👤 Vera Bittner

To have maximal benefit, Alzheimer's disease-modifying treatments might need to be started before the onset of clinical symptoms. Mutations of the PSEN1 gene are inherited as fully penetrant, autosomal-dominant traits, which almost always result in the clinical onset of Alzheimer's disease before the age of 65 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, including possible delayed emergence of cognitive impairment, and safety of crenezumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, in cognitively unimpaired carriers of the PSEN1 This 5-8-year common-close, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre trial screened kindred members aged 30-60 years from the main health-care site in Medellín, Colombia. Participants who were cognitively unimpaired and carried the PSEN1 619 Colombian API registrants were prescreened, 315 were assessed for eligibility, and 252 were enrolled (crenezumab-carrier, n=85; placebo-carrier, n=84; placebo-non-carrier, n=83; 160 [63%] women and 92 [37%] men) between Dec 20, 2013, and Feb 27, 2017. 237 (94%) completed the trial, with final data collection on March 22, 2022. The annualised rate of change in the API ADAD composite was -1·10 (SE 0·29) in the crenezumab group and -1·43 (0·29) in the placebo group (between-group difference 0·33 [95% CI -0·48 to 1·13]; p=0·43). The annualised rate of change in FCSRT-CI was -0·03 (0·00) in the crenezumab group and -0·04 (0·00) in the placebo group (between-group difference 0·01 [0·00 to 0·02]; p=0·16). All participants had at least one adverse event; serious adverse events occurred in 23 (27%) of 84 in the crenezumab group and 21 (25%) of 84 in the placebo group. No fatalities occurred. Crenezumab therapy administered for 5-8 years did not result in significant benefits on our primary clinical outcomes in cognitively unimpaired participants predisposed to developing ADAD dementia; secondary and exploratory outcomes also showed no significant effect on removal of amyloid plaques or other clinical or biomarker outcomes. Together with the results of other anti-amyloid β trials, robust fibrillar amyloid removal appears necessary for clinical efficacy in people with elevated brain amyloid. This study will further inform the biomarker, cognitive, and clinical trajectory of preclinical ADAD, the risk of clinical progression in amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative mutation carriers, and the size and design of future secondary and primary prevention trials. US National Institute on Aging (NIA), Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Genentech, F Hoffmann-La Roche. Show less

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although Lp(a) is a genetically determined risk factor, the plasma proteomic features associated with Lp(a) and whether they provide information about ASCVD risk beyond Lp(a) concentration are not well characterized. We sought to identify plasma proteomic features associated with Lp(a) concentration and to evaluate whether an Lp(a)-associated proteomic signature is associated with ASCVD phenotypes in young, healthy adults. In the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, we measured Year 7 Lp(a) and 184 cardiovascular proteins using the Olink proximity extension assay in 3,920 participants without prior coronary heart disease. Lp(a)-associated proteomic signatures were derived using LASSO regression in a split-sample design and tested for association with coronary artery calcification (CAC), incident CHD, and hs-CRP over 27 years of follow-up. External replication was performed in the UK Biobank (n=37,996). Lp(a) was associated with CAC (OR 1.23 [1.13-1.34]; p<0.0001) and incident CHD (HR 1.23 [1.07-1.41]; p=0.004). Lp(a) correlated with proteomic features reflecting immune activation, coagulation, and vascular dysfunction. A quantitative Lp(a) proteomic score was independently associated with incident CAC (standardized beta = 0.40, p<0.0001) and hs-CRP (standardized beta = 0.11, p = 0.00015) after adjustment for Lp(a) concentration. In the UK Biobank, a recalibrated Lp(a)-associated proteomic score was associated with CRP, incident CHD, and all-cause mortality. In young adults, Lp(a) is associated with distinct proteomic features that independently predict ASCVD phenotypes beyond Lp(a) concentration, generating hypotheses regarding biological pathways linked to Lp(a)-related cardiovascular risk. Show less

Oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) reflect pro-inflammatory properties of Lp(a) (lipoprotein(a)). The effect of OxPL-apoB on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome in recent the era is not known. OxPL-apoB levels and Lp(a) were measured in 11 630 participants before and 5185 participants 4 months after randomization to alirocumab or placebo in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline covariates evaluated associations between log Participants were followed for a median 2.9 years; the median age was 58 years, and 23.9% were female. Alirocumab reduced median placebo-adjusted OxPL-apoB by 13.0% and Lp(a) by 26.2% (both In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome receiving optimized statin treatment, elevated OxPL-apoB levels predicted MACEs, a relationship abrogated by alirocumab. The interaction of OxPL-apoB and Lp(a) in the placebo group indicates that OxPL-apoB independently predicts MACEs when Lp(a) levels are relatively low. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT001747 and NCT01663402. Show less

Residual cardiovascular risk remains, despite achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets with high-intensity statins. Traditional risk scores are suboptimal. This study evaluated the prognostic utility of a 9-plex apolipoprotein panel in recent patients with acute coronary syndrome on statins and its role in predicting treatment benefit by alirocumab, a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor, enabling precision medicine. Baseline serum samples from 11 843 participants in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01663402) were analyzed using mass spectrometry to measure Apo(a), ApoA-I, ApoA-II, ApoA-IV, ApoB, ApoC-I, ApoC-II, ApoC-III, and ApoE. Using logistic regression, probabilities of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause death over a median follow-up of 2.9 years were estimated based on baseline apolipoproteins and lipid concentrations. Clinical performance was assessed by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of 3 models: the apolipoprotein panel, the lipid panel (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides), and a combination. In addition, prediction models estimating the treatment benefit of alirocumab by the apolipoprotein panel were developed. The prognostic performance of the apolipoprotein panel for MACE showed an AUC (95% CI) of 0.648 (0.626-0.670), compared with 0.579 (0.557-0.602) for the lipid panel. For all-cause death, the apolipoprotein panel had an AUC of 0.699 (0.664-0.733), while the lipid panel had an AUC of 0.599 (0.564-0.635). Adding the apolipoprotein panel significantly improved the performance of the conventional lipid panel ( A multiplex apolipoprotein panel led to better prediction of MACE and all-cause death, beyond lipids, in patients with postacute coronary syndrome on optimized statin therapy. The panel also predicts the treatment benefit of alirocumab. Further validation of this approach is now needed, and if confirmed and improved, it could lead to better disease prediction and management in the future. Show less

Apolipoprotein (Apo) C3 has been associated with incident coronary heart disease and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Whether ApoC3 levels predict risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on optimized statin treatment is unknown. ApoC3 was measured by mass spectrometry at baseline (n=11,956) and after 4 months' treatment (M4; n=11 176) with alirocumab or placebo in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Patients with fasting triglycerides >400 mg/dL were excluded. The association of baseline ApoC3 with risk of MACE or death was assessed in post hoc adjusted Cox regression models and spline analyses adjusted for treatment and ApoB. In adjusted models in the alirocumab group we determined association of ApoC3 change from baseline to M4 with subsequent risk of MACE and death. Median (Q1, Q3) baseline ApoC3 concentration was 85 (65, 113) mg/L. With adjustment for ApoB, baseline ApoC3 showed no clinically meaningful relationship to risk of MACE or death in spline analyses and no association with MACE (P=0.89) or death (P=0.70) in Cox regression analyses. Alirocumab reduced ApoC3 modestly by median -10 (-27, -5) mg/L (P<0.0001) and reduced MACE (10.1% vs 12.1%; P=0.0006) and death (3.5% vs 4.2%; P=0.045) versus placebo. However, the change in ApoC3 on alirocumab did not predict subsequent MACE or death. In patients with recent ACS on optimized statins without severe hypertriglyceridemia, neither baseline ApoC3 (accounting for ApoB) nor ApoC3 change with alirocumab predicted MACE or death. It is uncertain whether targeted therapies producing larger reductions in ApoC3 from higher baseline levels will affect cardiovascular risk. Show less

This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing. Show less

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is used to guide lipid-lowering therapy after a myocardial infarction (MI). Lack of LDL-C testing represents a missed opportunity for optimizing therapy and reducing cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries who had their LDL-C measured within 90 days following MI hospital discharge. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years of age with an MI hospitalization between 2016 and 2020. The primary analysis used data from all beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage and pharmacy benefits (532,767 MI hospitalizations). In secondary analyses, we used data from a 5% random sample of beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage without pharmacy benefits (10,394 MI hospitalizations), and from beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage (176,268 MI hospitalizations). The proportion of beneficiaries who had their LDL-C measured following MI hospital discharge was estimated accounting for the competing risk of death. In the primary analysis (mean age 76.9 years, 84.4% non-Hispanic White), 29.9% of beneficiaries had their LDL-C measured within 90 days following MI hospital discharge. Among Hispanic, Asian, non-Hispanic White, and non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries, the 90-day postdischarge LDL-C testing was 33.8%, 32.5%, 30.0%, and 26.0%, respectively. Postdischarge LDL-C testing within 90 days was highest in the Middle Atlantic (36.4%) and lowest in the West North Central (23.4%) U.S. regions. In secondary analyses, the 90-day postdischarge LDL-C testing was 26.9% among beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage without pharmacy benefits, and 28.6% among beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage coverage. LDL-C testing following MI hospital discharge among Medicare beneficiaries was low. Show less

The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Management Guideline recommends moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy in eligible patients. To examine adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline in US cardiology practices. Among 161 cardiology practices, trends in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) were analyzed before (September 1, 2012, to November 1, 2013) and after (February 1, 2014, to April 1, 2015) publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline among 4 mutually exclusive risk groups within the ACC Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate for differences in trend in use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use in hierarchical logistic regression models. Participants were a population-based sample of 1 105 356 preguideline patients (2 431 192 patient encounters) and 1 116 472 postguideline patients (2 377 219 patient encounters). Approximately 97% of patients had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use before and after publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline. Time trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT. In the study cohort, the mean (SD) age was 69.6 (12.1) years among 1 105 356 patients (40.2% female) before publication of the guideline and 70.0 (11.9) years among 1 116 472 patients (39.8% female) after publication of the guideline. Although there was a trend toward increasing use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins overall and in the ASCVD cohort, such a trend was already present before publication of the guideline. No significant difference in trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins was observed in other groups. The use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy was 62.1% (before publication of the guideline) and 66.6% (after publication of the guideline) in the overall cohort, 62.7% (before publication) and 67.0% (after publication) in the ASCVD cohort, 50.6% (before publication) and 52.3% (after publication) in the cohort with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (ie, ≥190 mg/dL), 52.4% (before publication) and 55.2% (after publication) in the diabetes cohort, and 41.9% (before publication) and 46.9% (after publication) in the remaining group with 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher. In hierarchical logistic regression models, there was a significant increase in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins in the overall cohort (4.8%) and in the ASCVD cohort (4.3%) (P < .01 for slope for both). There was no significant change for other risk cohorts. Nonstatin LLT use remained unchanged in the preguideline and postguideline periods in the hierarchical logistic regression models for all of the risk groups. Adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guideline in cardiology practices was modest. Timely interventions are needed to improve guideline-concordant practice to reduce the burden of ASCVD. Show less