21.5 months, p = 0.02) and in patients treated with or without immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) during treatment (21.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.003). The cohort's clinical characteristics contrasted ROS1-fused cohorts. Co-occurrence of KRAS mutations led to shortened survival and patients benefited from ICB. Our data does not support the idea of ROS1 small-scale mutations as strong oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, but rather as relevant bystanders altering the efficacy of treatment approaches. Show less